Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
‘I Didn’t Pull the Trigger’
Really? That seems unlikely. I mean, that’s how guns work: it’s amazing how unlikely they are to fire if someone’s finger isn’t on the trigger. So, while it’s possible that Mr. Baldwin didn’t pull the trigger, there is about a zero percent probability that he didn’t pull the trigger.
Of course, he didn’t pull the trigger.
(Interesting note: There is such a thing as a possible event that has a zero probability of occurring. Math is an endless buffet.)
Meanwhile, in Wisconsin, DA John Chisolm didn’t pull the trigger when his soft-on-crime bail policies let serial felon Darrell Edward Brooks Jr. out on $1,000 bail less than a month ago when he assaulted and then drove his vehicle into his girlfriend. His mobility restored, Mr. Brooks then committed mass murder and put another few dozen folks into the hospital when he plowed into a Christmas parade last week in Waukesha. (The SUV, of course, receives top billing, since Mr. Brooks is, by virtue of his hue, not useful as an example of America’s purported White Supremacist problem. For what it’s worth, the SUV wasn’t white either.)
Meanwhile, in the City of Brotherly Love and record-breaking homicide, DA Larry Krasner didn’t pull the trigger when he knocked the bail down from $200,000 to zero and then dropped all charges against (alleged) violent serial criminal Latif Williams. Mr. Williams wasted no time in making good on his inexplicable freedom by (allegedly) murdering Tulane Temple University student Samuel Collington three days ago, while attempting to steal the young man’s SUV and shooting him twice because Mr. Collington was reluctant to surrender the vehicle (which belonged to his mother).
Unlike Kyle Rittenhouse, neither Mr. Brooks nor Mr. Williams is a nerdy little white kid carrying a scary gun. They’re just a couple of guys who can’t stay out of trouble, but who manage to stay out of jail thanks to the generosity of prominent Democratic DAs who are more concerned about being woke than doing their jobs.
2022 is coming.
Published in General
The DA’s should pull the trigger more ofent.
My understanding is that he was aiming at the director and camera operator on a film set. Seems there would be file of this event.
According to a statement from the script manager in a lawsuit that she has filed against Mr. Baldwin, he cocked the gun even though the scene did not call for the gun to be used. There have been some reports that live ammunition had been mixed with blanks, and two earlier accidental discharges did take place on the set.
There have been suggestions from some in Hollywood that police officers should be hired to act as an armorer on movie, or television sets. I doubt that any active member of a law enforcement agency would be allowed to do this for liability reasons.
I heard the same. It is a silly notion. The skill sets are different. An armorer should know more about guns than any cop does. It is amazing how much the Left hates police and then also wants them to do everything.
Yes. Not going to make it easy for him by not expecting it.
That’s what my college-age nephew did. Shot himself in the leg with a Ruger Bearcat .22 single-action revolver that I had loaned him.
All, DAV’s comment (follow the link) was a good one, and likely correct: my third example of “not pulling the trigger” probably wasn’t very good. I’ll eventually go back and review the case, and Krasner’s record in general, and decide whether I need to correct the post. But, in the meantime, and in the interest of accuracy, I wanted to acknowledge DAV’s point.
As far as I can tell, they’re always cocked.
I don’t know specifically about this Colt, but I have used revolvers that half cocked. Half cocking, you feel a click half-way through pulling back on the hammer and when you release the hammer it stays half-cocked. If you didn’t pull the hammer back far enough for it to half-cock, or some reason the hammer did not stay securely half-cocked, you would merely let the hammer down.
If there were a flaw in the half-cock sear, this would be evident on examination.
Depends on the weapon. On double-action-only handguns (and many striker-fired pistols are DAO), it isn’t cocked until you pull the trigger. On my favorite striker-fired pistol, the HK P7M8, the striker protrudes through the back of the slide to give you a visible confirmation that the gun is cocked (which it will be if you’re firmly gripping the handle).
Having said that, I continue to believe that the best defensive handgun for normal people is a double-action revolver.
What I read at the time, is that the scene had to be reshot, and Baldwin made a wise crack about shooting them rather than reshoot the scene. If there was film of it, I think we’d have heard about it.
So this Colt didn’t have a half-cocked position?
Were there two shots fired? I hadn’t heard that. I read that it was a single through and through, that struck two people.
From Wiki on the Colt Single Action Army:
And remember, drawing the hammer back rotates the cylinder simultaneously so that only partially pulling the hammer back only partially rotates the cylinder, and letting the hammer fall during this process, at the worst, would let the hammer fall on some area of the back of the cylinder other than the cartridge primer.
Well, I was referring to single-action striker pistols, and more specifically to the Glocks. Is there any way on any single-action striker pistols that you know of, to chamber a round, and then uncock the pistol?
The whole argument is silly. We all know how this is going to go down. They will review all info and evidence and dismiss anything that makes AB look bad and let him off as it just being a gun related accident that he was unfortunate enough to be in the area of. OF course, AB may have to give a donation to these folks families out of the goodness of his heart.
If you chamber a round on a Glock the pistol is ready to fire. The only way I know of to “uncock” the Glock is to eject the round by pulling the slide all the way back. The slide should lock open after the round is ejected. The magazine must be empty, or removed before pulling the slide back or you will chamber another round if it contains rounds.
Of course it’s silly, but those of us who love guns also love to discuss them in excruciating detail. Many of us are also personally offended when a firearm is misused. I know I am.
As I understand it, when a single-action revolver has the hammer cocked there is a small area called the sear that locks it in place. The distance between safety and failure is where the red and the blue meet on this picture:
From what I’ve read about this film the budgets were very, very tight. That calls into question the maintenance of the fire arm. I’ve read some posts that suggest a failing sear can be felt when shooting several rounds before breaking, that the trigger feels wonky and the gun is hard to control. I doubt very seriously if Baldwin had much of a history, if any, with this particular firearm.
If it was a sear failure this was an accident waiting to happen.
That’s why I can’t stand a Glock. My preference is old-school S&W 59. If there’s a round in the chamber and it is cocked, you can simply engage the safety, and the hammer comes down and hits a hammer block. It’s now ready for double action. (This is probably surer than holding the hammer back, pulling the trigger, and then lowering the hammer manually.)
If it’s a sear failure, it’s provable by an inspection.
Sorry, I just can’t resist.
Stephanopoulos: Your emotions are so right out there. And you’re not that good an actor. How do you do it?
Baldwin: Halyna’s death is the worst thing that’s ever happened to me. In my whole life.
I am definitely a gun guy. Guess my issue is it just pisses me off all the lying that will be done about this and in the end they will let him off because he is a liberal and not because of anything that happened or laws.
They could make up for the injustice by confiscating more guns from law-abiding citizens.
Despite all the discussion of it may or not being a single action Colt used, friends who have been stunt doubles in several films tell me that it is standard practice for each person who handles a gun to check themselves, even after a “cold gun” call has been sounded. You still check the ammo wheel yourself and then continue. If these guys think that is standard practice to always check it yourself, one would certainly think someone who has been around the industry his whole life would know better. (regardless of the gun used)
I was struck the other day when watching a DVD of “The Alamo” made in the 90s and in one of sections on the making of the film you see all the ways the armorer handled the hundreds of weapons in the battle reenactments and how professional it was – hundreds and hundreds of rounds being fired at the same time and no problems
When I did the shooting part of my CCW test, I used a K frame .38 Special. They made me shoot it double action; I didn’t like it. I have a SAO Ruger Vaquero also. I asked them what they would have done if that’s what I’d brought to do the test. They said they wouldn’t have let me use it.
I don’t know. I think I’ve sold all my striker fired pistols.
Several of my pistols have decockers.
They have a certain affection for the under-the-table gig economy.
But you don’t have any striker pistols. May I ask, why not?