Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Personal Wuhan Coronavirus Update

 

I received this text from my best friend Friday morning:

Two nights ago I felt restless and slept fitfully. Yesterday afternoon I noticed a sore throat. Last night, when I went to bed, I was chilled, and woke up every hour or so in a cold sweat. At that time I also noticed the headache. This morning I am drifting in and out of sleep, I ache all over, and I have a slight cough. I’ve canceled today’s jobs, and am hoping to recover over the weekend.

It seems likely that he and his wife have the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Their grown son received a positive test result a day or two after Thanksgiving, and the family spent Thanksgiving together, unmasked, un-distanced. His wife and their son and daughter-in-law have been mildly ill since the holiday.

I responded as would be expected, with a mixture of sympathy and gallows humor. He’s in his mid-50s, the odds that he and his wife will recover are excellent, and I’m not really worried about them.

My friend, who is also my younger brother, shares with me a skepticism about the Wuhan coronavirus and America’s response to it. We both think that the lockdowns should end – should have ended months ago. We think this disease, as bad as it is, isn’t all that bad, and that Americans need to get back to work. Life isn’t and can’t be risk-free, and the risk of this virus isn’t that great for most of us.

But most of all, we share a belief that Americans should be free, even though being free isn’t as safe as being under house arrest. We’ve had most of a year to deal with this thing, to build care capacity and to secure the relatively small portion of the population for whom this represents a serious danger. Instead, we chose to panic and to cower, to destroy the economy, and to inflict untold collateral damage on America’s families. We have lived, for nine months, under the capricious mismanagement of fearful and incompetent governors and hand-wringing technocrats.

On January 1, a new year begins. I hope and expect Americans to refuse to live through 2021 as we have half-lived through 2020.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Coronavirus Update: Death Toll Increasing

 

It’s been a long time since my last Coronavirus update. Both Western Europe and the US are experiencing a significant increase in the death toll. In Western Europe, it’s a second wave. In the US, it’s more like a third wave, though the second wave (in the summer) was pretty small.

Here is a graph of daily Covid deaths per million, for the US and Western Europe, showing a seven-day moving average. “Western Europe” is the 15 European countries west of the old Iron Curtain, down to little Luxembourg but excluding the micro-states.

As you can see, Western Europe (blue) had an earlier and higher peak, no second wave in the summer, and is having a second wave with a higher death rate than the US. The US had a small second wave in the summer, and is now in a third wave.

Here is the cumulative graph of total Covid deaths per million:

Overall, the US has a higher death rate from Covid than Western Europe. This may shift again, due to the current waves. US performance isn’t as bad as this graph might suggest, because the Western European average is pulled down by the happily low death rate, thus far, in Germany.

Here is a comparison of the cumulative deaths per million in the US and the biggest four Western European countries:

As you can see, the US death rate per capita is a bit lower than the UK, and Italy, and about equal to France. Germany’s unusually low death toll appears at the bottom.

Germany is having a winter wave, though, as are the other Western European countries. Here is the daily deaths graph for the same five countries, again showing the seven-day moving average:

The UK, Italy, and France all had much higher spikes between March and May than the US, but none of these four Western European countries had a summer wave. You can see that the winter wave in the UK, Italy, and France are considerably worse than in the US, and that Germany’s Covid death toll is rising like it never did before (though it still remains lower than the others).

I have a hypothesis about the summer wave in the US. There are doubtless many factors involved, but it may be principally a matter of weather. The first wave in the US was heavily concentrated in the New York City area. The summer wave seems to have occurred principally in the hot states — particularly Texas, Florida, and Arizona. The winter wave in the US appears to be occurring in the cold states.

To test this hypothesis, I calculated daily Covid deaths per million (seven-day moving average) for the following regions of the US:

  • The NYC area — New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut
  • The Sun Belt — Texas, Florida, and Arizona
  • The Frozen North — Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota
  • The rest of the country

Here is the graph:

The big green spike is New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, which have had low death rates since around July 1. The red line is Texas, Florida, and Arizona, and you can see that there was a summer hump in July and August. The cold states — Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, the blue line — had a modest first wave, low death figures through the summer, and have now increased significantly. The overall rate for the entire country is the yellow line, and the rest of the country is the purple line (which is a bit hard to read, but doesn’t vary as much).

That’s all for my analysis. I know that many of us have been annoyed by increased Covid precautions and mandates in many areas. The city of Tucson has actually imposed a 10 pm curfew starting tonight — though happily, I live a bit outside the city proper, so it won’t have much of an effect on me. There’s an exception for travel to work, anyway.

Hang in there, everyone, especially those in cold country like the good Mr. Lileks. It looks like the vaccine should be rolling out soon.

ChiCom delenda est.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Leftists, Hillbillies, and Jeff Bezos

 

Recently a liberal filmmaker (Ron Howard) made a movie with liberal actors about the book Hillbilly Elegy. It has received strong criticism from both sides of the political aisle. But since this is not a conservative movie, and it was made by standard-issue Hollywood leftists, the criticism from the left is more interesting.

The book was written by a man who had grown up in Appalachia with a lot of poor white neighbors. He describes the pathologies of that culture, from drug use, to lack of planning for the future, to lack of interest in education, and so on. But he also mentions some virtues of some of his neighbors, as an increasingly desperate group of people try to cope with plant closures and economic changes that are devastating their neighborhoods. These occasionally sympathetic glimpses into the lives of poor whites are drawing the ire of leftists, and Glenn Reynolds thinks he knows why:

The old Southern Democrats maintained the allegiance of poor whites by making sure those poor whites felt they could look down on blacks. The modern Democratic Party maintains the allegiance of ­upper-middle-class whites by making sure they can look down on lower-class whites. By ­humanizing those lower-class whites, Netflix’s “Hillbilly Elegy” calls the whole enterprise into question.

All forms of powerful, centralized governments, which have enormous impacts on people’s lives, require a villain. If you ask for high taxes, increased regulation, and other restrictions on prosperity and freedom from your citizens, you need to convince them that you are protecting them from someone who is evil. “You may get frustrated with us taking your money and your freedoms. But trust us – we may be scary, but the other guys are worse. Vote for us.”

This works a lot better if you can dehumanize the ‘other,’ just like Democrats used to do with blacks, and as Democrats currently do with poor whites.


A group of 400 politicians from around the world, including two ‘Squad’ members US congresswomen Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, recently wrote a letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos criticizing his company’s financial practices:

“In a letter to Amazon’s 56-year-old chief executive — the world’s richest man with a net worth of $185 billion — the leaders say the world “knows that Amazon can afford to pay its workers, its environmental cost and its taxes,” but that the company has “dodged and dismissed [its] debts to workers, societies and the planet,” according to a report in The Independent.”

They continued, explaining that by following the tax laws of various countries with the goal of paying as little tax as possible, he was intentionally hurting governments that were just trying to help people:

“Through global tax dodging, you damage the public provision of health, education, housing, social security and infrastructure,”

So Mr. Bezos is not just selling books and dog food. He’s “damaging the public provision of health, education, housing, social security and infrastructure.

Golly.

So they are in the process of dehumanizing this vicious white man who has committed a sin against humanity. The sin of working hard and being successful. So they’re going after him.

Remember that Mr. Bezos is a strident leftist, supporting the same causes as those who accuse him of being evil and selfish. He has done more for leftism than all those 400 leftist politicians combined. He might have thought that would buy him a pass from such attacks. But he was wrong.

Yesterday, he was a darling of leftists. Today, he’s a target of leftists. As I frequently point out at times like this, Robespierre is chuckling somewhere.


The left loved lower-class whites. Until it became more politically convenient to dehumanize them.

The left dehumanized blacks. Until it became more politically convenient to elevate them to near sainthood.

The left loved Jeff Bezos. Until it became more politically convenient to dehumanize him.

And so on and so on.

There are a few facets of this that bother me.

First, the very fact that the left needs a villain to gain the control they desire – that is terrifying, when you think about it. That is a political movement to be feared.

Next, the flexibility of the left, as they change their preferred heroes and villains over time, as the political winds of the day dictate. They apparently don’t believe in anything or anybody, and will destroy anyone, even their own allies, if it will help them gain even a few extra votes. That is a political movement to be feared.

Lastly, the habit of the left to blame individuals on their ‘villain’ list for failures of the governments run by leftists. An extreme example is Hitler blaming the woes of Germans after WWI on the Jews. Another is 400 politicians blaming some guy who sells books and dog food for “damaging the public provision of health, education, housing, social security and infrastructure.”

Guess what, politicians – infrastructure is your job. That guy sells retail. Come on. But no, when government health plans stink and the roads are worse, it’s because of Jeff Bezos. Right.

That is a political movement to be feared.

Jeff Bezos is a smart guy. Surely he understands this.

But do you expect Mr. Bezos to start supporting Republicans, to push back against vicious tyrants like those 400 politicians? Of course not.

I find that very odd.

But I’m not a leftist. I know they hate me. But Mr. Bezos, apparently, still hopes to stay on their good side. Good luck, buddy.

I suspect that if he were around today, Robespierre would suggest that Mr. Bezos visit Appalachia, talk to some lower-class whites, and see if they think that the Democrats will remain as loyal to him as they did to them.

The left is a political movement to be feared.

Robespierre understands this. So do Appalachian lower-class whites.

I don’t think that Mr. Bezos has caught on just yet…

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Today’s Advent Post concerns what happens when traditions are stripped from lives. It isn’t a Christmasy topic per se, or even an Advent-y one. Unpacking still from our move two years ago, I came across the contents of a long file drawer dating back to my office at SMU. In three boxes were folders with […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

I recently got my 300th post up on the Main Feed. I think that’s more than anybody who’s not a contributor, although I’m sure I’m probably missing somebody. Please jump in and correct me, if you know someone else who also can’t seem find anything better to do with their time, like me. I’m going […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

“There are really only two types of people: those who want to win in competition, and those who would prefer to shut competition down. The former are the strivers and entrepreneurs; the latter the monopolists and cronies. Philosophically, which are you?” -– Arthur Brooks This divide defines today’s America. Red-state governors like Noem and de […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

1. Identify a respected institution.2. kill it.3. gut it.4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.#lefties — David Burge (@iowahawkblog) November 10, 2015 Rinse, lather, repeat. Febreze Sneezing Surrender Flunkies are always in season.

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

As we enter the American winter holiday season, from Thanksgiving through New Years Day, thoughts turn to friends and family. Even for those bereft or apart from those who love or especially like them, the days on the calendar occasion strong emotional responses. Just ask a bartender about their business later on Thanksgiving and Christmas […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

I think that Joe Biden might have set three records in this presidential election: He won more votes than any presidential candidate in history. He won fewer counties (16.7%) than any presidential candidate in history. He did fewer campaign events, and spoke in front of fewer people, than any presidential candidate in history. I’m pretty […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

One of the proposals coming from the future Biden/Harris administration is a national oversight committee on policing. Needless to say, street cops who answer calls, or do proactive police work on a daily basis will have no place on this committee. Empty suits and pre-selected admin cops will be seated to pass judgment on real […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Thomas Sowell’s Tribute to Walter Williams

 

The great Thomas Sowell has written his tribute to his friend, the great Walter Williams. Here is a sample:

Walter once said he hoped that, on the day he died, he would have taught a class that day. And that is just the way it was, when he died on Wednesday, December 2, 2020.

He was my best friend for half a century. There was no one I trusted more or whose integrity I respected more. Since he was younger than me, I chose him to be my literary executor, to take control of my books after I was gone.

But his death is a reminder that no one really has anything to say about such things.

You can read the entire tribute here.

Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. ‘Tis the Season – Potterdopoulos, Mother

 

In the fall of 1977, I proposed to my then- and long-time girlfriend, Janet. We set a date in May, over six months away, which my soon-to-be mother-in-law explained was barely enough time to make proper arrangements. That meant Janet and I would have to spend the Christmas of that year introducing the other to various out-of-town relatives. Everyone from both families was coming to Ann Arbor, MI, that Christmas to meet the other’s intended. We were both the first child from our respective families to get married – which signaled a generational shift which both of us had been oblivious to when I made and she accepted my proposal.

It meant sitting through two Christmas dinners, one in each household. Her family had Christmas dinner at noon; mine at 6 p.m. (Somehow tucking away two massive dinners was less of a challenge in your late teens and early 20s.) I met her menace of uncles and aunts at her parents’ place at midday. (All of her father’s numerous brothers were well over six feet, and wanted to assure themselves I would do right by their innocent niece. I am not sure how well I succeeded in assuring them, but I survived the dinner.) Then it was time for Janet to meet my family.

She had fewer parental siblings to deal with. My mom had one brother, who lived in town, had met Janet previously, and approved of her. (Something about her being the making of me.) He was there with his family. Both sets of my grandparents were there (a minor miracle because my father’s parents had had an acrimonious divorce decades earlier, and his mother lived out of town.). My grandparents had all immigrated to the United States from Greece, except for Yaiyai (grandmother) Lillian, my father’s mother, who was born in the US a year after her parents arrived.

For some reason this made Lillian the most ardently chauvinistic of the four grandparents about her Greek heritage. Did you ever see My Big Fat Greek Wedding? Lillian made the bride’s father in that movie look positively accommodating to non-Greek culture. As far as she was concerned, if you did not come from Greece or were not descended from Greeks, you were only a generation or two removed from the apes which had descended from the trees. Blacks, Native Americans, Asians, and Northern Europeans – it made no difference – to her they belonged to the lesser breeds. Italians were barely acceptable, especially the southern Italians which had interbred with the Greeks since ancient times. Everyone else? Forget it.

Also there was my dad’s younger brother, Jack. Jack had been married (to a woman whose first name was Jill – it was on her birth certificate, just as Jack’s birth certificate had Jack as his full first name), but by 1977 they two had split up. At least part of the reason for the split was my grandmother. Jill was a very blond, very patrician WASP. Further, she and Jack had never had children. At every opportunity, Yaiyai would hold forth on Jill’s manifold (in Yaiyai’s eyes) flaws. Yaiyai was not the sole reason for the split, but she did her part.

(My dad was the “good son” in this setting. He had married a good Greek girl. It was about the only time he was the good son. Lillian had a long list of reasons why he was inadequate, and why my mom was a miserable choice independent of ethnicity. Lillian was a horrible mother and mother-in-law. Fortunately, Dad had a firm ally in Sophia, his mother-in-law, Mom’s mom. Since Lillian was afraid of Sophia, she left my parents alone when in Yaiyai Sophie’s presence.)

Lillian came prepared to disapprove of Janet on ethnic grounds. Janet came from English and German stock (her ancestors came to the United States from those countries in the mid-1700s to early 1800s). However, she also had dark hair and brown eyes – like most Greeks (except for the many Greek women who dyed their hair blond and wore blue contact lenses). As we would often joke later, she could “pass.” So Lillian could not condemn her simply based on appearance.

When dinner started, my maternal grandfather, in his role as family patriarch, sat at one end of the table, while my father, as host, sat at the other end. It was a very long table because it was two tables set together to accommodate all the guests. I sat in the middle, to be available to everyone and Janet sat to my left. To my surprise, Lillian sat next to Janet, rather than at the more prestigious position on one side of her eldest son. Uncle Jack sat next to his mother.

Dinner started as usual, with Papouli Perros (my mom’s father – papouli is Greek for grandfather) opening with his usual interminable prayer. (Ended, as usual. After Papouli went on for what Dad felt was long enough – generally as Papouli was just getting into his stride – when Papouli would pause for a breath, Dad would interject a loud “Amen.” We would all echo the amen, cross ourselves, and dinner would begin. My brothers and I laid bets on how long it took before Dad said Amen.)

My wife had been silent through dinner, intimidated by the family tradition and ceremony. (Much as I had been silent through most of dinner at her parent’s place.) I was trying to think of a way to get Janet involved in the conversation. To my surprise, Yaiyai Lillian, when passing Janet a platter of food, turned and asked Janet, “and what is your last name, dear?”

She asked the question sweetly; likely as sweet as the poisoned apple the wicked queen had passed to Snow White. I wondered what was up, before I realized why she had asked. Lillian was trying to learn whether Janet was Greek.

“Potter,” replied my unwary bride-to-be.

“And what is that shortened from?” Lillian followed.

I suddenly realized what was happening. Many Greeks changed or shortened their names when they came to the United States. Paraskevopoulos would be truncated to Poulos, or as in the case of the father of Texas oilman George Mitchell, changed to an American name like Mitchell.

My fiancée, unaware of the trap, just looked at my Grandmother puzzled. This was a piece of Greek culture to which she had not been exposed.

My Uncle Jack, without missing a beat, suddenly interjected, “Potterdopoulos, Mother. Pass the potatoes, please.” He then led Yaiyai off on another topic, before she could return to the subject. Janet, still puzzled, turned to me for an explanation. I whispered to her that I would explain after dinner.

Dinner continued without the incident Yaiyai had been hoping to ignite. Lillian was a drama queen, who had to be the center of attention. Due to our upcoming marriage, Janet and I were the center of attention at Christmas dinner that year. Lillian had been trying to make a scene to reclaim that position as her rightful due. By forestalling her attempt, Jack achieved a little bit of payback for all the put-downs he endured due to his ex-wife’s non-Greek background.

Lillian warmed up to Janet after Janet and I had our first child, the first grandchild for both sets of parents and Lillian’s first great-grandchildren. Great-grandchildren trumped ethnicity for her. Jan and I gained a joke to share. For years afterward, if Jan was asked if she were Greek, she would often respond saying, “I was once told my name was shortened from Potterdopoulos.”

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

You would not fly on a plane, or drive in a car, that was not designed and built with a decent quality system, subject to both internal and external audits. Quality is achieved through a rigorous series of cross-checks and processes to systematically root out error. These systems rely on competing and counter-incentives to ensure […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Today’s news from MyNorthwest.com: New approach to Curb use of Natural Gas in Seattle. The Mayor wants to ban natural gas heating in the city. Because Climate Change Disaster. South Park Biz Owner: When the sun goes down, the zombies come out. Increases in burglary and robbery after dark. Seattle leaders unveil plan to strengthen […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Well, We Knew This Was Going to Happen

 

Here in the Dictatorship of Washington State, our ruler in Olympia has announced that he will join in the evil conference of Trump-hating states to require state approval of any Covid vaccine approved by the FDA and CDC. This dictator, who is head-over-heels in love with government, and who insists that we comply with all CDC-related directives (with a statewide mask mandate), is now rejecting the approval by that august body of a Covid vaccine that, according to him, will be the only way we will ever approach a normal life here in our dictatorship. Here are a couple of quotes from an article announcing this.

Inslee says this is needed because the Trump Administration has undermined trust in federal agencies.

“Some of that has been caused by the ham-handed attempt by the president to monkey with the FDA process,” Inslee said. “And that has caused increased concerns.”

Inslee said while Washington is doing much better than most of the rest of the nation, we still need to take the pandemic seriously, especially when we’re around family and friends.

State Health Officer Dr. Kathy Lofy said a new study about face masks conducted by Western Washington University showed that of the 4,000 people surveyed, 90 percent said they often or always wear masks while in public. But that dropped to 50 percent when the participants said they were at home or attending private settings.

“Some people may feel it’s awkward to ask a friend to wear a mask when they come over to your house,” Lofy said. “But we really need to make mask wearing, particularly (while) inside (and) always with people (who are from) outside of your household . . . the norm.” [emphasis mine]

Both Ray and I are in a high-risk group (0ver 60 years old), and I am very angry that our dictator is delaying the introduction of any vaccine because he hates the President. And our dictator is putting all the nursing-home residents and frontline medical workers at risk, due to his bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. May he go straight to hell when the time comes.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Much like in 2016, the POTUS election was decided by relatively few votes in several significant battleground states. How we got to these similar narrow vote totals was decidedly more suspect and in the middle of the night in democrat strongholds. “F” is for fraud! Michigan – the margin for ‘victory’ for Biden was around […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Shouldn’t This Present Problems?

 

The actor formerly known as Ellen Page recently came out in an Instagram post saying she is a man, now to be known as Elliot Page.

I have my own mixed feelings towards transgenderism but probably lean to the Ben Shapiro side more than anything. We won’t get into that here. What I want to get into are some of the problems a story like this should present to the mainstream leftist ideology. None of these are original, just a few picked up here or there I find to be especially challenging.

  1. Ellen Page was a white female actress. We’re told that females (especially actresses) are paid less. Will Elliot Page see an immediate pay increase?
  2. Now identifying as a male (in the post Elliot says trans which is just doublespeak for male in my opinion), which we’re told is all you have to do to become a male, is Elliot Page now a member of the white patriarchy?
  3. Now identifying as a male but continuing to work in “his” current role, is Elliot not taking a job away from an underprivileged female? Is that not some form of modern 2020 blackface?

The mainstream leftist ideology is riddled with contradictions, especially when it comes to sex. How does one do it? Are they all just real-life “This Is Fine” dogs?

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Всегда вместе: Vera and Vladimir, An Unusual Literary Love Story (Borscht Report #4)

 

It was a love story centuries in the making. While Russian authors have written some of the greatest, and most beloved, love stories ever told, their personal lives tend to be far from any romantic ideal. Tolstoy tortured his wife of 48 years, forcing her to read of his numerous affairs and hatred for her in his diary, Mikhail Bulgakov was thrice wed, and Ivan Bunin invited another woman to live with himself and his second wife while in French exile. Hardly a track record that inspires confidence. 

The Nabokovs, though, were different. And a most improbable couple. Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov, born in April of 1899, could trace his family lineage back to the 14th century, when Tartar prince Nabok Muzra entered the service of the Tsars. On the other side was a seemingly unending line of Baltic German nobility. In both cases, it was a background filled with composers, writers, politicians, philosophers, and important businessmen. His grandfather was the Minister of Justice under Alexander II, and his father a prominent politician and professor of criminology at the Imperial School of Jurisprudence. 

Vera Yevseyevna Slonim was from much humbler stock. She was born in Petersburg in 1902, her father a lawyer who worked as a merchant exporting Smolensk timber to Europe, and her mother a housewife. Educated at the grammar school of Princess Obolenskaya and the Odessa Gymnasium, she was by all reports a charming and fiercely intelligent young woman with an unquenchable love for literature and poetry. There was a problem, though. Vera was Jewish. 

Today, this does not seem like an obstacle to much, but in early 20th century Russia, being of Jewish origin, practicing or not, was an experience rife with persecution and uncertainty. Indeed, antisemitism was so extreme in Russia that many observers, before and after WWII, predicted, or said that they had once expected, a genocide on the scale of the Holocaust in the Tsarist empire rather than Germany. Even for a girl so solidly upper-middle-class as Vera, marriage to a man of aristocratic, Orthodox blood was unthinkable. 

Unless that man came from the семья Набоковых. The Nabokov family had a very strange tradition: they were advocates of Jewish rights and against antisemitism. Vladimir’s grandfather, Dmitri, had successfully opposed the passage of antisemitic laws in the state Duma of his day, and his father Vladimir, who sat in the First Duma as a member of the Constitutional Democratic Party, was known as the most outspoken defender of Jewish rights in the whole empire. 

Both families fled Russia in the wake of the October Revolution in 1917 and traveled through the greater part of Eastern Europe, and even the Ottoman Empire, in search of refuge. The Nabokovs settled in England, and Vladimir was enrolled in Cambridge, while Vera’s father Yevsey chose to stay in Berlin and open a publishing firm, which his daughter was very active in helping to run. Vladimir’s father was mistakenly assassinated in Berlin in 1920, but even so, he decided to move there permanently in 1922 and became a favorite poet of the emigree society. Such an occupation didn’t pay too well, though, and he supplemented his income teaching languages, tennis, and boxing. 

Early in 1923, Svetlana Siewert broke off her engagement to the writer, afraid that he could never provide a stable life or salary. In May of the same year, during a charity ball, Vera and Vladimir briefly met. A few weeks later, on a bridge over a chestnut-tree-lined canal, Vladimir spotted a pair of naggingly familiar bright blue eyes behind a black satin mask. She refused to remove the mask over the course of their chance meeting but charmed the man she had already begun to admire from afar by reciting with crisp intonation and perfectly placed stresses fragments of his verse. 

He departed for France only a few days later but quickly was confirmed in the identity of his masked companion when she began to write to him. After three letters, he wrote back: 

“I won’t hide it: I am so unused to the idea of people, well, understanding me—so unused to it that in the very first minutes of our meeting it seemed to me that this was a joke, a masquerade deception…. There are just some things that are difficult to talk about—one brushes off their wondrous pollen by touching them with words…. Yes, I need you, my fairy tale. For you are the only person I can talk to—about the hue of a cloud, about the singing of a thought, and about the fact that when I went out to work today and looked each sunflower in the face, they all smiled back at me with their seeds.”

In Rul, the preeminent literary journal of the Russian ex-pat community, he published poems with allusions to her, and asked that they be placed as near as possible to her translations of authors like Edgar Allen Poe. They were married two years later, on the 15th of April, 1925. The succeeding years in Europe were somewhat less sunny than their courtship, though. Although both delighted in the birth of their only child, son Dmitri, in 1934, the specter of Hitler, and Vladimir’s affair with a notorious Russian emigree woman in Paris, loomed large. As the months dragged on, he in France for work and she in Berlin, supporting them as a translator, he began to realize just how precarious the family’s situation was. Vera was a Jewish woman alone in Nazi Berlin, looking after her half-Jewish son; the next year he bid his wife to join him, and they made a final tour through Prague and the south of France before boarding the SS Champlain for America in May of 1940. 

Vladimir was welcomed warmly into American academia, and took up a variety of positions at Cornell, Wessley, Harvard, and Ithaca; in some places he acted as a one-man Russian department, offering courses on the language and its literature that were bursting with students because of his style and wit. Vera followed, acting as “secretary, typist, editor, proofreader, translator and bibliographer; his agent, business manager, legal counsel and chauffeur; his research assistant, teaching assistant and professorial understudy.” During his annual summer trips to the West to catch butterflies, she drove and helped with capturing specimens, and on lecture tours she carried a gun for her husband’s protection, ever sitting at stage left. 

In return for her unflagging devotion, he showered her with pet names, little animations, and praise. “‘Sparrowling,” “Pussykins,” “Mousie,” “Mymousch” (after the Russian for “monkey”), “Mothling,” “Roosterkin,” “Long bird of paradise with the precious tail” (in a letter that closes with “Goodbye, my heavenly, my long one, with the dazzling tail and the little dachshund paws”), “Fire-Beastie,” and the especially wonderful “Pupuss,” which Nabokov parenthetically explains as “a little cross between a puppy and a kitten.’” He despaired when they were separated, and begged her to write more often, though now all of her letters are long destroyed. For anniversaries, birthdays, and sometimes just as a proof of his unwaning devotion, whatever mistakes he had made in the past, he drew delicate, brilliantly colored butterflies on the inside cover of the books he gifted her. Every book he published was dedicated to her. 

The couple returned to Europe in 1960 and took up residence at the luxurious Montreux Palace Hotel the next year. They remained there for the rest of Vladimir’s life, and, after her husband’s death in 1977, Vera became the head of his literary estate. She translated Pale Fire into Russian and, in a final act of defiance against his wishes to preserve his work, as she had ages before saved Lolita, she did not destroy The Original Laura, and set it up for publication. On April 7, 1991, she died in Switzerland. 

Her name, Вера, is the Russian language’s word for faith.

.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. When Computers Rule

 

“I wanted to kill myself. If I hadn’t been pregnant, I definitely would have killed myself.” Thus, does Seema Misra begin the story of her three-year odyssey as a sub-postmistress working for Britain’s Royal Mail.

She was approved to open a postal station in her small Surrey shop in 2005, and was set up with supplies and a Horizon computer terminal to use for Post Office business. (A word to the wise: the Post Office in the UK operates differently than it does in the States, and there are over 11,000 of these “sub-post offices,” usually operating out of small general stores, chemist shops, or newsagents, dotted all over the country, often in out-of-the-way villages (think Agatha Christie mysteries) which would otherwise be underserved. The people who run them are contractors, not employees of the Royal Mail. And the post office itself is used for purposes unheard of in the US–you can go there to pay your utility bill, perform banking transactions, and get your welfare payments, as well as buy stamps and send off letters and packages.)

It wasn’t long before Seema began to notice discrepancies in her end-of-day reconciliations, between what she thought should have been the total Post Office business done, and what the computer report spat out. In every case, the computer report indicated that there should have been more money applied to the account than indicated when Seema took the receipts and transaction history and totaled them up manually. Some days, the discrepancies were in the £100 range. Sometimes, thousands.

She reported this as a problem both to Horizon (Fujitsu) and to her supervisors at the Post Office. They advised her that she was liable for the discrepancies because she’d signed a contract promising to make good any losses. So she began feeding profits from her store into the Royal Mail system to make up the difference and balance the Post Office account. She kept reporting the problem. They kept insisting the trouble was with her.

She was suspended from her job with the Royal Mail in January of 2008, when an audit found a discrepancy of £74,000 in her accounts (about $100K in today’s money).

And after a court summons and a guilty verdict, Seema Misra was sent to jail where she spent months in the company of the dregs of society. While she was on the inside, her husband was repeatedly beaten up by neighbors who called his wife a thief. The family lost their home, and her record as a felon made it difficult for them to rent, and subsequently for her to get another job.

This year, for the first time, and as the result of an October 2020 statement by the Royal Mail that it will “not contest” the efforts of people such as Seema to get their convictions overturned (“Bally decent of the old chaps,” I can just about hear Bertie Wooster saying), there is hope for Seema and her family.

There are over 1,000 people like Seema Misra in the United Kingdom, victims of what some have called “the worst miscarriage of justice in the legal system in modern British history.” It’s an unbelievable horror of a tale, and I won’t belabor it (there are a number of links at the bottom of this post, if you’d like to read more), but in a nutshell, the facts are these:

  • In 1995, the Royal Mail instituted a pilot program at several offices involving a computerized “smartcard” system to automate the payout of welfare benefits to prospective recipients and reduce fraud (LOL).
  • The rollout failed (imagine my surprise) and the project was scrapped after an expenditure of about three-quarters of a billion pounds, but from its ashes arose something called “Horizon,” a point-of-sale (POS–LOL again) system for Royal Mail transactions.
  • Problems with balancing and reconciliation were quickly noted and publicized.
  • The IT vendor (Fujitsu) and the Post Office repeatedly insisted that each case was unique, that “no-one else” was reporting similar problems (this was false and they must have known this at the time), and did nothing to help its contracted employees.
  • The Post Office failed to find a problem with the software, commissioned an audit, canceled the audit a day before it was due to be published, and concluded that there was no systemic problem with the Horizon system.
  • Between 2009 and 2013, the Post Office began to admit that, yes, there were bugs in the system, but that the system was “working as designed” and was fit for purpose. It strenuously denied reports by sub-postmasters and postmistresses that it appeared as if transactions were being altered “after the fact” by Fujitsu technical support, and insisted that such things simply weren’t possible.
  • Investigative audits began to track errors in the software, including the fact that it wasn’t tracking certain transactions, was recording some transactions in duplicate, and was disadvantaged in some cases by old or inadequate equipment. The Post Office dismissed most of these claims, insisted that the problem was inadequate training, and that, instead, the bulk of the problem lay with the sub-postmasters and postmistresses who were, in a word, thieves.
  • At some point, the audits and investigation concluded that it was, despite the Royal Mail’s insistence to the contrary, entirely possible that employees at Horizon/Fujitsu could have intervened and changed the data unbeknownst to the postmasters/mistresses, and that, in fact, they likely had.
  • An organization, Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance, got things somewhat organized, and secured backing to reduce the fear (which many of the individuals had) that they couldn’t possibly contest the charges because if they did they’d, by law, be required to pay the Post Office court costs. This may have been the moment when the tide began to turn.

Meanwhile, The Royal Mail launched an aggressive campaign against people reporting the discrepancies and difficulty balancing, and over the course of several years, hundreds were sent to jail. Hundreds were disgraced. Many were placed on suicide watch. At least one committed the act. Hundreds of singles and couples who’d taken on the Royal Mail commission as a fillip for their retirement income were embarrassed, humiliated, shamed, and disgraced. In many cases, they were jailed and permanently branded “thieves.”

In December of 2019, in a blistering 400-page ruling, a judge ruled that “bugs, errors and defects in the Horizon system was the cause of the discrepancies which had ruined hundreds of people.” (550 of them were part of the class-action lawsuit which led to this ruling.) He also opened the door to the idea that the software defects should allow the defendants/convicted felons the right to petition to have their guilty verdicts overturned.

And that is what has led to the Royal Mail’s generous decision that it will “not contest” the efforts of people like Seema Misra to get their lives back after more than a decade in Hell. Jolly big of them. (Each “convict” has to petition individually, and have the case heard and the verdict rendered.)

Meanwhile, there’s a £58 million class-action settlement which, by the time all the fees are paid, means that participants in the suit will receive a pittance for their victimization, bullying, and terrorization by the all-powerful State.

It’s an absolutely sickening story. And now, for the rest of it. Warning–Strong opinions follow:

Almost nothing fills the heart of the person in IT-world with dread so much as the thought of being on the receiving end of a barrage of criticism from hundreds, maybe even thousands, of the great unwashed in Realville, complaining or explaining why the marvelous and perfect system he envisioned, coded, tested, and filled with the bells and whistles of his dreams, isn’t satisfactory and may even–quelle horreur, c’est impossible!–have a few defects. Not only is there the obvious ego problem, there’s often a language problem as well, as the computer-illiterate (not in any way intended as a slur) struggle to communicate with someone speaking from the rarefied heights of Technology Privilege.

It’s not dissimilar to, and I think the chasm is about as wide, the language difference between the sexes. I am sometimes reminded (as I often seem to be) of an old Punch cartoon from the late 1950s or early 1960s. (Probably the latter, since I must have been old enough to appreciate it and remember it.) A well-dressed lady–think Maggie Thatcher, or Margo Leadbetter (for fans of the old BBC series “Good Neighbors“)–is trying to explain to the garage mechanic, in as much detail as she can, exactly what’s wrong under the ‘bonnet’ of her vehicle. He’s standing there in his filthy overalls, scratching his…umm…belly and rolling his eyes, and probably imagining what fun he’s going to have telling this story to his mates at the pub, and she’s saying, I’m sure in a very Received Pronunciation sort of way: “It sounds like hairpins rattling around inside a plastic cup.”

The first response of our hero in IT-world (I was one, so absolute moral authority, and yes I’m exaggerating a bit for effect. But those of you who’ve lived the dream, tell me if I’m not right over the target) to such a presentation, and to an often inelegant and inaccurate attempt to describe the problem, is to try to get rid of these people as quickly as possible so he can get back to WoW or whatever was occupying his time prior to the nuisance call, and so she can get back to her knitting. There are a few tried and tested responses to help this along:

  • “Is that so? I’ve never heard of that before.”
  • “I can’t replicate your problem.”
  • “You must be doing it wrong.”
  • “No one else is reporting your problem.”
  • “Who told you to do that?”

And finally, the big guns:

  • “You must be mistaken. That’s just not possible. The computer isn’t wrong.”

Case closed. One of, or a collection of, these responses will probably get rid of more than half of the first-time callers who slink back to their desks in shame and promise themselves never to try something like that again.

If the person in Realville is persistent, isn’t intimidated into silence and a sense that she must have screwed up somehow, and if she really believes there’s something wrong (and not with her), where does she go next? To her supervisor, of course! Except that he’s probably not much of a computer person either, and there’s nothing he wants to hear less than that the system he and his company recommended and spent upwards of £1 billion to purchase, and years to implement, isn’t doing the job and may actually be distorting and corrupting the books. A moment’s thought, and it will occur to our doughty corporate warrior that calling the complainant a liar or a thief, and ordering her to make up the difference from her own pocketbook will probably shut her up, and if it doesn’t, at least it will move the problem out of his jurisdiction and into someone else’s.

And so they did.

Full disclosure: I knew nothing of this story until last week, when my sister and I were discussing the daily sausage-factory of new reports over possible election malfeasance in the United States. I remarked that “nothing would surprise me anymore.” And I also (full disclosure again) said that as a person of IT privilege (as both I and my sister are), I couldn’t imagine anything more difficult than trying to sort out the sheep from the goats (something else I have some experience with) when it came to the facts of the matter as explained by hundreds, if not thousands of folks who don’t share our obsession with binary and logical exactitude, and who were trying to describe their interaction with voting machines. She asked me if I’d heard about the Royal Mail story. I had not. But now I have.

And so have you.

Crimenutely, folks. I’m a firm believer in Hanlon’s razor. But, whether it’s malice or incompetence, it deserves to be looked at. And sometimes the inarticulate little people who are at the point of the spear have more real information than we do. This is a lesson I learned early on in my illustrious (LOL) IT career. It stood me in good stead, and I don’t think it ever, ever let me down.

Let’s hope that the truth, whatever it is (and I don’t know what the truth is–and, to be clear, neither do you) doesn’t take 15 years to come out because some of us are too cowardly, too invested in the status quo, or just too lazy, to engage with it.

Computers can, indeed, be wrong. We can talk more about whose fault that is, some other time.

Further reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon_(IT_system)

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/scots-postmasters-demand-public-inquiry-into-it-fiasco-that-led-to-theft-slurs-bankruptcy-and-lives-destroyed/

https://www.ft.com/content/0138cd7d-9673-436b-86a1-33704b29eb60

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50747143

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-23233573

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52905378

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54384427

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/spending-nears-40m-in-mammoth-post-office-case/5101919.article

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fraud-case-costs-post-office-58m-h2xb67lgr

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/post-office-high-court-case-it-horizon-postmaster-prison-latest-a9249431.html

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

This is Ruby Freeman, the Democrat election worker at the center of the recently released surveillance video where suitcases of ballots magically appeared at the State Farm Center in Fulton County, Georgia from underneath a long aproned table that were then fed into tabulation machines when the counting of ballots was supposed to have suspended […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Another blow to the “fraudless” election narrative came yesterday when Pennsylvania state legislators petitioned Gov. Tom Wolf to convene a special session on voter fraud. Anyone who has ever chatted with a state legislator knows that special sessions are one of their most hated things, so they are not doing this lightly. Jack Philips quotes […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

Yes, there are some funny ha-ha things about the recent election. I worked for my County doing signature-verification from a week before the election to three days after. My state has had all-mail balloting for at least 10 years. My state votes so heavily Democrat, they never need to cheat on a large scale. The […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Member Post

 

In Georgia, Fulton County closed their voting center at 10 PM. And then 4 people remained behind, pulled ballots out from under a table (NOT where the other ballots came from), and they worked diligently on them. At a rate of 3,000 ballots per hour, for 4 machines, for 10 hours…. This is not speculation, […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Others Drink from the Wrong Cup. And We Gag.

 

I have three little girls, who are in college now. When they were young we rarely gave them candy or soda. Those were special treats for birthdays, or travel, or holidays, or whatever. But that was not part of their everyday diet. We weren’t fanatics about it, but we avoided junk in their diet. Nothing wrong with the occasional treat, but that wasn’t how we lived every day. And we raised three very strong, healthy kids.

We lived in the mountains of Tennessee, and often would have a fire at night, out on the deck (That’s me, on just such an evening, pictured to the right.). We’d sit around the fire, look at the views of the mountains, admire the sunset, and enjoy the cool evening mountain air. It was idyllic. I enjoy bourbon, and on those evenings I would often have a bourbon and Coke. Or three. I mix them with an emphasis on the bourbon, adding Coke mainly for color, and to avoid the appearance that I’m drinking straight bourbon. Anyway, on one of these lovely evenings, the adults were sitting around the fire, and I had a beautifully potent BOURBON and coke sitting on the ground next to my chair.

My daughters were running around, catching fireflies, chasing the dogs, playing tag, and doing the things that little kids do on beautiful summer evenings. Until my middle daughter noticed what appeared to be a Coke sitting on the ground next to my chair. “What a special treat!” she thought to herself. “He won’t notice if I just take one drink!” she thought.

So I’m listening to one of the adults tell a story, when all of a sudden I hear a little girl choking and gagging on the ground behind my lawn chair. I jump up, run around my chair, and try to help her.

“What’s wrong, sweetheart?”

“Daddy, what’s wrong with your Coke!?! Ewwww!!!!”

It took me a second, and then I realized what she had done. A good father would have been very sympathetic and gotten her something to drink to get the taste of bourbon out of her mouth. I, of course, laughed myself silly. Along with the other adults. I still chuckle, just thinking about it. Maybe you had to be there. She looked so horrified and disgusted and green around the gills. She was maybe eight years old. She was so cute.

With entertainment like that, who needs TV?

I thought of that night today for some reason, and I smiled. What a great night.

And then I thought of Americans who voted for Joe Biden.

They thought they were being rebels. Going against the grain. Sneaking around, maybe even cheating a little bit to get what they wanted, and sticking it to the man.

Now, having taken a drink from that red Solo cup sitting on the ground – now we find out how much they like it.

If we’re lucky, they’ll get sick, and gag when they realize what they’ve done. And if we’re lucky, the adults around them will laugh at them. And if we’re lucky, they’ll eventually laugh along with the adults, learn from their mistakes, and change their behavior (and their votes) in the future.

For some reason, I find all of those possibilities to be unlikely. And I suspect that the consequences of their little fit of pique are likely to be painful for everyone. I hope I’m wrong, but I see the next four years involving a lot of disgusted gagging from all of us. Not just from those who decided to drink from this cup for questionable reasons. But from the rest of us, too.

Maybe I’m wrong. Hopefully I am.

Someone else took a drink from the wrong cup. And now he’s gagging.

But from a society-wide standpoint, drinking from the wrong cup can be extremely unpleasant. Not just for those who snuck a drink from the wrong cup. For everyone else, too.

Those who do so hope it will be like a little kid drinking from Daddy’s cup – C’mon! It’ll be fun! Let’s stir thing up a bit! What do they know! Haha!

And honestly, when it’s just a little kid getting a snoot full of bourbon, it is sort of funny.

But this – this is not funny.

This is not funny, because I feel like my kid took a drink of something that they weren’t expecting, but I’ll be the one gagging.

This is not funny.