Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
13 Republican Congressmen Save Pelosi, Biden on $1.2T Infrastructure Vote
Six Democrats voted against the $1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan (BIF) late Friday night, which should have killed the legislation. Instead, 13 Republicans rode to Nancy Pelosi’s rescue and voted yes. The BIF passed the Senate nearly two months ago, so the legislation will head straight to the White House for the President’s signature.
Here are the Republicans for Pelosi:
- Rep. Don Bacon (R–NE)
- Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R–PA)
- Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R–NY)
- Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R–OH)
- Rep. John Katko (R–NY)
- Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R–IL)
- Rep. Nicole Malliatokis (R–NY)
- Rep. David McKinley (R–WV)
- Rep. Tom Reed (R–NY)
- Rep. Chris Smith (R–NJ)
- Rep. Fred Upton (R–MI)
- Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R–NJ)
- Rep. Don Young (R–AK)
Despite Democrats not having the necessary support, the final vote was 228-206 thanks to these 13 Republicans. Each should be primaried, at least those who aren’t retiring. And it’s time for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–CA) to be removed as House Minority Leader since he has demonstrated brutal incompetence.
For the record, here are the six Democrats who voted against the bill:
- Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D–NY)
- Rep. Cori Bush (D–MO)
- Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–NY)
- Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–MN)
- Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D–MA)
- Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D–MI)
Things like that happen because once you involve central government and no-accountability bureaucracy, there is no incentive to fix them.
The infrastructure arguments that centrists make are exactly the same as the arguments leftists make for socialism.
“We haven’t tried it the right way yet”
“True infrastructure spending has never been tried”
“If the government didn’t (insert program here) society would collapse and the children something something…”
“We need more money so that it’s done right this time. How much? I don’t know, just give us more”
So, if $3.5T costs zero, does this get us some sort of rebate?
Yes. You get the infrastructure as an in-kind redistribution of income from the rich to everyone else, since the rich will be the ones paying the taxes to fund the infrastructure that the poor and middle class will use.
There’s what’s called pervious concrete, but the upkeep is expensive.
For one thing, black parents are clamoring for school choice.
You conflated infrastructure and this bill. Nice try. Reagan would have wiped his shoe on a $2T bill that “only” does $500B of what it’s supposed to do.
In addition to the previous list, here are some more jewels (some of which may be part of the original list):
GAZE.
Don’t feed the trolls.
I couldn’t have described the socialist delusion better myself. The rich will be largely unaffected by the feds producing funny money (spending money neither we nor the rich have, but printing plenty to make up the difference). Everything being more expensive — including essentials like food and fuel — is always, always hurtful to the poor and middle class. The rich will barely feel it (they might have to let one of their gardeners go). It’s a great way to make the middle class poor. Probably Biden/Pelosi’s only accomplishment.
You can’t redistribute your way out of what’s coming, even if we do manage to build a bridge or two in between the “green” “equity and inclusion” agenda built-in to the bill. We’re not European socialists. Heck, even the Europeans used as the “model” for American “progressives” aren’t really European socialists. It’s just fantasy.
Remember, when the Federal Reserve says that they are “reducing”, it means they are reducing the rate. They are still buying bonds.
If they do anything dramatic it will be in the news. And then the start market will crash.
Hmm, there are actually two congressmen named Anthony Gonzales. Weird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Gonzales
Could someone please explain what they mean when they say 19 GOP Senators already voted for this monstrous infrastructure bill?
Well, they have their own political agenda and are outliers. Do you not understand these factional disputes? Are you so uninformed politically that you actually believe that they are voting ‘no’ for the same reasons Republicans are?
You however, stand against a large Republican majority and align with a large Democrat majority.
It’s a little bit surprising to see you advocate against what is perhaps the only thing Republicans ( save for the phonies) agree on.
So it’s not just Trumpy McTrump is it?
Viruscop, you’re being disingenuous. You originally said that Democrats don’t benefit from Republican INITIATIVES. Not legislation. And most of it would be legislation if Democrats didn’t block it.
The tariffs, the wall (such as it is), and Operation Warp Speed were not pieces of legislation, so they don’t apply here and I’m not going to talk them.
The trade agreement really isn’t much different from NAFTA, but it was designed to fool stupid people into thinking that Trump was making a difference somewhere.
The only item where you might have a point is Covid relief, but Trump railed against McConnell at least as much as Pelosi for not doling out more money. In the end, Democrats did give people more money than the GOP.
So we should measure the success of a party by how much they give away? Sure. Just become your kid’s favorite parent by buying him a Corvette every week, that will make you a successful responsible parent.
Probably nobody cares about this, but I do. This is the leader of the most organized anti-trump group.
It’s just a boilerplate comment. We have had some really good pro comments here. These guys never talk in detail or originally. If you told him about the anti-centralization case he would go crazy like you weren’t realistic. These guys think they are really smart. The problem is they have just enough votes to screw everything up.
Viruscop, evey post is more blinkered than the previous one. In what world do corporations not pass their increased income tax along to customers? If you happen to buy something, you’ll be paying the tax. Those increased prices will affect those making less than $400K. And it will affect them more seriously than those making more than $400K. Did you notice the state of the economy improved after the tax and regulatory environment was eased?
And the federal government’s definition of rich is pretty elastic. At the inception of federal inome tax in the US, it was 1% of income on a handful of high earners. Alternative minimum tax was likewise only intended to affect the billionaires, but came to be imposed on millions of Americans.
It’s pretty much a one way street for Democrat politicians who never see the Dennis Moore situation developing.
lol
Forcing electric cars is idiotic.
If passing trillion dollar spending bills during runaway inflation is the moderate, sensible approach then I don’t want to be moderate.
Ricochet is such a welcoming community we let Lincoln Project trolls throw their two cents in.
The oligarchy is strong with this one.
We DO have a unified “leadership” … there are really not two “parties”, only big media, big corporations, big finance, big government, and lapdog RINOs doing a generally great job of convincing the masses that they still have some sort of voice — or even believing this is some sort of a “Democratic Republic” vs an oligarchy.
“Rigged” is a great introduction.
As president, Reagan vetoed a project known as the “Big Dig,” another “Infrastructure” boondoggle that wasn’t as bad as this one.
No one can know know what Reagan would do if he were president today, but on this issue I know which way to bet.
I try to avoid feeding the trolls.
John Wayne Gacy would be better than J.B. Pritzker. And he’s dead.
Will the GOP do anything when white parents prevent black parents from sending their kids to majority white schools? We both know that they will do nothing, and say that it is a local matter.
So school choice would be worthless.
Actually, the Democrats put in a $500 Billion tax cut for the rich inside the “Build Back Better” Bill.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/business/reconciliation-package-taxes-salt/index.html
That’s whitewashing its murder pretty hard. The Tea Party was not a political party in the sense the the Republican or Democrat Party is. It was a party in the sense of a group of people for a cause — such as a working party, a party of four, or a party of angry Bostonians who dumped a bunch of tea into the harbor.
I know that there is a vocal contingent whose “Taxed Enough Already” folksonym “TEA Party” (note caps) had aspirations to do real political party things, and they’ll tell you how they are the real people, in true tribal fashion. “Been doing this since 1995 [or whatever], we are the TEA Party!” But the Tea Party as we know it was a grassroots response to Obama’s appalling election, and it delivered crushing, historic victories in 2010. And then the GOPe and the Democrats went to war against it. Obama weaponized the IRS against us, and Lois Lerner was never touched. John Boehner appointed 16-term Representative Hal “Prince of Pork” Rogers to Budget, and Paul (the status quo wonk) Ryan to Appropriations. Forgive me for briefly liking Ryan at the time — in comparison, he shone. Paul Ryan famously sabotaged Trump’s (first) term, buying into the infernal Russia hoax, opposing the President the Tea Party elected.
The Tea Party is still here, of course. We weren’t all vaporized by Lois Lerner or Obama, or the GOPe gang. No, the angry hobbits remain under whatever name. The Tea Party is dead — Long Live the Tea Party! And Trump is our President.
Let’s go Brandon.
In this world. If you raise prices while other companies eat their costs, then consumers will shift to your competitors that did not raise the price. The econ 101 framework of a perfectly competitive market where prices rise for everyone only holds under strict assumptions.
There was no noticeable change in long-term GDP growth after the Trump tax cuts. There was a short-term increase before the midterms, but nothing that altered the economic trajectory of the US or changed world history.
Huh? You think the problem is branding?
Let’s go Branding!
I have nothing to do with the Lincoln Project.