There are 2 comments.

  1. Burwick Chiffswiddle Member

    Nic’s argument isn’t so much a case for lowering the voting age as it is a justification for not panicking if (when?) the voting age is lowered. He may be right about youthful apathy, of course, but “law x won’t make a difference” is hardly a reason to pass law x.

    Besides, social media already allows children — or would-be children — to wield disproportionate influence over politics.

    • #1
    • March 28, 2019, at 3:50 PM PDT
    • Like
  2. Joe D. Lincoln

    Count me as a crank. I want the voting aged raised back to 25 and a requirement that you have a net worth of at least $100,000.

    • #2
    • March 29, 2019, at 8:00 AM PDT
    • Like