A Few Thoughts Regarding the FBI Raid of Donald Trump’s Home

 

I think this is a really, really big deal.  The party in power is using the power of the government they now control to destroy their political adversaries.  Oh my God.  This has my head spinning, a bit.  Here’s a few thoughts that have come to mind in the 10 minutes since I heard about the FBI raid:

  1. Oh my God.
  2. They didn’t raid the Clintons or the Bidens, despite their obvious criminal activities.  The Democrats in our government know that this is an obvious double standard, which will be quickly pointed out by many.  I find it terrifying that they don’t care.  They apparently feel that it no longer matters what anyone thinks.  As if elections don’t matter anymore.  I wonder if they’re right?
  3. This is an open threat to anyone who might consider criticizing a Democrat, anywhere.  We can destroy a President of the United States.  We can certainly destroy you.
  4. I suspect that popular support for Mr. Trump running for President again just jumped.  By a lot.
  5. I also suspect that the FBI knows that this will make Mr. Trump more popular and will broaden his support.  They wouldn’t do this, unless they thought they could control elections.
  6. It’s possible (although unlikely, I think) that Mr. Trump goaded the FBI into raiding his home somehow.  Appeared to withhold evidence, that he could later show that they already had, or something like that.  He may have wanted this showdown, to elevate his popular support.  Again, I doubt that, but I suppose it’s possible.
  7. I used to laugh at people who predicted that America would break up into two or more countries in the near future.  Then, I didn’t laugh, but I still thought that was insane.  Now, I see no other way to save something that is vaguely like America.  Lord help us.
  8. The problem is that that will never happen.  It’s just impossible, I think.  But once our government can select its own leaders, and persecute its political opponents, then that fundamentally changes the relationship between citizens and their government.  Once government has that much power, it cannot be changed except by force.  Which, again, I just cannot imagine happening.
  9. It will be interesting to see who defends Mr. Trump.  We’re about to learn a great deal about various Republican leaders.  I suspect that we won’t like what we learn.
  10. This is a really big deal.  Oh my God, oh my God, oh my God…
Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 165 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Who should we run? The Democrats are telling you who. Trump was very effective. You can see it in their hatred. Run who they fear the most. We shouldn’t vote based on their happiness.

    Just to repeat this.

    • #121
  2. Timothy Landon Inactive
    Timothy Landon
    @TimothyLandon

    I feel just as bad hearing this news as I did on January 6 when a mob chanted “Hang Mike Pence” and disrupted Congress’s proceedings.

    This is not a can of worms DOJ and FBI should have opened up with such nonchalance.  It’s one of the most breathtakingly stupid decisions I’ve ever learned about.

    • #122
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Point your finger. Aim it right at friends and family that aided and abetted the rise of this regime. Forgive them and tell them it is time to make amends, because they (most of them) didn’t vote for this.

    I find it heartening, in a way, to see how desperate these people have become. Ballot box or otherwise, they will not win.

     

    My wife assumes that Trump is guilty of anything and everything and that this is the “walls closing in” on him. She is getting exactly what she voted for, Trump out of the White House and never allowed to return, and it doesn’t really matter what it takes to get that done because he is guilty, guilty, guilty.

    So since she doesn’t like Trump all the best values of and traditions of justice in America don’t matter anymore? I get that Trump is a jerk and he cheats on his wives. Don’t matter none. Every human being in the United ought to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Trump is small potatoes compared to over two centuries of the best traditions of America.

    How does she not get that?

    We haven’t talked about it specifically, but I get the feeling that’s the way my relatives think or want to think and they don’t want to discuss it under inquiry.

    • #123
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Django (View Comment):

    What has happened when Newsweek and MSN are more vocal than The Turtle has been?

    Merrick Garland Is Compromised. He Must Stand Aside and Appoint a Special Prosecutor | Opinion (msn.com)

    The media doesn’t even raise the question. That article really makes it sink in.

    • #124
  5. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Point your finger. Aim it right at friends and family that aided and abetted the rise of this regime. Forgive them and tell them it is time to make amends, because they (most of them) didn’t vote for this.

    I find it heartening, in a way, to see how desperate these people have become. Ballot box or otherwise, they will not win.

     

    My wife assumes that Trump is guilty of anything and everything and that this is the “walls closing in” on him. She is getting exactly what she voted for, Trump out of the White House and never allowed to return, and it doesn’t really matter what it takes to get that done because he is guilty, guilty, guilty.

    So since she doesn’t like Trump all the best values of and traditions of justice in America don’t matter anymore? I get that Trump is a jerk and he cheats on his wives. Don’t matter none. Every human being in the United ought to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Trump is small potatoes compared to over two centuries of the best traditions of America.

    How does she not get that?

    I wish I knew. It’s been a rough six years. To her, Trump is so terrible that any accusation seems plausible. She believes he threw food at the wall, flushed documents down the toilet, and conspired to overthrow the election on J6. She believes that he has raped multiple women, including children via Epstien, and that he abused his power as President to enrich his family. She also thinks that Kavanaugh was likely a serial rapist and never should have been confirmed. When Trump won in 16 she subscribed to the WaPo and NYT so she could follow the “real news” and counter her parents who “only watch Fox”.

    I love her dearly and I don’t try and influence her on politics. For one, it just makes things worse, and for two, pkitics shouldn’t be the end all of a marriage. It has been fascinating to watch though what one hears from solely the DNC, I mean the MSM. 

    • #125
  6. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    OK I’m listening to Levin right now.

    First of all for some damn reason the J6 attorney is also the attorney for the archivists. Sounds pretty Stalinist to me.

    People are saying Trump should release the warrant. There are two reasons he may not be able to do that. It might have classified information in it. The other reason is they can put gratuitous extra charges in it and the media won’t explain it. They won’t even explain it if they don’t do that, so they might not be able to do it for political reasons because the media is so dishonest.

    A warrant also has a more criminal tone to it, which I think that was his point. You need to listen to it yourself.

     

    Are you certain that Trump lawyers have a copy of the warrant? Isn’t it possible that after telling the Trump lawyers they were not allowed to watch the search in progress, that they also did not allow them to have a copy of the warrant? 

    • #126
  7. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    cdor (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    OK I’m listening to Levin right now.

    First of all for some damn reason the J6 attorney is also the attorney for the archivists. Sounds pretty Stalinist to me.

    People are saying Trump should release the warrant. There are two reasons he may not be able to do that. It might have classified information in it. The other reason is they can put gratuitous extra charges in it and the media won’t explain it. They won’t even explain it if they don’t do that, so they might not be able to do it for political reasons because the media is so dishonest.

    A warrant also has a more criminal tone to it, which I think that was his point. You need to listen to it yourself.

     

    Are you certain that Trump lawyers have a copy of the warrant? Isn’t it possible that after telling the Trump lawyers they were not allowed to watch the search in progress, that they also did not allow them to have a copy of the warrant?

    Right. They don’t have it, yet. I don’t get that, it seems really screwed up, but supposedly that’s the way it works. 

    You have some people saying they have to do that as soon as they can. Others are saying it’s likely a stupid or impossible tact. 

    I’m just parroting off of the radio and the TV. 

    • #127
  8. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I’m not done with it, but Megyn Kelly is simultaneously interviewing Dershowitz and Harmeet Dhillon. It seems like a really good discussion. Kelly has a great podcast. 

    • #128
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

    • #129
  10. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    It’s been a rough six years. To her, Trump is so terrible that any accusation seems plausible. She believes he threw food at the wall, flushed documents down the toilet, and conspired to overthrow the election on J6. She believes that he has raped multiple women, including children via Epstien, and that he abused his power as President to enrich his family. She also thinks that Kavanaugh was likely a serial rapist and never should have been confirmed. When Trump won in 16 she subscribed to the WaPo and NYT so she could follow the “real news” and counter her parents who “only watch Fox”.

    I love her dearly and I don’t try and influence her on politics. For one, it just makes things worse, and for two, pkitics shouldn’t be the end all of a marriage. It has been fascinating to watch though what one hears from solely the DNC, I mean the MSM. 

    Man, I feel for you. This is why I’ve tried mightily to push back on all of the demonization of Trump ( which of course gets one labeled an acolyte and a cult member).

    It’s basic human psychology. If you can anchor a bad impression of someone before the person gets to have their own experience of the person or gets objective information, all subsequent info is believed automatically.

    I guess this is why one of the Ten Commandments is about bearing “false witness” 

    I have been a victim of that, and I suppose all of us have. 

    Of all the things Trump has been accused of many were outright false (many of those accusations were known to be false by the accusers – Coy fish feeding in Japan) others were spun in the most negative way possible ( if you are famous they will let you grab them by the … obviously hyperbole, but nevertheless there’s a grain of truth to it which women despise BTW)

    More and more, I think we humans need someone to ‘hate’ at all times, and that it takes a lot of work to purge that tendency continually. Notice how there’s this new strain of racism and sexism now directed at white men. Or when the Ukraine invasion began, supposedly tolerant people were rampaging against Russian hockey players and musicians. 

    And since I was a victim of a smear campaign in Jr High, I always had sympathy and understanding of the dynamic. Once you are labeled, there’s nothing you can do.

    Even when the hateful person sees evidence that some of the things they hate Trump for turned out to be untrue, the psychological hold remains. It’s almost impossible for them to overcome the embedded animus.

    Sad.

     

     

    • #130
  11. Chris O Coolidge
    Chris O
    @ChrisO

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Right. They don’t have it, yet. I don’t get that, it seems really screwed up, but supposedly that’s the way it works. 

    You have some people saying they have to do that as soon as they can. Others are saying it’s likely a stupid or impossible tact. 

    I’m just parroting off of the radio and the TV. 

    One of his attorneys saw the warrant, but it did not include what constituted the probable cause for it. That is “sealed” and they’ll have to go to court to find out the basis for the warrant. 

    Trump’s attorney that was on site was not allowed to observe the search. She said agents walked in with backpacks and speculated it was possible material was brought in.

    Just relaying what was said. I saw a photo of agents at the gate to Mar-a-Lago. They were definitely there to intimidate given the hardware they carried. I thought D’s didn’t like assault rifles.

    • #131
  12. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Point your finger. Aim it right at friends and family that aided and abetted the rise of this regime. Forgive them and tell them it is time to make amends, because they (most of them) didn’t vote for this.

    I find it heartening, in a way, to see how desperate these people have become. Ballot box or otherwise, they will not win.

     

    My wife assumes that Trump is guilty of anything and everything and that this is the “walls closing in” on him. She is getting exactly what she voted for, Trump out of the White House and never allowed to return, and it doesn’t really matter what it takes to get that done because he is guilty, guilty, guilty.

    So since she doesn’t like Trump all the best values of and traditions of justice in America don’t matter anymore? I get that Trump is a jerk and he cheats on his wives. Don’t matter none. Every human being in the United ought to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Trump is small potatoes compared to over two centuries of the best traditions of America.

    How does she not get that?

    I wish I knew. It’s been a rough six years. To her, Trump is so terrible that any accusation seems plausible. She believes he threw food at the wall, flushed documents down the toilet, and conspired to overthrow the election on J6. She believes that he has raped multiple women, including children via Epstien, and that he abused his power as President to enrich his family. She also thinks that Kavanaugh was likely a serial rapist and never should have been confirmed. When Trump won in 16 she subscribed to the WaPo and NYT so she could follow the “real news” and counter her parents who “only watch Fox”.

    I love her dearly and I don’t try and influence her on politics. For one, it just makes things worse, and for two, pkitics shouldn’t be the end all of a marriage. It has been fascinating to watch though what one hears from solely the DNC, I mean the MSM.

    I have an acquaintance who gets news from NPR, NYTimes, and maybe WaPo. He thinks he is well-informed and has said that his guru for economics is Paul Krugman and his guru for social/moral issues is David Brooks. I don’t see him much since I retired and that’s a good thing. At least he has a sense of humor and admitted that maybe he was “being a bit tribal”. I didn’t get it at first because I had forgotten that he is a Jew. 

    • #132
  13. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Django (View Comment):
    I have an acquaintance who gets news from NPR, NYTimes, and maybe WaPo. He thinks he is well-informed and has said that his guru for economics is Paul Krugman and his guru for social/moral issues is David Brooks. I don’t see him much since I retired and that’s a good thing. At least he has a sense of humor and admitted that maybe he was “being a bit tribal”. I didn’t get it at first because I had forgotten that he is a Jew. 

    You should ask him about his investment portfolio.

    • #133
  14. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Django (View Comment):
    I have an acquaintance who gets news from NPR, NYTimes, and maybe WaPo. He thinks he is well-informed and has said that his guru for economics is Paul Krugman and his guru for social/moral issues is David Brooks.

    I have realized that’s the problem. If NPR says it they think it’s over. 

    Django (View Comment):

    At least he has a sense of humor and admitted that maybe he was “being a bit tribal”. I didn’t get it at first because I had forgotten that he is a Jew. 

    I think the root of this is, they really like to force things around in the name of justice and they don’t have any other paradigm. It’s the positive liberty side of Isaiah Berlin’s theory about positive and negative liberty. My brother-in-law is Jewish and he is totally like that and he just can’t entertain anything else. Me, I say it’s patently obvious that central planning is the dumbest thing mankind has ever invented. 

    By the way Isaiah Berlin is my new favorite person. Mark Levin discusses him at 1:31:00.

    https://dcs.megaphone.fm/WWO8204920210.mp3?key=6ccbc486ddd98dc16240b5b8c63dab5c&source=3

    • #134
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

    • #135
  16. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Wow! So how many raids have there been so far on anyone associated with Trump? Someone needs to sharpen a pencil and make a list!

    • #136
  17. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Timothy Landon (View Comment):

    I feel just as bad hearing this news as I did on January 6 when a mob chanted “Hang Mike Pence” and disrupted Congress’s proceedings.

    This is not a can of worms DOJ and FBI should have opened up with such nonchalance. It’s one of the most breathtakingly stupid decisions I’ve ever learned about.

    There were some disgusting people in that crowd that day. I wonder how many of the most embarrassing are jailed and how many were not Trump supporters.

    • #137
  18. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Chris O (View Comment):

    Point your finger. Aim it right at friends and family that aided and abetted the rise of this regime. Forgive them and tell them it is time to make amends, because they (most of them) didn’t vote for this.

    I find it heartening, in a way, to see how desperate these people have become. Ballot box or otherwise, they will not win.

     

    My wife assumes that Trump is guilty of anything and everything and that this is the “walls closing in” on him. She is getting exactly what she voted for, Trump out of the White House and never allowed to return, and it doesn’t really matter what it takes to get that done because he is guilty, guilty, guilty.

    So since she doesn’t like Trump all the best values of and traditions of justice in America don’t matter anymore? I get that Trump is a jerk and he cheats on his wives. Don’t matter none. Every human being in the United ought to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Trump is small potatoes compared to over two centuries of the best traditions of America.

    How does she not get that?

    I wish I knew. It’s been a rough six years. To her, Trump is so terrible that any accusation seems plausible. She believes he threw food at the wall, flushed documents down the toilet, and conspired to overthrow the election on J6. She believes that he has raped multiple women, including children via Epstien, and that he abused his power as President to enrich his family. She also thinks that Kavanaugh was likely a serial rapist and never should have been confirmed. When Trump won in 16 she subscribed to the WaPo and NYT so she could follow the “real news” and counter her parents who “only watch Fox”.

    I love her dearly and I don’t try and influence her on politics. For one, it just makes things worse, and for two, pkitics shouldn’t be the end all of a marriage. It has been fascinating to watch though what one hears from solely the DNC, I mean the MSM.

    I hope she never gets jury duty and I hope she realizes she married an excellent husband. Much respect for your approach. 

    • #138
  19. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Chris O (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Right. They don’t have it, yet. I don’t get that, it seems really screwed up, but supposedly that’s the way it works.

    You have some people saying they have to do that as soon as they can. Others are saying it’s likely a stupid or impossible tact.

    I’m just parroting off of the radio and the TV.

    One of his attorneys saw the warrant, but it did not include what constituted the probable cause for it. That is “sealed” and they’ll have to go to court to find out the basis for the warrant.

    Trump’s attorney that was on site was not allowed to observe the search. She said agents walked in with backpacks and speculated it was possible material was brought in.

    Just relaying what was said. I saw a photo of agents at the gate to Mar-a-Lago. They were definitely there to intimidate given the hardware they carried. I thought D’s didn’t like assault rifles.

    They were probably mad they couldn’t handcuff Trump and made him stand outside in his underwear.

    • #139
  20. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    They were probably mad they couldn’t handcuff Trump and made him stand outside in his underwear.

    Supposedly, if you do it by the book, you have to handcuff the person. Supposedly, that’s why they did it when he was gone.

    • #140
  21. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    FWIW: 

    • #141
  22. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    I have an acquaintance who gets news from NPR, NYTimes, and maybe WaPo. He thinks he is well-informed and has said that his guru for economics is Paul Krugman and his guru for social/moral issues is David Brooks. I don’t see him much since I retired and that’s a good thing. At least he has a sense of humor and admitted that maybe he was “being a bit tribal”. I didn’t get it at first because I had forgotten that he is a Jew.

    You should ask him about his investment portfolio.

    Krugman really is so dense that light curves around him:

    Stephen L. Miller on Twitter: “https://t.co/MTtzNwtOop” / Twitter

    • #142
  23. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Django (View Comment):

    FWIW:

    So, we are to conclude that documents were classified and dealt with national security and were also shown to the type of jury fielded inside of DC?

    • #143
  24. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    FWIW:

     

    So, we are to conclude that documents were classified and dealt with national security and were also shown to the type of jury fielded inside of DC?

    I guess we wait for the leaks. 

    • #144
  25. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Massie nailed it:

    • #145
  26. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Django (View Comment):

    Massie nailed it:

    Thomas Massie on Twitter: “I’m not in the Freedom Caucus, but I’d say: every meeting of that group, all of the internal dynamics, every source of information, every conversation with GOP leadership, all major donors, recruitment efforts, unofficial whistle blowers can all be gleaned from that one phone.” / Twitter

    The collapse into totalitarianism is happening faster than I thought it would.

    • #146
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Last I heard, they don’t actually have to take a phone to get those things, the service providers already have them.  Including things that may have been deleted from the actual phone.

    • #147
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Last I heard, they don’t actually have to take a phone to get those things, the service providers already have them. Including things that may have been deleted from the actual phone.

    Sure, but that doesn’t have the same intimidation factor as stopping you to take away your actual phone.

     

    • #148
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Last I heard, they don’t actually have to take a phone to get those things, the service providers already have them. Including things that may have been deleted from the actual phone.

    Sure, but that doesn’t have the same intimidation factor as stopping you to take away your actual phone.

    Exactly, which would indicate that it’s not really about evidence.

    But you may be surprised (although you shouldn’t be) at how ignorant people are.  I’ve known people who believed that their cell phone voice messages were stored ON THEIR PHONE.  And they couldn’t be convinced otherwise.

    • #149
  30. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    kedavis (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Last I heard, they don’t actually have to take a phone to get those things, the service providers already have them. Including things that may have been deleted from the actual phone.

    Sure, but that doesn’t have the same intimidation factor as stopping you to take away your actual phone.

    Exactly, which would indicate that it’s not really about evidence.

    But you may be surprised (although you shouldn’t be) at how ignorant people are. I’ve known people who believed that their cell phone voice messages were stored ON THEIR PHONE. And they couldn’t be convinced otherwise.

    It’s easy to demonstrate, at least with Verizon. Turn off the phone; dial the phone number from a landline if you have one; punch in your password and access your voicemail from that phone while you cell phone is turned off. Done. 

    I suspect this is the same with other providers. 

    • #150
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.