Does the Sussman Trial Cause Any Regret at All?

 

From RealClearPolitics on Thursday:

Baker’s testimony was followed, on Friday, by that of Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook. Mook casually (perhaps inadvertently) dropped a bombshell. Hillary Clinton, he said, had personally approved sharing the Trump-Alfa Bank story with the press. Mook said the campaign wasn’t sure if the story was true but figured the press would look into it. Hillary agreed and approved spreading the false story.

But Mook cannot be right when he says “the campaign” didn’t know if the Alfa Bank story was true. Mook may not have known, but others in the campaign surely did since they were the ones who created the false story. They expended campaign funds to generate that dishonest “inference and narrative” about Trump and Alfa Bank from internet data, knowing it would fool only naïve FBI agents and reporters. Real cyber experts could – and did – disprove the “inference” almost immediately.

Without a doubt, this was the Democratic Party using the levers of government to go after its opponents. For every person on the right who complained loud and long about the threat to the Republic by Trump, where are those voices now?

Those of us willing to overlook mean tweets (or enjoy them, which I admit too) were able to see how this was all a setup at the time. It was painfully clear because our eyes were not clouded. We are owed apologies by the people screeching that Trump was a threat to democracy.

We won’t get it.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 176 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    He didn’t say he was one of those who voted for Democrats, did he?

    I can understand the difficulties in voting for Trump. I overcame them and voted for him, but some people have trouble doing that.

    What I can’t understand is the people who had valid enough reasons not to vote for Trump, but who then did a 180-degree turnabout and voted for Biden. It was as if those reasons suddenly no longer mattered.   

    • #61
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    And/or who think Trump’s “assault on Norms” were somehow worse than Biden’s.

    • #62
  3. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    He didn’t say he was one of those who voted for Democrats, did he?

    I can understand the difficulties in voting for Trump. I overcame them and voted for him, but some people have trouble doing that.

    What I can’t understand is the people who had valid enough reasons not to vote for Trump, but who then did a 180-degree turnabout and voted for Biden. It was as if those reasons suddenly no longer mattered.

    He also said that his reasons for not voting was largely because Trump ‘obsessively’ catered to the conservative base, and not merely due to an intense dislike of Trump himself-that’s another matter entirely.

    • #63
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    He didn’t say he was one of those who voted for Democrats, did he?

    I can understand the difficulties in voting for Trump. I overcame them and voted for him, but some people have trouble doing that.

    What I can’t understand is the people who had valid enough reasons not to vote for Trump, but who then did a 180-degree turnabout and voted for Biden. It was as if those reasons suddenly no longer mattered.

    He also said that his reasons for not voting was largely because Trump ‘obsessively’ catered to the conservative base, and not merely due to an intense dislike of Trump himself-that’s another matter entirely.

    “obsessively catered” seems rather odd.  Nobody wins without their base, of course.  What exactly is “obsessively catering” anyway?  Actually being anti-abortion?  Do we really need – or want – pro-abortion “conservatives?”  “Obsessively catered” sounds a bit like GOPe talk, “Well sure we are okay with abortion and we want to take away everyone’s means of self-defense, but we’ll do it slower than the Dims so VOTE FOR US!”

    • #64
  5. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    kedavis (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    He didn’t say he was one of those who voted for Democrats, did he?

    I can understand the difficulties in voting for Trump. I overcame them and voted for him, but some people have trouble doing that.

    What I can’t understand is the people who had valid enough reasons not to vote for Trump, but who then did a 180-degree turnabout and voted for Biden. It was as if those reasons suddenly no longer mattered.

    He also said that his reasons for not voting was largely because Trump ‘obsessively’ catered to the conservative base, and not merely due to an intense dislike of Trump himself-that’s another matter entirely.

    “obsessively catered” seems rather odd. Nobody wins without their base, of course. What exactly is “obsessively catering” anyway? Actually being anti-abortion? Do we really need – or want – pro-abortion “conservatives?” “Obsessively catered” sounds a bit like GOPe talk, “Well sure we are okay with abortion and we want to take away everyone’s means of self-defense, but we’ll do it slower than the Dims so VOTE FOR US!”

    I’m a simple guy, so I just need to know this: WTF is wrong with the ideals and goals of the “conservative base”? 

    • #65
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base.

    In other words, you’re not especially fond of the conservative base, and don’t believe the Democrats (who had just spent a year promoting a terroristic hate movement that was burning down cities and killing people) are all that bad.

    It seems like your vote was only ‘gettable’ at too high a price, if the events of 2020 alone were not enough for you-its better to recruit people who are mugged by reality than people who see reality*, but don’t care.

    *An assumption based on your participation on conservative platforms.

    He didn’t say he was one of those who voted for Democrats, did he?

    I can understand the difficulties in voting for Trump. I overcame them and voted for him, but some people have trouble doing that.

    What I can’t understand is the people who had valid enough reasons not to vote for Trump, but who then did a 180-degree turnabout and voted for Biden. It was as if those reasons suddenly no longer mattered.

    He also said that his reasons for not voting was largely because Trump ‘obsessively’ catered to the conservative base, and not merely due to an intense dislike of Trump himself-that’s another matter entirely.

    “obsessively catered” seems rather odd. Nobody wins without their base, of course. What exactly is “obsessively catering” anyway? Actually being anti-abortion? Do we really need – or want – pro-abortion “conservatives?” “Obsessively catered” sounds a bit like GOPe talk, “Well sure we are okay with abortion and we want to take away everyone’s means of self-defense, but we’ll do it slower than the Dims so VOTE FOR US!”

    I’m a simple guy, so I just need to know this: WTF is wrong with the ideals and goals of the “conservative base”?

    Another good way of putting it, yes.

    • #66
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Except he was a threat to democracy on January 6th. How many apologies did we get for that travesty? I didn’t vote for him but I was glad he beat Hillary. I despise Biden but if Trump had been re-elected, he would have felt vindicated and there was a lot about his presidency I didn’t want to vindicate.

    Some of his policies were good. (But if today’s runaway inflation worries you, Trump helped that along as much as anyone.) I never called myself NeverTrump. I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base. Those of us who didn’t find his neverending tweets helpful were effectively told to piss up a rope. Surprise! I ended up not voting for him!

    Except he wasn’t and the idea he was is a lie. 

     

    • #67
  8. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    So basically, it always comes back too “But Trump” Got it

    • #68
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Except he was a threat to democracy on January 6th. How many apologies did we get for that travesty? I didn’t vote for him but I was glad he beat Hillary. I despise Biden but if Trump had been re-elected, he would have felt vindicated and there was a lot about his presidency I didn’t want to vindicate.

    Some of his policies were good. (But if today’s runaway inflation worries you, Trump helped that along as much as anyone.) I never called myself NeverTrump. I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base. Those of us who didn’t find his neverending tweets helpful were effectively told to piss up a rope. Surprise! I ended up not voting for him!

    I have to disagree.

    I think Trump should be vindicated. The charges against him have all been proven to be lies. The victim of false accusations should be granted vindication, otherwise you end up in a Reign of Terror. The first lair is the last to the guillotine.

    Trump’s policies where as much deflationary as inflationary. While the reckless covid relief spending was a terrible policy and terribly implemented, his focus on deregulation and energy production could have reduced some of the inflationary pressures.

    There would be some inflation – but in a Trump second term – it wouldn’t have been as bad.

    This is well said. We are decades past the point when you can control spending. The asset bubble needs to be kept intact or that party loses power. You need to do other libertarian things particularly with fossil fuel. My God this is terrible.

    No all bubbles pop at some point anyway, its better to control the unwinding of assets so that it doesnt destroy the world. (I know probably too late for that too)

    But Biden made the inflation much worse by radically expanding the money supply – by 6 trillion dollars in the past 2 years – while at the same time restricting production, distribution of goods… He designed this inflationary economy.

    In my opinion this was all over by 2004 at the latest. Probably 10 years earlier.

    • #69
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):
    Surprise! I ended up not voting for him!

    Everything Moves Left All Of The Time

    Roe is on the verge of being overturned. Everything doesn’t move left all of the time.

    OMG that is one thing out of many bad ones. Every single institution except for the Supreme Court is failing from a libertarian or conservative point of view. Enabling Democrats doesn’t work. Scoop Jackson is gone and he is never coming back.

    I remember welfare reform, a ban on assault weapons that was allowed to expire, balanced budgets. We have a conservative majority on the Supreme Court because of successive conservative victories. If you don’t want things to not always move left, you need to not start with your surrender.

    I don’t buy that in aggregate this is working out.

    What year are you talking about balanced budgets? If you are talking about during the NASDAQ bubble you are kidding yourself.

    The Nasdaq, S&P 500 and the Dow are way higher today and we don’t have a balanced budget. Somebody is kidding themself. It ain’t me.

    Government expenditure is out running the capitol gains generated by fed easy money. 

    You need to be more specific if you are going to disagree with me.

    • #70
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Except he was a threat to democracy on January 6th. How many apologies did we get for that travesty? I didn’t vote for him but I was glad he beat Hillary. I despise Biden but if Trump had been re-elected, he would have felt vindicated and there was a lot about his presidency I didn’t want to vindicate.

    Some of his policies were good. (But if today’s runaway inflation worries you, Trump helped that along as much as anyone.) I never called myself NeverTrump. I was always a “gettable” vote but neither Trump nor his supporters were interested in winning my support. His strategy was an obsessive appeal to his base. Those of us who didn’t find his neverending tweets helpful were effectively told to piss up a rope. Surprise! I ended up not voting for him!

    I have to disagree.

    I think Trump should be vindicated. The charges against him have all been proven to be lies. The victim of false accusations should be granted vindication, otherwise you end up in a Reign of Terror. The first lair is the last to the guillotine.

    Trump’s policies where as much deflationary as inflationary. While the reckless covid relief spending was a terrible policy and terribly implemented, his focus on deregulation and energy production could have reduced some of the inflationary pressures.

    There would be some inflation – but in a Trump second term – it wouldn’t have been as bad.

    This is well said. We are decades past the point when you can control spending. The asset bubble needs to be kept intact or that party loses power. You need to do other libertarian things particularly with fossil fuel. My God this is terrible.

    No all bubbles pop at some point anyway, its better to control the unwinding of assets so that it doesnt destroy the world. (I know probably too late for that too)

    But Biden made the inflation much worse by radically expanding the money supply – by 6 trillion dollars in the past 2 years – while at the same time restricting production, distribution of goods… He designed this inflationary economy.

    Biden tried to increase spending by that much. He came up short. He still spent too much but not as much as you claim. The president doesn’t expand the money supply. The Fed does.

    Oh please. They work together to get past the next election. 

    • #71
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    It’s a real genius system. You keep indiscriminately debasing debt and stuffing the economy with debt regardless of if it’s productive. Then everything collapses. This stupidity is called inflationism and there are actually nominal Republicans that think this is a good idea. If you wonder why everything moves left all of the time and you are freaked out about populism, this is a lot of it. 

     

     

     

    • #72
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    All of that should have been overhauled the second the Soviet Union fell. Instead we did everything wrong with that and with respect to automation and globalized trade. Nobody did anything about the unfunded liabilities. Then they whine about Reagan and spending. 

    • #73
  14. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Remind yourself to vote. 

     

     

     

    • #74
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Brutal truth.

     

     

     

    • #75
  16. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    No. Body. Cares. 

     

     

     

    We’re Living in the Age of Capital Consumption

    Ronald-Peter Stöferle https://mises.org/wire/were-living-age-capital-consumption  

    • #76
  17. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Two months and I decided that the Russia stuff was bogus. 

    Trump knows he’s an international criminal and he’s going to run for POTUS. Sure. 

    Trump decides to become an international criminal even though the IRS is giving him a continuous colonoscopy for that $1 billion deduction he took. Sure. 

    I get that the Bidens did that… But they are Democrats.

    • #77
  18. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    My son graduated High School Yesterday. I am far more moved than I thought I would be. 

    • #78
  19. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Two months and I decided that the Russia stuff was bogus.

    Trump knows he’s an international criminal and he’s going to run for POTUS. Sure.

    Trump decides to become an international criminal even though the IRS is giving him a continuous colonoscopy for that $1 billion deduction he took. Sure.

    I get that the Bidens did that… But they are Democrats.

    I expected it of the Democrats. 

    It is the people on our “side” who turned out to be on their “side”

    • #79
  20. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Two months and I decided that the Russia stuff was bogus. 

    I waited for the evidence.

    And waited.

    And waited.

    • #80
  21. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    In my opinion this was all over by 2004 at the latest. Probably 10 years earlier.

    That maybe a bit early. The fix was not fixed after the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of resolution to that crisis will lay the groundwork for the next crisis – just like every other financial crisis has led to the next since the Long Term Capital Management bankruptcy in the 90s.

    Long Term Capital Management should have been the clear warning to the real world that economists are dumber than diplomats… There you had a group of Nobel winning economists running a hedge fund, and it went swimmingly for a while – until their model broke, and rather than re-examine the data and modify the model, they doubled down on the broken model and nearly bankrupted wall street.

    We’ve had a financial crisis every few years since – each an order of magnitude larger than the last. Bankers have learned they can pocket the profits and socialize the losses. With the losses being taken up by the taxpayer, either through federal spending with bailout packages rushed through congress (like TARP) or inflated away by the federal reserve. So bankers have had the risk tolerance dialed up to 11 (a Spinal Tap reference – the actual risk tolerance, is much greater than that). After all they can pocket the returns from highly leveraged investments – but when things hit the fan – they’ll ‘retire’ to a friendly beach somewhere and live out their lives in splendid luxury.

    • #81
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    In my opinion this was all over by 2004 at the latest. Probably 10 years earlier.

    That maybe a bit early. The fix was not fixed after the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of resolution to that crisis will lay the groundwork for the next crisis – just like every other financial crisis has led to the next since the Long Term Capital Management bankruptcy in the 90s.

    Long Term Capital Management should have been the clear warning to the real world that economists are dumber than diplomats… There you had a group of Nobel winning economists running a hedge fund, and it went swimmingly for a while – until their model broke, and rather than re-examine the data and modify the model, they doubled down on the broken model and nearly bankrupted wall street.

    We’ve had a financial crisis every few years since – each an order of magnitude larger than the last. Bankers have learned they can pocket the profits and socialize the losses. With the losses being taken up by the taxpayer, either through federal spending with bailout packages rushed through congress (like TARP) or inflated away by the federal reserve. So bankers have had the risk tolerance dialed up to 11 (a Spinal Tap reference – the actual risk tolerance, is much greater than that). After all they can pocket the returns from highly leveraged investments – but when things hit the fan – they’ll ‘retire’ to a friendly beach somewhere and live out their lives in splendid luxury.

    We aren’t disagreeing very much. 

    You can’t expect conservatism to work very well if the country isn’t using intelligent policy to deal with the deflation from automation and trade that happened after the Soviet Union fell. Everybody wants better prices except everybody wants the Fed to inflate the value of their house. etc. This is madness. Then they whine about Reagan and spending.

    You could argue that started in 1987. It definitely started under LTCM.

    • #82
  23. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Progress is prices going down constantly. 

    If you want to make it complicated, somethings go up because they are getting way better than they were before. 

    Everybody knows what we are really doing.

    • #83
  24. DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax)
    @DonG

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Everything Moves Left All Of The Time

    Roe is on the verge of being overturned. Everything doesn’t move left all of the  time.

    Too soon to tell.   In 5 years, when all the big companies will pay a bonus to any employee that gets an abortion and Hawaii becomes renowned for abortion tourism and Amazon will deliver a home abortion kit the same day, it will feel like a leftward move.

    • #84
  25. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    We aren’t disagreeing very much. 

    You can’t expect conservatism to work very well if the country isn’t using intelligent policy to deal with the deflation from automation and trade that happened after the Soviet Union fell. Everybody wants better prices except everybody wants the Fed to inflate the value of their house. etc. This is madness. Then they whine about Reagan and spending.

    You could argue that started in 1987. It definitely started under LTCM.

    No. We’re not. Yes, the 1987 financial crisis began the Greenspan Punt and the rumored “Plunge Protection Team” … but with LTCM they did it in broad daylight in the full sight of the public. Perhaps the invention of cable news and the 24 hour news cycle in the 90s made it seem impossible to keep financial moves of this magnitude secret.

    Thats why I point to LTCM instead of Black Monday – a lot of the stuff around Black Monday is still labelled a “Conspiracy Theory”.

    • #85
  26. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    We aren’t disagreeing very much.

    You can’t expect conservatism to work very well if the country isn’t using intelligent policy to deal with the deflation from automation and trade that happened after the Soviet Union fell. Everybody wants better prices except everybody wants the Fed to inflate the value of their house. etc. This is madness. Then they whine about Reagan and spending.

    You could argue that started in 1987. It definitely started under LTCM.

    No. We’re not. Yes, the 1987 financial crisis began the Greenspan Punt and the rumored “Plunge Protection Team” … but with LTCM they did it in broad daylight in the full sight of the public. Perhaps the invention of cable news and the 24 hour news cycle in the 90s made it seem impossible to keep financial moves of this magnitude secret.

    Thats why I point to LTCM instead of Black Monday – a lot of the stuff around Black Monday is still labelled a “Conspiracy Theory”.

    There was no reason to print money on Black Monday. He should have kept his mouth shut. 

    Now they have a three-way mandate. Unemployment, inflation, and the stock market.

    • #86
  27. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) (View Comment):

    spaceman_spiff (View Comment):

    Everything Moves Left All Of The Time

    Roe is on the verge of being overturned. Everything doesn’t move left all of the time.

    Too soon to tell. In 5 years, when all the big companies will pay a bonus to any employee that gets an abortion and Hawaii becomes renowned for abortion tourism and Amazon will deliver a home abortion kit the same day, it will feel like a leftward move.

    Hawaii will have to get in line. Ontario is already talking about it.

    • #87
  28. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Greenspan will leave an economy in shambles and a lifetime of pandering. Rothbard left a grand vision of liberty united with science, an example of what it means to truly think long term.

    https://mises.org/ko/library/parallel-lives-liberty-or-power?fbclid=IwAR2NCY1p_wdDIqp4EkSjEwZ_E4A-ZxFpvswt5JkDXcFov_lL1GYOO2AV8aE

     

     

    • #88
  29. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Percival (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Two months and I decided that the Russia stuff was bogus.

    I waited for the evidence.

    And waited.

    And waited.

    If I recall, I was already inoculated against it by the CIA’s action associating Flynn with being a Russian spy.  And of course the internally inconsistent and clearly faked “dossier”.

    • #89
  30. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Everybody wants better prices except everybody wants the Fed to inflate the value of their house. etc.

    Good point.

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.