An Open Letter to People Who Beat Dead Horses

 

Dear people who beat dead horses,

Please. Stop.

It’s inhumane!

Now, far be it from me to defend horses. I think they’re total jerks and probably deserve to be beaten to death, but no creature deserves to be beaten after death.

That horse is clearly not moving so why do you insist on continuing to take a bat after it?

I don’t understand your passion in sending the horse to the afterlife without a bone left intact. It’s just not right. Please stop trying to re-kill it, it’s already dead! You’re like a vulture, but instead of eating the corpse, you just keep beating it with a bat. Do you enjoy the squishing noises that spring up from every thwack? Are you trying to kill the flies that keep landing on it? What is going on in your head?!

This horse is no more! It is an ex-horse!

Please, I’m begging you, just step away from the horse.

Published in Group Writing
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 80 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    You have to prevent zombie horses somehow.

    • #1
  2. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    • #2
  3. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Is there a more serious topic lurking around here that I don’t recognize–some variety of NeverTrumpism, perhaps?

    • #3
  4. Gary Robbins 🚫 Banned
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):
    Is there a more serious topic lurking around here that I don’t recognize–some variety of NeverTrumpism, perhaps?

    Nah.  Something about using a Constitutional check and balance means committing a coup, and starting a civil war.

    All nonsense, with the NFL playoffs going on.

    I like New England over Jacksonville, and Minnesota over Philadelphia.  While it would be great for Minnesota, Philadelphia or Jacksonville to win their first Super Bowl, I think New England will repeat.

    There is one record that Bill Belichick does not have, consecutive winning seasons.  Tom Landry has 20, and I think that Belichick has only 17.  I never thought anyone would beat Landry’s record, but it looks like Belichick will.

    • #4
  5. J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado Coolidge
    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado
    @JulieSnapp

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):
    Is there a more serious topic lurking around here that I don’t recognize–some variety of NeverTrumpism, perhaps?

    Just intended to be satirical. :) It’s the Group Writing topic this month.

    • #5
  6. J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado Coolidge
    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado
    @JulieSnapp

    No seriousness allowed on this post!

    • #6
  7. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado (View Comment):
    No seriousness allowed on this post!

    Oh, good.  That sounds wonderful!

    • #7
  8. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    One might also beat dead horses for purposes of meat tenderization.

    • #8
  9. J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado Coolidge
    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado
    @JulieSnapp

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    One might also beat dead horses for purposes of meat tenderization.

    Ewwww! What kind of heathen would eat horse meat??

    • #9
  10. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    One might also beat dead horses for purposes of meat tenderization.

    Ewwww! What kind of heathen would eat horse meat??

    A hungry one.

    • #10
  11. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    We should have a Constitutional Amendment to ban the beating of dead horses.  What number would that be?  The 25th?

    • #11
  12. DocJay Inactive
    DocJay
    @DocJay

    Julie’s post is meant to be taken with equanimity.

    • #12
  13. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    One might also beat dead horses for purposes of meat tenderization.

    Ewwww! What kind of heathen would eat horse meat??

    A hungry one.

    • #13
  14. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    DocJay (View Comment):
    Julie’s post is meant to be taken in with equanimity.

    Is that some kind of liquor?

    • #14
  15. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    DocJay (View Comment):
    Julie’s post is meant to be taken in with equanimity.

    Is that some kind of liquor?

    Only if it’s the kind you pronounce li-core, instead of likker.

    • #15
  16. DocJay Inactive
    DocJay
    @DocJay

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    DocJay (View Comment):
    Julie’s post is meant to be taken in with equanimity.

    Is that some kind of liquor?

    Dos Caballos Meurte Tequilla.

    • #16
  17. Gary Robbins 🚫 Banned
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    We should have a Constitutional Amendment to ban the beating of dead horses. What number would that be? The 25th?

    You have been missing the other posts!  The 25th Amendment includes  provisions for appointing a new Vice President, and removing a President by way of disability.  The 26th Amendment allows 18 year olds to vote, and the 27th Amendment provides delays changes in the compensation of members of Congress until after the next election.

    The 28th Amendment would read as follows:

    Section 1.  No person shall beat dead horses,

    Section 2.  Congress shall enact the provisions by which to determine when a horse is dead, what actions constitute beating said horse or horses, and the civil and criminal penalties thereto.

    Section 3.  This Amendment is effective only if it is ratified within seven years after submission to the several states.

    • #17
  18. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Whereas the 67th Amendment protects you from having to testify on the grounds that your organs will be chopped into a patty.

    • #18
  19. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    Whereas the 67th Amendment protects you from having to testify on the grounds that your organs will be chopped into a patty.

    I though the 67th was the one that allowed Arnold Swarzeneggar to run for president.

    • #19
  20. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    Whereas the 67th Amendment protects you from having to testify on the grounds that your organs will be chopped into a patty.

    I though the 67th was the one that allowed Arnold Swarzeneggar to run for president.

    61st. I’ll admit I had to look it up.

    • #20
  21. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    You just wanted to use that graphic in a post, didn’t you, @juliesnapp?


    This is indeed a conversation in our Group Writing Series under the January theme of “An Open Letter…” In February, our theme will be “We Need a Little Summer” where we will chase away the winter with tales of summers past. Or, summers future, if you have a time machine. The Schedule and Sign-Up Sheet is available here.

    • #21
  22. Chris O. Coolidge
    Chris O.
    @ChrisO

    Speaking of that horse and amendments, I’m reminded of this:

    THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

    Some things about living still weren’t quite right, though. April for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron’s fourteen-year-old son, Harrison, away.

    Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is always a great reminder that even if I don’t agree with much of what someone says, there is wisdom (and wit) to be mined from them. Until 2081, anyway.

    • #22
  23. Mim526 Inactive
    Mim526
    @Mim526

    Arahant (View Comment):

    You just wanted to use that graphic in a post, didn’t you, @juliesnapp?


    This is indeed a conversation in our Group Writing Series under the January theme of “An Open Letter…” In February, our theme will be “We Need a Little Summer” where we will chase away the winter with tales of summers past. Or, summers future, if you have a time machine. The Schedule and Sign-Up Sheet is available here.

    I keep tellin’ myself it’s a donkey pinata at a birthday party, but myself isn’t quite believin’ it yet.  Must be that mean-lookin’ batter…and the flies.  Never seen flies around a pinata before.  Sigh…it’s a dead horse, isn’t it, @juliesnapp?

    • #23
  24. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    J.D. Snapp, Possum Aficionado (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    One might also beat dead horses for purposes of meat tenderization.

    Ewwww! What kind of heathen would eat horse meat??

    French people

    • #24
  25. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Is it OK to beat fake dead horses?  And then move them?

    • #25
  26. Muleskinner Member
    Muleskinner
    @Muleskinner

    In grad school, I saw these expired equines reupholstered and then re-flayed over and over again, until it was eventually revealed as the point of the exercise.

    • #26
  27. Fred Houstan Member
    Fred Houstan
    @FredHoustan

    This is my kind of thread. The satisfaction I feel when the light finally goes off, I am complete this morning.

    • #27
  28. She Member
    She
    @She

    I canter quite say if I have ever seen a foaler post than this one.  Perhaps Gallop could poll the membership and see if that’s the case.  First, I think posts about horse are unsuitable for Ricochet, and probably a CoC violation right out of the gate.  @juliesnapp, you really should rein yourself in, spur yourself on, groom your posts before publishing, and perhaps try to present a more stable appearance in the future.

    Joust sayin’

    • #28
  29. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    She (View Comment):
    I canter quite say if I have ever seen a foaler post than this one. Perhaps Gallop could poll the membership and see if that’s the case. First, I think posts about horse are unsuitable for Ricochet, and probably a CoC violation right out of the gate. @juliesnapp, you really should rein yourself in, spur yourself on, groom your posts before publishing, and perhaps try to present a more stable appearance in the future.

    Joust sayin’

    Jockeying for the best post position, aren’t you?

    • #29
  30. She Member
    She
    @She

    Django (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    I canter quite say if I have ever seen a foaler post than this one. Perhaps Gallop could poll the membership and see if that’s the case. First, I think posts about horse are unsuitable for Ricochet, and probably a CoC violation right out of the gate. @juliesnapp, you really should rein yourself in, spur yourself on, groom your posts before publishing, and perhaps try to present a more stable appearance in the future.

    Joust sayin’

    Jockeying for the best post position, aren’t you?

    Fetlock of good that would do at this point.

    (Bravo! Though.)

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.