It’s Time for Liz Cheney to Go

 

House Republicans kept Liz Cheney in her leadership role by a secret vote in February. If there’s a vote in May, she won’t be so lucky.

The Wyoming representative angered many in the base when she joined nine other Republicans to impeach President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol. As House Republican Conference chair, she holds the third-highest position in minority leadership. Trump supporters found it a betrayal of their party.

Cheney avoided removal with a 145-61 vote in her favor. Anyone with a hint of political acumen or leadership instincts would start mending fences, uniting the caucus, and moving forward. Cheney chose the opposite.

She crowed about her victory at the time and worsened her position ever since. Every few weeks, Cheney popped up in the news, always to condemn Donald Trump and the majority of Republicans who supported him.

The last straw came Monday. Speaking at an off-the-record AEI conference in Sea Island, GA, Cheney said: “We can’t embrace the notion the election is stolen. It’s a poison in the bloodstream of our democracy. We can’t whitewash what happened on January 6 or perpetuate Trump’s big lie. It is a threat to democracy. What he did on January 6 is a line that cannot be crossed.”

These comments were leaked, as Cheney expected. They were preceded earlier in the day with her tweet: “The 2020 presidential election was not stolen. Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law, and poisoning our democratic system.”

As after every Cheney comment in the past three months, Republicans and pundits are attacking each other, relitigating the 2016 and 2020 elections, and fretting about Trump’s future moves.

If House leadership’s job is to divide its own party, Cheney would be a perfect fit. But Republican Conference Chairs are supposed to unite the team and take the fight to Democrats. You know, the party that controls the House, the Senate, and the White House, and is jamming through a radical progressive agenda.

On substance, I agree with Cheney. The election was not stolen and Trump’s Jan. 6 incitement merited impeachment. But all that is history. The GOP’s job today is to stop Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer. In that fight — the only fight that matters six months after the election — Cheney is AWOL.

Say I bought a sweet 1967 Ford Mustang. Candy apple red, 320 horses, lovingly restored. But six months ago, my wife borrowed it, ran a stop sign, and totaled the car. I would be upset. We would have a long, painful talk. I would sulk for a few weeks then buy a boring used Honda to replace it.

Then my wife asks me to drop off the kids at school, I reply, “Oh, should I bring them in my crappy Accord I had to buy because you destroyed my beautiful Mustang?!

When she asks if I want anything from Starbucks, I say, “how about a hot Venti Ford-uccino? Do they have one of those?

“Ugh, Jon. the stylist wrecked my hair.”

“Speaking of wrecks…”

“Jon, that was six months ago. Can we please move on?”

“We can’t embrace the notion that you didn’t wreck my car. It’s a poison in the bloodstream of our marriage. We can’t whitewash what happened to my Mustang! What you did to my car was a line that cannot be crossed!”

Everything sulky Jon said above was accurate. Nothing was helpful, intelligent, or useful to our relationship.

The wife would be right to file for divorce. And it’s time to file papers on Rep. Cheney.

This mess isn’t just about Liz Cheney, the House GOP, or Beltway pundits. Cheney was hired to represent the people of Wyoming and she refuses to do it.

In a just-released poll, Wyoming Republican primary voters oppose her 29% to 65%. Fifty-two percent would vote against her regardless of the challenger. This is hardly surprising since the state chose Trump over Biden 70.4% to 26.7%. Trump’s margin was higher than Cheney’s in 2020.

It’s not as if she is bitterly holding on in a blue state. Wyoming’s lower house is 51-9 GOP and the senate is 28-2 GOP. You could paint an R on a stray cat and voters would send it to the US Capitol over a Democrat.

Most GOP representatives would do a better job as Chair today and Cheney will likely be removed from the House by her own constituents 18 months from now. The job should go to a Republican who wants to achieve party goals in the current Congress and prepare to take the majority in 2022.

For those who want to relitigate the past, there are plenty of pundits eager to take up the slack.

Published in Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 187 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    If that were true, President Trump wouldn’t have been campaigning for them. But he did. Don’t believe everything you read from National Review.

    • #121
  2. Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Democracy) Coolidge
    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Democracy)
    @GumbyMark

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    If that were true, President Trump wouldn’t have been campaigning for them. But he did. Don’t believe everything you read from National Review.

    What’s NR got to do with it?  Look at voting in the most Republican counties and the erosion in turnout between November and January.  Trump violated the first rule of campaigning – have a consistent and strong message – instead he’d say few words about the January election and voting and then rail endlessly about how November was stolen, how January would be, and how bad Kemp and all his other “enemies” were.  The man was a disaster.  I voted for Trump but it demonstrated his biggest downside – it’s always about him.  He threw everyone who wanted to hold the Senate under the bus while he indulged in his personal vendettas.  He lost a winnable election in 2020 because of his inability to control himself.

    • #122
  3. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    If that were true, President Trump wouldn’t have been campaigning for them. But he did. Don’t believe everything you read from National Review.

    What’s NR got to do with it?

    Oh, I just assumed they were spreading lies again.

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    He threw everyone who wanted to hold the Senate under the bus while he indulged in his personal vendettas.  He lost a winnable election in 2020 because of his inability to control himself.

    Not true, actually. He lost the election through Democrat chicanery.

    • #123
  4. Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Democracy) Coolidge
    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Democracy)
    @GumbyMark

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    If that were true, President Trump wouldn’t have been campaigning for them. But he did. Don’t believe everything you read from National Review.

    What’s NR got to do with it?

    Oh, I just assumed they were spreading lies again.

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    He threw everyone who wanted to hold the Senate under the bus while he indulged in his personal vendettas. He lost a winnable election in 2020 because of his inability to control himself.

    Not true, actually. He lost the election through Democrat chicanery.

    You mean the one where the Dems were smart enough to nationally rig the presidential but dumb enough to forget to rig the Senate and House?

    • #124
  5. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    So send the FBI after me because I won’t accept the assertions of the Ruling Class, then.

    • #125
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gazpacho Grande’ (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Jon, look at this interesting evidence of massive voter fraud in 2020.

    https://electionwiz.com/2021/05/04/census-reveals-weird-anomaly-shows-millions-less-voted-in-2020-election-than-official-tally/

    Impeach. Bar. Remove the Census from office.

    There’s some wonky things happening with census right now. Statistical anomalies that suggest the Democrats are fudging numbers to retain House seats in Blue states that have lost a lot of population.

    Dems changing numbers to get their own way?

    Not.

    Possible.

    I’ve never figured out how the Democrats were so smart they were able to coordinate a sophisticated national effort involving many people to steal the presidential election but so dumb they forgot to do the same and unexpectedly almost lost the House and would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    Your mistake is assuming a coordinated national effort.

    • #126
  7. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Giulietta (View Comment):
    Yes, the GOP had both branches of Congress under Trump. But to what extent was the GOP actually united behind Trump? some of them disavowed him publicly from the start- shall we even mention the Lincoln Project here that made it their mission to undo him (and then undid themselves so charmingly in recent months?).

    Instead of backing the triumph of a GOP president, house and senate after the elections of 2016 and immediately setting to work to implement his policies, Paul Ryan backed down and did absolutely nothing to help him. As we look back, it’s easy to see the heavy hand of Ryan’s former running mate, Mitt Romney, as well as the Bush faction in the background. When Trump needed the party to close ranks and stand up to the Clinton-created Russian silliness, there was an eerie quiet from GOP leadership in Washington D.C.  I remember thinking at the time how Nancy Pelosi would react had the reverse situation presented itself and just knew she would fight like a tiger for her president and bring the house with her.  Trump fought alone as there was no tiger of any stature in Washington D.C. to help him. The millions of voters who made his presidency possible watched the  nightly news with silent tears as the pompous pundits gleefully asserted their considerable power over the narrative in hopes of destroying him. 

    • #127
  8. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Giulietta (View Comment):
    Yes, the GOP had both branches of Congress under Trump. But to what extent was the GOP actually united behind Trump? some of them disavowed him publicly from the start- shall we even mention the Lincoln Project here that made it their mission to undo him (and then undid themselves so charmingly in recent months?).

    Instead of backing the triumph of a GOP president, house and senate after the elections of 2016 and immediately setting to work to implement his policies, Paul Ryan backed down and did absolutely nothing to help him. As we look back, it’s easy to see the heavy hand of Ryan’s former running mate, Mitt Romney, as well as the Bush faction in the background. When Trump needed the party to close ranks and stand up to the Clinton-created Russian silliness, there was an eerie quiet from GOP leadership in Washington D.C. I remember thinking at the time how Nancy Pelosi would react had the reverse situation presented itself and just knew she would fight like a tiger for her president and bring the house with her. Trump fought alone as there was no tiger of any stature in Washington D.C. to help him. The millions of voters who made his presidency possible watched the nightly news with silent tears as the pompous pundits gleefully asserted their considerable power over the narrative in hopes of destroying him.

    Yes. Well said. Happily, Ryan is gone. And the sooner Mittens disappears, the better.

    • #128
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Giulietta (View Comment):
    Yes, the GOP had both branches of Congress under Trump. But to what extent was the GOP actually united behind Trump? some of them disavowed him publicly from the start- shall we even mention the Lincoln Project here that made it their mission to undo him (and then undid themselves so charmingly in recent months?).

    Instead of backing the triumph of a GOP president, house and senate after the elections of 2016 and immediately setting to work to implement his policies, Paul Ryan backed down and did absolutely nothing to help him. As we look back, it’s easy to see the heavy hand of Ryan’s former running mate, Mitt Romney, as well as the Bush faction in the background. When Trump needed the party to close ranks and stand up to the Clinton-created Russian silliness, there was an eerie quiet from GOP leadership in Washington D.C. I remember thinking at the time how Nancy Pelosi would react had the reverse situation presented itself and just knew she would fight like a tiger for her president and bring the house with her. Trump fought alone as there was no tiger of any stature in Washington D.C. to help him. The millions of voters who made his presidency possible watched the nightly news with silent tears as the pompous pundits gleefully asserted their considerable power over the narrative in hopes of destroying him.

    This is exactly right. Eight years to get ready to get rid of the ACA, and nothing. What a bunch of liars. They should have just told him to wait a year because they weren’t ready. 

    Why in the hell wasn’t the second priority the wall? It obviously levers up all of the other border patrol activity. It’s a totally good idea. 

    • #129
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

     

    • #130
  11. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    You mean the one where the Dems were smart enough to nationally rig the presidential but dumb enough to forget to rig the Senate and House?

    Sure, the wannabe Congress Critters wouldn’t pay the vig. Not too hard to imagine.

    • #131
  12. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    would have failed to take the Senate but for Trump deciding as a matter of personal revenge to hand the Georgia seats to them.

    If that were true, President Trump wouldn’t have been campaigning for them. But he did. Don’t believe everything you read from National Review.

    Interesting how quiet everyone is/was about how much of his war chest Mitch used in Georgia…or does he just use that to defeat conservatives in R primaries?

    • #132
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

     

     

    • #133
  14. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Kinzinger can go, too.

    • #134
  15. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    Tex929rr (View Comment):
    They boasted about it in a national magazine. How hard is that to accept?

    Anti-Trumpers are bolstered by a fervent, near-religious belief that there was nothing hinky about the 2020 Presidential election. Meanwhile, 70% of Republicans and even 30% of Democrats believe the election was stolen.

    Please provide documentation as to your arguments.

    • #135
  16. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    ago

    The people who didn’t bother to show up are finding out what suckers they were.

    • #136
  17. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    We are so lost as a party when people attend a Gaetz-Greene rally.

    • #137
  18. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    We are so lost as a party when people attend a Gaetz-Greene rally.

    How did it come to this?

    • #138
  19. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    We are so lost as a party when people attend a Gaetz-Greene rally.

    What do you mean “we”?

    • #139
  20. spaceman_spiff Member
    spaceman_spiff
    @spacemanspiff

    Percival (View Comment):

    You can wave Jeffy’s resume or Liz’s birth certificate all you want. That changes nothing.

    You can call her a progressive Republican all you want. That changes nothing unless voting in sync with Trump 93% of the time makes you a progressive Republican. Then you might have a point.

    • #140
  21. spaceman_spiff Member
    spaceman_spiff
    @spacemanspiff

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Giulietta (View Comment):

    There is no question in my mind that Trump revitalized the Republican Party…

    If he had revitalized the party, they wouldn’t have lost BOTH houses of Congress. The GOP held the whole shebang when he won in 2016. His leadership cost them both branches of Congress and the presidency – some revitalization.

    I think that the last incumbent president who lost both houses of congress and the presidency when seeking re-election was the hapless Herbert Hoover, which was 88 years ago. The Democrats held the presidency for the next 20 years. So much winning with Trump!

    What did the feckless Republican Party do when they had control?

    The fecklessnes was with voters who backed Trump and Trump himself. In the very first debate he praised the socialist health systems of Scotland and Canada. That comment in no way hurt him. Clearly his voters didn’t care about the issue.

    In 2009 the GOP drew up a health plan he rejected as “too mean.” Fine. They went back to the drawing board and passed the “skinny repeal.” That plan faltered because of McCain and shame on him for it. But Trump was in no position to win McCain to the plan. He’d long ago burned that bridge – some deal maker. That was at the very beginning of his presidency. In all the back and forth Trump never offered his own plan. After that fiasco he kept promising he had a plan one but he NEVER produced it. He never made any kind of effort to move health care legislation through the Congress.

    The national party told us that they couldn’t stop Obama unless they had Congress, so voters gave them the House.

    They DID stop Obama, long before Trump came along. Obama’s legislative agenda was dead once the GOP took the House. They just didn’t have the tools to roll back Obamacare until they had the presidency. Unfortunately for the GOP, the president turned out to be Trump, someone who liked being president but had zero interest in doing the job.

    Everything Obama did after the Republicans won Congress he did with his pen and his phone. The courts were supposed to stop that nonsense which they often did but not for the most visible cases like Obamacare and later, DACA.

    • #141
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    @spacemanspiff 

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    • #142
  23. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Member
    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone
    @DrewInWisconsin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    Sent McCain and Ryan packing.

    • #143
  24. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    Sent McCain and Ryan packing.

    Trump lied about it and he wasn’t ready. The GOP lied about it FOR EIGHT YEARS and they weren’t ready. 

    The combination of employer-based insurance and the ACA is just totally thorny in every way. Obama lied to get it passed with a parliamentary trick. They are forcing single payer and it worked.

    • #144
  25. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    It would have been nice if someone had at least checked to see if Olympia Snowe had a backbone.

    • #145
  26. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    philo (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    It would have been nice if someone had at least checked to see if Olympia Snowe had a backbone.

    You mean Susan Collins. 

    They all lied about and or didn’t think about about the political and operational issues every time they voted for repeal, prior. 

    • #146
  27. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    It would have been nice if someone had at least checked to see if Olympia Snowe had a backbone.

    You mean Susan Collins.

    They all lied about and or didn’t think about about the political and operational issues every time they voted for repeal, prior.

    No, Snowe was the master RINO of Maine who mentored Collins:

    When history calls, history calls. - Olympia Snowe

     

    • #147
  28. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    They could have sent the same bill that they sent to Obama seven times unless that was all just part of failure theater.

    • #148
  29. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    philo (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    It would have been nice if someone had at least checked to see if Olympia Snowe had a backbone.

    (Sorry, I now see that I misunderstood your point. I read too fast and was thinking of the years that the D party controlled everything and passed the ACA.  Snowe was gone by the timeframe you were actually talking about.)

    • #149
  30. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    @ spacemanspiff

    What should the GOP have done about the ACA in those two years when they controlled everything?

    They could have sent the same bill that they sent to Obama seven times unless that was all just part of failure theater.

    None of these people give this any thought. Operationally or the politics of it. 

    • #150
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.