Immigration Is Not a Deal Breaker for Rubio

shutterstock_375031762
Crush Rush / Shutterstock.com

Sen. Marco Rubio’s involvement in the Gang of Eight attempt to pass comprehensive immigration reform has been one of his campaign’s biggest stumbling blocks. This, and and his refusal to disavow some form of “amnesty,” has left him vulnerable and at odds with the base. The only way for Rubio to win the nomination — so the theory goes — is to take a hardline on immigration.

This conventional wisdom sounds very logical and compelling. There’s only one problem with it: It’s completely wrong.

Read On

Fight or Flight: The Middle East Choice

Kenneth Pollack recently described the choice he believes we face in the Middle East in quite stark terms. If you have a quarter of an hour, his whole essay, originally published in Foreign Policy, is worth your time. The opening sentence: “The modern Middle East has rarely been tranquil, but it has never been this bad.”

I think he’s right. Often on Ricochet I hear that what we’re seeing now is the way it’s always been in that part of the world, so why should we pay special notice? I agree with Pollack that no, it has really never been this bad. This is a new level of disorder.

Read On

The Unspoken Issue Threatening to Tear This Nation Apart

On Ricochet we are not afraid to tackle the tough issues, in fact we pay for the privilege, we go at it hammer and tongs debating those crucial questions which will determine the future of our nation.

Whether it be the proper manner in which to cook spaghetti, who creates the best pizza or even the quantity of pointless comments. I hesitated before publishing this, some issues may be too hot even for our sober minded community however problems are not resolved by ignoring them so I am going there.

Read On

The Problem with Trump

The-Emperors-New-ClothesAfter successive wins in South Carolina and New Hampshire, Donald Trump is very much the Republican frontrunner. In attempting to make sense out of his scattered foreign policy statements over the last few weeks, observers have tried to locate him within the usual categories: Is he a hawk or a dove? An isolationist or a realist? My take is that he taps into nationalist feelings more than anything else — albeit in a discombobulated way. Attempts at pigeonholing him are useful as far as they go, but they still miss the single most important thing about Trump, along with his biggest foreign policy problem; namely, he is completely unfit to be America’s commander-in-chief.

Let’s begin by stipulating that many of Trump’s supporters are reacting with understandable anger against some disturbing national trends of the last decade or more. Wages are stagnant; there is a feeling that the US is in relative decline; political correctness has run amok; the nation’s elites show a kind of contempt for blue-collar white voters; the country’s immigration bureaucracy is clearly dysfunctional; and America has seemed unable convincingly to win a series of military engagements overseas. Indeed, these negative trends have accelerated under Barack Obama. But Trump offers no serious solutions to any of these problems. He only points to others’ flaws, even when his own flaws are vastly greater.

Read On

The Non-Prepper’s Guide to Prepping

Water-Tablets1-840x350There has been a remarkable increase in interest in “prepping” in the last few years. It started with the after-effects of Hurricane Katrina, and now there are TV shows dedicated to people getting ready for the end of the world and a candidate who has talked about “exo-atmospheric electromagnetic pulse weapons” during a Presidential debate.

“Survivalism” was once considered a fringe movement comprised of wackos who believed all manner of conspiracies theories. Now congressional staffers are encouraged to have “go bags” and there is a website run by the .gov to help people survive a major disaster in their area.

Read On

What’s Up Your Nose?

I’m a guy. I know every word in Caddyshack. I like sports. I like beer. I like steak and potatoes. I actually like the coffee they serve where I get my car’s oil changed. I watch the Top Gear reruns with Jeremy Clarkson. The only movie that makes me cry is the ending to On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (gets me every time). My blue jeans actually fit.

When I go to get a haircut, I want to read the newspaper and hear men talk about football.

Read On

Saturday Night Science: Strange Angel

“Strange Angel” by George PendleFor those who grew up after World War II “rocket science” meant something extremely difficult, on the very edge of the possible, pursued by the brightest of the bright, often at risk of death or dire injury. In the first half of the century, however, “rocket” was a pejorative, summoning images of pulp magazines full of “that Buck Rogers stuff”, fireworks that went fwoosh—flash—bang if all went well, and often in the other order when it didn’t, with aspiring rocketeers borderline lunatics who dreamed of crazy things like travelling to the Moon but usually ended blowing things up, including, but not limited to, themselves.

This was the era in which John Whiteside “Jack” Parsons came of age. Parsons was born and spent most of his life in Pasadena, California, a community close enough to Los Angeles to participate in its frontier, “anything goes” culture, but also steeped in well-heeled old wealth, largely made in the East and seeking the perpetually clement climate of southern California. Parsons was attracted to things that went fwoosh and bang from the very start. While still a high school senior, he was hired by the Hercules Powder Company, and continued to support himself as an explosives chemist for the rest of his life. He never graduated from college, no less pursued an advanced degree, but his associates and mentors, including legends such as Theodore von Kármán were deeply impressed by his knowledge and meticulously careful work with dangerous substances and gave him their highest recommendations. On several occasions he was called as an expert witness to testify in high-profile trials involving bombings.

Read On

If You Like Jeb, Please Vote Against Him

sad-jeb-bush-dying-of-lightWhen he launched his presidential bid, Jeb promised that he would campaign “joyfully.” His lethargic run for the GOP nomination has been everything but.

There was the lady who fell asleep listening to his interminable explanation of healthcare reform. The farrago of awkwardly creepy campaign pitches. The abandonment of his primary paleo diet. The endless swirlies Donald Trump gave him in the high school debate room.

Read On

This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Speeches

At FiveThirtyEight — you know, the site that does opinion poll analysis and aggregation based on baseball sabermetrics and has pretty much been treated as a Delphic oracle ever since Nate Silver called the 2012 election? — they’re running a pukemaking pair of columns called The Perfect Democratic Stump Speech and The Perfect Republican Stump Speech.

They asked two well-known political speechwriters, Jeff Nussmann for the Democrats and Barton Swaim for the Republicans, to write the ideal, focus-group-tested, entirely-pandering stump speech for a generic Democratic or generic Republican presidential candidate. The speeches they wrote are based on the positions and phrases, according to polls and their experience, that most appeal to the target audience. Both include margin notes explaining why they chose those words and phrases, tips on how to deliver the lines, and the data they used to decide which positions the candidate should take.

Read On

A Growth Message, Not Catfights, Will Propel the GOP to November Victory

shutterstock_177135713In the week leading up to the New Hampshire primary, a few GOP candidates put forth a strong, positive, optimistic message of economic growth. Donald Trump did it, and it contributed to his landslide. John Kasich did it, and he surged to second place. Jeb Bush put his best growth foot forward, and he nearly took third place. Others, not so much, and their numbers sagged.

Growth is the number-one issue of this presidential campaign — even beating out national security, which is, of course, very important.

Read On

Harper Lee Dead

Harper Lee died at the age of 89, it was confirmed today, in the same small Alabama town where she lived most of her life, and the setting for her one and only masterwork of published writing, To Kill a Mockingbird.

I don’t know much about Harper Lee. She was such a private person, I’m not sure anyone does. But, I imagine she told us all she wanted to about herself in her semi-autobiographical character, Scout. That’s how I’m going to remember her, anyway. As Scout, all grown up and grown old, still at the heart of her beloved Monroeville.

Read On

Q & A, hosted by Jay NordlingerEp. 45: Obama in Cuba: The Meaning of It All

President Obama has announced that he will travel to Cuba next month. Jay discusses this, and related matters, with Otto Reich, late of the Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43 administrations.

150px-Otto_ReichReich was born in Cuba. What’s he doing with a name like “Otto Reich”? Jay explains, and Reich explains further. Obama’s trip to Cuba is very important – not in a positive way. Otto Reich knows exactly what it means.

Read On

Need to Know with Mona Charen and Jay NordlingerEp. 147: Ben Sasse For President?

Well, maybe not this year, but someday, it could well happen. Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska, is, after all, one of the new stars in the conservative firmament.

D7idMyaSHe joins Need to Know this week to talk about the coming battle over Justice Scalia’s replacement, the state of the Republican Party (and the party system in general), and across-the-aisle comity, among other topics.

Read On

Zoning Rules! The Rise of Zoning, Suburbia, and the Homevoter

shutterstock_172769132A joint review of William Fischel’s “Zoning Rules!” and “The Homevoter Hypothesis”

What if you could purchase membership in a full-service residential club guaranteeing you not only a nice neighborhood for your house, but also insurance against loss of property value in your home? Perhaps such a club sounds like a private planned development run by a homeowner association. And perhaps it could be. But according to William Fischel in Zoning Rules!, it also describes the zoned residential suburb.

Read On

How Teachers Can Earn Millions

Last year, the comedy duo Key & Peele’s TeachingCenter sketch imagined what it would be like if teachers were treated like pro-athletes, earning millions, being drafted in widely televised events, and starring in car commercials. We’re not likely to see the latter two anytime soon, but some teachers are already earning seven figures.

The sketch inspired think pieces arguing that K-12 teachers should be paid more, but without making any fundamental changes to the existing system. Matt Barnum at The Seventy-Four brilliantly satirized this view in calling for pro-athletes to be treated more like teachers: stop judging teams based on wins or players based on points scored, eliminate performance pay in favor of seniority pay, and get rid of profits.

Read On

Here Come the Fox Mulder Democrats: I Want to Believe in Bernienomics

SandersIt’s super-convenient for me that Fox has revived “The X-Files.” Now some of my favorite catchphrases are again relevant, at least for a bit.

For example: Many Democrats/social democrats/progressives/left-liberals are having a “I want to believe” moment with Bernie Sanders. They want to believe, so very badly, that it’s all possible. All of it. “Medicare for All,” free college, universal preschool, Social Security on steroids, paid family leave, massive new infrastructure and clean-energy spending. And the Two Percent economy transmogrifies into a Five Percent economy to pay for it.

Read On

Three Martini LunchThree Martini Lunch 2/19/16

Greg Corombos of Radio America and Jim Geraghty of National Review cross their fingers and hope that the South Carolina primary will lead to fewer GOP candidates going forward. They also slam two major school districts in Northern Virginia that are cancelling school on Super Tuesday to avoid congestion at polling places, but we explain why it’s good for kids to be there on Election Day. And we wade into the Pope vs. Trump debate.

Read On

Justice for Freedom

shutterstock_121239673It’s sometimes difficult to adjudicate the the outer boundaries of freedom of expression — for what it’s worth, I prefer to stake as wide a claim as possible — but there shouldn’t be any disagreement over the protection’s core function: to ensure that citizens’ natural right to publicly and freely comment on public affairs goes unmolested. But in a recent and egregious case covered by the Cato Daily Podcast, Colorado resident Tammy Holland was hauled into civil court not once but twice for taking out a series of newspaper ads regarding Common Core and encouraging her neighbors to educate themselves on the matter and the upcoming school board election.

According to the Institute for Justice — which is representing Holland and has a full summary of her case — almost any allegation of campaign finance impropriety in Colorado automatically results in a court case without any discretion from law enforcement. As IJ puts it, this system effectively gives would-be censors the benefit of the doubt, while putting the burden of proof on speakers. It’s a monstrous and shameful inversion of how our political system is supposed to work.

Read On

Libertarians Should Help Save the Most Libertarian Part of Government

640px-US_Supreme_Court_Building
SCOTUS by Duncan Lock, Dflock – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Libertarians rarely get many outright victories in our political system. The median voter is a moderate socialist statist and Congress is filled with law-makers, not law-repealers. The president and Congress are — more often than not — in a symbiotic rather than an adversarial relationship, with calls of “bipartisanship” almost always working against freedom.

The one part of government that is actually capable of leading to major victories for liberty is somewhat ironically called the conservative wing of the Supreme Court. This is because the “originalist” opinion nearly always duplicates the libertarian position, especially from where we stand today. If even one of the liberals were replaced with another Thomas-type justice, we would experience a measurable roll-back of the authoritarian advancement from of both parties.

Read On

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. ...
  9. 163