Lower Your Expectations — and Your Defenses

 

The Pentagon is in the midst of reducing our armed forces to levels not seen since 1940. Thirty thousand active duty Army troops are to be eliminated in the next two years. The Obama Administration has since announced that they want 1,500 illegal aliens inducted into service. This is madness.

Just this year, since the beginning of the southern border crisis, at least 40,000 detained illegals have been released and vanished into the wider population. No one knows who they are, what their intentions are, or even their health status.

The reliably clueless New York Times screams a headline about the “mystery respiratory illness” that has swept into 38 states and hospitalized hundreds of children. No one stops and asks the obvious. Could the Feds moving thousands of sick children, teens and young adults unannounced to hundreds of communities across the country be the cause?

Democrats, you know, the “pro-science” crowd, who eschews vaccinations and epidemiology are so desperate to end America’s founding principles and finish off the march to full socialism, they don’t care how many get sick. While no one has died from Enterovirus-D68 who knows what other diseases lie in wait.

Then there’s the “Ft. Hood Disease.” Introducing persons of suspect loyalty into the military. Because it would be politically incorrect to acknowledge it, not everyone coming across our southern border is necessarily an economic refugee.

Last year Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-Tyler, TX) mentioned on C-SPAN about possible alliances between Mexican drug cartels and al Qaeda. The press, particularly PolitiFact, were quick to dismiss his claims as being false. “Experts” from think tanks and universities all fell in line against the Congressman. Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, told PolitiFact that “Gohmert’s claim struck him as ‘incredibly sloppy. It doesn’t help the debate. We don’t know that these claims are true.'”

Of course, he failed to say, we don’t know that these claims are untrue, either.

Either way, it seems that a lowering of defenses in an unstable world seems to be the order of the day.
Oh, that way madness lies. Let me shun that. No more of that.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 10 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Xennady Member
    Xennady
    @

    I sure wish wish there was a political party that would oppose all of that- no wait, that would be racist.

    Never mind.

    • #1
  2. user_1700 Inactive
    user_1700
    @Rapporteur

    Like.

    (for the well-written post, not the disturbing subject matter)

    • #2
  3. Devereaux Inactive
    Devereaux
    @Devereaux

    The problem is, from my perspective, that no one seems to be serious – not our side, not theirs. All anyone wants to do is rant.

    We have a large and extremely capable military. Perhaps we don’t need quite such a large force on constant duty. But there is no real, rational debate over what we ought to have.

    We have a porous southern border (to say the least). Yet there is no discussion of using the military, which we have in large numbers, now mostly unemployed except for training, to close the border. ?Might that include raids into “Mexico” to get to the cartels. Well, since we apparently can bomb Syria without a declaration of war, I would submit we can bomb/raid into Mexico for the purpose of demolishing cartel headquarters/communications hubs/storage locations/etc.

    This is not a posse comitatus issue. We w0uld be using the military to defend the national border, a valid usage of federal troops.

    On the foreign front, we seem incapable of identifying our enemy, despite his repeated self-identification! We are at war with Islam. This is not a “war on terror”, just as WWII was not a “war on V2 bombs”. We may not have to kill every muslim, but we need to put them on notice that we are willing to. IF, indeed, they want to “get their religion back from the extremists who have hijacked it”, then they will, indeed, have to do just that.

    • #3
  4. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Like! the post, EJ – as George Rapp says, above; wondering what we can *do* about it?…(“Pray!”, for certain – and I’m on it.)

    • #4
  5. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    It’s worse.  A recent article in Navy Times (cannot remember the author, a guy named Bacon, IIRC) wrote on Navy officials stating their lament about much-needed repairs to our ships (including carriers!) going unfulfilled because of cutbacks – Obama is Jimmy Carter redux.

    I joined the Navy in October, 1977, and went to OCS January 1978.  Even with Carter in office, I didn’t think any President could possibly let our military start to rot from within, but it happened in the last couple of years under Jimmy, even with (now-extinct) Democrat hawks in Congress.  The military experienced its own kind of malaise . . .

    When Reagan swept into office, our attitude and morale improved overnight.

    • #5
  6. BuckeyeSam Inactive
    BuckeyeSam
    @BuckeyeSam

    Yet I don’t see or hear GOP candidates pointing this travesty out. When are GOP politicians going to start pushing an Americans First agenda?

    • #6
  7. Eeyore Member
    Eeyore
    @Eeyore

    Devereaux: Might that include raids into “Mexico” to get to the cartels.

    No need. The Federal Government has ceded a wide swath north of the Southern border to the drug cartels (for instance, in Arizona, the territory south of the I-10/I-8 line, which is now one of the prime “trade routes” for the drug cartels into the US).

    Perhaps the military could retake and defend this area of the US and “get” a significant number of cartel members in the process. From Arizona:

    border-sign-warning

    • #7
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    BuckeyeSam:Yet I don’t see or hear GOP candidates pointing this travesty out. When are GOP politicians going to start pushing an Americans First agenda?

    Excellent comment!  I believe Rush is correct when he says the Republicans need to point out what they are for, not just assume the voters will elect them because they hate the Democrats.

    • #8
  9. Tuck Inactive
    Tuck
    @Tuck

    EJHill: The reliably clueless New York Times screams a headline about the “mystery respiratory illness” that has swept into 38 states and hospitalized hundreds of children. No one stops and asks the obvious. Could the Feds moving thousands of sick children, teens and young adults unannounced to hundreds of communities across the country be the cause?

    I decided to educate myself about that virus after reading that idiotic Times piece.  Took about 15 minutes.  The virus has been around for a while, and was first described in California.  No mystery, just a bug that’s likely always been with us finding a denser population makes it easier to transmit.

    And given how much Americans move around anyway, I suspect the movement of those illegal aliens is just a drop in the bucket…

    • #9
  10. user_199279 Coolidge
    user_199279
    @ChrisCampion

    Eeyore:

    Devereaux: Might that include raids into “Mexico” to get to the cartels.

    No need. The Federal Government has ceded a wide swath north of the Southern border to the drug cartels (for instance, in Arizona, the territory south of the I-10/I-8 line, which is now one of the prime “trade routes” for the drug cartels into the US).

    Perhaps the military could retake and defend this area of the US and “get” a significant number of cartel members in the process. From Arizona:

    border-sign-warning

    That’s just great.  I love the fact that our public lands are no longer public.  Hey, feel free to use them, but don’t be surprised if you get shot by illegals crossing the border.

    • #10
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.