Quote of the Day: Is Europe Finished?

 

Let’s cut through the diplo-speak: If Mr. Biden and the Europeans don’t get Ukraine right, Europe’s future is finished.

Putin is Hitler. He is attempting the extermination of a people and the obliteration of their cities. World War II wasn’t fought in Europe to prevent a future nuclear exchange between Russia and the U.S. It was fought because Europe was experiencing the indiscriminate murder of civilians under Nazi military doctrine, now revived by Mr. Putin and the Russian general staff.— Daniel Henninger

In an ambitious flurry of activity, Europe is speaking out and taking action against Vladimir Putin, canceling some of their commitments to him and stepping in to help Ukraine. Most of the Ukrainian refugees are landing in Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia. The EU has established an emergency protection system, offering jobs, shelter, and medical treatment. They have also worked at streamlining their entry procedures. The invasion of Putin has been criticized harshly, and Europe has stepped up.

But how long will they enthusiastically deal with this new reality?

At this writing, 4 million people have fled Ukraine; another 6.5 million people are displaced. It’s impossible to know how long the conflict will drag on, or whether the EU countries will be able to support millions of refugees, or how many of the Ukrainians will stay. Will they be able to find work? Will they be able to adjust if they choose to stay? Will they be welcomed by the various countries?

And will the U.S. make a sincere and reasonable effort to supply arms and compassionate support, and for how long?

And yet . . . and yet . . .

Does Europe really have a choice? Over time will they try to ignore the threats that Putin poses to the European continent?

Will they realize that helping Ukraine and Ukrainians and standing up to Putin could determine the very future of Europe?

Published in Foreign Policy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 223 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    Charles Mark (View Comment):
    One can only do what one can. Mrs Mark and I haven’t been found wanting I assure you.

    As Red Green would say at the end of every show, “We’re rootin’ for ya. We’re all in this together.

    [EDITED to eliminate CoC violation]

    What could Red Green have said that could violate the code of conduct?  I can’t imagine.

    • #151
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    I tend to agree, that this is more or less what I’ve been led to believe.  But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    • #152
  3. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    I tend to agree, that this is more or less what I’ve been led to believe. But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    It seems that home ownership in Europe is far less than for Americans – people tend not to own their small apartments that were mentioned previously – and since the home is the most valuable thing owned by most people, that suggests European wealth would be significantly lower.  But that doesn’t necessarily translate to lifestyle, since Europeans tend to have a lot more paid vacation time etc.

    • #153
  4. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    kedavis (View Comment):
    But that doesn’t necessarily translate to lifestyle, since Europeans tend to have a lot more paid vacation time etc.

    I’ve always had a sense that Americans of my generation liked to work. That seems to have waned some as we go through new generation but we still haven’t caught up with Europeans. The Covid pandemic lockdown and other recent pressures on small business will probably help America to catch up with Europe.

    • #154
  5. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Flicker (View Comment):
    But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    What about the nice households?

    • #155
  6. Charles Mark Member
    Charles Mark
    @CharlesMark

    For all the efforts by the EU to turn the continent of Europe into a superstate, it remains a large collection of nation-states, with their own histories, cultures and languages. Some are in the EU, some are not. There was a meltdown when the Brits checked out, precisely because it countered the march of federalism. There is no comparison with the US, which has a common language, polity and culture, notwithstanding the regional differences. Likewise, comparing household size, family size  or income is a waste of time. Citizens of European countries should remember that also. 

    • #156
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    What about the nice households?

    I tried my best.  I actually changed the wording from mean European and mean American to avoid impugning either side.  All our European members would have thought “Yes!  Mean Americans” and “How dare he speak of mean Europeans!”  Fortunately, no one read it that way.

    But just to be safe, I suppose next time I’ll refer to nice European household wealth, because everyone will still know I mean mean.

    • #157
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    What about the nice households?

    I tried my best. I actually changed the wording from mean European and mean American to avoid impugning either side. All our European members would have thought “Yes! Mean Americans” and “How dare he speak of mean Europeans!” Fortunately, no one read it that way.

    But just to be safe, I suppose next time I’ll refer to nice European household wealth, because everyone will still know I mean mean.

    Or just say “average” since that’s what most people take “mean” to…. mean… anyway.

    • #158
  9. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    What about the nice households?

    I tried my best. I actually changed the wording from mean European and mean American to avoid impugning either side. All our European members would have thought “Yes! Mean Americans” and “How dare he speak of mean Europeans!” Fortunately, no one read it that way.

    But just to be safe, I suppose next time I’ll refer to nice European household wealth, because everyone will still know I mean mean.

    Or just say “average” since that’s what most people take “mean” to…. mean… anyway.

    But the average was roughly given.  What I wanted to see was the mean, if you get the drift of my, um, meaning.

    • #159
  10. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    What about the nice households?

    I must be slow.  I was scratchin’ my head for a good minute or two wondering what the heck you meant and why people gave you likes.   Now I get it, HA!

    • #160
  11. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    Flicker (View Comment):

    I tend to agree, that this is more or less what I’ve been led to believe. But I’d be interested in the European mean household wealth versus the American mean.

    Yeah.  It isn’t commonly noticed, but if you look at the footnotes on the Web about GDP, etc, you’ll see that national accounts from our main accounting organizations, like IMF, CIA, and US BEA, severely distort the financial data with respect to the tiny countries with the highest GDP. 

    Luxembourg and Ireland come to mind but there are a number of them, including several in Europe as well as the Caribbean.  Those interested can look it up easy enough I guess.  The countries are marked with asterisks usually.

    Their GDPs are inflated by “pass-thru” corporations created to avoid taxes on the “real” corporations back in the really rich countries.

    You’d want to look at one of the sets of National Accounts from agencies that correct for this distortion (there is at least one, can’t think of the name).

    I’m not sure how the distortion affects Household Wealth, though.  I don’t think it would much, because the ghost assets would tend to be on the balance sheets of Financial or Non-Financial Corporations, which are reported separately from Households. Not sure, just shooting from the hip, but I didn’t pull the trigger.

     

    • #161
  12. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    Don’t be fooled with raw numbers. The distribution of wealth is different. I’m not complaining, but wealth in the US is concentrated to fewer. That throws average off. The average American is about the same as the average European.

    I don’t think that is right. Don’t forget that we have people on the bottom that skew the statistics just as much as those at the top. I’ve looked over various economic factors in the past and Europeans always fall short of their American counterparts. They have lower wages, fewer appliances, fewer cars, less living space, lower buying power with the money they do have, and so on. Some pundits used to argue that when certain European countries criticized our treatment of Blacks, it turns out that our Blacks have higher living standards than those country’s average citizens do.

    But Americans have more debt, in some cases, way more.  Many of us are living beyond our means.  And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population.  I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.  The European system provides economic value that is masked in the numbers.  They also retire earlier and have more time off.  Let’s put it this way.  If Americans have a better standard of living than Europeans, it’s only slightly better.  And some of that has to do with lack of natural resources in Europe.

    • #162
  13. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    Don’t be fooled with raw numbers. The distribution of wealth is different. I’m not complaining, but wealth in the US is concentrated to fewer. That throws average off. The average American is about the same as the average European.

    I don’t think that is right. Don’t forget that we have people on the bottom that skew the statistics just as much as those at the top. I’ve looked over various economic factors in the past and Europeans always fall short of their American counterparts. They have lower wages, fewer appliances, fewer cars, less living space, lower buying power with the money they do have, and so on. Some pundits used to argue that when certain European countries criticized our treatment of Blacks, it turns out that our Blacks have higher living standards than those country’s average citizens do.

    But Americans have more debt, in some cases, way more. Many of us are living beyond our means. And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it. The European system provides economic value that is masked in the numbers. Let’s put it this way. If Americans have a better standard of living than Europeans, it’s only slightly better. And some of that has to do with lack of natural resources in Europe.

    Yes, the free stuff complicates things, but even then the whole lifestyle, apartment size (even subsidized), number of cars, price of gas, heating, spare freezers, food money (even subsidized), cooking and dining out, and even entertainment (in home and out).  And to a degree the access to timely and effective medical care.

    I assume good wine is €2 a bottle everywhere.

    • #163
  14. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes.  I’ve known people in those circumstances.  You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people.  Others criticize the U.S.  for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    • #164
  15. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yeah, the idea that American’s are denied healthcare unless they have insurance is just inaccurate. Every Catholic hospital (and many Christian doctors) will take patients gratis. Even our city-owned hospital (until purchased by UCHealth a few years ago) was running budget deficits due to all the indigents it served. When our British friends advocating for an NHS here would  suggest that people weren’t getting healthcare, I’d ask them where all the corpses were lining the streets. And the stats on early detection and cancer survival rates for Americans put other countries to shame. Or, they did until Obamacare when veterans stopped being screened annually for prostate and breast cancer, for example. . .

    As the saying goes, your healthcare can be high quality, accessible, or cheap. Pick two. Until recently American healthcare was high quality and accessible and paid for for the indigent by high insurance premiums for everyone else. But, we’re moving toward the Cuban model of two-tiers — one system for the wealthy and powerful and a lesser system for everyone else. Sort of like the justice system.

    • #165
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yeah, the idea that American’s are denied healthcare unless they have insurance is just inaccurate. Every Catholic hospital (and many Christian doctors) will take patients gratis. Even our city-owned hospital (until purchased by UCHealth a few years ago) was running budget deficits due to all the indigents it served. When our British friends advocating for an NHS here would suggest that people weren’t getting healthcare, I’d ask them where all the corpses were lining the streets. And the stats on early detection and cancer survival rates for Americans put other countries to shame. Or, they did until Obamacare when veterans stopped being screened annually for prostate and breast cancer, for example. . .

    As the saying goes, your healthcare can be high quality, accessible, or cheap. Pick two. Until recently American healthcare was high quality and accessible and paid for for the indigent by high insurance premiums for everyone else. But, we’re moving toward the Cuban model of two-tiers — one system for the wealthy and powerful and a lesser system for everyone else. Sort of like the justice system.

    You mean the healthcare system is finally catching up to the education system?  Huzzah!

    • #166
  17. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yes, hospital emergency service, but walk into a doctor’s office and tell them you have no insurance and see what you get.  See if you get follow ups and physical therapy and other outpatient services.  There is most decidedly a difference between those that have insurance and those that don’t.  

    • #167
  18. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    iWe (View Comment):
    Our job is in this world, and G-d expects us to keep faith and keep going.

    Maybe that’s why I refuse to give up hope for the future. If we are to serve G-d, we can’t do it sitting on our hands or giving up. We are called to make a difference.

    Actually in Catholicism (I can’t speak for other branches of Christianity) despair is a mortal sin.

    • #168
  19. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    kedavis (View Comment):

    genferei (View Comment):
    My point is that almost all of the talk of civilizational decline directed at Western Europe can be directed at the US with a few tweaks. To the extent that one considers the situation still remediable in the US, almost the same considerations could apply to Europe. (Note the two “almost”s, though.)

    Except the single biggest problem, native population growth, has been on the decline in Europe for quite a while. If the birth rate in the US has dropped below replacement, it’s only been pretty recently, and perhaps due to economic pressures which can change more rapidly and more easily than what has caused the decline in Europe.

    I suspect it’s more than economic.  Sen Patrick Moynahan once said that the US tended to be 30 (? I can’t remember the actual number, it might be more than 30) years behind the trends of Europe.  I think something has happened in the last 25 years with the loss of religion that has changed the nature of our country.

    • #169
  20. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    Don’t be fooled with raw numbers. The distribution of wealth is different. I’m not complaining, but wealth in the US is concentrated to fewer. That throws average off. The average American is about the same as the average European.

    I don’t think that is right. Don’t forget that we have people on the bottom that skew the statistics just as much as those at the top. I’ve looked over various economic factors in the past and Europeans always fall short of their American counterparts. They have lower wages, fewer appliances, fewer cars, less living space, lower buying power with the money they do have, and so on. Some pundits used to argue that when certain European countries criticized our treatment of Blacks, it turns out that our Blacks have higher living standards than those country’s average citizens do.

    Walter E Williams wrote about that several times. 

    • #170
  21. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yeah, the idea that American’s are denied healthcare unless they have insurance is just inaccurate. Every Catholic hospital (and many Christian doctors) will take patients gratis. Even our city-owned hospital (until purchased by UCHealth a few years ago) was running budget deficits due to all the indigents it served. When our British friends advocating for an NHS here would suggest that people weren’t getting healthcare, I’d ask them where all the corpses were lining the streets. And the stats on early detection and cancer survival rates for Americans put other countries to shame. Or, they did until Obamacare when veterans stopped being screened annually for prostate and breast cancer, for example. . .

    As the saying goes, your healthcare can be high quality, accessible, or cheap. Pick two. Until recently American healthcare was high quality and accessible and paid for for the indigent by high insurance premiums for everyone else. But, we’re moving toward the Cuban model of two-tiers — one system for the wealthy and powerful and a lesser system for everyone else. Sort of like the justice system.

    I knew an inner-city hospital which turned a profit serving a large percentage of indigent people.  From the moment they showed up in the ER they began paperwork for medicaid.  Before discharge every moment of care was covered.  It worked out well for them, but I’ve never seen it repeated anywhere.

    • #171
  22. DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax)
    @DonG

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Ultimately none of that matters, if you don’t have enough children.

    The latest number I found is 1.70 for 2019, and still dropping.

      I think it the whole replacement rate idea is bunk.  What is the ideal population for Ireland?   I have included a handy graph below.  Circle the number that that spells doom and circle the number that is idea.

     

     

    Ireland's population in the mid 1800's

    • #172
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Ultimately none of that matters, if you don’t have enough children.

    The latest number I found is 1.70 for 2019, and still dropping.

    I think it the whole replacement rate idea is bunk. What is the ideal population for Ireland? I have included a handy graph below. Circle the number that that spells doom and circle the number that is idea.

     

     

    Ireland's population in the mid 1800's

    Doesn’t matter if you think there is some ideal population, if the birth rate remains below 2, eventually you end up with none.

    • #173
  24. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Doesn’t matter if you think there is some ideal population, if the birth rate remains below 2, eventually you end up with none.

    Birth rates tend to change.  Show me a country whose birth rate has remained constant over a couple hundred years.  Or even over one hundred years. 

    • #174
  25. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yes, hospital emergency service, but walk into a doctor’s office and tell them you have no insurance and see what you get. See if you get follow ups and physical therapy and other outpatient services. There is most decidedly a difference between those that have insurance and those that don’t.

    I still think you are not quite aware of how much the poor get.   A friend of mine developed brain cancer.  He and his wife had lost everything previous to this, lost his job, kicked out of their house, and living off of friends and welfare.  Since they had no means of payment whatsoever, the hospital  put him in some sort of assistance program for indigents (I’m not sure if governmental or private).  He stayed in the hospital for nearly two months, received experimental treatments and had surgery, and eventually slipped away into the next world while his wife and I sat with him in the hospital room.   His wife was never charged for his treatment which had to have run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    • #175
  26. Steven Seward Member
    Steven Seward
    @StevenSeward

    EHerring (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Arguably, the US is at least as wealthy as Europe, and yet the US birth rate hasn’t collapsed like Europe’s has.

    If I’ve got my memory cap on, the average European is only 2/3rds as wealthy as the Average American. There are only a couple of tiny countries in Europe that have higher per capita income than the United States.

    Don’t be fooled with raw numbers. The distribution of wealth is different. I’m not complaining, but wealth in the US is concentrated to fewer. That throws average off. The average American is about the same as the average European.

    I don’t think that is right. Don’t forget that we have people on the bottom that skew the statistics just as much as those at the top. I’ve looked over various economic factors in the past and Europeans always fall short of their American counterparts. They have lower wages, fewer appliances, fewer cars, less living space, lower buying power with the money they do have, and so on. Some pundits used to argue that when certain European countries criticized our treatment of Blacks, it turns out that our Blacks have higher living standards than those country’s average citizens do.

    Walter E Williams wrote about that several times.

    One of my favorite pundits.  A big loss to the conservative world.

    • #176
  27. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    And Europeans cover health insurance of their entire population. I certainly don’t advocate a socialist healthcare system, but our system does leave a good percentage without it.

    Ask any hospital or healthcare worker and they will tell you that absolutely nobody is denied healthcare services in this country, and the ones who can’t afford it don’t even have to pay for it, not even through taxes. I’ve known people in those circumstances. You can’t say that about European countries where the poor people pay similar tax rates as the rich people. Others criticize the U.S. for not having universal healthcare without knowing the actual circumstances.

    Yes, hospital emergency service, but walk into a doctor’s office and tell them you have no insurance and see what you get. See if you get follow ups and physical therapy and other outpatient services. There is most decidedly a difference between those that have insurance and those that don’t.

    I still think you are not quite aware of how much the poor get. A friend of mine developed brain cancer. He and his wife had lost everything previous to this, lost his job, kicked out of their house, and living off of friends and welfare. Since they had no means of payment whatsoever, the hospital put him in some sort of assistance program for indigents (I’m not sure if governmental or private). He stayed in the hospital for nearly two months, received experimental treatments and had surgery, and eventually slipped away into the next world while his wife and I sat with him in the hospital room. His wife was never charged for his treatment which had to have run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Also, the hospital that I believe I mentioned on #171 tapped into a statewide indigent medical fund to recoup some of its expenses, plus it got lost income credit for all its free care given as charity.  The end result is that they did fairly well off the indigent population.  They certainly didn’t lose money overall.

    • #177
  28. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Israel is the only Western country where the population of the secular population continues to grow.

    I credit Hamas and other enemies – having enemies helps people find a reason to fight back.

    • #178
  29. DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax)
    @DonG

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Doesn’t matter if you think there is some ideal population, if the birth rate remains below 2, eventually you end up with none.

    Ahhh.  As ‘t’ approaches infinity.   There is not much point in focusing on infinity. 

    • #179
  30. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Doesn’t matter if you think there is some ideal population, if the birth rate remains below 2, eventually you end up with none.

    Ahhh. As ‘t’ approaches infinity. There is not much point in focusing on infinity.

    No, it doesn’t take infinitely long.  Half each time, progresses the same way as double each time.  And population is also different in that each new generation only has a certain amount of time to reproduce, before the females are too old.

    • #180
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.