I’m Struggling with Personal Freedom Today

 

The Libertarian in me is struggling to stay consistent in my desire for personal freedoms, especially where personal property is concerned. Mustangman and I put our house on the market a couple days ago — we’re moving to Dayton, OH in a few weeks. The Portland market can only be described one way: hot! Most houses listed below $400,000 are under contract within a week, and we have been hoping for a fast sale.

This weekend, we packed up the kitties and took a trip up to Yakima to see Ryan M and his family while our realtor did open houses and a ton of showings. Everyone loved our house with one glaring exception. Here’s where we take a step back.

When you stand in the street looking at our house, to the right is a well-kept house and yard. To the left, you might as well be looking at a junkyard/auto repair shop. We never talk to this neighbor, who I not-so-affectionately refer to as “the grease monkey,” but he’s always out in his driveway “fixing” one of the three rusted-out 1960s Chevy trucks parked in his driveway and the street. In the back of the truck parked on the street is a load of roofing shingles waiting to be taken to the dump from where he replaced his roof … almost a year ago. There’s an old exercise bike in the front yard, along with several tires and an axle.

The backyard is so much worse. If you are ever in need of bags of concrete, water heaters, car parts, kitchen sinks, or marijuana, his backyard is the place to go. As you might imagine, the idea of living next to a trash heap is less than appealing to potential buyers. More than one person has said the next door neighbor was a barrier to them putting in an offer, and I am left desperately yearning for something I normally abhor — HOAs.

My general regard for HOAs is low; they many times end up being run by community busybodies seeking to create their little fiefdom by means of CC&Rs. I’ve seen ridiculous outcomes from battles fought in the month HOA meetings, resulting in huge fines being paid and lawsuits over the pruning of trees. But right now I would gladly proclaim, “My kingdom for an HOA!” While we live in a heavily populated area, we are part of an unincorporated town, so we are under the county’s jurisdiction. As such, there is little we can do to make the neighbor pick up his yard, which is affecting our home value.

I have always thought that people should be able to do with their property as they see fit. But what if the things you see fit are in bad taste? What if your lifestyle brings down the property value of those around you? At this point, are not his personal freedoms to live like a slob harming me? Should I have the right to require he conform to community standards of upkeep?

I’m conflicted about this, y’all. But more than that, I just really want to go over there and tell him, “Act like an adult, put your damn toys away, and go get a job!”

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 135 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Mike H Inactive
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    In this case, “we all” was exclusive to us on Ricochet. I do think most people appreciate beauty, but they may disagree on what they find beautiful.

    • #91
  2. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

     

    Most hardcore libertarians will still abide the common law. From the discription, this guy’s yard and conduct may meet the common law definition of nuisance. Perhaps @formerlawprof Can weigh in on this.

    I’m all for letting people do what they want with their own property, and I admire your respect for property rights, but if it is as you describe, some government intervention may be warranted.

    However, I think the first step would be talking to this guy.

    “Most”

    Fred, my experiences here at Ricochet is I have been told that reduction in property values is not “harm” even though we can put a $ figure to it. I have also been told be libertarians that zoning should not be allowed. I have also been told that drugs should be 100% legal. People were less clear on noise laws. I do know that libertarians think HOAs are the Devils work (metaphorically for you atheists), and should not be enforced on a new person moving in. And don’t get me started on historical districts.

     

    Some libertarians on this site have argued that someone has a right to build a strip club next to my house and that any law or rule stopping them is a bad thing.

    So, this is one area where libertarians are wrong. Thank God, they don’t enforce their tyranny on the rest of us.

    The thing is that it’s possible for restrictive rules to be as much of a taking as creating an eyesore. So it’s not as simple as one person is doing something other people don’t appreciate, and so they are the ones in the wrong. We all appreciate beauty and order, but there’s a healthy balance between beauty and order and freedom of action. And I don’t propose to know the answer for the balance, that’s for the free market and common law (but I repeat myself) to determine.

    Wouldn’t a good Libertarian say that he or she is not at all opposed to a Home Owners Association? It’s a contract which you enter in to freely. No one forced you to move in the neighborhood. What the Libertarian would be opposed to is the government telling you that you had to get rid of your broken down chevy full of roofing material.

    Ideally, HOA disputes would be handled by private arbitration, not the full force of government authority.

    All private arbitration is backed by the full force of government authority. 

    • #92
  3. Mike H Inactive
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

     

    Most hardcore libertarians will still abide the common law. From the discription, this guy’s yard and conduct may meet the common law definition of nuisance. Perhaps @formerlawprof Can weigh in on this.

    I’m all for letting people do what they want with their own property, and I admire your respect for property rights, but if it is as you describe, some government intervention may be warranted.

    However, I think the first step would be talking to this guy.

    “Most”

    Fred, my experiences here at Ricochet is I have been told that reduction in property values is not “harm” even though we can put a $ figure to it. I have also been told be libertarians that zoning should not be allowed. I have also been told that drugs should be 100% legal. People were less clear on noise laws. I do know that libertarians think HOAs are the Devils work (metaphorically for you atheists), and should not be enforced on a new person moving in. And don’t get me started on historical districts.

     

    Some libertarians on this site have argued that someone has a right to build a strip club next to my house and that any law or rule stopping them is a bad thing.

    So, this is one area where libertarians are wrong. Thank God, they don’t enforce their tyranny on the rest of us.

    The thing is that it’s possible for restrictive rules to be as much of a taking as creating an eyesore. So it’s not as simple as one person is doing something other people don’t appreciate, and so they are the ones in the wrong. We all appreciate beauty and order, but there’s a healthy balance between beauty and order and freedom of action. And I don’t propose to know the answer for the balance, that’s for the free market and common law (but I repeat myself) to determine.

    Wouldn’t a good Libertarian say that he or she is not at all opposed to a Home Owners Association? It’s a contract which you enter in to freely. No one forced you to move in the neighborhood. What the Libertarian would be opposed to is the government telling you that you had to get rid of your broken down chevy full of roofing material.

    Ideally, HOA disputes would be handled by private arbitration, not the full force of government authority.

    All private arbitration is backed by the full force of government authority.

    Yes, my preference would be for courts to simply rubber stamp the private arbitration outcome. It’s true that last resort enforcement would fall on the government, but I don’t want courts deciding that the result reached by agreed upon arbitration was “unfair” or something.

    • #93
  4. Vicryl Contessa Thatcher
    Vicryl Contessa
    @VicrylContessa

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    Almost goes without saying. It’s the same reason why in some neighborhoods in NYC are very picked up and in other neighborhoods people are readily seen throwing their trash on the sidewalk. Some people just do not value cleanliness. 

    • #94
  5. :thinking: Member
    :thinking:
    @TheRoyalFamily

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    When my sister got her Texas driver’s license, they misspelled her last name. When she took it to the lady behind the counter, the lady told her they couldn’t alter an official document.

    When I got my drivers license, I noticed the birthdate was wrong – the data input monkey person mixed up a couple of digits (even though I triple-checked that all the info was right, AND they had my birth certificate in hand). No big deal, I thought. But that seems to be the one thing that can’t be changed. Name, weight, gender (it’s CA) –  no problem. But birthday?
    So far the only one that has noticed was the campus ID person when I first entered my last university.

    • #95
  6. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Yet again, we see libertarianism is just like the left.

    Huh?

    • #96
  7. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Yet again, we see libertarianism is just like the left.

    Huh?

    He’s just throwing out insults to get a rise out of you Fred. 

    • #97
  8. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Yet again, we see libertarianism is just like the left.

    Huh?

    He’s just throwing out insults to get a rise out of you Fred.

     

     

    I’d rather give him the benefit of the doubt. (As we should all extend to one another.)

    I am nothing if not an eternal optimist. Someday I’ll get through to him. In the meantime I’ll keep trying to patiently explain things to him. 

    • #98
  9. Mike H Inactive
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    Almost goes without saying. It’s the same reason why in some neighborhoods in NYC are very picked up and in other neighborhoods people are readily seen throwing their trash on the sidewalk. Some people just do not value cleanliness.

    By the way, I’m excited that you’re moving to Ohio! We should get together sometime!

    • #99
  10. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    Almost goes without saying. It’s the same reason why in some neighborhoods in NYC are very picked up and in other neighborhoods people are readily seen throwing their trash on the sidewalk. Some people just do not value cleanliness.

    By the way, I’m excited that you’re moving to Ohio! We should get together sometime!

    You guys should do an Ohio meetup. 

    • #100
  11. Vicryl Contessa Thatcher
    Vicryl Contessa
    @VicrylContessa

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    Almost goes without saying. It’s the same reason why in some neighborhoods in NYC are very picked up and in other neighborhoods people are readily seen throwing their trash on the sidewalk. Some people just do not value cleanliness.

    By the way, I’m excited that you’re moving to Ohio! We should get together sometime!

    We’re coming in town April 20-24. I had reached out to @skipsul about doing a little meet up that weekend.

    • #101
  12. Hammer, The Inactive
    Hammer, The
    @RyanM

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):
    How do people think that the solution to inept government is more government?! I don’t understand how people can go through life with the experiences with local government that they have and think “you know, we need more of this.”

    Because freedom is scary to some people. They think if the only think keeping your neighbor from erecting a oil derick next door to them is holy mother government.

    No. Maybe some of us have seen bad neighbors once to often.

    But, hey, if it works for you to make anyone who disagree with you in to someone who is just afraid of freedom , you demonstrate you don’t want to talk you want to call names.

    Yet again, we see libertarianism is just like the left.

    But he’s not wrong… freedom may not be scary to people, but it is certainly more work and it does require more creative problem solving. Government authority is safe and easy (at least in theory). It is very difficult to manage freedom.

    • #102
  13. Vicryl Contessa Thatcher
    Vicryl Contessa
    @VicrylContessa

    Good news! We accepted an offer tonight (above asking too), and are now under contract. It’s so nice to not have to keep the place aggressively spotless anymore. We’ve been eating out so as to not get a call in the middle of cooking dinner that someone wants to show the house in 15 minutes. Now we can get back to some normalcy.

    • #103
  14. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):
    Vicryl Contessa Post author
     

    Good news! We accepted an offer tonight (above asking too), and are now under contract. It’s so nice to not have to keep the place aggressively spotless anymore. We’ve been eating out so as to not get a call in the middle of cooking dinner that someone wants to show the house in 15 minutes. Now we can get back to some normalcy.

    Huzzah Lebanese food.

    • #104
  15. Mike H Inactive
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    Good news! We accepted an offer tonight (above asking too), and are now under contract. It’s so nice to not have to keep the place aggressively spotless anymore. We’ve been eating out so as to not get a call in the middle of cooking dinner that someone wants to show the house in 15 minutes. Now we can get back to some normalcy.

    Your libertarianism survives!

    • #105
  16. Mike H Inactive
    Mike H
    @MikeH

    Hammer, The (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):
    How do people think that the solution to inept government is more government?! I don’t understand how people can go through life with the experiences with local government that they have and think “you know, we need more of this.”

    Because freedom is scary to some people. They think if the only think keeping your neighbor from erecting a oil derick next door to them is holy mother government.

    No. Maybe some of us have seen bad neighbors once to often.

    But, hey, if it works for you to make anyone who disagree with you in to someone who is just afraid of freedom , you demonstrate you don’t want to talk you want to call names.

    Yet again, we see libertarianism is just like the left.

    But he’s not wrong… freedom may not be scary to people, but it is certainly more work and it does require more creative problem solving. Government authority is safe and easy (at least in theory). It is very difficult to manage freedom.

    This is a really difficult conflict, I just can’t see a way of solving it… I know! Let’s get a bunch of guys with guns to throw people in cages if everyone else doesn’t conform to my prefered result!

    • #106
  17. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    1967mustangman (View Comment):

    To all the suggestion thank you but we have a nice fence and trees and all the good stuff. There are a couple of problems with these:

    1 – We can’t fence off the view of his front yard which at last count had 3 axles, a transmission, the back half of an old Chevy pickup, and a truck that is constantly in process of renovation.

    2- There is another truck that is sitting on the street, is only moved often enough to prove that it moves, and is still mounded with roofing from his roofing project last year.

    3 – We can see into his backyard from the small bedroom upstairs. It is strewn with junk and they built this beautiful blue shed out there an then at some point painted an orange demon head on it.

    Fortunately, we have offers and should soon be out.

    Do you have Code Enforcement locally? Give them a call.

    • #107
  18. Pony Convertible Inactive
    Pony Convertible
    @PonyConvertible

    Painter Jean (View Comment):

    Here in our little Midwestern town, I saw something similar with an abandoned house that took years for the city to demolish. But I talked to a city administrator I’ve gotten to know and so learned the reasons for the long wait: These kinds of procedures – condemning a property and eventually demolishing it — usually have to follow an established protocol. For example, the city attorney must attempt X number of times to contact the owners; inspections and reports must be conducted; legal notice must be served and in some cases brought before the city council; etc. In other words, a long time frame in which the owners can attempt to resolve the problems is usually granted. Now, this might make it inconvenient for the immediate neighbors of those properties, but take comfort from the fact that this shows a respect for property rights. It shouldn’t be easy for a city, county, or state to take control of property.

    I know all that.  I lived it, and yes I appreciate respect for private property rights.  However, the city could have immediately said something to the affect of, “Raw sewage on the ground is a safety hazard to the community.  The water is being shut-off today.  You have 30 days to repair the sewer line and have it inspected.  If it is not complete in 30 days we will condemn the property and the sheriff will move out the tenants”.   

    It took 2 years to fix a safety issue. 

    Would it be acceptable for a drunk to drive on the streets for 2 years while we  go through a long complicated legal process? No we arrest them and get them off the road immediately. 

    It shouldn’t be easy to take away someone’s right to freedom and lock them up, but when they do things that endanger other people we do it all the time.

    • #108
  19. Mate De Inactive
    Mate De
    @MateDe

    Keep Portland Weird. Just say that the neighbor is a free spirit. He’s living his truth.

    • #109
  20. TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder Inactive
    TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder
    @Kaladin

    Late to the party here, and maybe it’s been discussed, but did the guy live there when you moved in?

    Sounds like he did and you guys bought it, which means some other sucker will too.

    Now if he moved in after, that sucks and you just have to go on a super passive aggressive campaign to get him to move.  Or move yourself, which you are doing.

    Personally HOAs make me a bit nauseous and I’m currently in one. The idea that I can’t do what I want with my property infuriates me.  I’d honestly rather have grease monkey next door than the super uniform boring same three homes repeated in a massive neighborhood.  I am married, however, and my lovely bride couldn’t agree with me less on this point, so there you have it.

    I pushed pretty hard to live in a trailer community, but she wouldn’t have it.

    Hopefully in a few years we’ll move further out of town and then she and I will both be satisfied, her not wanting neighbors and me able to let my grass turn brown in August without getting a snarky note in the mail.

    Edit: Congratulations on the sale. Have fun in Ohio?

    • #110
  21. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder (View Comment):

    Late to the party here, and maybe it’s been discussed, but did the guy live there when you moved in?

    Sounds like he did and you guys bought it, which means some other sucker will too.

    Now if he moved in after, that sucks and you just have to go on a super passive aggressive campaign to get him to move. Or move yourself, which you are doing.

    Personally HOAs make me a bit nauseous and I’m currently in one. The idea that I can’t do what I want with my property infuriates me. I’d honestly rather have grease monkey next door than the super uniform boring same three homes repeated in a massive neighborhood. I am married, however, and my lovely bride couldn’t agree with me less on this point, so there you have it.

    I pushed pretty hard to live in a trailer community, but she wouldn’t have it.

    Hopefully in a few years we’ll move further out of town and then she and I will both be satisfied, her not wanting neighbors and me able to let my grass turn brown in August without getting a snarky note in the mail.

     

     

    “Elbow room!  Cried Daniel Boone.”

    • #111
  22. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Now I feel I can be a little more snarky – I think the full libertarian answer to “I don’t like what this piece of property looks like” is to buy that piece of property. If he’s initially not in a mood to sell, you have to keep raising the price until his price is found. 

     

    • #112
  23. Hammer, The Inactive
    Hammer, The
    @RyanM

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    Good news! We accepted an offer tonight (above asking too), and are now under contract. It’s so nice to not have to keep the place aggressively spotless anymore. We’ve been eating out so as to not get a call in the middle of cooking dinner that someone wants to show the house in 15 minutes. Now we can get back to some normalcy.

    Read: I get to go back to being a slob!

    (p.s. my phone bit the dust, but Kieran says Thank You!)  :)

    • #113
  24. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Now I feel I can be a little more snarky – I think the full libertarian answer to “I don’t like what this piece of property looks like” is to buy that piece of property. If he’s initially not in a mood to sell, you have to keep raising the price until his price is found.

    That’s the nice thing about libertarianism: there isn’t just one answer for problems.

    • #114
  25. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Mate De (View Comment):

    Keep Portland Weird. Just say that the neighbor is a free spirit. He’s living his truth.

    Actually a pretty good thing to consider.

    As I mentioned earlier, Mrs. Tabby had our prior house painted blue with a burgundy front door and burgundy window trim. We always told ourselves that our freedom to paint the house the colors we wanted was also the freedom that allowed our next door neighbor to avoid painting their house at all for decades, and to keep a non-running car in the driveway. Our situation with the neighbor never got to the level that some of you have described, so I may not have the proper frame of mind (they were actually very nice to us, though they were sometimes very unkind to each other). Me having the freedom to do my thing means someone else having the freedom to do his thing.

    At this stage in our lives we are prepared to give up some of that freedom in exchange for a tidy neighborhood governed by an HOA. But we will be checking their restrictions to ensure we don’t get into one in which we can’t even fly an American flag on the front of our house. 

    • #115
  26. Kay of MT Inactive
    Kay of MT
    @KayofMT

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    But we will be checking their restrictions to ensure we don’t get into one in which we can’t even fly an American flag on the front of our house. 

    This is my fear of an HOA. When I was working hard with my neighbors to get a meth house shut down, I had a big sign hung on my front fence stating: You Sell and I tell. It got ripped down a few times but I kept putting it back.

    • #116
  27. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Mike H (View Comment):
    It’s true that last resort enforcement would fall on the government, but I don’t want courts deciding that the result reached by agreed upon arbitration was “unfair” or something.

    Thanks for admitting that all enforcement are always men with guns. 

     

    • #117
  28. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Kay of MT (View Comment):
    It’s true that last resort enforcement would fall on the government, but I don’t want courts deciding that the result reached by agreed upon arbitration was “unfair” or something.

    And yet, I am told I fear freedom because I worry that someone will build something next to my home that is not fit for residential. 

    If people are willing to set up a meth lab next to me when it is illegal to do so, what on earth makes libertarians think that sort of thing won’t happen if it is legal to do so?

    I am going to start using Meth Lab instead of strip club, because that gives me a 2-fer: I can make fun of libertarian fantasies on lack of zoning and legalization of hard cord drugs. 

    Thanks Kay

    • #118
  29. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):

    Vicryl Contessa (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Mike H (View Comment):
    We all appreciate beauty and order,

    Do we? Some people are utter slobs, and their houses are trashed because they lead disordered lives.

    Almost goes without saying. It’s the same reason why in some neighborhoods in NYC are very picked up and in other neighborhoods people are readily seen throwing their trash on the sidewalk. Some people just do not value cleanliness.

    By the way, I’m excited that you’re moving to Ohio! We should get together sometime!

    We’re coming in town April 20-24. I had reached out to @skipsul about doing a little meet up that weekend.

    Yeah, sorry I kinda dropped the ball on that – the last few weeks have been very very busy for me.

    • #119
  30. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Fred Cole (View Comment):

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Now I feel I can be a little more snarky – I think the full libertarian answer to “I don’t like what this piece of property looks like” is to buy that piece of property. If he’s initially not in a mood to sell, you have to keep raising the price until his price is found.

    That’s the nice thing about libertarianism: there isn’t just one answer for problems.

    That assumes he will sell. A stubborn person out to grief others might never sell. 

    That the problem with Libertariansim: It fails to account for totally irrational people. It also appears to be set up to give maximum freedom to people to be annoying jerks. 

    Be enough of a jerk and you are doing “harm”, but that does not appear to include things like shifting the water so it crosses my land, or opening a club next door to play loud music all hours of the night. (Had happened to people).

     

     

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.