The Real Baltimore

 

Kim Klacik is a Republican running for Congress in Baltimore, and she has a few things to say. Warning: pearl clutchers should have pearls handy before watching this campaign ad:

While Nancy makes selfie-videos of her $30 a pint designer ice cream, Kim Klacik is shaking up her old home town. Sometimes the revolution that arises is not the one the elites were staging. A race worth following. Donate here.

As you were.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 202 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    The world views – on the part of black voters – might be “real” but they are not accurate.

    • #91
  2. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    Sorry to rain on the parade here but I think we have to give serious consideration to the possibility that Blacks vote Dem because they by and large are (or have been up to now) sympathetic to the Dem’s general political world view: more government, more spending, and the explicit acknowledgement that continued racism is largely responsible for unequal outcomes. I don’t think it’s a messaging issue or that inner city Blacks are “low information” voters or somehow being duped. Those are always the reasons given when voters don’t vote the way they’re supposed to and it’s rarely the case. Those were the reason’s the Left tried to use to explain the Trump and Reagan presidencies and they are no more valid when applied to the inner city support for Dems.

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    No, they vote for the party that has identified a scapegoat for their failures. A scapegoat that undoubtedly bears some of the blame in some cases. The fact that that same party uses its position of trust to shaft them time and time again doesn’t penetrate because the party apparatus as successfully stigmatized information sources that would report on that. By and large.

    This.

     

    • #92
  3. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    The world views – on the part of black voters – might be “real” but they are not accurate.

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.  

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.  

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools.  The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    • #93
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Taras (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    The world views – on the part of black voters – might be “real” but they are not accurate.

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I would like to make another appeal:  it’s the Democrat Party.  NOT the DemocratIC Party.

    • #94
  5. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    The world views – on the part of black voters – might be “real” but they are not accurate.

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I would like to make another appeal: it’s the Democrat Party. NOT the DemocratIC Party.

    You mean the Demoncrat Party?

    • #95
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    The world views – on the part of black voters – might be “real” but they are not accurate.

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I would like to make another appeal: it’s the Democrat Party. NOT the DemocratIC Party.

    You mean the Demoncrat Party?

    That works too.  It grates on me that co-opting the term DemocratIC probably gives them some mileage with some people who take that to mean the “other side” – i.e., us! – doesn’t believe in elections, etc.

    Back in High School, there was one guy I knew that I joked around with a lot, we said stuff like “Demonic Demagogues” for the Dems and “Repulsive Reptiles” for the Reps.  When he once said “give me a wild guess” and I waved my arms and yelled “GUESS!!!!” we laughed our butts off for like 20 minutes.

    And of course “a rough guess” was “guess” said like you had a bad sore throat or something…

    • #96
  7. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    • #97
  8. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    @kedavis — The Democrats have been referring to themselves as  “Democratic” for more than 200 years, ever since they were the Democratic Republicans.

    Quite true, they pretty consistently oppose democracy; but then the leading fascist organization of our time calls itself “Antifa”.

    • #98
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Taras (View Comment):

    @kedavis — The Democrats have been referring to themselves as “Democratic” for more than 200 years, ever since they were the Democratic Republicans.

    Quite true, they pretty consistently oppose democracy; but then the leading fascist organization of our time calls itself “Antifa”.

    Which is part of my point.  Too many people – probably especially minorities who end up damaging themselves as a result – believe things like that anyone who calls themselves DemocratIC must ipso facto be better than someone who says they’re a Republican, that someone who says they’re/call themselves “anti-fascist” must actually be anti-fascist, that the NAACP is actually for the ADVANCEMENT of “colored people,” and so forth.

    • #99
  10. FloppyDisk90 Member
    FloppyDisk90
    @FloppyDisk90

    Taras (View Comment):

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I think this is a perfect example of my point.  The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse.  Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make.  Now you can argue, and I would agree with you, that the benefits outweigh the costs and that the inner city schools deserve to be defunded but that’s the crux of the debate.  If you put yourselves in the shoes of those black welfare mothers I can certainly understand how a message of “those rascally Republicans are trying to defund your schools” would sell.  It’s no different than when Trump goes to working class Pennsylvania and sells the idea that Democrats want to ship jobs to China and let illegal immigrants take over the ones that are left.

    • #100
  11. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make. Now you can argue, and I would agree with you, that the benefits outweigh the costs and that the inner city schools deserve to be defunded but that’s the crux of the debate. If you put yourselves in the shoes of those black welfare mothers I can certainly understand how a message of “those rascally Republicans are trying to defund your schools” would sell. It’s no different than when Trump goes to working class Pennsylvania and sells the idea that Democrats want to ship jobs to China and let illegal immigrants take over the ones that are left.

    Taxpayer money is devoted to ‘public education’ not ‘public schools’

    There is a difference, very important distinction between the two.

    Charter schools are funded by taxpayers and often share space with traditional public schools.

     

    • #101
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make. Now you can argue, and I would agree with you, that the benefits outweigh the costs and that the inner city schools deserve to be defunded but that’s the crux of the debate. If you put yourselves in the shoes of those black welfare mothers I can certainly understand how a message of “those rascally Republicans are trying to defund your schools” would sell. It’s no different than when Trump goes to working class Pennsylvania and sells the idea that Democrats want to ship jobs to China and let illegal immigrants take over the ones that are left.

    Isn’t it different when what the Dems say is false, but what the Reps say is true?

    • #102
  13. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):
    Charter schools are funded by taxpayers and often share space with traditional public schools.

    Thomas Sowell has written a new book and made several interview appearances – including on The Ricochet Podcast – about this.

    • #103
  14. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Inner city blacks may be the worst educated voting demographic in the US, and probably the most ill-informed.

    Large percentages still believe the Tawana Brawley hoax, and the Duke lacrosse team hoax, and the “hands up don’t shoot“ hoax, and the Trayvon Martin hoax.

    Corrupt “community leaders” who are sold out to the Democratic Party can routinely persuade them to vote against their own interests.

    I remember reading in the New York Times, years ago, about a proposal in Chicago to provide scholarships to several thousand poor black kids so they could go to good schools. The Democratic Party was able to mobilize and get the poor black welfare mothers whose children would have benefited from the program to oppose it.

    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make. Now you can argue, and I would agree with you, that the benefits outweigh the costs and that the inner city schools deserve to be defunded but that’s the crux of the debate. If you put yourselves in the shoes of those black welfare mothers I can certainly understand how a message of “those rascally Republicans are trying to defund your schools” would sell. It’s no different than when Trump goes to working class Pennsylvania and sells the idea that Democrats want to ship jobs to China and let illegal immigrants take over the ones that are left.

    The problem with failing public schools is not money.

    The 2 biggest problems are:

    1. cannot fire incompetent teachers
    2. cannot expel problem students

     

    • #104
  15. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    The Black voters rejecting is going to be the biggest political divorce from an abusive spouse…

    As was explained to me by a black coworker. The blacks owe the Democrats and big government for saving them from Jim Crow laws. It is why most blacks are against federalism since every state in the union had Jim Crow laws against blacks.

    What? Democrats created Jim Crow. Only when Northern Democrats joined the long-standing position of the GOP minority in Congress did it begin to change.

    Not sure who outside conservatives believe that.

    • #105
  16. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    The Black voters rejecting is going to be the biggest political divorce from an abusive spouse…

    As was explained to me by a black coworker. The blacks owe the Democrats and big government for saving them from Jim Crow laws. It is why most blacks are against federalism since every state in the union had Jim Crow laws against blacks.

    What? Democrats created Jim Crow. Only when Northern Democrats joined the long-standing position of the GOP minority in Congress did it begin to change.

    Leftists control tv and education. Those facts are hard to come by.

    • #106
  17. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):
    I teared up for a second and wanted to reach into the screen and hug the dude, tell him how sorry I was. 

    #MeToo

    • #107
  18. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):
    The problem with failing public schools is not money.

    We proved this on Ricochet about a decade ago.

    • #108
  19. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    The Black voters rejecting is going to be the biggest political divorce from an abusive spouse…

    As was explained to me by a black coworker. The blacks owe the Democrats and big government for saving them from Jim Crow laws. It is why most blacks are against federalism since every state in the union had Jim Crow laws against blacks.

    What? Democrats created Jim Crow. Only when Northern Democrats joined the long-standing position of the GOP minority in Congress did it begin to change.

    Not sure who outside conservatives believe that.

    1964 Civil Rights act passed because of GOP support.

    Without GOP support, Senate could not break filibuster.

    Also, railroad companies in the South were not happy about Plessy vs Ferguson.  Building separate but ‘equal’ compartments decreased their profit per passenger.

     

     

    • #109
  20. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    Instugator (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):
    The problem with failing public schools is not money.

    We proved this on Ricochet about a decade ago.

    I guess Ricochet has zero influence on the issue of public education?

     

     

    • #110
  21. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    The Black voters rejecting is going to be the biggest political divorce from an abusive spouse…

    As was explained to me by a black coworker. The blacks owe the Democrats and big government for saving them from Jim Crow laws. It is why most blacks are against federalism since every state in the union had Jim Crow laws against blacks.

    What? Democrats created Jim Crow. Only when Northern Democrats joined the long-standing position of the GOP minority in Congress did it begin to change.

    Not sure who outside conservatives believe that.

    1964 Civil Rights act passed because of GOP support.

    Without GOP support, Senate could not break filibuster.

    Also, railroad companies in the South were not happy about Plessy vs Ferguson. Building separate but ‘equal’ compartments decreased their profit per passenger.

    you still don’t get it.  We live in a post fact world.  It is all about the feels.  In today’s world all things bad are because of racist GOP, all things good is because of the progressive Democrats.  Even Abraham Lincoln is a Democrat by most people understanding and the Democrats got rid of Jim Crow and created the civil rights for blacks.  The GOP is trying to put blacks back into chains.  The GOP are the party of the KKK and white supremacy.  

    • #111
  22. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):
    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make.

    No, it’s not a fair point to make:

    Fewer butts in seats mean lower costs to the public schools.  The cost-per-pupil stays roughly constant.

    • #112
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):
    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make.

    No, it’s not a fair point to make:

    Fewer butts in seats mean lower costs to the public schools. The cost-per-pupil stays roughly constant.

    Yes, and as I understand it, at least where I’ve lived before, the amount taken out for each child going to a charter school, is LESS than the full amount the public schools receive per student.  Which means that it’s actually BETTER for the public schools if a student leaves, their effective income-per-student goes UP; in fact if ALL of the public school students left for charter schools, the public schools would still receive money while having NO STUDENTS.

    • #113
  24. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    kedavis (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):
    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make.

    No, it’s not a fair point to make:

    Fewer butts in seats mean lower costs to the public schools. The cost-per-pupil stays roughly constant.

    Yes, and as I understand it, at least where I’ve lived before, the amount taken out for each child going to a charter school, is LESS than the full amount the public schools receive per student. Which means that it’s actually BETTER for the public schools if a student leaves, their effective income-per-student goes UP; in fact if ALL of the public school students left for charter schools, the public schools would still receive money while having NO STUDENTS.

    Ah, okay.  In that case, a sufficiently corrupt school administration would be interested in limiting charter schools, both because they’re skimming a percentage off the incoming revenue stream, and the power of having a monopoly.

    • #114
  25. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):

    ……

    So to combat explicit racism, they vote for the party that has been – and arguably continues to be – the most explicitly racist over time?

    I won’t pretend to know the answer to that question. I was mainly reacting to what I saw as the conventional wisdom in this thread that inner city Blacks are being duped or tricked by Democrats. Bottom line: I don’t think the average inner city Black is any more or less irrational in their voting behavior then the average schmo in any other voting demographic. I think the policy differences and world views are real and substantive.

    See Larry Elder. Every black family had a copy of Ebony magazine on display in their home/apartment. Not one conservative black has ever been featured, a real “black out” of Supreme Court Justice Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, . . .

    • #115
  26. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Nighty night… 9 million views.

    • #116
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    FloppyDisk90 (View Comment):
    I think this is a perfect example of my point. The typical claim of Democrats is that scholarships, charter schools, education grants, etc…divert money away from public schools and would make an already bad situation worse. Given that most/all public schools are funded based on butts in seats, this is actually a fair point to make.

    No, it’s not a fair point to make:

    Fewer butts in seats mean lower costs to the public schools. The cost-per-pupil stays roughly constant.

    Yes, and as I understand it, at least where I’ve lived before, the amount taken out for each child going to a charter school, is LESS than the full amount the public schools receive per student. Which means that it’s actually BETTER for the public schools if a student leaves, their effective income-per-student goes UP; in fact if ALL of the public school students left for charter schools, the public schools would still receive money while having NO STUDENTS.

    Ah, okay. In that case, a sufficiently corrupt school administration would be interested in limiting charter schools, both because they’re skimming a percentage off the incoming revenue stream, and the power of having a monopoly.

    Well that and they like having as many people as possible working for them, since that increases THEIR pay.  Fewer teachers under them – perhaps both figuratively and literally – means less supervisory status for them, and less salary.  Plus just the power of feeling like they’re in charge of a lot of people.

    • #117
  28. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    The Black voters rejecting is going to be the biggest political divorce from an abusive spouse…

    As was explained to me by a black coworker. The blacks owe the Democrats and big government for saving them from Jim Crow laws. It is why most blacks are against federalism since every state in the union had Jim Crow laws against blacks.

    Huh? What the? Jim Crow laws? Every state? Blacksplaining?

     

    Did not get into it too much. Disagreeing with minorities at work is a trip to HR and maybe out the door. Just happened to be in the room while the discussion happened.

    I want a picture of the coworker.

    • #118
  29. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Isn’t it different when what the Dems say is false, but what the Reps say is true?

    Convincing them on who is speaking the truth is the trick.

    Just remember, you can’t reason people out of a position they weren’t reasoned into.

    • #119
  30. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):
    The problem with failing public schools is not money.

    We proved this on Ricochet about a decade ago.

    I guess Ricochet has zero influence on the issue of public education?

     

     

    With sayings like “those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach,” are we surprised?

    Rs don’t even let their daughters teach, even though it is an incredibly great career for women aspiring to be mothers to have.

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.