Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Normalizing Pedophilia
After studying the trend toward corrupting our children with transgender propaganda, I didn’t think there was a way to intensify my outrage about the distortions of gender and sexuality in this country.
I was wrong.
We have a queer (his own label) human being, Allyn Walker, who is an assistant professor at Old Dominion University, who has decided to reduce the incriminations against people who “like children,” but have shown restraint in their own behavior. He is proposing that pedophiles not be labeled so negatively, and that the term, “minor attracting persons” (MAPS) be used instead:
Walker is the author of the book ‘A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity,’ which challenges ‘widespread assumptions that persons who are preferentially attracted to minors—often referred to as ‘pedophiles’—are necessarily also predators and sex offenders, this book takes readers into the lives of non-offending minor-attracted persons (MAPs).’
I find this effort unconscionable. And yet in these days where every norm is subject to distortions, condemnation, and irreverence, we shouldn’t be surprised. Our world of right and wrong, good and bad, moral and immoral has been turned upside down, and too many people now believe that any people who are “oppressed” are entitled to special treatment.
But they are not.
Spencer Lindquist who wrote the linked article in the Federalist made this powerful point:
Yet again we witness an instance of the left siding with the oppressor while pretending to advocate for the victim, this time under the guise of academic inquiry. One has to wonder if Walker has ever considered that our sympathies should lie not with pedophiles who don’t appreciate being called what they are but instead with their victims. Walker’s book intends to help pedophiles pursue dignity. How does a child robbed of his or her innocence pursue his or her sense of dignity?
The magnitude of the problem is not well understood. In addition, the long-term effects on children are staggering. And then there are the international organizations that have been openly supporting child sexual abuse.
There has been a petition posted, protesting this professor’s actions and calling for him to be fired. Given the times, I’m not hopeful for dismissal; to date, 1,500 people have signed.
Old Dominion University released the following statement regarding Walker:
An academic community plays a valuable role in the quest for knowledge. A vital part of this is being willing to consider scientific and other empirical data that may involve controversial issues and perspectives. Following a recent interview that gained national attention, Dr. Allyn Walker has released the following statement.
‘I want to be clear: child sexual abuse is an inexcusable crime. As an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice, the goal of my research is to prevent crime. My work is informed by my past experience and advocacy as a social worker counseling victims. I embarked on this research in hopes of gaining understanding of a group that, previously, has not been studied in order to identify ways to protect children.’
Following recent social media activity and direct outreach to the institution, it is important to share that Old Dominion, as a caring and inclusive community, does not endorse or promote crimes against children or any form of criminal activity.
I expect that everyone will be reassured by the ODU statement.
The ongoing efforts to ruin the lives of our children are exhausting, and I see no end in sight. The effort to normalize pedophilia in any way is repugnant. We can only hope that someday, some time, wisdom prevails.
Published in Culture
A philosopher Starcicus wrote:
You’re all ribbons and curls, ooh, what a girl,
Eyes that sparkle and shine.
You’re sixteen, you’re beautiful and you’re mine.
(mine, all mine, mine, mine)
I never understood why this was allowed to go number one.
Joel Pollak: “You know, in 1973, Ringo Starr hit Number 1 on the Billboard charts with the song ‘You’re Sixteen, You’re Beautiful and You’re Mine’ and it was a remake of an earlier song. He was 30-something at the time, singing about a 16-year-old. You want to take away Ringo Starr’s achievement?”
That wouldn’t be so obviously… something… if there were some kind… almost any kind, really… of sanction on the teenage boys maybe PLUS the teenage girls, for… spurious reproduction? Instead the teenage fathers tend to be admired by their peers, as are the teenage mothers too plus they likely get free housing and other subsidies. In the end it’s the children they produce who suffer the most, and eventually they tend to bring that suffering into society when they get older.
Put another way, if it’s wrong for teenage girls/young women to be having children with men who ARE capable of supporting them, then it’s DAMNED SURE wrong for them to be doing it with teenage boys who AREN’T.
That seems a bit intemperate, Stina. You and I differ about some matters of values; let’s leave it at that.
Yes, but the moral laxity of “leave-people-alone” is one of the ways we’ve gotten to the point of normalizing pedophilia. Seriously. You can’t see that?
One moment you stop burning witches, because mean, and the next your children show an interest in Buddhism. Hold the line!
It’s still not her business and it’s insulting the way she addressed it. If she wants him to hear her point, she should speak in a way she can be heard.
Clearly, that’s not what’s going on here and I don’t understand what point you are trying to make with the satire.
No, I can see that. But, like it or not, leaving people alone is an important part of what I love about America. We aren’t a country that has historically spent a lot of time controlling the private behavior of individuals in order to further one particular set of values over another. We put a lot of value on individual liberty. I like it that way, even if I don’t always like the consequences.
I have spoken in a way that’s heard even if this isn’t one of them. The thing that is the point is that most of us are reaching outside ourselves to define what is right and wrong in an objective way, typically defined by our respective faiths. Henry keeps reaching into himself to define right and wrong and thinks that should mean something to us. Sure, he’s polite about it, but he is just as intractable as the religious people are. I can at least point to what defines my sense of right and wrong and it’s something that’s been quite stable over a very long time. He has no such stability.
I should clarify, I don’t mean we should be busting down the doors of homosexual couples. But, we should be able to speak honestly about the costs associated with normalizing homosexuality — both to the practitioners and to society at large. And we certainly shouldn’t be legitimating homosexual behavior with SSM and adoption (all children deserve a mother and a father).
And, yes, I would be appalled if my children wanted to be Buddhist. They’ve been shown a God who loves them enough to suffer and die for them. Christianity is radical love and its demands are great because the graces are unfathomable and undeserved. “Take up your cross and follow” means practicing chastity even if you’re inclined to homosexuality. It means practicing chastity (rightly ordered relations) even within (real, traditional) marriage.
But if what you value – i.e., your values – has consequences you don’t like that lead eventually to the destruction of the society you claim to want, doesn’t that suggest that your values need adjusting? After all, despite their claims to value “sustainability,” it seems to be more the Left that advances “this is what we think is right, no matter how destructive it is.”
(“It doesn’t matter what happens to society because of what I believe, because I’ll be long gone before it gets REALLY bad” sounds like the Left too.)
“After me, the deluge.”
Me neither, but I am completely okay with busting down the doors of pedophiles if we think there’s pederasty underway. Ditto with other child molesters. I think you would be too.
The salient difference, imho, is the ability to give informed consent is by default missing when it comes to children having sex.
Sure, but you should expect pushback and you need to be armed with facts in addition to opinions. (Editorial you.)
Didn’t going easy on witches start society on the path to current day moral decadence and relativity?
Akshully, from my perspective, the decline of the West (Christendom) started about 500 years ago, when the authority of the First Church of Christ was undermined. YMMV.
For now. And if we want to keep it that way, we must be wary and resistant to all efforts that move massive decisions ever lower – including abortion, voting, and gender reassignment.
Will you hold those lines?
About 10 years ago, there was a radical leftist child development major who claimed you could teach infants to consent by asking them if they wanted their diaper changed and waiting for smiles to change it. It might sound innocent and reasonable in a bizarre and quirky way, but if it softens us on believing children can’t consent then it moves us one step closer to this.
Sure. I’m all about informed consent being the determining factor in people’s private lives and the laws which affect them.
You softy.
As a Jew, I don’t believe that everyone should adopt my religion. In fact, I believe that people like Hank are sufficiently principled that believing in a religion won’t necessarily make him a better man. I think he would benefit from a belief in G-d, but that he doesn’t pursue it doesn’t bother me. His values are close enough to mine that I feel we share a lot in that area. There are many people who claim they are Jewish or Christian who are not principled, but rather are hateful and bigoted. So religion doesn’t guarantee that a person will be good.
I think our society has lost a great deal by turning into a secular society, but that’s not the only problem. It is the disdain and hatefulness, the unprincipled judgment of others, that is the worst part of that lifestyle. I think, Stina, that you unfairly characterize Hank as self-centered, as a man who thinks he is his own god. From everything I’ve read from him on this site, that is far from a fair description of him. Not everyone has to be religious. Not everyone has to be a Christian or a Jew. And I think, especially in America, we have room for all kinds of people, especially if they are self-reflective, kind and thoughtful.
One last thought. I accept that some people are homosexual. I must say honestly that their choice makes me uncomfortable, and it doesn’t go along with Jewish beliefs. But I also believe that if they are good people otherwise, and since they are created in the image of G-d, I want to treat them politely, and I believe they have free will to make whatever choices they do.
Susan’s post has nothing to do with controlling the private lives of others, or even their disturbed, though consensual, actions with other adults. It’s about protecting children from sexual predators and from the normalization of the sick infatuations they possess. Anyone who tries to argue away the fact that sexual relationships between adults and children is anything other than criminal has lost their moral compass, or never had one to begin with.
It’s not really about whether Henry is a good person or not. It’s about having a more homogeneous agreement on the source of moral authority that can unite a society around some kind of wisdom tradition, whether Jewish or Christian.
WC, I love your don’t hold back comments on this thread. Preach it!
Hey hey hey! No food in church!
I said ask any counselor. Or just ask any homosexual you call a friend and are close enough to broach the question with. I also notice you left out the other portion of my comment which had nothing to do with trauma counselors.
Bread of Life, baby!
Can’t find the clip, but Dennis Miller had some great advice for pedophiles:
Something like “If you are an adult man and you feel the need to have sex with children, and you can’t control it … you’ve got to kill yourself. Yes, you’ve got to lean into the strike zone and take one for the team. Nothing else you are ever going to do with your life is going to make up for the damage you are going to cause. If you are truly a caring person, you will see this, and kill yourself.”
Yeah? She didn’t look like a male to me, in any respect. I thought you had put up a generic picture of a liberal chick with a typical stupid haircut. I kind of like her glasses though. She’s the professor – the GUY – who is at the center of all this?? Good god.
Why would a woman-pretending-to-be-a-man be so interested in furthering the cause of pederasty?
As Adam Corolla says, “I’m shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhocked.”
There are of course different kinds of differences.
The practical difference between a black man and a white man is almost non-existent. While we may look a bit different superficially, we are basically the same cat.
The practical difference between a homosexual man and a heterosexual man is much more pronounced. But only in certain areas; in many (most?) we are functionally the same.
However, the practical difference between a man and a woman is off the charts. In almost every category. Who can make sense out of women? – words fail me. And they probably feel the same about us. But of course they’re all crazy.
(And I wouldn’t have it any other way. Viva le difference!)
This is why I know that men can’t become women simply by putting on a dress and telling me I’m wrong about everything: they don’t intimidate me and bewilder me and make me confess to everything, as a real woman will. They just make me shake my head.
Hey! Keynesian economics!
The heterosexuals are the ones who are doing the sodomy thing the most, quantitatively speaking, so perhaps best concentrate all efforts to reduce the harm on that randy cohort?