Trump Donates First 3 Months Salary to National Park Service

 

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and Harpers Ferry National Historic Park Superintendent Tyrone Brandyburg accept Trump’s donation check from White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.

During the campaign, candidate Trump promised, “If I’m elected president, I’m accepting no salary.” Today, President Trump began to fulfill that commitment. He has donated his first three months of salary to the National Park Service.

Press Secretary Sean Spicer announced the move at his Monday briefing, presenting a check for $78,333.32 to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. “The President has spoken with counsel and made the decision to donate his first-quarter salary to a government entity,” Spicer said.

Zinke noted that the donation will be directed to maintaining historic battlefield sites.

A question for the Ricochetti: Where should Trump direct next quarter’s donation?

Published in Economics, Environment, General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 68 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    If Donald Trump walked on water there are folks who would state he cannot swim.

    Seawriter

    • #61
  2. Chris Bogdan Member
    Chris Bogdan
    @ChrisBogdan

    What are the odds that, just out of habit, he gives it to Chuck Schumer?

    • #62
  3. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Seawriter (View Comment):
    If Donald Trump walked on water there are folks who would state he cannot swim.

    Seawriter

    And if Donald Trump repeatedly proved beyond a doubt that he was so inept a swimmer that he should never be let near any body of water, there are folks who would still think he’s Jesus.

    See?  We can both do that.  I don’t know as it gets us anywhere.

     

    • #63
  4. Mark Wilson Inactive
    Mark Wilson
    @MarkWilson

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    See? We can both do that. I don’t know as it gets us anywhere.

    I think the idea here is that you were unnecessarily (or un-libertarianly) critical, to the point of using profanity, of a pretty innocuous action by DT.  The reciprocal argument you’re making doesn’t seem relevant to any of the comments here.

    • #64
  5. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):
    If Donald Trump walked on water there are folks who would state he cannot swim.

    Seawriter

    And if Donald Trump repeatedly proved beyond a doubt that he was so inept a swimmer that he should never be let near any body of water, there are folks who would still think he’s Jesus.

    See? We can both do that. I don’t know as it gets us anywhere.

    If he walked on water, that would mean he is OK near water. By saying someone who cannot swim but can walk on water should not be allowed to be near water because he can’t swim, you are proving the point. Heh

    • #65
  6. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    If he doesn’t sink he’s a witch.  Amirite?

    • #66
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Zafar (View Comment):
    If he doesn’t sink he’s a witch. Amirite?

    A witch!

    • #67
  8. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):
    If Donald Trump walked on water there are folks who would state he cannot swim.

    Seawriter

    And if Donald Trump repeatedly proved beyond a doubt that he was so inept a swimmer that he should never be let near any body of water, there are folks who would still think he’s Jesus.

    See? We can both do that. I don’t know as it gets us anywhere.

    Did you think I was talking about you? Why?

    Seawriter

    • #68
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.