Iowa Predictions: For the Record

 

IowaI just want it on the record.

I think Trump is going to get creamed. He has no ground game in Iowa. His lead poll captain thinks 9/11 was an inside job. He is too cheap to give said poll captain $500 to rent a hall. Iowa is a ground game state that requires an infrastructure. Trump doesn’t think he needs an infrastructure! He can win on sheer guts alone!

Oh, the polls say he’s in the lead, eh? These, the same polls that said Mitt Romney was neck-and-neck with Obama? The same polls that said that the Georgia governor was so unpopular in 2014 that he was going to sink the sitting senator with him? How did that turn out? The same polls that said McConnell was going to lose in Kentucky? He carried that state by 17 points!

I’m no expert in polling. My father is, though. Taught it in university for twenty years. A good, solid poll needs at least a thousand respondents. Most polls have half that, and  +/- 3.5 is a 7-point swing. With fewer than 300, polls start getting +/- ratios of 5. That’s a ten-point swing!

My gut feeling is that come Tuesday morning, we’re going to have a bunch of pundits standing around talking about his dramatic loss and how no one could have seen it coming.

But I saw it coming, so nyah.

And if he wins? Well, I’m sure I’ll come up with something appropriate.

What’s everyone else’s prediction?

Published in Elections, General, Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 67 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    Ryan M:

    You know what would be interesting and helpful? (Claire, are you still reading this??)

    A post that just gives a nice overview of how the primary voting process actually works. The difference between caucus-states and others, the various quirky laws… heck, even the brokered convention, and, later on, the electoral college.

    The GOP Iowa Caucus:

    How is a caucus different from a primary? The answer differs depending on which party you’re asking about. Instead of heading to one of Iowa’s 1,681 precincts and pulling a lever, voters will head to a caucus site that may toss several precincts together. Instead of seeing their votes tabulated by the state elections office, they’ll see them reported to the state parties, which will in turn report them to the news media.

    A Republican caucus is odd but simple, a peanut-butter-and-tuna-fish combination of a normal election and a PTA meeting. At nearly 900 caucus sites, voters will gather, then hear speeches from whichever campaigns have precinct captains assigned to whip up votes.(Presidential candidates can show up and do this for themselves, in one of the most intimate examples of democracy in all of politics.) Then they’ll write their choices on paper and hand them in.

    • #31
  2. Benjamin Glaser Inactive
    Benjamin Glaser
    @BenjaminGlaser

    My guess at the Top 5:

    1. Cruz
    2. Rubio
    3. Carson
    4. Trump
    5. Paul
    • #32
  3. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    Fricosis Guy:

    Ryan M:

    I believe this is the way the Democrat caucus works, which won’t matter so much with a two-person race. They’ll be fighting over O’Malley’s scraps.

    The GOP is less byzantine.

    The Democratic Caucus:

    The Democratic caucus process is more complicated. When they show up at one of the 1,100-odd sites, voters will be asked to gather in sections designated for the candidates. They will be counted. If one candidate fails to get at least 15 percent of voters in his corner, they are released, and caucus captains for the surviving candidates can personally lobby and answer questions, enticing them to join up. After that, delegates are assigned based on the support for each candidate.

    It sounds confusing, and it is. For starters, the number of delegates for each precinct will be assigned based on Democratic turnout in that precinct from the last two elections. (There is no raw vote total released, only projections of how many Democrats turned out.) If there’s a massive surge of voters in, say, an Iowa City precinct, if there’s a massive fall-off in a rural precinct, it does not matter — the same number of delegates are at stake. This might be best illustrated by the live recording C-Span did from one key caucus site in 2008.

    • #33
  4. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    The 2012 elections put paid to the whole “unskewed polls” stuff. The polls are usually accurate. Trump by around 7 or so in IA.

    • #34
  5. Frank Soto Member
    Frank Soto
    @FrankSoto

    Douglas:The 2012 elections put paid to the whole “unskewed polls” stuff. The polls are usually accurate. Trump by around 7 or so in IA.

    So Iowa caucus polling is actually notoriously terrible.  The problem is you are looking at 20% turnout for a single party.  Finding that 10% of voters who will show up is incredibly difficult.

    National polling tends to be extremely accurate.  State polling in large elections tends to be very accurate.  Primary polling is a crap shoot.

    • #35
  6. Egg Man Inactive
    Egg Man
    @EggMan

    Remember two men: Howard Dean and Rick Santorum.

    Howard Dean was expected to win. Eventually, the pressure to make a mature decision got to the Dems and they went with Kerry. (Kerry’s closing message to Deaniacs was “Don’t send a message. Send a President.”)

    Santorum surged dramatically in the final week, knocking off Mitt Romney (although we didn’t realize he came in first until a couple of days later). Obviously, not the same “angry voter” dynamic at work here, but it shows that things move quickly.

    Perhaps the odd nature of caucuses creates a lot of uncertainty in the polls. I’m hoping that the sober-minded people who were favorably disposed to Trump get some peer pressure and don’t take a risk with this buffoon.

    • #36
  7. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    “The 2012 elections put paid to the whole “unskewed polls” stuff. The polls are usually accurate. Trump by around 7 or so in IA.”

    Except for all the 2014 polls some of which I cited earlier.  Kansas (earlier cited Georgia mea culpa) where the Dem was going to win and Brownback won by 20 points.  Or McConnell who was neck and neck, only to carry Kentucky by 17 points.

    We have a lot of polls these days, and most of them are lousy.  Unless they have a 1000 respondents we should take them with a grain of salt.

    • #37
  8. The King Prawn Inactive
    The King Prawn
    @TheKingPrawn

    All this to garner some percentage of the 30 Iowa delegates…

    • #38
  9. Brian McMenomy Inactive
    Brian McMenomy
    @BrianMcMenomy

    The King Prawn:All this to garner some percentage of the 30 Iowa delegates…

    Very fair point, the media “momentum” story is the bigger deal (for as long as that will last) than delegate count.  Party bigwigs need to keep calm & keep their powder dry; this is going to be a long slog.

    • #39
  10. Pencilvania Inactive
    Pencilvania
    @Pencilvania

    I predict Trump comes out on top – not that I want that – then Rubio, and close behind him, Cruz.  I think Cruz’s ethanol stand really stung.

    • #40
  11. Jordan Wiegand Inactive
    Jordan Wiegand
    @Jordan

    Prediction market data for those interested.

    • #41
  12. Katie O Inactive
    Katie O
    @KatieO

    Brian Watt:Trump may have just insulted many Iowa caucus voters by ducking out of the debate. And everyone knows what Iowans can be like:

    Oh, there’s nothing halfway

    About the Iowa way to treat you,

    When we treat you…

    I’ve had The Music Man in mind all day, Brian :) Only 20% of Iowa’s Repubicans caucus. The ones who show up are serious people, not naive  marks for a con man. So, that is another reason I think Trump won’t win.

    large_music_man_blu-ray05largest

    • #42
  13. Leigh Inactive
    Leigh
    @Leigh

    In VA in 2014 the polls were literally 9 points off. We were a few votes away from a major upset. Just saying…

    • #43
  14. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    Brian McMenomy:

    The King Prawn:All this to garner some percentage of the 30 Iowa delegates…

    Very fair point, the media “momentum” story is the bigger deal (for as long as that will last) than delegate count. Party bigwigs need to keep calm & keep their powder dry; this is going to be a long slog.

    Indeed, that and who is out. Iowa and New Hampshire are more about who in the race is getting eliminated, what we should be asking is who suspends their campaign and how quickly.

    • #44
  15. rico Inactive
    rico
    @rico

    The King Prawn:All this to garner some percentage of the 30 Iowa delegates…

    That’s my reaction, too. Furthermore, 3 of those 30 delegates belong to RNC, so this great commotion will probably earn the winner about a dozen delegates, just a few more than the second place finisher.

    As for momentum…barring a major surprise there will be no real impact. All the players will retain their current roles for NH (the role of Santorum, Huckabee, and Carson being to drop out).

    That said, I’ll play along and guess: Cruz 13, Trump 8, Rubio 6.

    • #45
  16. Brian McMenomy Inactive
    Brian McMenomy
    @BrianMcMenomy

    Roberto:

    Brian McMenomy:

    The King Prawn:All this to garner some percentage of the 30 Iowa delegates…

    Very fair point, the media “momentum” story is the bigger deal (for as long as that will last) than delegate count. Party bigwigs need to keep calm & keep their powder dry; this is going to be a long slog.

    Indeed, that and who is out. Iowa and New Hampshire are more about who in the race is getting eliminated, what we should be asking is who suspends their campaign and how quickly.

    It wasn’t so very long ago that Ben Carson (very briefly) overtook Trump in the national polls.  Now we (very reasonably) are talking about when he gets out.  Things will really change when we see actual voters casting actual votes; the rest is sound & fury, signifying very little.

    • #46
  17. J. D. Fitzpatrick Member
    J. D. Fitzpatrick
    @JDFitzpatrick

    Ryan M:2012 really burned me on disregarding polls. I was certain that they were wrong and that Romney would win.

    But then, Nate Silver just keeps being right…

    I hope you’re right about this one.

    Speaking of Nate Silver, here’s 538’s page on Iowa polls.

    • #47
  18. Sowell for President Member
    Sowell for President
    @

    My prediction is Cruz wins IA, places at least 3rd in NH, and wins SC and then the majority of states in the next round.

    • #48
  19. Ricochet Inactive
    Ricochet
    @KimberlyEngle

    Quake Voter: Hanging my hope on lack of any increase in Iowa GOP registration to date to indicate a Trump surge, Cruz’s old school organization of the state,Trump’s remarkable cheapskate approach (no money for vans?), and the depth of Cruz’s values emphasis despite the flawed roll out.

    I’ve lived in Iowa for the past 10 years.  This will be my 3rd caucus and 3rd different caucus site.  Caucusing is hard.  First you have to be smart enough to even find it.  Keep in mind that it is not like a regular primary like they had in my previous states, where it takes 20 minutes, tops.  The caucus takes a good 3 hrs, and believe me–it’s painful.  It’s a lot of standing around (literally–there’s never enough seating because it’s always in school gym or the bank or a designated room in the library or something) listening to people’s speeches and waiting for the precinct leads to get organized before you ever cast a vote.  I’m not expecting a lot of Democratic crossover because the Democratic caucus is held at the same time and there’s a lot of contention on that side, too.  It’s easy to tell someone on the phone you’ll be there; it’s hard to actually show up and do it.  I know a handful of Trump supporters and there’s no way they will put forth the effort of attending.

    • #49
  20. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    I’m not going to guess at the numbers, but I will call first, second, and third.

    It’s going to be

    1. Cruz
    2. Paul
    3. Rubio
    • #50
  21. Jamie Wilson Member
    Jamie Wilson
    @JamieWilson

    I think it’ll be Cruz by a respectable margin – and Trump will come in third. Fiorina will make a better showing than expected. Second could be any number of candidates, but it won’t be an establishment guy. Probably Rubio.

    For the Dems, I think Bernie will be close enough to scare Hillary, if he doesn’t flat out win.

    • #51
  22. Frank Soto Member
    Frank Soto
    @FrankSoto

    Fred Cole:I’m not going to guess at the numbers, but I will call first, second, and third.

    It’s going to be

    1. Cruz
    2. Paul
    3. Rubio

    There is optimism, and then there is hoping against hope.

    • #52
  23. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    What do I get if I’m right, Frank?

    • #53
  24. Frank Soto Member
    Frank Soto
    @FrankSoto

    Fred Cole:What do I get if I’m right, Frank?

    A prayer answered?

    • #54
  25. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    Ryan M: You know what would be interesting and helpful? (Claire, are you still reading this??)

    I am. And I agree. And I have a funny story about the editors trying to update the dates in this post and realizing that we ourselves didn’t understand this. We couldn’t agree how many days it was until Super Tuesday, couldn’t agree how many states would have finished deciding before then, couldn’t even agree what day Super Tuesday would be. It took us about two hours and 15 Google searches to be sure we had it right.

    It was really embarrassing.

    But it also made me think, “If this is so complicated that the editors of Ricochet can’t figure it out, maybe people who don’t, you know, follow this for a living might find it a bit confusing?”

    • #55
  26. inmateprof Inactive
    inmateprof
    @inmateprof

    I predict that I will get angrier and angrier at the fact that the people of Iowa and New Hampshire will pick the nominee for the people of the other 48 states.

    • #56
  27. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Katie O:

    Brian Watt:Trump may have just insulted many Iowa caucus voters by ducking out of the debate. And everyone knows what Iowans can be like:

    Oh, there’s nothing halfway

    About the Iowa way to treat you,

    When we treat you…

    I’ve had The Music Man in mind all day, Brian :) Only 5% of Iowa’s Repubicans caucus. The ones who show up are serious people, not naive marks for a con man. So, that is another reason I think Trump won’t win.

    large_music_man_blu-ray05largest

    TrumpMusicMan

    • #57
  28. Dex Quire Inactive
    Dex Quire
    @DexQuire

    livingthehighlife:I have no freaking idea.

    Well, okay, that’s not right. I know Jeb! doesn’t have a prayer. And that makes me just a little happy.

    I’m with you; and now that you’ve taken my words let me try to come up with a few of my own…Ted Cruz will never be president of the United States of America. Because I said so. He talks like he was raised by two cable channel evangelist dads; and I like cable channel evangelist dads but Americans are just not going to put up with Cruz’ odd speech voicings and cadences that knock your spine out of whack…Kasich makes me feel like a Human Resources interviewer: I got him at minute one and now it’s minute five and he’s making me uncomfortable…Christie…I can’t get the image of Obama being engulfed in his all-enfolding grab; I think Obama might still be in there trying to get out…Rubio…he’ll have a better shot after he turns 16…Ben Carson…confirms everything I’ve thought about the human brain for years…Rand Paul…we’ve never yet elected a toupee for president…Speaking of Trump…his absence showed how flat and journalistic the phrase great Republican bench…back at you ToryWarWriter…

    • #58
  29. Mr. Dart Inactive
    Mr. Dart
    @MrDart
    1. Trump
    2. Cruz
    3. Rubio
    4. Paul– much will be made of Rand’s Top4 finish
    • #59
  30. Kent Owens Member
    Kent Owens
    @KentOwens

    This election cycle has proven impervious to logic and everything I thought I knew about politics. So take this with a big grain of salt.

    The Donald doesn’t have a ground game so he places a distant third. Cruz and Rubio come in first and second but are very close; too close for me to say who gets which spot.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.