Trump, Melania Test Positive for COVID-19

 

President Trump took to Twitter just before 1 a.m. ET to announce that both he and the First Lady tested positive for COVID-19.

Sean Conley, the Physician to the President, released the following statement:

I release the following information with the permission of President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

This evening I received confirmation that both President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump have tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The President and the First Lady are both well at this time and they plan to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence.

The White House medical team and I will maintain a vigilant watch, and I appreciate the support provided by some of our country’s greatest medical professionals and institutions. Rest assured I expect the President to continue carrying out his duties without disruption while recovering, and I will keep you updated on any future developments.

Get well soon, President and First Lady!

Published in General

Comments are closed on this post.

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 506 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    • #301
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I just read that President Trump will be hospitalized at Walter Reed for a couple of days while tests are run. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwJZJVJRlNDbTbfjjXFSPnHKDvf

    Can we all agree to pray for his good health and for our country?

    You want to destroy the nation by voting for Biden. You don’t want its good health, you want its utter destruction.

    Further, you rooted for Trump to die with your Pence fantasy.

    Again, using you value set on judgment of what people say.

    Can we just pray for President Trump and our country?

    • #302
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Folks, let’s just wish President Trump and his wife well.

    It’s really too late for you to do that now because you essentially already wished him ill(er) with your Pence-Haley comment.

    This is who you have allowed yourself to become.

    Yes, but we simply have to be able to forgive each other if this nation is going to survive. There was more brotherly feeling after the Civil War in this country than between some quarters in America right now.

    I’m hoping to open Gary’s eyes to the wickedness of wishing the Left on us patriots, Christians, Jews, immigrants who are fugitives from communism. . . I will be happy to forgive him — delighted, actually — if he acknowledges that his anti-Trumpism is de facto support for the terrorists on our streets ruining peoples’ lives and livelihoods. This election isn’t about Trump. It’s about America-lovers versus America-haters. Choose a side.

    I didn’t want to get on this thread, but this comment is so on point that I can’t help myself. Most here wish Trump were a lot better than he is, mostly just as it relates to his personal behaviors not his professional performance. For Joe Biden, many think he could be much worse, although that might be doubtful with regard to his professional performance. But where we are is not about Trump or Biden, it is a confrontation between the sides named above and President Trump and former Vice-President Biden are representing and leading these opposing sides. Trump supporters are supporting the direction he is taking us, too much gets made of it being about him, it’s not.

     

     

     

    • #303
  4. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Americans died because Trump turned wearing masks into a political issue rather than a matter of common sense.

    It was always a political issue, from the very beginning.

    Why did it have to be?

    Everything is political.

    • #304
  5. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    • Restricted who can use Abbot Labs’ fast COVID tests – tests that could be used to screen airline passengers 

    You are blaming Trump for an action by the same deep state that is the mortal enemy of everything Trump. 

     

     

    • #305
  6. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Biden’s not much, but at least he’s trying to set a good example

    No, he’s not.

    • #306
  7. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    Again, nobody refutes my assertion that mask wearing will become mandatory under the leftests.  What omnipotent being will tell me it is alright to take it off, if ever.

    • #307
  8. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    • #308
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    In the hospital, mask are thrown away after each brief use and do what they were designed for. This is not done by the public.

    Right, because Trump’s policies made it all but impossible to obtain throw away masks for the first five months of the pandemic:

    https://www.econlib.org/impoverishing-economic-illiteracy/

    https://www.barrons.com/articles/one-reason-ppe-gloves-are-hard-to-buy-china-tariffs-51586944801

    Trump’s policies? Or the CDC/NIH infrastructure giving advice. And how did this happen?

    Blaming Trump for CDC/NIH policies is like blaming Trump for DOJ’s illegal surveillance of Trump. 

    Some people just don’t know how not to blame Trump.

    • #309
  10. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all. 

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask? 

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through.  Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    • #310
  11. OldPhil Coolidge
    OldPhil
    @OldPhil

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through. Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    See the source image

    • #311
  12. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through. Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    See the source image

    A snowfence is not effective in keeping a gentle snowfall from landing where it lands. It is effective in keeping snow off the roads, though. Even in a blizzard, even if the prevailing winds are from the lake, that particular snowfence will be as effective as someone wearing a mask over his nose. 

    • #312
  13. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Again, nobody refutes my assertion that mask wearing will become mandatory under the leftests. What omnipotent being will tell me it is alright to take it off, if ever.

    Thanos?

    • #313
  14. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    So you are the self-appointed Trump Avenger who wildly attacks someone you disagree with? You really ought to see a counselor about that.

    • #314
  15. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    So you are the self-appointed Trump Avenger who wildly attacks someone you disagree with? You really ought to see a counselor about that.

    Here is something for you to consider: An argument is not an Uber ride. You can’t take it only as far as you want. Someone will take it to its logical conclusion. 

    Now, I have no idea what you mean by “Trumpism”. If by that term you mean adherence to Trump’s policies, you cannot rationally oppose Trumpism. His policies are the best in living memory, with the possible exception of Reagan’s first term. Opposing them would make your views incoherent at best. OK, spending. You can oppose some of that if you want; so do I. 

    If by “Trumpism” you mean something like a cult revolving around Trump himself, I have to say I don’t know anyone in the cult. So why don’t you drop the tone of driving Trumpism out and driving a stake through its heart. You’re getting tiresome. 

    • #315
  16. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    In the hospital, mask are thrown away after each brief use and do what they were designed for. This is not done by the public.

    Right, because Trump’s policies made it all but impossible to obtain throw away masks for the first five months of the pandemic:

    https://www.econlib.org/impoverishing-economic-illiteracy/

    There you go again.

    https://www.barrons.com/articles/one-reason-ppe-gloves-are-hard-to-buy-china-tariffs-51586944801

     

    • #316
  17. OldPhil Coolidge
    OldPhil
    @OldPhil

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through. Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    See the source image

    A snowfence is not effective in keeping a gentle snowfall from landing where it lands. It is effective in keeping snow off the roads, though. Even in a blizzard, even if the prevailing winds are from the lake, that particular snowfence will be as effective as someone wearing a mask over his nose.

    The point is that the snow is everywhere, fence or no fence.

    • #317
  18. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Biden’s not much, but at least he’s trying to set a good example

    No, he’s not.

    I noticed he said the polite formalities and best wishes then went into a little promo on wearing masks….just a sly dig at Trump to continue the lie about him not wearing masks. BTW, haven’t seen in TV anchors or reporters wearing masks while they work indoors, other than press conference show theater.

    • #318
  19. EB Thatcher
    EB
    @EB

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):
    Were Birchers racists? I associate them more with paranoid conspiracy theories, such as the idea that fluoridation of water was a Commie plot.

    I don’t think they were racists. They had black members (not very many) and several black speakers in their speakers bureau.  My understanding of the objection to fluoridation was not that it was a communist plot, but that the government shouldn’t be doing mass medication of the public.  Fluoridation of course has been a benefit, but we see people saying similar things today. 

    My husband and I had dinner last night with a couple  who are dear friends of ours.  They were adamant that they would not take a COVID vaccine because they didn’t want the government telling them what to do.  They don’t wear masks and walk out of stores that require it.  (Interestingly, they have no problem with “the government” saying, “Your child can’t go to school without a measles vaccination.”)

    They were surprised at our reaction.  My husband went to Oxford and is familiar with the group that is working on the vaccine.  If their trials are successful, we would certainly want the vaccine.  We would prefer not to get the virus than recover from it.

    And we are praying for Pres. Trump and his wife as we pray for all who are infected.

    • #319
  20. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    The organizations are run by Trump’s people.

    That’s not true. The deep state is run by the deep state, and it has ever been that way in every country that has had a managerial state.  You seem not to have paid attention during the past four years, or even during the past couple millenia.  Trump puts people at the top, but they don’t run the agencies. Sometimes they can exert some influence until Trump’s deep state enemies get those efforts overturned by the courts. It’s an ongoing conflict between Trump and the deep state.  

    And I remember being assured – right here on Ricochet during the 2016 election – that Trump hires only the best people.

    He does. That’s why they are opposed by the government.  

     

    • #320
  21. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Blaming Trump for CDC/NIH policies is like blaming Trump for DOJ’s illegal surveillance of Trump. 

    Some people just don’t know how not to blame Trump.

    Same with the Biden/Wallace team blaming him for the 2020 recession. Blaming him for the virus itself. Blaming him for the riots. It’s always projection with these people.

    • #321
  22. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Wind blowing across a snowy field picks up some of the snow. The faster the wind blows. the more snow it can carry. Slowing the wind down with a snow fence causes some of the snow to be redeposited on the ground and prevents it from reaching something, such as a road. 

    • #322
  23. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    EHerring (View Comment):
    BTW, haven’t seen in TV anchors or reporters wearing masks while they work indoors, other than press conference show theater.

    I’ve seen some remarkable face-mask theater from reporters doing stand-ups outside. By themselves. With nobody within 50 yards  of them.

    Face-mask theater is so ridiculous. Wear one when you need to. Take it off when you don’t. Keeping it on when you don’t need to, to show that you’re a good citizen is just . . . narcissism.

    • #323
  24. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Blaming Trump for CDC/NIH policies is like blaming Trump for DOJ’s illegal surveillance of Trump.

    Some people just don’t know how not to blame Trump.

    Same with the Biden/Wallace team blaming him for the 2020 recession. Blaming him for the virus itself. Blaming him for the riots. It’s always projection with these people.

    You are just too generous. Projection is a subconscious or unconscious defense mechanism to compensate for deficiencies or failures. They actually do these things and consciously do their best to attribute them to others, frequently Trump.

    • #324
  25. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through. Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    See the source image

    A snowfence is not effective in keeping a gentle snowfall from landing where it lands. It is effective in keeping snow off the roads, though. Even in a blizzard, even if the prevailing winds are from the lake, that particular snowfence will be as effective as someone wearing a mask over his nose.

    The point is that the snow is everywhere, fence or no fence.

    That’s not the point of a snowfence. The point of a snowfence is to keep the roads from drifting in and keeping traffic from getting through.  The point of a snowfence is to keep the roads open, a point that seems to have been lost on the people who erected the one in the photo. (It’s not hard to find guidelines on the web on snowfence placement.)

    In the case of a mask, viruses will get through. But the point isn’t to keep every last virus from passing through. That would be nice if it could be done, but it’s not practical for most people. But if you can reduce the airborne spread of viruses, a lot of people’s natural, non-specific immune systems will probably be able to handle those that sneak through, if there aren’t too many.  (It doesn’t help people whose immune systems are shot; those people need to take more severe measures.)  And if enough viruses sneak through to cause an infection, it might be a less severe infection if the viral load is kept down.

    That’s what I expect masks of the type most of us are using to do.  They aren’t magic. But they can help make the problem manageable. 

    • #325
  26. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    These people.

    • #326
  27. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

    Well enough to be effective. It’s not exactly the same phenomenon, but the holes in a snowfence are big enough for snowflakes to pass through. Yet a snowfence is effective in keeping snow off the roads.

    See the source image

    A snowfence is not effective in keeping a gentle snowfall from landing where it lands. It is effective in keeping snow off the roads, though. Even in a blizzard, even if the prevailing winds are from the lake, that particular snowfence will be as effective as someone wearing a mask over his nose.

    The point is that the snow is everywhere, fence or no fence.

    That’s not the point of a snowfence. The point of a snowfence is to keep the roads from drifting in and keeping traffic from getting through. The point of a snowfence is to keep the roads open, a point that seems to have been lost on the people who erected the one in the photo. (It’s not hard to find guidelines on the web on snowfence placement.)

    In the case of a mask, viruses will get through. But the point isn’t to keep every last virus from passing through. That would be nice if it could be done, but it’s not practical for most people. But if you can reduce the airborne spread of viruses, a lot of people’s natural, non-specific immune systems will probably be able to handle those that sneak through, if there aren’t too many. (It doesn’t help people whose immune systems are shot; those people need to take more severe measures.) And if enough viruses sneak through to cause an infection, it might be a less severe infection if the viral load is kept down.

    That’s what I expect masks of the type most of us are using to do. They aren’t magic. But they can help make the problem manageable.

    That’s my understanding, the term I’ve heard used is ‘viral load’, a measure of density of viral particles both in the air and in an infected person. It affects the severity of the viral infection. I’ve heard it used to explain some of the reasons for the effects in very crowded locations like New York City. Match high viral load with weak resistance and you get bad results.

    • #327
  28. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    EHerring (View Comment):
    BTW, haven’t seen in TV anchors or reporters wearing masks while they work indoors, other than press conference show theater.

    I’ve seen some remarkable face-mask theater from reporters doing stand-ups outside. By themselves. With nobody within 50 yards of them.

    Face-mask theater is so ridiculous. Wear one when you need to. Take it off when you don’t. Keeping it on when you don’t need to, to show that you’re a good citizen is just . . . narcissism.

    A couple weeks ago I stopped at a Bigby’s to get a sandwich and coffee on a bicycle ride. I had to wear a mask inside, and then I brought my lunch outside to take over to the town park a few blocks away. Usually I take my mask off right away when I step outside, but that time I forgot, maybe because my hands were busy at first holding stuff. Anyway I was halfway to the park when I realized I still had my mask on. It was embarrassing. I didn’t want to be one of those idiots I make fun of, who are wearing a mask when they are outside and are not near other people. I managed to yank it off before I got to the park.  Whew. My virtue signal remained intact.  

    • #328
  29. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    In the case of a mask, viruses will get through. But the point isn’t to keep every last virus from passing through. That would be nice if it could be done, but it’s not practical for most people. But if you can reduce the airborne spread of viruses, a lot of people’s natural, non-specific immune systems will probably be able to handle those that sneak through, if there aren’t too many. (It doesn’t help people whose immune systems are shot; those people need to take more severe measures.) And if enough viruses sneak through to cause an infection, it might be a less severe infection if the viral load is kept down.

    That’s what I expect masks of the type most of us are using to do. They aren’t magic. But they can help make the problem manageable. 

    Right. It’s not magic. All we’re going for is a rational management of the probabilities. Someone in these crowds has a flu, someone has a cold, and someone might have covid. Maybe it’s me. Fewer viruses get around if we all learn to wear the dang masks on the MTR.

    Out on the hiking trail masks seem to me a thorough irrational management of the probabilities. This thing doesn’t transmit in open air, sunlight kills it, and we’re pretty dang socially distanced on the hiking trails.

    • #329
  30. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    • #330
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.

Comments are closed.