Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
13 Republican Congressmen Save Pelosi, Biden on $1.2T Infrastructure Vote
Six Democrats voted against the $1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan (BIF) late Friday night, which should have killed the legislation. Instead, 13 Republicans rode to Nancy Pelosi’s rescue and voted yes. The BIF passed the Senate nearly two months ago, so the legislation will head straight to the White House for the President’s signature.
Here are the Republicans for Pelosi:
- Rep. Don Bacon (R–NE)
- Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R–PA)
- Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R–NY)
- Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R–OH)
- Rep. John Katko (R–NY)
- Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R–IL)
- Rep. Nicole Malliatokis (R–NY)
- Rep. David McKinley (R–WV)
- Rep. Tom Reed (R–NY)
- Rep. Chris Smith (R–NJ)
- Rep. Fred Upton (R–MI)
- Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R–NJ)
- Rep. Don Young (R–AK)
Despite Democrats not having the necessary support, the final vote was 228-206 thanks to these 13 Republicans. Each should be primaried, at least those who aren’t retiring. And it’s time for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–CA) to be removed as House Minority Leader since he has demonstrated brutal incompetence.
For the record, here are the six Democrats who voted against the bill:
- Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D–NY)
- Rep. Cori Bush (D–MO)
- Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–NY)
- Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–MN)
- Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D–MA)
- Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D–MI)
The same thing happened with man-made canals, here.
Remember the Global Crossing Internet thing? I would like to think that was 100% private money but I doubt it.
Now the big thing is rural broadband, which I call communist broadband. The problem is broadband requires density which they don’t have. So what this means is, every asset and almost every single business in these areas is worth less now. So they are going to fix this with communism. I’m not saying they should or shouldn’t do this, but this is a huge political mess in Minnesota for obvious reasons.
This ship sailed over two decades ago. Stop worrying about spending. If they actually ever did anything the economy would collapse.
He’s dead.
So he can’t comment on whether he would support this Porkulus.
I think I just figured out why you never say anything original or detailed about public policy.
Government Is How We Steal From Each Other™
It wasn’t communist enough. I’m dead serious.
This ship has sailed. They are going to force inflation and hopefully society will hold together. I am dead serious.
Nobody is going to control spending anymore. We screwed this up decades ago. I have said this over and over. It’s even worse than I thought. Pay the dollar for this transcript.
https://www.realvision.com/shows/mike-green-in-conversation/videos/is-the-golden-age-of-liberal-capitalism-over
Mommy! The kids are picking on me again! MOMMY!
Actually, the lack of infrastructure was the Confederacy’s greatest asset- with few roads or railroads to use an invading army faced a logistical nightmare. That is why many European military experts thought the South would be able to hold of the Union army. It is also why Sherman’s March to the Sea was such strategic surprise-he abandoned the logistical tail and thereby was able to move rapidly & deeply thru the South. His move not only crippled the South’s remaining breadbasket but it served as a warning to the South as to what attempting to wage a guerrilla war would do to their property. Sherman also proved the Southern aristocrats were highly self motivated- b/c the best way to stop him was a scorched earth strategy in front of his advancing army (since he was “living off the land”)-but few of them would burn their own crops, b/c they hoped to be able to make a killing selling their produce in the ensuing shortages after Sherman passed by. He should that the bluster of the Deep South aristocracy was just that- they would fight until the last poor white guy in VA & Nc died-but would not risk their own property for the cause. The slaves could see this as well-the rich white slaveholders (NB-they were a “natural aristocracy”)couldn’t stop an army of working class guys from the North-despite all their claims of natural superiority.
Another reminder that the Tea Party is dead.
Yes it is.
It’s more like $40 billion.
Gary,
You seem to conflate “desirable” with “Constitutional.”
The arguments don’t hold water. Infrastructure should be locally funded and locally selected. If Federal it will be loaded with pork. Good lord that’s the whole point. Local stuff has pork as well and local folks have to fight over it as well. Folks continue with the fiction that folks who live in Washington, Bureaucrats and permanent representatives focus on the tens of thousands of towns and cities and rural areas that constitute the US. They do not.
If you knew anything about building a structure under water with the interactions of soil and water versus drilling through a mountain, you might understand why it is so much more expensive on a per mile basis. The foundation of the structure is a huge cost.
Well, it was stillborn.
It was a hinderance more than any help to the Confederacy. The limited amount of railroads meant that it was difficult to move troops rapidly between states. It also hindered trade between states. From what I understand, Mississippi rail wasn’t even the same gauge as the rest of the Confederacy, so there would be an interval where cargo would have to be shipped by animal-drawn wagons and placed on a new train.
So there would be huge gaps in infrastructure in the middle of the country with small populations. Some plan.
FIFY . . .
We don’t know that. It could happen without central funding and authority. What we are doing now is going to end the hard way, anyway.
I couldn’t disagree more with the O/P. My criticism of McCarthy and the Republicans who voted against this is that it should have been sold as a nationalist plan for stitching the country together. As it is, they have turned it into a Biden victory rather than an American victory. Dumb.
Everybody is too stupid and corrupt to make this happen.
bad infrastructure favored the defense- like Russia vs Napoleon & Hitler. An invading army had to tie up a lot of resources to ensure supply- just look at the manpower required to garisson troops all the way back to their starting point-a huge drain on manpower. Additionally, wagon trains require large amounts of fodder (an ox eats more than they can pull if they travel more than a couple of days). A defense force lives off their own land and doesn’t have to guard supplies & fear the local inhabitants. While the South had trouble shifting forces from the east & the west, the North had much greater trouble sustaining their troops in a hostile environment. The deeper the invasion, the greater the trouble as supply lines became further lengthened-all the while the enemy fell back on supportive territory. The South could also destroy infrastructure & supply as they fell back, thereby worsening the burden on the North.
I once read a book entitled Alexander the Great and the Logistics of the Macedonian Army. I think the author concluded that a wagon train could last for seven days without foraging, then it would run out of fodder. And, of course, if it carried seven days worth of fodder, it wasn’t carrying anything else.
Imagine a continent-spanning civilization split up into independent states without a centralized authority to borrow and spend on infrastructure, and coordinate the building of trans-border roads, canals, rail lines, bridges and tunnels. It would be anarchy. It would be impossible to get anything done. Which is why we need the Federal Government to handle infrastructure and why since the 19th century and to this day it is impossible to cross Europe by road and rail, bridge and tunnel.
I can tell you that the Minneapolis light rail is reducing national GDP now and forever. It would not have happened without the feds.
Imagine thinking that payoffs to a Senator’s wife, furniture for the Department of Homeland Security, bike riding lessons for first responders, mystery slush funds for a left-wing son of a communist to spend as he pleases, and 15 billion for the FCC were “infrastructure.” Imagine an infrastructure bill with $600 Billion in unaccountably mystery spending attached to it.
Enjoy your mileage tax.
Just for the record #88 has my name on a quote that I didn’t say.
I don’t see any excuse for any conservative to vote in a way that concentrates more power in the federal government at this point. It’s not the money flowing out of Washington, as inefficient and corrupt as that may be (and I’m not disagreeing with a word you said, I Walton). It’s the power flowing in and feeding Leviathan. No true Reagan Republican would vote to empower “the problem,” not the solution to our woes. We’ve moved waaaay beyond the 80’s, and not in a good way.