The Platinum Rule

 

The Golden Rule, “Whoever has the gold makes the rule,” has turned into the Platinum Rule: “He who has the government’s American Excess Platinum Card makes the rules.” Because state politicians lack the power to spend significantly in excess of annual revenues, thanks to state constitutional balanced budget provisions, they turn to Uncle Sugar. The first taste may be free, but then come the demands. This bipartisan political dynamic has pernicious effects on the constitutional balance between states and the federal government. nationalizing much of our policy, right down to local government and so right down to where you live.

But wait, we hear all the time about states in debt, what is this state constitutional limit talk?

True, states and their creatures, local governments, are carrying enormous debt. The debt levels vary significantly by state. Each state produces a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Search on “[state name] Comprehensive Annual Financial Report,” and you will get the state’s latest report. World Population Review has a very clear presentation of debt by state in 2021. The common theme is that states have large unfunded obligations on public pensions and social spending. These are the result of serial election and government worker union compensation package negotiation cycles. Where wages and other benefits that must be paid by current budgets are limited, the contractual promises of fatter retirement packets were cost-free in the political short run.

So, it is true that states vary but all carry debt, and that they are internally limited on spending more than they collect in each budgetary cycle. Even California, with its dominant Democratic Party, has strong, state balanced budget provisions.* The cross-pressure of electoral incentives to spend on popular or powerful state and local constituencies, with popular state constitutional limits on annual deficit spending, sets up every level of state government, together with all of us, for strong pressure from national bureaucracies, Congress, the president, and the federal courts.

First taste is free.

Uncle Sugar is the world’s biggest drug dealer. Beyond literal drugs, the U.S. federal government has become accustomed to supplying popular fixes to every customer. Never mind red, blue, and black pills, Uncle Sugar supplies conservative, liberal, rural and urban, rich and poor, with the goodies they crave. Law and order spending? Check. Save the “family” farmers? Check. Mothers and children? That’s American as Mom and Apple Pie.

So it is that everything from the local school to your local zoning commission is hooked on “free federal money.” Anyone who refuses these dollars, if they can, is in danger of being voted out in an election that is structurally rigged, set well away from the big biannual federal election days, to produce low turn out easily dominated by constituents who expect a concentrated benefit at someone else’s expense at some fuzzy future time.

This is not about unfunded mandates. Far from it. This is about federal incentives turning into mandates sweetened and strengthened by federal funny money, drawn from the Bank of China or the Bank of Neverland. The fault lies in both major political parties and in our fallen human nature.

It is less than fully honest to point to the dominant progressive wing of the Democratic Party, which is, after all, striving to keep very public promises. If there is fault at the federal level, it falls heavily on the Senate RepubliCAN’T Conference and the House Republicans. They mouth platitudes about smaller government and their latest lie: “freedom and opportunity for everyone.” If you believe that, you were not watching their duplicity in riding “repeal Obamacare” to House and then Senate majorities, only to collude with their good friends, the congressional Democrats, and the permanent bureaucracy in the fraudulent “Russia, Russia, Russia” operation, dishonestly declaring they had real concerns that voters were tricked or votes altered or President Trump was compromised by Putin. McConnell and Lyin’ Ryan were at the heart of this crooked scheme to void the obligation to fulfill their false promises uttered during the Obama presidency.

What is to be done?

Every state and local government must act within the broadest reading of their constitutional powers to ban CRT  in education and its related student activity requirements (including student lobbying and demonstrations as part of school credit). They need to do the same with. Every Republican state attorney general should immediately grab Montana Attorney General Knudsen’s Binding Opinion On Critical Race Theory and adapt it for their own state. Every state legislature, backed by every Republican governor, must clearly legislate against any form of CRT, in education, government, business, or housing. Oklahoma and Idaho were the early achievers on banning CRT in public education.

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey’s veto of just such legislation is a national disgrace and a sign that he is a corporatist Nixon-Bush Republican, not a Reagan-Trump Republican. His laughable assertion that he did so to force a budget bill is false on its face, as the budget must be passed within weeks by law. His real purpose was to gut real Arizona resistance to the left, for whatever self-serving reason.

Before speaking or writing, every official and their staff need to commit the phrases from Christopher Rufo’s “Critical Race Theory Briefing Book.” No stupid utterances that subvert the cause of rolling back the left.

Defining critical race theory

“Critical race theory divides Americans into oppressor and oppressed based on their skin color.”
“Critical race theory says the solution to past discrimination is present discrimination. I reject this. Racism is always wrong.”
“I oppose racism, whether it comes from the Klan or from critical race theory.”

[…]

Critical race theory in schools

“Race reeducation programs”
“Neo-racist theories have no place in public education.”
“Critical race theory teaches children that they are defined by their race, not as individuals.”
“Critical race theory teaches children to hate each other and hate their country.”

Anti-CRT legislation

“Neo-racist theories have no place in our public institutions.”
“Public institutions must reflect the values of the public—not fringe racial theories that seek to divide Americans into oppressor and oppressed.”
“This bill does not prevent schools from teaching about racism, slavery, and segregation. It prohibits schools from indoctrinating students into fringe racial theories that claim one race is superior to another or that individuals should be treated differently on the basis of race.”

Starting Election Night 2016, McConnell, Lyin’ Ryan and their congressional cronies were the dog that caught the bumper. If McConnell and McCarthy are leading their caucus into the 2022 election, any incumbent that has not denounced them publicly is colluding and conspiring to ride the “stop the left” money train just like they did the “repeal Obamacare” train. Any candidate that is not pledged to a change of Republican congressional leadership is looking to get in on the gravy train. Only the real act of political courage of pledging now to completely change leadership counts as a trustworthy indicator of real fight for real reform.


* CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION – ARTICLE IV LEGISLATIVE [SEC. 1 – SEC. 28]
( Heading of Article 4 amended Nov. 8, 1966, by Prop. 1-a. Res.Ch. 139, 1966 1st Ex. Sess. )

Sec. 12.  (a) Within the first 10 days of each calendar year, the Governor shall submit to the Legislature, with an explanatory message, a budget for the ensuing fiscal year containing itemized statements for recommended state expenditures and estimated state revenues. If recommended expenditures exceed estimated revenues, the Governor shall recommend the sources from which the additional revenues should be provided.

(b) The Governor and the Governor-elect may require a state agency, officer or employee to furnish whatever information is deemed necessary to prepare the budget.

(c) (1) The budget shall be accompanied by a budget bill itemizing recommended expenditures.

(2) The budget bill shall be introduced immediately in each house by the persons chairing the committees that consider the budget.

(3) The Legislature shall pass the budget bill by midnight on June 15 of each year.

(4) Until the budget bill has been enacted, the Legislature shall not send to the Governor for consideration any bill appropriating funds for expenditure during the fiscal year for which the budget bill is to be enacted, except emergency bills recommended by the Governor or appropriations for the salaries and expenses of the Legislature.

(d) No bill except the budget bill may contain more than one item of appropriation, and that for one certain, expressed purpose. Appropriations from the General Fund of the State, except appropriations for the public schools and appropriations in the budget bill and in other bills providing for appropriations related to the budget bill, are void unless passed in each house by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring.

(e) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or of this Constitution, the budget bill and other bills providing for appropriations related to the budget bill may be passed in each house by rollcall vote entered in the journal, a majority of the membership concurring, to take effect immediately upon being signed by the Governor or upon a date specified in the legislation. Nothing in this subdivision shall affect the vote requirement for appropriations for the public schools contained in subdivision (d) of this section and in subdivision (b) of Section 8 of this article.

(2) For purposes of this section, “other bills providing for appropriations related to the budget bill” shall consist only of bills identified as related to the budget in the budget bill passed by the Legislature.

(f) The Legislature may control the submission, approval, and enforcement of budgets and the filing of claims for all state agencies.

(g) For the 2004–05 fiscal year, or any subsequent fiscal year, the Legislature may not send to the Governor for consideration, nor may the Governor sign into law, a budget bill that would appropriate from the General Fund, for that fiscal year, a total amount that, when combined with all appropriations from the General Fund for that fiscal year made as of the date of the budget bill’s passage, and the amount of any General Fund moneys transferred to the Budget Stabilization Account for that fiscal year pursuant to Section 20 of Article XVI, exceeds General Fund revenues for that fiscal year estimated as of the date of the budget bill’s passage. That estimate of General Fund revenues shall be set forth in the budget bill passed by the Legislature.

(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or of this Constitution, including subdivision (c) of this section, Section 4 of this article, and Sections 4 and 8 of Article III, in any year in which the budget bill is not passed by the Legislature by midnight on June 15, there shall be no appropriation from the current budget or future budget to pay any salary or reimbursement for travel or living expenses for Members of the Legislature during any regular or special session for the period from midnight on June 15 until the day that the budget bill is presented to the Governor. No salary or reimbursement for travel or living expenses forfeited pursuant to this subdivision shall be paid retroactively.

(Sec. 12 amended Nov. 2, 2010, by Prop. 25. Initiative measure.)

SEC. 12.5.
Within 10 days following the submission of a budget pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 12, following the proposed adjustments to the Governor’s Budget required by subdivision (e) of Section 13308 of the Government Code or a successor statute, and following the enactment of the budget bill, or as soon as feasible thereafter, the Director of Finance shall submit to the Legislature both of the following:

(a) Estimates of General Fund revenues for the ensuing fiscal year and for the three fiscal years thereafter.

(b) Estimates of General Fund expenditures for the ensuing fiscal year and for the three fiscal years thereafter.

(Sec. 12.5 added Nov. 4, 2014, by Prop. 2. Res.Ch. 1, 2013-14 2nd Ex. Sess.)

Published in Domestic Policy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

There are 19 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ekosj Member
    Ekosj
    @Ekosj

    NJs constitution prohibits State Gov’t from borrowing to fund current operations.
    Well…except if it’s an emergency.

    And Covid was an emergency.   So to keep the 2020 planned spending increases intact, Murphy borrowed 4Billion @ 2% interest.   (Hey … it was a steal right? )

    Surprise, surprise it turns out they overestimated their emergency needs!    Who’d imagine that?    So now they are using the ‘excess’ to promise to make a full scheduled payment into NJs worst-in-the-country underfunded pension fund.

    Murphy’s administration should also be in a good position to manage the initial step up to full pension funding, thanks to a combination of factors, including money the state borrowed last year when it was expecting significant revenue losses would be triggered by the pandemic.

    See how that slight of hand works?   There is an “emergency“ (when isn’t there?) which required borrowing and then Badda bing badda bang badda boom the borrowed money gets used for a purpose they wouldn’t have been able to borrow for.    The taxpayers are on the hook so Murphy can satisfy his Public Employee Union supporters’ financial needs.

     

    • #1
  2. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    AG Knudsen in Montana has written an excellent opinion condemning Critical Race Theory. I hope, as you recommend, that other governors take up his ideas and act accordingly. Good for him! Thanks for the update, Clifford.

    • #2
  3. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Clifford, this is an example of how a crank theory can become the accepted “truth”.  This is an “editorial” cartoon that is being seen all of the country.

    https://www.timesfreepress.com/cartoons/2021/jun/05/critical-race-theory/4918/

    We’re in for a long haul; a very long haul.  However, this is a fight that we cannot lose.

     

    • #3
  4. kedavis Member
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Clifford, this is an example of how a crank theory can become the accepted “truth”. This is an “editorial” cartoon that is being seen all of the country.

    https://www.timesfreepress.com/cartoons/2021/jun/05/critical-race-theory/4918/

    We’re in for a long haul; a very long haul. However, this is a fight that we cannot lose.

    Why not just include it?

     

     

     

    • #4
  5. kedavis Member
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    But, I don’t get the point.

    • #5
  6. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Clifford, this is an example of how a crank theory can become the accepted “truth”. This is an “editorial” cartoon that is being seen all of the country.

    https://www.timesfreepress.com/cartoons/2021/jun/05/critical-race-theory/4918/

    We’re in for a long haul; a very long haul. However, this is a fight that we cannot lose.

    Why not just include it?

     

     

     

    This drawing from that scene in Men in Black?

    • #6
  7. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Clifford, this is an example of how a crank theory can become the accepted “truth”. This is an “editorial” cartoon that is being seen all of the country.

    https://www.timesfreepress.com/cartoons/2021/jun/05/critical-race-theory/4918/

    We’re in for a long haul; a very long haul. However, this is a fight that we cannot lose.

    Why not just include it?

     

     

     

    I do everything from my notepad; it’s difficult to include anything except a link…

    • #7
  8. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    kedavis (View Comment):

    But, I don’t get the point.

    I assume you’re joking…

    • #8
  9. kedavis Member
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    But, I don’t get the point.

    I assume you’re joking…

    Probably not.  She’s being protected to learn critical race theory?  Doesn’t exactly shiver my britches.

    • #9
  10. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    But, I don’t get the point.

    I assume you’re joking…

    Probably not. She’s being protected to learn critical race theory? Doesn’t exactly shiver my britches.

    Uhhhh, You don’t remember Norman Rockwell’s famous painting from the late 50s?

    • #10
  11. kedavis Member
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    But, I don’t get the point.

    I assume you’re joking…

    Probably not. She’s being protected to learn critical race theory? Doesn’t exactly shiver my britches.

    Uhhhh, You don’t remember Norman Rockwell’s famous painting from the late 50s?

    Yes, but apparently it doesn’t translate the same for me.

    • #11
  12. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Uhhhh, You don’t remember Norman Rockwell’s famous painting from the late 50s?

    Oh. Of course. I get it.

    Thank you.

    • #12
  13. Clifford A. Brown Contributor
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    AG Knudsen in Montana has written an excellent opinion condemning Critical Race Theory. I hope, as you recommend, that other governors take up his ideas and act accordingly. Good for him! Thanks for the update, Clifford.

    You are welcome. The first paragraph started in a comment on @unsk post “Biden’s ‘Infrastructure Plan’ includes a direct assault on Single Family Home ownership and the Single Family Home suburbs.”

    • #13
  14. Ontheleftcoast Member
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Jack Posobiec at Human Events reports that it really is in the Army now:

    More and more it seems like the Left really wants a race war.  They are doing everything possible to worsen racial tensions in this country.

    And to guarantee their victory in that race war, it seems like they will employ the US military.

    Not kidding.

    A very woke Lt Colonel, with pronouns in his bio, made it crystal clear what the role and future of the US military will be.

    Update: Fort Carson has contacted Human Events and indicated they are looking into the story and intend to share a response. This story will be updated as informalities present.

    JWB at the Gun Free Zone comments:

    This isn’t some chariborne public affairs or JAG officer.

    This is the commander of a combined arms infantry battalion.

    The man who is spewing racial animosity has the authority to order his troops to shoot you with a 120mm smoothbore cannon.

    JWB also thinks he has some of Col Rhodes’ tweets:

     

    This officer is so Woke he wants to upend the UCMJ and elimante any established rights of the accused and the ability to be judged without bias.

    Any comments from the author of the OP, @bossmongo and/or any other Army folks.

     

     

    • #14
  15. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Ontheleftcoast (View Comment):

    Jack Posobiec at Human Events reports that it really is in the Army now:

    More and more it seems like the Left really wants a race war. They are doing everything possible to worsen racial tensions in this country.

    And to guarantee their victory in that race war, it seems like they will employ the US military.

    Not kidding.

    A very woke Lt Colonel, with pronouns in his bio, made it crystal clear what the role and future of the US military will be.

    Update: Fort Carson has contacted Human Events and indicated they are looking into the story and intend to share a response. This story will be updated as informalities present.

    JWB at the Gun Free Zone comments:

    This isn’t some chariborne public affairs or JAG officer.

    This is the commander of a combined arms infantry battalion.

    The man who is spewing racial animosity has the authority to order his troops to shoot you with a 120mm smoothbore cannon.

    JWB also thinks he has some of Col Rhodes’ tweets:

     

    This officer is so Woke he wants to upend the UCMJ and elimante any established rights of the accused and the ability to be judged without bias.

    Any comments from the author of the OP, @ bossmongo and/or any other Army folks.

     

     

    I saw the same link at Human Events this morning.  As the article shows, this is not some staff weenie but a battalion commander of an infantry unit.  When he’s openly contemptuous of “Vetbros”, he’s talking about his own Senior NCOs; so, I figure that the contempt will be coming right back to him (in spades).

    My condolences to everyone under his command.  He is truly a disgrace to the uniform.

    • #15
  16. Clifford A. Brown Contributor
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Ontheleftcoast (View Comment):

    Jack Posobiec at Human Events reports that it really is in the Army now:

    More and more it seems like the Left really wants a race war. They are doing everything possible to worsen racial tensions in this country.

    And to guarantee their victory in that race war, it seems like they will employ the US military.

    Not kidding.

    A very woke Lt Colonel, with pronouns in his bio, made it crystal clear what the role and future of the US military will be.

    Update: Fort Carson has contacted Human Events and indicated they are looking into the story and intend to share a response. This story will be updated as informalities present.

    JWB at the Gun Free Zone comments:

    This isn’t some chariborne public affairs or JAG officer.

    This is the commander of a combined arms infantry battalion.

    The man who is spewing racial animosity has the authority to order his troops to shoot you with a 120mm smoothbore cannon.

    JWB also thinks he has some of Col Rhodes’ tweets:

     

    This officer is so Woke he wants to upend the UCMJ and elimante any established rights of the accused and the ability to be judged without bias.

    Any comments from the author of the OP, @ bossmongo and/or any other Army folks.

     

     

    I saw the same link at Human Events this morning. As the article shows, this is not some staff weenie but a battalion commander of an infantry unit. When he’s openly contemptuous of “Vetbros”, he’s talking about his own Senior NCOs; so, I figure that the contempt will be coming right back to him (in spades).

    My condolences to everyone under his command. He is truly a disgrace to the uniform.

    I would not accept that kind of social media post, attacking the laws and regulations, from a subordinate commander. The problem is that he is following the lead of the rotten, politicized leaders at the very top. So, if his brigade commander has an issue with this inappropriate conduct, that brigade commander must be cautious of not taking fire from higher.

    • #16
  17. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    Ontheleftcoast (View Comment):

    Jack Posobiec at Human Events reports that it really is in the Army now:

    More and more it seems like the Left really wants a race war. They are doing everything possible to worsen racial tensions in this country.

    And to guarantee their victory in that race war, it seems like they will employ the US military.

    Not kidding.

    A very woke Lt Colonel, with pronouns in his bio, made it crystal clear what the role and future of the US military will be.

    Update: Fort Carson has contacted Human Events and indicated they are looking into the story and intend to share a response. This story will be updated as informalities present.

    JWB at the Gun Free Zone comments:

    This isn’t some chariborne public affairs or JAG officer.

    This is the commander of a combined arms infantry battalion.

    The man who is spewing racial animosity has the authority to order his troops to shoot you with a 120mm smoothbore cannon.

    JWB also thinks he has some of Col Rhodes’ tweets:

     

    This officer is so Woke he wants to upend the UCMJ and elimante any established rights of the accused and the ability to be judged without bias.

    Any comments from the author of the OP, @ bossmongo and/or any other Army folks.

     

     

    I saw the same link at Human Events this morning. As the article shows, this is not some staff weenie but a battalion commander of an infantry unit. When he’s openly contemptuous of “Vetbros”, he’s talking about his own Senior NCOs; so, I figure that the contempt will be coming right back to him (in spades).

    My condolences to everyone under his command. He is truly a disgrace to the uniform.

    I would not accept that kind of social media post, attacking the laws and regulations, from a subordinate commander. The problem is that he is following the lead of the rotten, politicized leaders at the very top. So, if his brigade commander has an issue with this inappropriate conduct, that brigade commander must be cautious of not taking fire from higher.

    Exactly.  It appears he will be treated a bit differently that LTC Lohmeier…

    • #17
  18. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    The guy says, “We need to talk about it,” but also hides his tweets. So we’re talking about it, but apparently he didn’t mean “we” when he said “we.” 

    • #18
  19. Clifford A. Brown Contributor
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Winning locally:

    Southlake, Texas residents used every tool:

    Opponents, however, told a series of heated meetings for the Carroll school district that the plan created “diversity police” — and was effectively “reverse racism” pushing a “left-wing agenda,” the Dallas Morning News previously reported.

    They even went to court and won a temporary restraining order to stop implementation, the paper noted.

    Voters also sent a resounding message against the plan at the weekend election — with the two school board positions as well as mayor and city council seats going to opponents of the “cultural competence,” with each getting almost 70 percent of the vote.

    “Critical Race Theory ain’t coming here,” tweeted the Southlake Families PAC that supported the victorious candidates in the wealthy suburb about 30 miles northwest of Dallas.

    “This is what happens when good people stand up and say, not in my town, not on my watch,” said the group, which first started to oppose the implementation of the 34-page action plan.

    Radio host Dana Loesch, who lives in the district, also celebrated the “LANDSLIDE VICTORY.”

    Rapid City, South Dakota voters did not wait for the governor or state legislature to act.

    An enthusiastic coalition of parents, grandparents, taxpayers, businesspeople, and Christians rallied around the American flag to win 4 out of 4 positions up for election on the 7-member School Board. Displaying the American flag appeared to be a key element in these successful races. . . .

    SDPIE also reported that the local Republican Party awoke from their years of slumber discovering to their surprise that the current school board members were mostly registered Democrats. They began to weigh-in, joining the old warriors of the Tea Party movement, SDPIE, South Dakota Citizens for Liberty, Family Heritage Alliance Action and the homeschooling network. This collaboration was fundamental to the success of the election upset, which unseated even the Board’s president.

     

    • #19