Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Trump Donates First 3 Months Salary to National Park Service
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and Harpers Ferry National Historic Park Superintendent Tyrone Brandyburg accept Trump’s donation check from White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.
During the campaign, candidate Trump promised, “If I’m elected president, I’m accepting no salary.” Today, President Trump began to fulfill that commitment. He has donated his first three months of salary to the National Park Service.
Press Secretary Sean Spicer announced the move at his Monday briefing, presenting a check for $78,333.32 to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. “The President has spoken with counsel and made the decision to donate his first-quarter salary to a government entity,” Spicer said.
Zinke noted that the donation will be directed to maintaining historic battlefield sites.
A question for the Ricochetti: Where should Trump direct next quarter’s donation?
Published in Economics, Environment, General
Radio y Televisión Martí
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_y_Televisi%C3%B3n_Mart%C3%AD
“President Trump helps support Spanish language programming.” The crowds will love that.
Use these donations as small pin-prick-sized weapons.
Donate money to Chicago’s best inner city charter school.
Donate money to the Oroville Dam and see if Jerry Brown will actually accept it.
Donate the money to repair broken-down courthouses in Appalachia, the Ozarks, and elsewhere. Some of these necessary buildings haven’t been remodeled in 60 years while silly, new government buildings constantly expand into the richest counties of Virginia and Maryland.
Right here:
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/gift/gift.htm
Trump’s “donation” was money either taken from me by force, or borrowed and I’ll have to pay back. He could have returned it to the treasury if he wished.
It is almost as if you resent him getting paid at all.
And no one else ever did?
Which other US President has?
Perhaps not while in office but book deals, foundations, speaking fees. Perhaps the president will lower the fees and dues after he leaves office and the increase is a sort of security fence.
Yeah. Imho significant.
Hoover and Kennedy both donated their salaries.
I see no libertarian reason to care one way or another what a paid employee does with his or her salary, elected official or not.
That sounds like a very noble charity to me. It’s a shame though, that Maserati no longer offers the Quattroporte with a manual transmission.
Fred, do you look at the link?
I’m reminded of something Rose Kennedy said once when criticized for the money the Kennedys spent on electing their progeny to office (I’m paraphrasing here): “It’s our money, and we can spend it any way we like.” So, we can all have ideas of where he should have donated, but it’s Trump’s money to donate as he chooses.
I hate to be cynical about this because I think he has done nothing wrong and the gesture is admirable. But knowing how large bureaucracies work, I wonder what multiple of $78,333.32 it cost the taxpayers to pay the salaries of the people who researched and put this list of options together?
Being Mad at Trump for this reveals that someone will be mad at Trump for anything he does.
Does it matter if they are already on staff and this kept them from whatever it is that they are paid to meddle with?
I was just told that Trump isn’t following the rule of law. Did Obama?
I missed that. This donation does not follow the rule of law?
No. It’s in general that he’s, apparently, not following the rule of law.
I think whoever’s President should have to PAY to get the job. We can auction it off to the highest bidder!
Is anyone actually mad about this?
Speaking for myself, I think I’d have the same reaction to any President doing this.
Wrt, Trump, I’m not inclined to cut him slack, which is entirely his own doing.
The Romans tried that once. It didn’t work very well.
Worked out okay for Septimus Severus.
Indeed it did.
It is his money. I would think as a libertarian (or libertarian-like person if you do not identify with the label), you would not have much to say at all about how someone else spends his money.
Trump donated his salary to what appears to be a good cause that helps us honor the fallen heroes. It might not be the cause you want it donated too, but I applaud any person’s donation to a good cause. I cannot imagine being so miserly in spirit that I could not even begrudge that for someone’s act, regardless of the person.
The MSM still hasn’t acknowledged this. Quelle surprise.
So @FredCole you are mad that he didn’t give his money the park service and not to the treasury debt pay down fund….why not make this rule for all federal workers since all of their money is, by your definition, taken from us by force. We’ll call it the Cole Amendment:
Not mad. Not a thing to get mad about.
Im just not going to cherish and praise him for this.
Huh so the [explitive] wasn’t typed in to denote anger? Interesting. Anytime anyone donates a huge chunk of their salary it is noteworthy.
I’ll praise Trump if the economy grows at a 3% rate.
I’ll cherish him if it stays there.
They have. They just acknowledge it while wailing about cuts to the National Park Service. On Facebook. Because they don’t like Trump.
But apparently they love 20 trillion in debt and median household incomes in the crapper for 8 years.