The Kraken Katchers

WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that portions of this podcast may cause anxiety, irritation, abdominal pain, and explosive diarrhea to supporters of the President and people who believe the election was “stolen.” For everyone else, the Surgeon General recommends  this show as it will make you laugh, make you think, amaze you with the hosts ability recall arcane trivia about long ago TV shows, movies, and theater (and some current ones too).

Subscribe to GLoP Culture in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsors!

DonorsTrust

Boll & Branch

Use Code: GLOP

Tommy John

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 400 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Eddy Ericsson Inactive
    Eddy Ericsson
    @EddyEricsson

    At the end of the podcast, they talk about the awful, yet inadvertantly hilarious “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls”, written by a young Roger Ebert. Here is an older Ebert reading a column written about the movie by the great 5-day a week Chicago columnist, Mike Royko.  

    • #31
  2. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Meanwhile, back on planet Earth…

    Yes, you’re exactly like Tucker.

    If you listened to the whole clip, and if you listen to Tucker more regularly then you might notice that Tucker doesn’t view any of this as absurd or crazy. It’s just that the time to show the evidence is now. The red flags are already apparent to those who want to see, but red flags aren’t enough.

    Truth is what I’m after. The truth is that Tucker is genuinely curious about getting to the bottom of all this; you seem to be strategically incurious and using Tucker’s frustration more as a weapon than an actual argument.

    Agreed …. the caption associated with the video is the twitter posters take away from the video, not anything Carlson actually said.

    My take away was Tucker was telling Powell this is a extremely monumental allegation so you better start showing the public you actually have the goods.

    • #32
  3. Biden Pure Demagogue Inactive
    Biden Pure Demagogue
    @Pseudodionysius

    • #33
  4. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Eddy Ericsson (View Comment):

    At the end of the podcast, they talk about the awful, yet inadvertantly hilarious “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls”, written by a young Roger Ebert. Here is an older Ebert reading a column written about the movie by the great 5-day a week Chicago columnist, Mike Royko.

    I miss that Chicago.

    • #34
  5. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Yes, you’re exactly like Tucker.

    If you listened to the whole clip, and if you listen to Tucker more regularly then you might notice that Tucker doesn’t view any of this as absurd or crazy. It’s just that the time to show the evidence is now. The red flags are already apparent to those who want to see, but red flags aren’t enough.

    No, I’m actually nothing like Tucker. But I do watch him on a regular basis. 

    The point of posting this clip was that Sidney Powell, the President’s lawyer dodged an interview with Tucker Carlson, the guy with 5 million viewers and one of the President’s most reliable defenders — although certainly not a pushover and undoubtedly, he would have pushed her to present evidence to back up her claims. If she’s got “the red flags,” let’s see them. She declined Carlson’s request. Repeatedly.  Draw your own conclusions from that. 

    • #35
  6. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):
    My take away was Tucker was telling Powell this is a extremely monumental allegation so you better start showing the public you actually have the goods.

    Yes, that was exactly my point in posting this clip, and more importantly, the point made in this podcast with the Glen Glengarry Glen Ross leads example.

    • #36
  7. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Yes, you’re exactly like Tucker.

    If you listened to the whole clip, and if you listen to Tucker more regularly then you might notice that Tucker doesn’t view any of this as absurd or crazy. It’s just that the time to show the evidence is now. The red flags are already apparent to those who want to see, but red flags aren’t enough.

    No, I’m actually nothing like Tucker. But I do watch him on a regular basis.

    The point of posting this clip was that Sidney Powell, the President’s lawyer dodged an interview with Tucker Carlson, the guy with 5 million viewers and one of the President’s most reliable defenders — although certainly not a pushover and undoubtedly, he would have pushed her to present evidence to back up her claims. If she’s got “the red flags,” let’s see them. She declined Carlson’s request. Repeatedly. Draw your own conclusions from that.

    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    • #37
  8. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Yes, you’re exactly like Tucker.

    If you listened to the whole clip, and if you listen to Tucker more regularly then you might notice that Tucker doesn’t view any of this as absurd or crazy. It’s just that the time to show the evidence is now. The red flags are already apparent to those who want to see, but red flags aren’t enough.

    No, I’m actually nothing like Tucker. But I do watch him on a regular basis.

    The point of posting this clip was that Sidney Powell, the President’s lawyer dodged an interview with Tucker Carlson, the guy with 5 million viewers and one of the President’s most reliable defenders — although certainly not a pushover and undoubtedly, he would have pushed her to present evidence to back up her claims. If she’s got “the red flags,” let’s see them. She declined Carlson’s request. Repeatedly. Draw your own conclusions from that.

    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    The repetition of the Nevers is endless.

    • #38
  9. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Yes, you’re exactly like Tucker.

    If you listened to the whole clip, and if you listen to Tucker more regularly then you might notice that Tucker doesn’t view any of this as absurd or crazy. It’s just that the time to show the evidence is now. The red flags are already apparent to those who want to see, but red flags aren’t enough.

    No, I’m actually nothing like Tucker. But I do watch him on a regular basis.

    The point of posting this clip was that Sidney Powell, the President’s lawyer dodged an interview with Tucker Carlson, the guy with 5 million viewers and one of the President’s most reliable defenders — although certainly not a pushover and undoubtedly, he would have pushed her to present evidence to back up her claims. If she’s got “the red flags,” let’s see them. She declined Carlson’s request. Repeatedly. Draw your own conclusions from that.

    We already see the red flags. They’re all around. I don’t know the specifics of the exchange between Powell and the Tucker show. Perhaps Powell did “get angry”; perhaps she didn’t. Who knows? Either way, we’ll all know one way or another very soon if they have what they say they have: either the detail they claim to have will be presented in court or it won’t. We’ll see.

    • #39
  10. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    Jonah mentioned my view on this in passing on the podcast. I was tempted to cut it, but I left it in for posterity.

    The good news for all concerned (the guys, the audience, ME) is that for all intensive purposes, this will end on its own accord in January.

    I for one, am looking forward to it.

    • #40
  11. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    Jonah mentioned my view on this in passing on the podcast. I was tempted to cut it, but I left it in for posterity.

    The good news for all concerned (the guys, the audience, ME) is that for all intensive purposes, this will end on its own accord in January.

    I for one, am looking forward to it.

    Well I hope it will end. I pray we don’t hear Biden’s idiocy somehow blamed on Trump. He lives rent free in Jonah’s head. 

    • #41
  12. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Ed G. (View Comment):
    We already see the red flags. They’re all around. I don’t know the specifics of the exchange between Powell and the Tucker show. Perhaps Powell did “get angry”; perhaps she didn’t. Who knows? Either way, we’ll all know one way or another very soon if they have what they say they have: either the detail they claim to have will be presented in court or it won’t. We’ll see.

    Speak for yourself, Ed. WE do not see them “all around.” Read the people I posted excerpts from in my previous comment. Hinderaker, McCarthy, Ericsson, York — these are not CNN or MSNBC journalists. These are our guys and they are not buying what the President and his team are selling. You can ignore it  — that’s up to you. But it’s not going to change it. 

    • #42
  13. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    Jonah mentioned my view on this in passing on the podcast. I was tempted to cut it, but I left it in for posterity.

    The good news for all concerned (the guys, the audience, ME) is that for all intensive purposes, this will end on its own accord in January.

    I for one, am looking forward to it.

    Hatred never dies Blue. 

    • #43
  14. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):
    My take away was Tucker was telling Powell this is a extremely monumental allegation so you better start showing the public you actually have the goods.

    Yes, that was exactly my point in posting this clip, and more importantly, the point made in this podcast with the Glen Glengarry Glen Ross leads example.

    I haven’t actually listened to the Mean Girl podcast for some time … I just enjoy jumping on the comment board to heckle Regina, Karen, and Gretchen.

    • #44
  15. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    https://stream.org/i-know-sidney-powell-she-is-telling-the-truth/

    Non-partisan legal expert Jonathan Turley is one of the few reliable commentators left out there. He observed after watching the press conference that Powell and the rest of the president’s team took a similar risk today. They accused a massive corporation, Dominion, with links to friendly billionaires like Soros and many foreign governments, of felonies. Of colluding with corrupt election officials to steal the White House.

    If these charges are false, their careers are finished. If defamation lawsuits get launched — and I don’t see how Dominion has any choice but to file them, or go bankrupt — Sidney Powell could lose her house and her license to practice law. She’d be a pauper. The same is true of Ellis, Giuliani, and anyone else on the president’s team. But only if the charges are unsupported and untrue.

    Given the death threats to election officials in Michigan, and the doxing of their children, for refusing to certify a corrupt election, I’d say Ms. Powell is risking a lot more than money.

    • #45
  16. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    The good news for all concerned (the guys, the audience, ME) is that for all intensive purposes, this will end on its own accord in January.

    I for one, am looking forward to it.

    Hatred never dies Blue.

    People who think this is all going away if Trump exits the stage are foolish. I don’t know how many times this needs to be said. This was never about Trump. This was about us. The hated. The “deplorables.” The forgotten man. The people who actually make this country work. The ones who are taxed to death while the elitists dine at posh restaurants, unmasked, on our dime.

    It’s not going away no matter how much you may wish it to. It’s going to get more intense.

    Unless and until the criminals are exposed and punished. But that happens . . . never.

    • #46
  17. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Not just “win” but from what I hear, he got 10 million more votes than Obama? BS.

    The voting age population has increased from 229M(2010) to 255M(2019), an increase of 25M. So I can see that, provided the enthusiasm were consistent between the two, it would be possible.

    There is no way that voter enthusiasm for Biden equals that of Obama.

    • #47
  18. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    There is one specific thing that should be easy to check (and prove) between Tucker and Sidney.

    She claims that she sent a deposition to Tucker’s team.

    Tucker claims they received not a single page.

    Both cannot be true.

    Unless – Tucker means “single page” literally, as depositions are multiple pages.

    • #48
  19. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    People who think this is all going away if Trump exits the stage are foolish. I don’t know how many times this needs to be said. This was never about Trump. This was about us. The hated. The “deplorables.” The forgotten man. The people who actually make this country work. The ones who are taxed to death while the elitists dine at posh restaurants, unmasked, on our dime.

    It’s not going away no matter how much you may wish it to. It’s going to get more intense.

    Unless and until the criminals are exposed and punished. But that happens . . . never.

    No, the election challenges are about Trump. Full stop. He’s the one contesting it. He’s the one tweeting that he won it in a landslide. His lawyers are the ones arguing that Hugo Chavez invented the process used to steal this election. This is entirely on him. 

    Look, if there is actual evidence of massive fraud, then show us. So far, they have not. And if there is no evidence presented, then this should go away. 

    • #49
  20. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that portions of this podcast may cause anxiety, irritation, abdominal pain, and explosive diarrhea to supporters of the President and people who believe the election was “stolen.”

    From the Ricochet Code of Conduct:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?

    It appears that there are some very important personages here on Ricochet who can violate the CoC and insult a good portion of the paying membership without consequence. 

    Perhaps not a terribly smart business move to insult a good portion, if not a majority, of Ricochet’s subscribers to introduce a podcast. Of course, if the strategy is to whittle away the number of paying members then far be it from me to get in the way of co-owners who want lose money.

    When should we anticipate that a Lincoln Project podcast will appear on Ricochet?

    • #50
  21. DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Constant Sorrow
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Man of Consta… (View Comment):

    People who think this is all going away if Trump exits the stage are foolish. I don’t know how many times this needs to be said. This was never about Trump. This was about us. The hated. The “deplorables.” The forgotten man. The people who actually make this country work. The ones who are taxed to death while the elitists dine at posh restaurants, unmasked, on our dime.

    It’s not going away no matter how much you may wish it to. It’s going to get more intense.

    Unless and until the criminals are exposed and punished. But that happens . . . never.

    No, the election challenges are about Trump. Full stop. He’s the one contesting it. He’s the one tweeting that he won it in a landslide. His lawyers are the ones arguing that Hugo Chavez invented the process used to steal this election. This is entirely on him.

    You aren’t hearing what I’m saying. You think there’s going to be an end to all this tsuris once the election is resolved? That’s nonsense talk, because this isn’t about Trump. It never was. It isn’t really just about this fraudulent election. The fraudulent election is simply the breaking point. It’s about the relationship of the citizen to the government, and it’s about a political claass that operates above the law and without the consent of the governed. That trust was broken a long time ago. The only question now is whether the United States can last. To make this all about Trump is an extremely narrow view.

    • #51
  22. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Franco (View Comment):

    Ricochet Audio Network: supporters of the President and people who believe the election was “stolen.”

    Because you guys know? I don’t think so. I really don’t think you guys have any insight worth listening to. Your advice, predictions, wishes and dreams have been exposed. This comes after 7 years of listening to, and reading your posts, and juxtaposing these witty ramblings against the transpired events.

    You guys have short memories of your errant predictions and long ones of your glory days.

    To assume ( or conclude? ) there wasn’t coordinated and possibly massive fraud (on top of the pedestrian fraud in every election), at this juncture, with these crazy anomalies visible to us all, betrays abject naïveté, or something incredibly manipulative and devious.

    The incuriousness into vote fraud of this significance of supposed Right of center commentators is frightening and suspicious.

    Because Trump. Sad.

    If you let this slide, say goodbye to your GOP ever winning anything again. Bill Kristol’s self-fulfilling ‘prophecy’.

    • #52
  23. JamesSalerno Inactive
    JamesSalerno
    @JamesSalerno

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that portions of this podcast may cause anxiety, irritation, abdominal pain, and explosive diarrhea to supporters of the President and people who believe the election was “stolen.”

    From the Ricochet Code of Conduct:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?

    It appears that there are some very important personages here on Ricochet who can violate the CoC and insult a good portion of the paying membership without consequence.

    Perhaps not a terribly smart business move to insult a good portion, if not a majority, of Ricochet’s subscribers to introduce a podcast. Of course, if the strategy is to whittle away the number of paying members then far be it from me to get in the way of co-owners who want lose money.

    When should we anticipate that a Lincoln Project podcast will appear on Ricochet?

    Brian, you summed up exactly what I’ve been thinking. This behavior is disgusting.

    • #53
  24. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Blue Yeti, aren’t you tired of Trump talk on GLOP? I sure am. I’ve stopped listening to Jonah’s podcasts. He’s like a tired old broken record.

    Jonah mentioned my view on this in passing on the podcast. I was tempted to cut it, but I left it in for posterity.

    The good news for all concerned (the guys, the audience, ME) is that for all intensive purposes, this will end on its own accord in January.

    I for one, am looking forward to it.

    Yeti persisted!

    • #54
  25. Cato Rand Inactive
    Cato Rand
    @CatoRand

    Jonah, it’s not that you’re wrong about Trump.  It’s just that obsessing about it gets tedious.  Some of us read most of what you write and listen to most of what you say in a public forum – GLOP, the Remnant, the Dispatch, etc.  We’re fans.  Don’t bore your fans.

    • #55
  26. repmodad Inactive
    repmodad
    @Repmodad

    Laying aside the political content of this episode, I would like to point out that two print journalists repeatedly putting off the advertisement so they can take turns extending their conversation about print journalism is the most Print Journalist Thing ever.

    • #56
  27. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):
    Look, if there is actual evidence of massive fraud, then show us.

    Interestingly enough, @saintaugustine has been doing that very thing on his marvelous post, Keeping Track of Election Fraud.

     

    • #57
  28. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that portions of this podcast may cause anxiety, irritation, abdominal pain, and explosive diarrhea to supporters of the President and people who believe the election was “stolen.”

    From the Ricochet Code of Conduct:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?

    It appears that there are some very important personages here on Ricochet who can violate the CoC and insult a good portion of the paying membership without consequence.

    Perhaps not a terribly smart business move to insult a good portion, if not a majority, of Ricochet’s subscribers to introduce a podcast. Of course, if the strategy is to whittle away the number of paying members then far be it from me to get in the way of co-owners who want lose money.

    When should we anticipate that a Lincoln Project podcast will appear on Ricochet?

    They already carry Bill Kristol so it probably isn’t far behind.

    • #58
  29. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):
    Look, if there is actual evidence of massive fraud, then show us.

    Interestingly enough, @saintaugustine has been doing that very thing on his marvelous post, Keeping Track of Election Fraud.

     

    And somehow, the Ricochet Editors REFUSE to bring it to the Main Feed.

    This stinks. Treating members badly is not a good move for the management of a club.

    • #59
  30. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    Blue Yeti (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):
    We already see the red flags. They’re all around. I don’t know the specifics of the exchange between Powell and the Tucker show. Perhaps Powell did “get angry”; perhaps she didn’t. Who knows? Either way, we’ll all know one way or another very soon if they have what they say they have: either the detail they claim to have will be presented in court or it won’t. We’ll see.

    Speak for yourself, Ed. WE do not see them “all around.” Read the people I posted excerpts from in my previous comment. Hinderaker, McCarthy, Ericsson, York — these are not CNN or MSNBC journalists. These are our guys and they are not buying what the President and his team are selling. You can ignore it — that’s up to you. But it’s not going to change it.

    LOL. In the very same comment after calling out Ed G for using first-person plural, you use first person possessive! Who is OUR?

     

    Listen, there may be some holes and flaws in some of the charges. I don’t really know. That’s normal for any case that has this many elements. But to conclude there’s nothing ‘there’ is a heluva stretch. Snipe all you like about legal errors, but don’t think your nothing-to-see-here approach isn’t considered an abject betrayal. Why? Because it’s not necessary at this point unless you have a stake in the outcome. 

    As to your spurious claims that Sidney Powell has to produce hard evidence on Tucker’s ( now failing ) show before presenting it in a legal venue,  and conclude that she therefore has no evidence since she declined, dovetails nicely with all the other misunderstandings and conflicting notions you hold.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.