The Real Baltimore

 

Kim Klacik is a Republican running for Congress in Baltimore, and she has a few things to say. Warning: pearl clutchers should have pearls handy before watching this campaign ad:

While Nancy makes selfie-videos of her $30 a pint designer ice cream, Kim Klacik is shaking up her old home town. Sometimes the revolution that arises is not the one the elites were staging. A race worth following. Donate here.

As you were.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 202 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure.  And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    • #181
  2. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Currently 9.7 million views.  So the growth has leveled off substantially over the last couple days.

    Yes… literally flattened the curve.

    • #182
  3. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    • #183
  4. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Math.  Why did there have to be math?

    • #184
  5. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Stina (View Comment):

    I’d like to point out… it seems the most dysfunctional attitudes on teaching and unions and public schooling is coming from administrators and higher degree holders. It seems there’s a decent enough mix among lower teachers to make it battle worthy that the school administrations and bureaucrats in education are improperly utilizing the money that is earmarked for the schools.

    When teachers complain of lack of funding, it’s less about needing taxes to go up, but for administrator pay to drop so more money goes into the classrooms.

    It doesn’t look like these younger teachers have as much union power as the older members with more advanced degrees have.

    In other words, there may be enough fracture there for some limited working together.

    The education administration and bureaucracy needs a haircut. With all the money we dump into schools, there is no reason why teachers should be paying out of pocket for school supplies.

    A question; why does an administrator of pretty much anything make more money than the people doing the thing? 

    I get why it happens in business (and should). But why in government? 

    • #185
  6. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum? 

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change. 

    • #186
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Stina (View Comment):
    It doesn’t look like these younger teachers have as much union power as the older members with more advanced degrees have.

    Except there are – or at least there still better be! – more teachers than administrators.  So the teachers could vote for what they want, and win, except they get “convinced” to vote the way the union leadership wants.  And a lot of them are probably stupid enough to even do so voluntarily.

    • #187
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    A lot of this comes from a desire among the higher-degreed administrators etc, to use the teachers and students as their experimental laboratory.  They tend to have their own little theories about what should be done to “improve” education.  And like with managers in private business, they can feel that if they don’t “shake things up” then they aren’t demonstrating their value over the previous schmuck, or the other schmucks who applied for the same job.

    • #188
  9. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    My understanding is that Texas and California have a lock on the K-12 textbook market. It’s a matter of economics – the costs of production are supposedly so high, and the client base so regularized, that we end up using the same textbooks in nearly every school system. If CCPV-19 disruption can help us break the textbook oligopoly, we might even come out ahead in the 2-5 year term.

    • #189
  10. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    • #190
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Stina (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    Those are the kinds of things that I think should be determined by actual people with experience and stuff.  (I resist using the word “experts” especially in this context since “experts” in “education” often have their own agendas.)  Each little elementary-school teacher should not be developing their own independent lesson plans based on little if any experience even in their own area, let alone understanding the wider framework.

    • #191
  12. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Stina (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    Curriculum is like anything else in that people who haven’t done it simply don’t know what’s involved.

    • #192
  13. CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker
    @CarolJoy

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    I think Larry Elder and his team are going to need to update their Uncle Tom Documentary to include a Klacik chapter.

    At first I didn’t like the look, but I’m not black, and I don’t live in Baltimore. I did not go to a failing school. Even though my early life is not a paragon of white privilege, I always had hope that I could do and be.

    Klacik is the voice that the downtrodden need to hear. She is the face they need to see. She has a story that will resonate.

    Klacik will connect with the voters who want OUT of the destruction they’ve been handed. Those who are not interested will ignore. She may not win this year, but she has started the right “conversation.”

    I think her video has an outreach beyond Baltimore, and may inspire others like herself, in other ruined cities to step up.

     

    She may not be a congress person out of Baltimore but I can definitely see a senator out of Maryland

    Wishful thinking. Some recent history: The Maryland Democratic Party openly backed Cardin instead of Mfume for the US Senate seat that opened in 2006. Cardin is a backbench zombie with very good fund-raising connections. Mfume was head of the NAACP, a veteran of Sunday TV news panel shows and a player in the black caucus–a man with admittedly high-end political credentials even if you hate his politics. The party leadership was terrified that white voters would opt for the GOP black guy (former Lt. Gov. Michael Steele) instead of the black guy with the radical-sounding name. So they muscled Cardin to a 3-pt win in the primary.

    You would think black voters would be angry at the openly racist intentions behind the party’s backing Cardin. Wrong. They voted 90% for the Democrat against the black Republican. The Democrats are probably right to take them for granted.

    Good history and analysis. I did not know any of that.

    The one consideration you left out is how traditionally, the dead always vote for Democrats too.

    • #193
  14. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    Curriculum is like anything else in that people who haven’t done it simply don’t know what’s involved.

    Yes. And it’s really costly for parents to buy curriculums that exist.

    It’s almost impossible (is?) to find a loose guidance curriculum that allows an interested parent to fill in the gaps.

    For instance, I’m not half bad at teaching elementary math, but I have my blind spots. We began with manipulatives, I added in tools to help develop a visual “sense” of numbers and visually grouping to make counting faster, and we use clothespin numbers on flash cards to build fine motor strength and reinforce basic math facts. My 5 year old can do addition facts under 10 in his head. I have a good idea of the blocks.

    But even so, my blind spots are shapes, time, and money.

    Language arts and history, just forget about it. And trying to get trusted sources of current books? Nope. 

    Children’s biographies are useless… they are a boring collection of facts and kids learn best in story, so narrative history is best, but 1st, it’s impossible to find and 2nd, I’d never trust anyone getting published in today’s world.

    • #194
  15. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Stina (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    Curriculum is like anything else in that people who haven’t done it simply don’t know what’s involved.

    Yes. And it’s really costly for parents to buy curriculums that exist.

    It’s almost impossible (is?) to find a loose guidance curriculum that allows an interested parent to fill in the gaps.

    For instance, I’m not half bad at teaching elementary math, but I have my blind spots. We began with manipulatives, I added in tools to help develop a visual “sense” of numbers and visually grouping to make counting faster, and we use clothespin numbers on flash cards to build fine motor strength and reinforce basic math facts. My 5 year old can do addition facts under 10 in his head. I have a good idea of the blocks.

    But even so, my blind spots are shapes, time, and money.

    Language arts and history, just forget about it. And trying to get trusted sources of current books? Nope.

    Children’s biographies are useless… they are a boring collection of facts and kids learn best in story, so narrative history is best, but 1st, it’s impossible to find and 2nd, I’d never trust anyone getting published in today’s world.

    I’ve heard that Hillsdale has references for home-schooling, but not sure if it goes down to elementary level.

    • #195
  16. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Stina (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Also, it’s important to note that teaching is, by its nature, a very simple process.

    It doesn’t require exotic materials or technology, it doesn’t require a lot of money, it doesn’t require complex infrastructure. And we’ve been doing it for a very, very long time.

    There’s certainly a degree of craft and skill involved. And the student has to be eager to learn.

    But the level of failure we see can be directly attributable to criminals plundering a system.

     

     

    Curriculum in standard schooling is the priciest… and I think it’s the most daunting, since most people going in have a set expectation of what education is.

    I know it’s the most intimidating point for me.

    What do you mean by curriculum?

    I’m sure my view of a one-room schoolhouse is hopelessly naive but that model used the same books year after year and most subjects weren’t subject to change.

    What you teach, when you teach it, creating synergy between one subject and another, utilizing existing books/biographies/histories/literature in age appropriate ways…

    For math, reading, and grammar, what building blocks come first. For instance, teaching ‘e’ sound is different than teaching ‘ee’ sound and comes at a different reading stage.

    For reading and grammar, you can use literature and histories for composition, grammar, and other language arts pieces, but what are they and how do you teach them?

    Schools actually break it out week by week.

    Curriculum is like anything else in that people who haven’t done it simply don’t know what’s involved.

    Yes. And it’s really costly for parents to buy curriculums that exist.

    It’s almost impossible (is?) to find a loose guidance curriculum that allows an interested parent to fill in the gaps.

    For instance, I’m not half bad at teaching elementary math, but I have my blind spots. We began with manipulatives, I added in tools to help develop a visual “sense” of numbers and visually grouping to make counting faster, and we use clothespin numbers on flash cards to build fine motor strength and reinforce basic math facts. My 5 year old can do addition facts under 10 in his head. I have a good idea of the blocks.

    But even so, my blind spots are shapes, time, and money.

    Language arts and history, just forget about it. And trying to get trusted sources of current books? Nope.

    Children’s biographies are useless… they are a boring collection of facts and kids learn best in story, so narrative history is best, but 1st, it’s impossible to find and 2nd, I’d never trust anyone getting published in today’s world.

    https://www.abeka.com/abekaonline/downloadcatalogs/

    • #196
  17. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Thanks for posting the ad, @sisyphus. It’s just… fantastic.

    But am I the only one who wishes she were running for Mayor of Baltimore instead of for a House seat? She could do so much more for the city as a local elected official than she would be able to do from Washington.

    • #197
  18. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    And also, @kedavis, for heaven’s sake, yes she looks like a female human. Sheesh.

     

    • #198
  19. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I’ve heard that Hillsdale has references for home-schooling, but not sure if it goes down to elementary level.

    Downloaded right after you mentioned it. Has details for every class and every week of instruction.

    • #199
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Instugator (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I’ve heard that Hillsdale has references for home-schooling, but not sure if it goes down to elementary level.

    Downloaded right after you mentioned it. Has details for every class and every week of instruction.

    Glad to be of service.  (I tried to find a clip of that from HHGTTG but couldn’t.)

    • #200
  21. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Thanks for posting the ad, @sisyphus. It’s just… fantastic.

    But am I the only one who wishes she were running for Mayor of Baltimore instead of for a House seat? She could do so much more for the city as a local elected official than she would be able to do from Washington.

    Except that it would be her against the rest of a corrupt city government.  They’d probably mess her up badly.

    Assuming corruption is the major source of Baltimore’s problems… You’re in the position of attempting to replace a corrupt city government.  How many successful examples are there of this?

    My guess is that you’d have to make some arrests first.  Clean it out a little.   And then run a slate of people to work together as a team, city council and all.

    • #201
  22. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Over 10 million views.

    Mike Huckabee shows his appreciation.

     

    • #202
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.