Are Never Trumpers OK with the Destruction of Evidence by Mueller’s Team?

 

I just don’t get it. Never Trumpers have gone on and on and on about how Mueller was on to something, but just could not prove it. Mueller did not exonerate Trump, etc.

Well.

If Mueller was that and a bag of chips, and his crew were as pure a the driven snow, how on Earth can they justify the destruction of evidence? These people all managed to “accidentally” destroy evidence. Come on.

Maybe some of our legal experts in the community could weigh in on how the destruction of evidence is a crime.

I’d love to hear from the pro-Mueller crowd on this. Y’all have been so behind this man, and still think Trump colluded with Russia to fix the election, despite no strong evidence it happened. I dare you to explain how this sort of very strong evidence of malfeasance, this criminal activity by the team doing the investigation is OK and has no bearing at all on the investigation. Because my belief is that anyone investigator that destroys evidence is an investigator that is building a lie.

Change my mind.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 190 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Would Biden have been a Birther?
    Would Biden say that he prefers war heroes who were not captured?
    Would Biden say that there were very good people at Charlottesville?
    Would Biden try to bribe Ukraine into opening a bogus election?
    Would Biden lie and directly contribute to almost 200,000 dead Americans?

    These are effing lies, Gary.

    How does he justify in his conscience such lying?

    OMB.

    I, however, believe OMG.

    Office of Management and Budget?

    Orange Man Bad.

    How odd. I should have figured that, but I saw OMG as the old-fashioned Oh My God and that short-circuited something.

    I too saw Office of Management and Budget and then OMG, and thought I was just out of it.

    • #151
  2. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Would Biden have been a Birther?
    Would Biden say that he prefers war heroes who were not captured?
    Would Biden say that there were very good people at Charlottesville?
    Would Biden try to bribe Ukraine into opening a bogus election?
    Would Biden lie and directly contribute to almost 200,000 dead Americans?

    These are effing lies, Gary.

    How does he justify in his conscience such lying?

    OMB.

    I, however, believe OMG.

    Office of Management and Budget?

    Orange Man Bad.

    How odd. I should have figured that, but I saw OMG as the old-fashioned Oh My God and that short-circuited something.

    I too saw Office of Management and Budget and then OMG, and thought I was just out of it.

    Perhaps more people in gov’t should voice their outrage at runaway spending by invoking: OMB!!

    • #152
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management.  Why should they be rioting?

    • #153
  4. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today.  And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    • #154
  5. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I’d like to point to perverse incentives. Bryan has another post on the Main Feed that has 16 comment. This post which includes the name “NeverTrump” has 146 comments.

    This one just seemed to catch on. 

    Never can tell what will sell. 

    • #155
  6. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I’d like to point to perverse incentives. Bryan has another post on the Main Feed that has 16 comment. This post which includes the name “NeverTrump” has 146 comments.

    This one just seemed to catch on.

    Never can tell what will sell.

    Gary does boost comments.

    • #156
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I’d like to point to perverse incentives. Bryan has another post on the Main Feed that has 16 comment. This post which includes the name “NeverTrump” has 146 comments.

    This one just seemed to catch on.

    Never can tell what will sell.

    And it has 17 right now. Do my own comments as responses don’t count. :P

    • #157
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I’d like to point to perverse incentives. Bryan has another post on the Main Feed that has 16 comment. This post which includes the name “NeverTrump” has 146 comments.

    This one just seemed to catch on.

    Never can tell what will sell.

    Gary does boost comments.

    But not “likes.”  At least not on the posts he creates.

    • #158
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    • #159
  10. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    I arrived in Portland the night of December 28, 1978, the night the jet crashed on Burnside, and stayed for a couple of years.  I really, really liked Portland.  When St. Helens blew I felt the house shake and collected the ash.  I met a guy there who mined gold near Grants Pass, and I did that too.  BLM and the Forestry Service were bad words there.

    Where did you live?

    • #160
  11. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    I arrived in Portland the night of December 28, 1978, the night the jet crashed on Burnside, and stayed for a couple of years. I really, really liked Portland. When St. Helens blew I felt the house shake and collected the ash. I met a guy there who mined gold near Grants Pass, and I did that too. BLM and the Forestry Service were bad words there.

    OMB! Really?

    • #161
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    I arrived in Portland the night of December 28, 1978, the night the jet crashed on Burnside, and stayed for a couple of years. I really, really liked Portland. When St. Helens blew I felt the house shake and collected the ash. I met a guy there who mined gold near Grants Pass, and I did that too. BLM and the Forestry Service were bad words there.

    Where did you live?

    In the Willamette Valley area mostly, except for a couple years in Bend.  I never lived in Portland “proper” although I had about 6 months on a sailboat moored at Hayden Island.

    I suspect a lot of people in a lot of states never heard of the acronym BLM until this latest one.

    Fortunately I was never subjected to the liberal hell-hole that Eugene was even back then.

    • #162
  13. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    I arrived in Portland the night of December 28, 1978, the night the jet crashed on Burnside, and stayed for a couple of years. I really, really liked Portland. When St. Helens blew I felt the house shake and collected the ash. I met a guy there who mined gold near Grants Pass, and I did that too. BLM and the Forestry Service were bad words there.

    Where did you live?

    In the Willamette Valley area mostly, except for a couple years in Bend. I never lived in Portland “proper” although I had about 6 months on a sailboat moored at Hayden Island.

    I suspect a lot of people in a lot of states never heard of the acronym BLM until this latest one.

    I never thought of sailing on the Willamette, but the guy I bought my last sailboat from sails on it.

    • #163
  14. Jager Coolidge
    Jager
    @Jager

    Dennis A. Garcia (formerly Gai… (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Dennis A. Garcia (formerly Gai… (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

     

    As to the validity of the post – I personally believe that NeverTrumpers aren’t simply playing a parlor game on proper political etiquette and thus are offended by the Orange Man Bad but they should be challenged on every issue that arises because they’ve thrown their support behind Biden and the radical Democrat agenda, because these challenges can reveal their duplicity and the fact that they are an existential threat to the republic because they put the importance of the Republican Party before the fate of the nation. That they do so in such a condescending way, claiming some higher moral authority is also repugnant. They should be called out on every issue and often.

    Our own little twitter mob- isn’t it lovely?- where one is never allowed to forget what the popular position is.

    I pay my dues to support the podcasts which remain of high quality. There are nonpolitical posts still which can result in a genuine conversation. And sometimes I feel like screaming into the void, which is what the political threads have become.

    Read your last paragraph back to yourself slowly. You’ve set up Nevertrumpers, as an Emmanual Goldstein or ceremonial jew, a scapegoat onto which all the problems of the world can be cast to avoid the shadow of introspection and deny any faults to big brother. That’s not argument it’s ritual. It’s not citizenship it’s tribalism.

    Self proclaimed “Nevertrumpers” were fully behind the Muller Probe. Muller was said to be a good and honorable man, just what the investigation needed.  When the probe found no collusion and no clear obstruction. The report was still said to be deeply troubling. 

    So if the Muller team members hid their work from the IG. Basically their own version of obstruction, this is a big deal. Something these “nevertrumpers” should be willing to address. 

    To suggest this is not to create “a scapegoat on to which all problems of the world can be cast to avoid the shadow of introspection”  It is not all the problems of the world, just the credibility of a group of investigators and their potentially committing acts just as bad or worse than what they were investigating. 

    The people who supported Mueller and his team at the time and spoke of them glowingly, are the ones avoiding introspection. If these people behaved poorly, were they worthy of your trust. If they feel the need to hide things, what did they do? It would seem that they may have broken the rules and still could not find anything to prosecute. 

    • #164
  15. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And of course, BLM is Bureau of Land Management. Why should they be rioting?

    When I hung out in southwest Oregon, the BLM was just about as well thought of as this new BLM of today. And I still have to translate BLM in my head.

    I lived in Oregon the first 30 years of my life.

    I arrived in Portland the night of December 28, 1978, the night the jet crashed on Burnside, and stayed for a couple of years. I really, really liked Portland. When St. Helens blew I felt the house shake and collected the ash. I met a guy there who mined gold near Grants Pass, and I did that too. BLM and the Forestry Service were bad words there.

    Where did you live?

    In the Willamette Valley area mostly, except for a couple years in Bend. I never lived in Portland “proper” although I had about 6 months on a sailboat moored at Hayden Island.

    I suspect a lot of people in a lot of states never heard of the acronym BLM until this latest one.

    I never thought of sailing on the Willamette, but the guy I bought my last sailboat from sails on it.

    My stay was during the winter, and before I had a chance to go anywhere, my job changed again.

    Actual “sailing” on the Willamette is likely something of a misnomer, although perhaps not that hard in the parts close to the Columbia.  (Hayden Island is on the Columbia river, the I-5 bridge from Portland to Vancouver passes over it, Jantzen Beach – and the mall with that name, if it still exists – is to the west of the freeway/bridge.)

    I knew people who moored their boats on the Willamette as far south as Salem and would motor back and forth to the Columbia when the water was deep enough.  But last I heard, the locks at Oregon City are no longer operating, so that option is closed.

    • #165
  16. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    I’d like to take a survey – every person on this thread who has ever *accidentally* wiped their phone, please respond.

    In fact, if you even know somebody who has ever accidentally wiped their phone, speak up.

     

    • #166
  17. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Jager (View Comment):

    Dennis A. Garcia (formerly Gai… (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Dennis A. Garcia (formerly Gai… (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

     

    As to the validity of the post – I personally believe that NeverTrumpers aren’t simply playing a parlor game on proper political etiquette and thus are offended by the Orange Man Bad but they should be challenged on every issue that arises because they’ve thrown their support behind Biden and the radical Democrat agenda, because these challenges can reveal their duplicity and the fact that they are an existential threat to the republic because they put the importance of the Republican Party before the fate of the nation. That they do so in such a condescending way, claiming some higher moral authority is also repugnant. They should be called out on every issue and often.

    Our own little twitter mob- isn’t it lovely?- where one is never allowed to forget what the popular position is.

    I pay my dues to support the podcasts which remain of high quality. There are nonpolitical posts still which can result in a genuine conversation. And sometimes I feel like screaming into the void, which is what the political threads have become.

    Read your last paragraph back to yourself slowly. You’ve set up Nevertrumpers, as an Emmanual Goldstein or ceremonial jew, a scapegoat onto which all the problems of the world can be cast to avoid the shadow of introspection and deny any faults to big brother. That’s not argument it’s ritual. It’s not citizenship it’s tribalism.

    Self proclaimed “Nevertrumpers” were fully behind the Muller Probe. Muller was said to be a good and honorable man, just what the investigation needed. When the probe found no collusion and no clear obstruction. The report was still said to be deeply troubling.

    So if the Muller team members hid their work from the IG. Basically their own version of obstruction, this is a big deal. Something these “nevertrumpers” should be willing to address.

    To suggest this is not to create “a scapegoat on to which all problems of the world can be cast to avoid the shadow of introspection” It is not all the problems of the world, just the credibility of a group of investigators and their potentially committing acts just as bad or worse than what they were investigating.

    The people who supported Mueller and his team at the time and spoke of them glowingly, are the ones avoiding introspection. If these people behaved poorly, were they worthy of your trust. If they feel the need to hide things, what did they do? It would seem that they may have broken the rules and still could not find anything to prosecute.

    Well said, and better than me. 

    • #167
  18. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    I’d like to take a survey – every person on this thread who has ever *accidentally* wiped their phone, please respond.

    In fact, if you even know somebody who has ever accidentally wiped their phone, speak up.

     

    Not I

    Then Again, I don’t have an Ivy League education

    • #168
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    I’d like to take a survey – every person on this thread who has ever *accidentally* wiped their phone, please respond.

    In fact, if you even know somebody who has ever accidentally wiped their phone, speak up.

    I do that probably once a day, if not more.

    You mean with a cloth, right?

    • #169
  20. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    I’d like to take a survey – every person on this thread who has ever *accidentally* wiped their phone, please respond.

    In fact, if you even know somebody who has ever accidentally wiped their phone, speak up.

    Not I

    Then Again, I don’t have an Ivy League education

    Not I

    Then again, I don’t have a phone.

    (Well, a land line. I suppose I could wipe that . . . with a cloth!)

    EDIT: D’oh! Kedavis’d!

    • #170
  21. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Clinton Shrug GIF | Gfycat

    • #171
  22. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    171 comments and counting?  I’d say you hit a nerve @bryangstephens……..not only that, these investigations have uncovered, and continue to uncover (more to come from Lindsey Graham apparently) rampant, appalling lies, deception, cover ups and crimes at the very highest levels, including and most especially, by Hillary Clinton, Obama and Biden….

    • #172
  23. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I’d like to point to perverse incentives. Bryan has another post on the Main Feed that has 16 comment. This post which includes the name “NeverTrump” has 146 comments.

    This one just seemed to catch on.

    Never can tell what will sell.

    Gary does boost comments.

    When I see some posts, I tell myself, “Don’t comment!  Don’t comment!  You will only attract trolls.”  Usually I can restrain myself.

    • #173
  24. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    This article from CTH tells the story of why incriminating evidence was wiped from these phones. That FBI agent from the Washington Field Office should be decorated for his work that reveals all these people involved in this coverup. He’s the one that set up James Wolfe and that represents about 90% of the story and a big part of the coverup is Warner and Rubio on the SCCI. They are still covering up.

    Blazing Sunlight – Senate Intel Committee Refuses to Give GOP Senators Documents From Russia Investigation…

    • #174
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gary doesn’t realize that, at least on these threads, he is the troll.

    • #175
  26. Sisyphus Member
    Sisyphus
    @Sisyphus

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):
    Who are these white supremacists you’re talking about? Even the media-creation of Whatsisname Spencer couldn’t fill a room with more than 200 people. “White Supremacists” are a phantom threat. I can’t take you seriously. There aren’t enough white supremacists in this country to be concerned about, and the ones that do exist aren’t organized enough to cause any serious trouble. Meanwhile we’ve got BLM rampaging through our cities, ambushing and executing police officers, under the cover of favorable media coverage, and the anti-Trumpers are all “But Q-Anon!”

    White supremacists are the bad actors infiltrating BLM peaceful protesters and attempting to burn down the Hatfield federal courthouse in Portland for over a hundred straight days. And they are the fiery part of the fiery but peaceful protests. In Richmond, they actually managed to find one. One. And charge him. Tens of millions in damage, thousands of rioters, and they only prosecuted the one that fed the narrative the mayor wanted to feed. The black mayor who was allowing BLM to burn down, loot, and terrorize black neighborhoods. What a monster.

    • #176
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):
    Who are these white supremacists you’re talking about? Even the media-creation of Whatsisname Spencer couldn’t fill a room with more than 200 people. “White Supremacists” are a phantom threat. I can’t take you seriously. There aren’t enough white supremacists in this country to be concerned about, and the ones that do exist aren’t organized enough to cause any serious trouble. Meanwhile we’ve got BLM rampaging through our cities, ambushing and executing police officers, under the cover of favorable media coverage, and the anti-Trumpers are all “But Q-Anon!”

    White supremacists are the bad actors infiltrating BLM peaceful protesters and attempting to burn down the Hatfield federal courthouse in Portland for over a hundred straight days. And they are the fiery part of the fiery but peaceful protests. In Richmond, they actually managed to find one. One. And charge him. Tens of millions in damage, thousands of rioters, and they only prosecuted the one that fed the narrative the mayor wanted to feed. The black mayor who was allowing BLM to burn down, loot, and terrorize black neighborhoods. What a monster.

    Aren’t like half or two-thirds of the white supremacy groups actually made up of FBI agents?  Or is that only the KKK?

    • #177
  28. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Dennis and Gary:

    What the zark is “Trumpism”?

    Orange Man Good.

     

    OMG – yes!

    • #178
  29. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):
    Who are these white supremacists you’re talking about? Even the media-creation of Whatsisname Spencer couldn’t fill a room with more than 200 people. “White Supremacists” are a phantom threat. I can’t take you seriously. There aren’t enough white supremacists in this country to be concerned about, and the ones that do exist aren’t organized enough to cause any serious trouble. Meanwhile we’ve got BLM rampaging through our cities, ambushing and executing police officers, under the cover of favorable media coverage, and the anti-Trumpers are all “But Q-Anon!”

    White supremacists are the bad actors infiltrating BLM peaceful protesters and attempting to burn down the Hatfield federal courthouse in Portland for over a hundred straight days. And they are the fiery part of the fiery but peaceful protests. In Richmond, they actually managed to find one. One. And charge him. Tens of millions in damage, thousands of rioters, and they only prosecuted the one that fed the narrative the mayor wanted to feed. The black mayor who was allowing BLM to burn down, loot, and terrorize black neighborhoods. What a monster.

    Aren’t like half or two-thirds of the white supremacy groups actually made up of FBI agents? Or is that only the KKK?

    Just the KKK in the mid 20th century. Once it was realized how inept they are the FBI was able to cut back.

    Edited to add: Truthfully, I don’t know, just regurgitating info from a mid 90’s conversation.

    • #179
  30. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    Dennis A. Garcia (formerly Gai… (View Comment):

    All I am asking for is if the loss of black lives is OK or not. If you say it is not OK, then yes, I will follow up on any support you show for the police, if not I will hold you to account for white supremacy, by filling in what I assume you believe about unrelated cases.

    So, you are right that no matter how a White Supremecist or Trump supporter answers, it undermines his position. But that is because the facts support me. If someone supports locking immigrant children in cages and gunning down unarmed black citizens then they must ignore the value of non-white lives. To any reasonable person, this looks fishy.

    Who are these white supremacists you’re talking about? Even the media-creation of Whatsisname Spencer couldn’t fill a room with more than 200 people. “White Supremacists” are a phantom threat. I can’t take you seriously. There aren’t enough white supremacists in this country to be concerned about, and the ones that do exist aren’t organized enough to cause any serious trouble. Meanwhile we’ve got BLM rampaging through our cities, ambushing and executing police officers, under the cover of favorable media coverage, and the anti-Trumpers are all “But Q-Anon!”

     

    This fits with my assessment. My life experience doesn’t indicate to me that there is much out there in terms of numbers. J. Edgar Hoover was very adept at accruing embarrassing information to use in his dealings with others.

    • #180
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.