Trump Donates First 3 Months Salary to National Park Service

 

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and Harpers Ferry National Historic Park Superintendent Tyrone Brandyburg accept Trump’s donation check from White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.

During the campaign, candidate Trump promised, “If I’m elected president, I’m accepting no salary.” Today, President Trump began to fulfill that commitment. He has donated his first three months of salary to the National Park Service.

Press Secretary Sean Spicer announced the move at his Monday briefing, presenting a check for $78,333.32 to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. “The President has spoken with counsel and made the decision to donate his first-quarter salary to a government entity,” Spicer said.

Zinke noted that the donation will be directed to maintaining historic battlefield sites.

A question for the Ricochetti: Where should Trump direct next quarter’s donation?

Published in Economics, Environment, General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 68 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    $78,333.32 must be wrong. Surely our president is paid more than that for three months.

    • #1
  2. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    goldwaterwoman (View Comment):
    $78,333.32 must be wrong. Surely our president is paid more than that for three months.

    $400k/year.  January is a short month because inauguration day was the 20th.

    • #2
  3. MLH Inactive
    MLH
    @MLH

    National Parks: specifically to upgrade the water pipe at the Grand Canyon.

    • #3
  4. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    Hmm, now what is this about?

    Spicer said the choice of the Park Service — and, in particular, the battleground parks — was made by the president himself.

    “It’s a decision he made. Counsel presented him with several options. He believed . . . some great work is being done there, especially work being done to restore our great battlegrounds,” Spicer said.

    Why involve counsel, concerns about conflict of interest?

    • #4
  5. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    You know how this will be spun: Trump avoids taxes through charity loophole abuse. Grows budget deficit.

    Seawriter

    • #5
  6. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury.  He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    • #6
  7. Viruscop Inactive
    Viruscop
    @Viruscop

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    Fred, you know as well as I do that you are supposed to eat the red meat that is being tossed to you.

    • #7
  8. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Put it into ethics training classes for the intelligence community.

    • #8
  9. Brian Wyneken Member
    Brian Wyneken
    @BrianWyneken

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    It is a donation, as the money was earned as wages.

    I think he is wise to donate the money to historical preservation efforts. That seems fitting for his current role as chief executive and CinC.

    • #9
  10. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Percival (View Comment):
    Put it into ethics training classes for the intelligence community.

    Or for his own White House staff.

    • #10
  11. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    Can I call the spin, or what?

    Seawriter

    • #11
  12. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    Can I call the spin, or what?

    Seawriter

    Pardon?

    • #12
  13. Brian Wyneken Member
    Brian Wyneken
    @BrianWyneken

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    Can I call the spin, or what?

    Seawriter

    (Edited) Yes.

    • #13
  14. Matt White Member
    Matt White
    @

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    Can I call the spin, or what?

    Seawriter

    Pardon?

    Read Seawriter predicting a response from Trump’s opponents in comment #5, then read your comment #6.

    • #14
  15. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    There will be multi-spins.  One will be substance-less showboating. “Whoop-de-doo, a paltry $78k.  Cheap grandstanding that is meant to enthrall his trailer park base.”

    See, you get a healthy dose of cynicism AND elitism out of one jab.  Efficient.

    • #15
  16. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Matt White (View Comment):
    Read Seawriter predicting a response from Trump’s opponents in comment #5, then read your comment #6.

    Oh.

    I didn’t include the tax avoidance angle.  So, sorry, @seawriter, I’m not giving you a point for that one.

    I don’t care if he avoids taxes.  I care that he refuses to release his tax return and that nobody holds him to account for it.

    • #16
  17. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Matt White (View Comment):
    Read Seawriter predicting a response from Trump’s opponents in comment #5, then read your comment #6.

    Oh.

    I didn’t include the tax avoidance angle. So, sorry, @seawriter, I’m not giving you a point for that one.

    I don’t care if he avoids taxes. I care that he refuses to release his tax return and that nobody holds him to account for it.

    That’s okay, Fred, I understand perfectly.

    Seawriter

    • #17
  18. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):
    Put it into ethics training classes for the intelligence community.

    Or for his own White House staff.

    Come on, Fred. Which “ethical lapses” in particular are you objecting to in the current administration? Failure to disclose taxes? There’s no law mandating that. Jabbering? There’s no law against that either.

    The ethical lapses of the Obama administration border on the criminal. Some of them may have crossed that border.

    • #18
  19. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Percival (View Comment):
    Come on, Fred. Which “ethical lapses” in particular are you objecting to in the current administration? Failure to disclose taxes? There’s no law mandating that. Jabbering? There’s no law against that either.

    I’m referring to how the Trump transition team cancelled ethics training for the White House staff.

    Maybe if they had, you know, done the training, they could’ve avoided the ethical lapses they’ve had so far.

     

    • #19
  20. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):
    Come on, Fred. Which “ethical lapses” in particular are you objecting to in the current administration? Failure to disclose taxes? There’s no law mandating that. Jabbering? There’s no law against that either.

    I’m referring to how the Trump transition team cancelled ethics training for the White House staff.

    Maybe if they had, you know, done the training, they could’ve avoided the ethical lapses they’ve had so far.

    As this is the training that the Obama staff got, I say we can take it as given that the training is ineffective.

    • #20
  21. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):
    Come on, Fred. Which “ethical lapses” in particular are you objecting to in the current administration? Failure to disclose taxes? There’s no law mandating that. Jabbering? There’s no law against that either.

    I’m referring to how the Trump transition team cancelled ethics training for the White House staff.

    Maybe if they had, you know, done the training, they could’ve avoided the ethical lapses they’ve had so far.

    Spell them out. Which lapses?

    • #21
  22. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    That’s about the cost of equipping four soldiers. He should have a photo op with the G.I.s.

    • #22
  23. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Percival (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):
    Come on, Fred. Which “ethical lapses” in particular are you objecting to in the current administration? Failure to disclose taxes? There’s no law mandating that. Jabbering? There’s no law against that either.

    I’m referring to how the Trump transition team cancelled ethics training for the White House staff.

    Maybe if they had, you know, done the training, they could’ve avoided the ethical lapses they’ve had so far.

    Spell them out. Which lapses?

    I think they had something to do with the missing strawberries.

    Seawriter

    • #23
  24. Jon Gabriel, Ed. Contributor
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.
    @jon

    I think Trump should donate his next check to the Jon Gabriel Maserati Fund.

    • #24
  25. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    Jon Gabriel, Ed. (View Comment):
    I think Trump should donate his next check to the Jon Gabriel Maserati Fund.

    Might as well go for a Bugatti Veyron. Live a little.

    • #25
  26. Big Green Inactive
    Big Green
    @BigGreen

    Fred Cole (View Comment):
    He should return it to the [expletive] treasury. He’ll be long out of office, and I’ll still be paying the interest on the money we borrowed for his “donation.”

    I am quite certain that the National Park Service is funded by the treasury.  Since money is fungible, this is a donation to the treasury.

    • #26
  27. JcTPatriot Member
    JcTPatriot
    @

    I’m going to side with Jon, sort of. Donate it to Ricochet. This place could use some new curtains.  And don’t get me started on the break room. UGH.

    The reality is that after eight years of out-of-control spending, I can’t think of a single Federal Department that could possibly need any more money. How about, find the V.A. hospital in the worst shape, and give it a makeover.

    • #27
  28. Hartmann von Aue Member
    Hartmann von Aue
    @HartmannvonAue

    The next check should go to a veterans’ charity or combination of veterans’ charities. The one after that to a pro-life pregnancy center. The one after that to struggling private religious schools. All such recipients should be carefully vetted to inspire maximum leftist outrage.

    • #28
  29. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    @hartmannvonaue Donations to Christian bakers would surely inspire some outrage from the left.

    • #29
  30. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Classy!

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.