Trump, Melania Test Positive for COVID-19

 

President Trump took to Twitter just before 1 a.m. ET to announce that both he and the First Lady tested positive for COVID-19.

Sean Conley, the Physician to the President, released the following statement:

I release the following information with the permission of President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

This evening I received confirmation that both President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump have tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The President and the First Lady are both well at this time and they plan to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence.

The White House medical team and I will maintain a vigilant watch, and I appreciate the support provided by some of our country’s greatest medical professionals and institutions. Rest assured I expect the President to continue carrying out his duties without disruption while recovering, and I will keep you updated on any future developments.

Get well soon, President and First Lady!

Published in General

Comments are closed on this post.

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 506 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):
    Out on the hiking trail masks seem to me a thorough irrational management of the probabilities. This thing doesn’t transmit in open air, sunlight kills it, and we’re pretty dang socially distanced on the hiking trails.

    And yet, I’ve seen that, too. Was out hiking a trail outside of the city, and encountered a woman walking her dog. All masked up. The trail was wide enough that we could pass each other easily, and for maybe a split-second — maybe — we were within six feet of each other. Sure, she probably felt safer, but someone made her think that was necessary.

    • #331
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    They Live.

    Take off the sunglasses, and you won’t notice…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjw_DuNkOUw

    • #332
  3. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    Sorry, but I dispute your story. Any and all forms of advertisement these days must be completely balanced and feature all of the following: a black man or woman, an Hispanic man or woman, an interracial couple with a child, a homosexual couple with a child or at their own wedding, and a group of HIV positive men at some sort of dance class. “The person depicted” my arse.

    • #333
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    So you are the self-appointed Trump Avenger who wildly attacks someone you disagree with? You really ought to see a counselor about that.

    I am applying your rules for Trump to you. If you think it is unfair, maybe you are the one who needs to see the therapist. 

    • #334
  5. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    philo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    Sorry, but I dispute your story. Any and all forms of advertisement these days must be completely balanced and feature all of the following: a black man or woman, an Hispanic man or woman, an interracial couple with a child, a homosexual couple with a child or at their own wedding, and a group of HIV positive men at some sort of dance class. “The person depicted” my arse.

    It’s a woman.

    In fact, this banner on their website is the same as their billboard. No mention of the WuFlu at all. No reason for the mask. It’s just . . . a normalizing of an abnormal thing.

    • #335
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    Sorry, but I dispute your story. Any and all forms of advertisement these days must be completely balanced and feature all of the following: a black man or woman, an Hispanic man or woman, an interracial couple with a child, a homosexual couple with a child or at their own wedding, and a group of HIV positive men at some sort of dance class. “The person depicted” my arse.

    It’s a woman.

    In fact, this banner on their website is the same as their billboard. No mention of the WuFlu at all. No reason for the mask. It’s just . . . a normalizing of an abnormal thing.

    It’s crap.  But I might be less opposed if I owned a mask factory.

    • #336
  7. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The overwhelming majority of members of the Republican Party are not racists.

    Neither are the Proud Boys, that doesn’t stop you from labeling them as such.  And Qanon condemnation from a Charlottesville hoaxer rings hollow.

    • #337
  8. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):
    Out on the hiking trail masks seem to me a thorough irrational management of the probabilities. This thing doesn’t transmit in open air, sunlight kills it, and we’re pretty dang socially distanced on the hiking trails.

    And yet, I’ve seen that, too. Was out hiking a trail outside of the city, and encountered a woman walking her dog. All masked up. The trail was wide enough that we could pass each other easily, and for maybe a split-second — maybe — we were within six feet of each other. Sure, she probably felt safer, but someone made her think that was necessary.

    Seen it myself. An odd phenomenon.

    • #338
  9. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bryan G. Stephens, Trump Aveng… (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    So you are the self-appointed Trump Avenger who wildly attacks someone you disagree with? You really ought to see a counselor about that.

    I am applying your rules for Trump to you. If you think it is unfair, maybe you are the one who needs to see the therapist.

    So you are now a self-appointed vigilante.  

    You can’t back up your increasingly histrionic statements, while I make a point of doing so when challenged, and when I am wrong, promptly make amends.  

    Your behavior is not indicative of a dinner party, it is indicative of a bar brawl, and thus violates the Code of Conduct.

    Please provide documentation of your screeds, or apologize and move on.

    • #339
  10. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    Sorry, but I dispute your story. Any and all forms of advertisement these days must be completely balanced and feature all of the following: a black man or woman, an Hispanic man or woman, an interracial couple with a child, a homosexual couple with a child or at their own wedding, and a group of HIV positive men at some sort of dance class. “The person depicted” my arse.

    It’s a woman.

    In fact, this banner on their website is the same as their billboard. No mention of the WuFlu at all. No reason for the mask. It’s just . . . a normalizing of an abnormal thing.

    Every person that I have come across in a bank for months now wears a mask.  If they aren’t wearing a mask, the bank security officer denies entry.  To show someone without a mask would have been like showing someone who isn’t wearing clothes.

    • #340
  11. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The overwhelming majority of members of the Republican Party are not racists.

    Neither are the Proud Boys, that doesn’t stop you from labeling them as such. And Qanon condemnation from a Charlottesville hoaxer rings hollow.

    This comes from the last or almost last person who uses a confederate flag as part of his avatar.  Mississippi just changed their flag.  South Carolina took down the confederate flag from the flagpole at their capital.

    Are you now standing up for Q-Anon?  I have not met anyone at Ricochet who claims to do so.  [Ed. Note: According to NPR, the U.S. House of Representatives just denounced Q-Anon by a 371-18 vote.]

    • #341
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    I’m probably going to do a thread on it, but there’s a billboard near my house for a bank, and although the billboard has absolutely no mention of COVID or safety or anything related the virus, the person depicted on the billboard is all masked up.

    It bothers me every time I drive by it.

    Sorry, but I dispute your story. Any and all forms of advertisement these days must be completely balanced and feature all of the following: a black man or woman, an Hispanic man or woman, an interracial couple with a child, a homosexual couple with a child or at their own wedding, and a group of HIV positive men at some sort of dance class. “The person depicted” my arse.

    It’s a woman.

    In fact, this banner on their website is the same as their billboard. No mention of the WuFlu at all. No reason for the mask. It’s just . . . a normalizing of an abnormal thing.

    Every person that I have Come across in a bank for months now wears a mask. If they aren’t wearing a mask, the bank security officer denies entry. To show someone without a mask would have been like showing someone who isn’t wearing clothes.

    So far they haven’t been making TV series-es and movies with everyone wearing masks.  But that might be coming.  I know I’ve heard that there are porn videos being made with masks… wtf could be the point, really?

    On the other hand, once the backlog caught up, I noticed many of the comic strips had their characters wearing masks.  Including Dilbert, which was especially disappointing.  Scott Adams, Scott Adams, why hast thou forsaken us???

    • #342
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I am going to say this again. They don’t have any idea how much a state mask mandate changes the R0. All of this money and grief and they have no idea. 

    I think people should be forced to wear them in certain obviously risky situations, and that’s it. 

    If a spreader has a mask on,  and you spend a long time around them indoors, it isn’t going to make a difference.

    • #343
  14. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The overwhelming majority of members of the Republican Party are not racists.

    Neither are the Proud Boys, that doesn’t stop you from labeling them as such. And Qanon condemnation from a Charlottesville hoaxer rings hollow.

    This comes from the last or almost last person who uses a confederate flag as part of his avatar. Mississippi just changed their flag. South Carolina took down the confederate flag from the flagpole at their capital.

    Are you now standing up for Q-Anon? I have not met anyone at Ricochet who claims to do so. [Ed. Note: According to NPR, the U.S. House of Representatives just denounced Q-Anon by a 371-18 vote.]

    And of course, you respond with anti-Southern bigotry and oblique accusations of racism toward someone on the basis of a progressive narrative.  Much like you previously kept insisting that it was Southerners who were responsible for ‘inflicting’ the ‘racist’ Trump on the Republican party, despite being told again and again that he received more support from non-Southern states throughout the primary.  Just as you are now slandering thousands of innocent people as racist who belong to an organization that is led by a black Cuban, because you are filled with the same irrational animosity and prejudices that afflict your Democrat allies.  As for Qanon, they are relatively harmless conspiracy theorists compared to the domestic terrorists and Orwellian racists who effectively dominate the Democrat party.

     

     

    • #344
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary is like this guy. He’s a lawyer that always makes lawyer arguments as if he’s defending a client instead of arguing like a regular person. 

    Mayo is in charge of one of the Trump resistance things called Principles First. Everybody around him is funded by Pierre Omidyear. He will babble about propriety, but he’s completely on board with the Lincoln Project.

    • #345
  16. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I think the reality is, the Proud Boys aren’t that bad but Gavin is on tape saying some pretty nutty stuff. This was an excellent interview.

     

     

     

    • #346
  17. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    https://babylonbee.com/news/coronavirus-panics-after-testing-positive-for-trump

    • #347
  18. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    You can’t back up your increasingly histrionic statements, while I make a point of doing so when challenged, and when I am wrong, promptly make amends.

    Recently you commented with a cursory list of false smears against Trump.  One of them was the out of context Charlottesville smear that is used to falsely portray Trump as racist.  You wrote that Trump said: There are fine people on both sides.

    The context of this fragment of what he said is that Trump had immediately and rightly said that he specifically condemns the KKK and nazis.  Virtually in the same breath he says that there are also fine people on both sides, referring to those who want to either preserve the statue in Charlottesville for cultural and historical reasons and people who want to have it removed because they find it to be socially offensive.

    Will you condemn this slur that deliberately and falsely implies that Trump was condoning racism?  And will you retract this slur and admit that you wrote it to falsely impugn and malign Trump?  And will you apologize for promoting such a slur on this site to those who read it?

    It matters — because slurs — and honesty — matter.

    • #348
  19. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    You can’t back up your increasingly histrionic statements, while I make a point of doing so when challenged, and when I am wrong, promptly make amends.

    Recently you commented with a cursory list of false smears against Trump. One of them was the out of context Charlottesville smear that is used to falsely portray Trump as racist. You wrote that Trump said: There are fine people on both sides.

    The context of this fragment of what he said is that Trump had immediately and rightly said that he specifically condemns the KKK and nazis. Virtually in the same breath he says that there are also fine people on both sides, referring to those who want to either preserve the statue in Charlottesville for cultural and historical reasons and people who want to have it removed because they find it to be socially offensive.

    Will you condemn this slur that deliberately and falsely implies that Trump was condoning racism? And will you retract this slur and admit that you wrote it to falsely impugn and malign Trump? And will you apologize for promoting such a slur on this site to those who read it?

    It matters — because slurs — and honesty — matter.

    This^ 

    • #349
  20. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):
    It is a well meaning “let’s make the people feel like they’re contributing to the betterment of mankind” and hopefully it does something which we are unable to measure, but we’ll go ahead and scold others when they don’t follow the “rules” we have know way of knowing even make a bit of difference.

    No, it’s a recognition that something is better then nothing in this case. Wearing a mask helps stop transmission, and we think may lessen the severity of infection if you do get it ( believed to be due to lower initial inoculum of virus).  Obviously it would be great if everyone acted like adults and wore the best mask they could, but in reality some are going to just wear a FU face covering, and the government has recognized it’s not worth the strife it would cause to try and force the issue.

    • #350
  21. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Django (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    People seem to have forgotten the common sense uttered early on. Masks don’t protect you; they protect others from you. One should assume he is infected and show enough consideration for others to wear the mask. That’s how masks work, if at all.

    How well do they do that if the virus is small enough to travel through the mask?

     

    I don’t know. It does not hurt to say so.

    Because the virus is loaded on to tiny drops of spit when you breath, and masks filter out a large number of those.   Thats how they help.

    • #351
  22. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    My sainted mother voted for Trump. She is certainly not a racist or terrible person.

    And clearly has all the brains in the family.

    • #352
  23. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    A lawyer, a minister and an engineer were to be guillotined.

    The lawyer probably deserved it.

    Funny that Gary would use a lawyer joke.  He had an absolute snit on 1 thread that was full of lawyer jokes.

    • #353
  24. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The mask topic is very easy. They don’t know how well it works as a public health intervention. They have no idea. Masks should probably be worn in some risky situations. That’s it.

    Supposedly, there is a huge Scandinavian study on the efficacy of masks as a public health intervention that is overdue.

    There have now been over 100 studies done supporting the use of masks to limit the spread of Covid.  

    • #354
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Kozak (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The mask topic is very easy. They don’t know how well it works as a public health intervention. They have no idea. Masks should probably be worn in some risky situations. That’s it.

    Supposedly, there is a huge Scandinavian study on the efficacy of masks as a public health intervention that is overdue.

    There have now been over 100 studies done supporting the use of masks to limit the spread of Covid.

    Then the government can put on a dog and pony show about why they work. 

     

    • #355
  26. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    WilliamDean (View Comment):

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    2020 sucks.

    Let’s get the worst-case scenario out of the way: does the VP automatically take the place of POTUS on the ballot box?

    No. From what I read, the party’s national committee / leadership body would select a nominee, which of course COULD be the VP nominee, but doesn’t have to be. Whether the new nominee can make it onto the ballot or not varies by law from state to state.

    Not the information I wanted to hear, but its the information I asked for. Thank you.

    I’m just speculating here, but since we actually vote for electors, I’d think that if it’s too late to change the ballot the original slate of electors pledged to Trump would still be valid, and it would be up to them to decide how to cast their votes in the Electoral College.

    I doubt it’s that easy. They are pledged. They cant just use their discretion, not any more. I would think that if dead Trump and live Pence win. Pence becomes VP and the president slot goes to the House of representatives. Or Pence is made VP and the becomes President after that and the Senate votes on the VP. But honestly I hope it gets bogged down in litigation and no one becomes president and the Supreme court picks. But really Joe Biden (god chosen instrument on earth, a second King David, and savior of the Republic) just crushes the now dead Trump ticket as Republicans face complete electoral collapse. [Redacted]

    Huh…funny I’m pretty sure others have wished for the death of other political leaders on this site I don’t recall those being moderated? What are we saying Trump is more deserving of sympathy than his best friend Kim Jong Un? Make up your minds people.

    Moderators don’t have time to read every comment on every thread.  Sometimes we will see something on our own, sometimes it’s because a flag is thrown.  Just because someone gets away with something, that doesn’t mean that everyone has carte blanche to do it.

    • #356
  27. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The mask topic is very easy. They don’t know how well it works as a public health intervention. They have no idea. Masks should probably be worn in some risky situations. That’s it.

    Supposedly, there is a huge Scandinavian study on the efficacy of masks as a public health intervention that is overdue.

    There have now been over 100 studies done supporting the use of masks to limit the spread of Covid.

    Then the government can put on a dog and pony show about why they work.

     

    Why?  You honestly think anyone on the Anti mask side is going to budge at this point?

    • #357
  28. Bryan G. Stephens, Trump Avenger Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens, Trump Avenger
    @BryanGStephens

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens, Trump Aveng… (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I remember talking to another attorney who had just witnessed a car accident. Instead of going immediately to compassion, she started to think about who would be liable for the accident. It is an occupational hazard. And it is what it is.

    I am going to offer you an amateur opinion. You argue all the time like you are defending a client. You would be better off just making a regular argument addressing what people say about your data and facts.

    Probably so. I feel badly that so much of the comments in this post have gone down the rabbit hole of responding to my analytical statement, and then the question of if I have called people racists.

    I dont believe you.

    And, using your standards for Trump, I maintain you are calling people racist and cultists.

    You just won’t let this go, despite your complete failure to provide documentation of such a horrible allegation.

    Nope. I am giving you the same Treatment you give Trump.

    See how it works?

    So you are the self-appointed Trump Avenger who wildly attacks someone you disagree with? You really ought to see a counselor about that.

    I am applying your rules for Trump to you. If you think it is unfair, maybe you are the one who needs to see the therapist.

    So you are now a self-appointed vigilante.

    You can’t back up your increasingly histrionic statements, while I make a point of doing so when challenged, and when I am wrong, promptly make amends.

    Your behavior is not indicative of a dinner party, it is indicative of a bar brawl, and thus violates the Code of Conduct.

    Please provide documentation of your screeds, or apologize and move on.

    Your behavior is to lie and lie. You have never made Amends for that. You won’t even acknowledge your lies. The idea you promptly make amends is absurd. 

    You have provided all the documentation. Go look. Every mention of Trumpism and Trumpists is your code for it being a cult. You have yet to even disavow that. 

    Again, just holding you, Gary, to the same standards you hold Trump too. Of course, you are calling that histrionic. It ought to be like looking in a mirror. I should have thought of this sooner.

    • #358
  29. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Kozak (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The mask topic is very easy. They don’t know how well it works as a public health intervention. They have no idea. Masks should probably be worn in some risky situations. That’s it.

    Supposedly, there is a huge Scandinavian study on the efficacy of masks as a public health intervention that is overdue.

    There have now been over 100 studies done supporting the use of masks to limit the spread of Covid.

    Then the government can put on a dog and pony show about why they work.

     

    Why? You honestly think anyone on the Anti mask side is going to budge at this point?

    I’m not exactly “anti-mask.” I simply believe they have limited efficacy out in the wild. Have you seen the way some (many) people wear them??? Under the nose or even under the chin! I see this a lot. And the disturbing videos of mask enforcers assaulting or threatening people who are not wearing masks? Seems a majority of them are wearing masks incorrectly. I’m particularly thinking of the large black woman who karate chopped a maskless woman in the throat as she was walking down from the altar after serving. Stunning.

    • #359
  30. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Flicker (View Comment): …The context of this fragment of what he said is that Trump had immediately and rightly said that he specifically condemns the KKK and nazis. Virtually in the same breath he says that there are also fine people on both sides, referring to those who want to either preserve the statue in Charlottesville for cultural and historical reasons and people who want to have it removed because they find it to be socially offensive.

    Will you condemn this slur that deliberately and falsely implies that Trump was condoning racism? And will you retract this slur and admit that you wrote it to falsely impugn and malign Trump? And will you apologize for promoting such a slur on this site to those who read it?

    It matters — because slurs — and honesty — matter.

    See comment #142 here about the Charlottesville Hoax:

    “…I resolved to not post on that issue in the future…” – Gary Robbins, May 1 2019

    Clearly he didn’t mean it. (In fact, he is really kind of wedded to the narrative.)

    But you are asking for honesty and intellectual consistency from someone who simply is not either…and demonstrably so throughout the pages of Ricochet. Even while making his above “resolution,” he admitted that he has reviewed the evidence but, apparently because he detected Racist Trump in another interview, Gary was going to ignore the actual words Trump used in the Charlottesville interview and deemed him “still not innocent” in this case. Lawyerly my arse.

    In fact, this whole theme he seems to be pushing in this thread about “I think like a lawyer” and “I present my arguments like a lawyer” really is laughable to anyone who has been soiled by his presence for way too many years.  From his mindless repetition of MSNBC talking points (and habitual disengagement from direct challenges to his already discredited material) to his shallow analyses littered with bubblegum logic (i.e. “Since the passage of the 22nd Amendment…) to his love letters to Adam Schiff during impeachment (“House Manager Adam Schiff spoke with easy fluency in a two hour and twenty minute opening statement. He clearly had mastered his materials; it was a virtuoso performance“), the character he plays on Ricochet is far from the charade he is putting on today.  For his own good, he probably needs to get back on his meds.

    • #360
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.

Comments are closed.