Reacting to the Pelosi Assault – Here We Go Again

 

Here we go again; the rush to politicize another horrific violent assault.

We see it with every terrible mass shooting. And now, with the bizarre attack on the 82-year-old husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Paul Pelosi.

We wish him a full recovery and the full force of our justice system on his attacker. From several accounts of the assailant, he was deranged, if not mentally ill. But that hasn’t stopped partisans from trying to pin the attack on Republicans in these final days before the 2022 elections.

“Following the attack on Paul Pelosi, Democrats and the media quickly framed the alleged assailant as a right-wing conspiracy theorist incited to violence by rhetoric from former President Donald Trump and Republicans,” reported Justthenews.com.

And it was led by none other than the President of the United States, Joseph R. Biden.

President Biden on Friday likened the attack against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband Paul to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, saying the San Francisco attacker shouting “Where is Nancy?” echoed chants used by the rioters.

Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser in Philadelphia, Mr. Biden condemned the attack as an act of political violence and chastised Republicans for stoking widespread vitriol.

“It’s reported that the same chant used by this guy they have in custody was used on January 6th in the attacks on the U.S. Capitol,” he said. “This is reported. I can’t guarantee it. We can tell you what’s being reported.”

Please don’t complain to me about anything Donald Trump said ever again. Joe Biden is unfit for the presidency. Gone are the days of waiting for the facts before weighing in on such matters.

Blogger and former California Independent gubernatorial candidate Michael Shellenberger detailed the assailant’s story. It’s worth your time. He concludes with this:

We must reject the opportunism of politicians and activist journalists to blame addiction-and-mental-health tragedies on their political opponents. When fanaticism is behind violence we should hold the ideologies to account. But it was, fundamentally, mental instability, not political ideology, that drove DePape. My aunt who suffered from schizophrenia, and was raised in the 1950s, had delusions about Elvis and JFK. Psychotic homeless people I interview speak frequently of their communications with aliens. There is a huge difference between the mere rantings of a psychotic and the ideological drivers of a fanatic.

Finally, it’s simply not the case, as Biden claimed, that just “one party” lies, and talks of stolen elections; they both do. DePape’s alleged attack on Pelosi was not, at bottom, “the direct result of toxic right-wing rhetoric,” as Weiner said, but rather the direct result of America’s continuing failure to properly treat mental illness, dangerous psychiatric disorders, and drug addiction.

He’s right, of course. Shellenberger, a former Progressive activist, and energy expert (nuclear proponent), is a best-selling author on the Golden State’s homelessness crisis.

The people who expect me to write a dissertation on the evil attack on Paul Pelosi are also strangely silent about an assassination attempt on a sitting US Supreme Court justice and violent attacks on more than 100 pro-life pregnancy centers, organizations, and churches. The White House has been strangely mute on that violence, with one exception.

I quarter no lectures or lessons from them. This isn’t about “whataboutism.” It is about incivility, double standards, hypocrisy, and projection.

One constructive reaction concerns growing threats of violence against our public officials and the need to increase their security. The shooting of former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords (D-AZ). The attack at a Republican congressional baseball practice that nearly killed US Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA). The violent assault on US Senator Rand Paul (R-KY). The “Swatting” of US Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). And now this.

Perhaps we could start by having the children of our public officials at least not celebrate attacks on Members of Congress, as Christine Pelosi did in 2020 in this now-deleted tweet.

Regardless of party affiliation, all of us need to consistently call out and condemn the violence of this nature and the celebrations and politicization of it by partisans, especially in our tribes. Until we do, this incivility will continue and incent more violence and evil.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 129 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):
    Remember, he recently had a DUI. Drunk drivers kill people. The guy’s not an upstanding citizen.

    Was the passenger on the car with him ever identified?

    Mary Joe. 

    Unavailable for comment at press time. 

    • #61
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Percival (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    (This comment will be deleted however in 5-10 minutes.)

    Screen shots are forever, Missus Flicker.

    You didn’t!

    • #62
  3. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door. 

    • #63
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Um, but didn’t the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door, not know that he was calling 911?

    • #64
  5. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    So does the area that Paul Pelosi was in have a Castle Doctrine? Or a stand your ground law? Is it “duty to retreat” area? Given Pelosi political leaning should they not also respond as “duty to retreat” doctrine? I understand that the man did not have a weapon and that the hammer was actually Paul Pelosi’s. A case can be made that this deranged mentally confused person accidently entered Paul Pelosi personal space where Paul Pelosi decided to attack him with a hammer. Seems like charges could be made. I suspect anybody else in California would be facing jail time but being Democrats they are above the law.

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    DePape got more and more agitated, and Pelosi called 911, but to avoid any overresponse from the police, said he didn’t know DePape, but he was a friend (meaning acquaintance) named David, and then hung up.

    The dispatcher knows to reconnect with 911 callers and can’t and sent out for an urgent wellness check.

    In the mean time, DePape got aggressive, and Pelosi tried to arm himself.

    As police arrived, DePape struggled to take the hammer, and hit Pelosi.

    This seems to be reasonable. True or not, this seems to be what the determination will be.

    Please don’t write a better script for them than they could produce themselves.

    It’s already circulating in draft form I’m sure.

    How many $500/hr lawyers are reviewing the script? 

    • #65
  6. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Um, but didn’t the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door, not know that he was calling 911?

    Paul had the hammer, no? The nut job is at that point unarmed. If I have a bathroom door (presumably lockable) between me and a threatening person, the door stays closed. If he attempts to force the door, he gets a shot or two to the dome on his way in. And the unknown person who lets the cops in – what’s his deal?

    • #66
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Where do you get the bathroom door part?  I haven’t read that anywhere?

    • #67
  8. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Um, but didn’t the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door, not know that he was calling 911?

    I posit, as a possible interpretation, that he was trying to convince his…guest that he was just making an ordinary phone call, possibly to his harpy wife. 

    I’m not claiming that this is what happened, but rather that it might fit the facts. 

    • #68
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    TBA (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Um, but didn’t the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door, not know that he was calling 911?

    I posit, as a possible interpretation, that he was trying to convince his…guest that he was just making an ordinary phone call, possibly to his harpy wife.

    I’m not claiming that this is what happened, but rather that it might fit the facts.

    Or maybe claimed to be ordering a pizza…

     

    • #69
  10. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    TBA (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    It is just possible that Paul’s don’t-know-him/David/friend comment was an attempt to not anger the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door.

    Um, but didn’t the nut job with a hammer on the other side of the bathroom door, not know that he was calling 911?

    I posit, as a possible interpretation, that he was trying to convince his…guest that he was just making an ordinary phone call, possibly to his harpy wife.

    I’m not claiming that this is what happened, but rather that it might fit the facts.

    Someone on CNN said that he had dialed 911 so that the phone could catch the background conversation.  So yes, I think he was talking to the crazy man.

    • #70
  11. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Don’t forget the Secret Service, Capitol Police and Highway Patrol.  that was one MAGA Ninja.

    • #71
  12. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Metalheaddoc (View Comment):

    Who was the “unknown” person who let the cops in?

    Why did the perp let Pelosi go the bathroom where he called 911? Why didn’t Pelosi lock himself in the bathroom if he felt he was in danger?

    How did this perp evade security? Don’t they live in a gated community? Where was the guard?

    Something is fishy about this whole thing. This doesn’t sound like some rando walked in off the street to attack him and/or her. Smells like this guy was an insider of some sort.

    Yes, . . .

    The Paul Pelosi Story makes no Sense and the Public Needs Answers.

     

    #JussieSmollet2.0

    • #72
  13. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Flicker (View Comment):
    Someone on CNN said that he had dialed 911 so that the phone could catch the background conversation.

    And why are we believing anything from CNN? Didn’t those guys immediately run with the MAGA TRUMP SUPPORTER RIGHT WING NUTJOB story?

    • #73
  14. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    You would think the Pelosi’s had security . . .

    • #74
  15. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

     

    • #75
  16. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Kozak (View Comment):

     

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Don’t forget the Secret Service, Capitol Police and Highway Patrol. that was one MAGA Ninja.

    Prolly learned that stuff on one of the alt-right militia training camps that Berkeley is so famous for. 

    • #76
  17. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Just read a WSJ editorial about this. It didn’t shed much light, but it decried political attacks by nutjobs who read provocative things in the innernet. 

    But it made me realized that this attack on Pop Pop Pelosi doesn’t have Trump’s name on it at all. 

    Trump isn’t in office, and this guy never worked for him, and Trump is only one of the possible Republican candidates. iow, this has much less to do with him than a lot of politi-whack jobs seem to have with actual candidates. 

    • #77
  18. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The only thing sicker than this are the claims by even some people at Ricochet that Paul Pelosi had brought been assaulted by a male prostitute. This is really, really sick folks and shows us in a horrible light.

    Gee Gary, that sounds homophobic and disrespectful to sex workers.

    You’ll need some diversity training, for sure.


    Meanwhile in the new Twitter world, Elon Musk fact-checks Hillary Clinton:

    • #78
  19. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The only thing sicker than this are the claims by even some people at Ricochet that Paul Pelosi had brought been assaulted by a male prostitute. This is really, really sick folks and shows us in a horrible light.

    Gee Gary, that sounds homophobic and disrespectful to sex workers.

    You’ll need some diversity training, for sure.


    Meanwhile in the new Twitter world, Elon Musk fact-checks Hillary Clinton:

    Musk Twitter is so lit! 

    • #79
  20. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The only thing sicker than this are the claims by even some people at Ricochet that Paul Pelosi had brought been assaulted by a male prostitute. This is really, really sick folks and shows us in a horrible light.

    Gee Gary, that sounds homophobic and disrespectful to sex workers.

    You’ll need some diversity training, for sure.


    Meanwhile in the new Twitter world, Elon Musk fact-checks Hillary Clinton:

    Heh. Joe Biden also got an official Twitter fact-check, too. Change is in the air!

    • #80
  21. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    Someone on CNN said that he had dialed 911 so that the phone could catch the background conversation.

    And why are we believing anything from CNN? Didn’t those guys immediately run with the MAGA TRUMP SUPPORTER RIGHT WING NUTJOB story?

    Yeah, I said earlier that they’re lying.  But I myself certainly wouldn’t hang up on 911.  So it is possible.

    • #81
  22. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich.  What could go wrong?!

    • #82
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich. What could go wrong?!

    Yep, part of my point to in #46.

    • #83
  24. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Parts of the story are interesting. 

    • #84
  25. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich. What could go wrong?!

    Yep, part of my point to in #46.

    I don’t mean how he’s treated after the fact, it’s about how he lets his plush and privileged life-style influence his personal judgment.

    • #85
  26. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    And now “zip ties” take on a new meaning. Yay journalism!

    • #86
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich. What could go wrong?!

    Yep, part of my point to in #46.

    I don’t mean how he’s treated after the fact, it’s about how he lets his plush and privileged life-style influence his personal judgment.

    Yes that’s what I meant too, he’s willing to risk things that other people wouldn’t.

    • #87
  28. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich. What could go wrong?!

    Yep, part of my point to in #46.

    I don’t mean how he’s treated after the fact, it’s about how he lets his plush and privileged life-style influence his personal judgment.

    Yes that’s what I meant too, he’s willing to risk things that other people wouldn’t.

    I mean that he didn’t see any risk at all.

    • #88
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The simplest, most benign explanation is that DePape showed up at Pelosi’s door half dressed, and rang the bell, and perhaps called out a bit.

    Pelosi remembered DePape from years before as a crazy green activist, and thought that it would be easier all around to let him in and see what he wants at 2am.

    Yeah, no.

    No, he’s rich. What could go wrong?!

    Yep, part of my point to in #46.

    I don’t mean how he’s treated after the fact, it’s about how he lets his plush and privileged life-style influence his personal judgment.

    Yes that’s what I meant too, he’s willing to risk things that other people wouldn’t.

    I mean that he didn’t see any risk at all.

    That too.  I expect that’s what “willing to risk” mostly means.  We see it as taking a risk, they don’t think it’s a risk at all.

    • #89
  30. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Vance Richards (View Comment):

    And now “zip ties” take on a new meaning. Yay journalism!

    How long before zip ties are going to be illegal to possess? Dang, I use about 40 zip ties on my winter fencing every year. just as many on my garden fencing in the summer. I’m going to be seen as a criminal.

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.