Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Handel Defeats Ossoff in Georgia Special Election
Republican Karen Handel has defeated Democrat Jon Ossoff in Georgia’s 6th District special election to replace HHS Secretary Tom Price. With 100 percent of precincts reporting, Handel received 52.7 percent to Ossoff’s 47.3 percent.
The contest garnered significant national attention as another chance for Democrats to take a GOP seat and send a message to President Donald Trump. Ossoff, a political newcomer, raked in a staggering $23 million from across the nation, as well as high-octane political and celebrity endorsements. As with other touted Democratic efforts since Trump’s inauguration, however, it was all for naught.
Note: Being a political professional, I did offer the most important insight of the evening as the first votes rolled in.
Published in GeneralBREAKING: If you rotate #GA06 135 degrees, it looks like a doggie. pic.twitter.com/x5crYWn5dJ
— jon gabriel (@exjon) June 21, 2017
Ugh. Can we not even celebrate a victory without bringing this crap up again.
Let. It. Go.
LOL, I love your doggie observation!
What a glorious outcome to the election. Don’t you just love it when the media gets it wrong and under predicts conservative outcomes? I do. I haven’t had time for Ricochet – just checked, my last comment was 20 days ago – but the election results this morning was a prod to get back over here. Always a pleasure to celebrate.
“It seems that my patriarchy might be in jeopardy!”
-nobody
Nope.
Congressional candidates rise and fall on their ability to coalesce their base, especially in a special election. The candidate’s political skills are a minor contribution in this type of election, unlike a presidential election. I think conservatives came out, despite the – or perhaps because of – the media fury to elect a Dem.
Yeah, unfortunately. This time. For now.
Where ya been?
That’s exactly what I meant. “…is unimportant in the voting scheme” meaning, with 238 R and 193 D in the House, it won’t change the results of any Bill passing, or not.
It is a huge win as far as everything else.
Unless of course the Democrat had won. Then this district would have been a nationwide repudiation of Trump and he might as well resign the presidency right now.
The de-moralization of the Democrats is the most important outcome of the race. The Special Elections are a punch in the face to the pajama boys all across this fruited plane. If Republican’s could figure it out, they should drive the wedge so hard between the LEFT and the LABOUR that they become two separate parties.
The Bernie Bros for whatever reason are blind to the fact that they will get what they want even if Clinton won. If they feel they need to strike off on their own, they should do it and relegate themselves to a minority for an extra decade.
If only the poor little Democrat had possessed the necessary resources and elite media coverage necessary to defeat the Republican/Russian machine.
So after 4 specials in a row going R, is it finally time for the Never Trump folks to make THEIR peace with reality?
What sayeth thou, Mr Gabriel? Mona and Jay? Mr Poderhoz?
No. Don’t. Despite having all the advantages, we are still sitting in the water going nowhere because 80% of the Repubs in office remain Trump hostile.
Pass some bills, Mr Ryan. Confirm some judges, Mr McConnell. Ignore the false flag controversies that the left is making up out of whole cloth. Do your freaking jobs.
Fie on the Repubs who remain Never-Trumpsters.
But they didn’t have one…a serious democrat candidate.
Maybe I missed a comment, but all the outside money and the outsider candidate reeks of interference. While not the Russians, simply the Dems from other states, it seems funny that the party of election interference investigation and prevention is more than hypocritical in this particular election.
I’m just sayin’, nothing new here.
This is from today’s Transom (Ben Domenech’s daily newsletter – he used to hang around here back in the day before he got all famous. Understand he’s on Sunday shows, but I don’t watch that dreck.):
“In the grand scheme of things, this was just one seat, and one special election, and shouldn’t be read as meaning too much – but in terms of the impact on Washington and Democratic Party leadership, this is a neutron bomb. I had half a dozen Democrats in the last month tell me essentially the same thing: that an Ossoff loss would do huge damage to their ability to recruit quality candidates for 2018, undermining the resistance and demonstrating to potential centrist candidates that none of this anti-Trump fomenting has any juice. That’s what happened.”
So who knows.
The candidate was serious enough. He spoke in a blue dog manner that would have worked in 06 and 08, but the memory of their betrayal is still fresh in everyone’s minds.
If you look at the history of open seats the victory is much closer than that of an incumbents. Now that these Republicans have their seats we need to strengthen their numbers.
Our opponents are much more emotional than us. This loss is important.
And you really think antagonizing them at what should be an obvious opportunity to come together is a good strategy?
Have you learned nothing from the Democrats’ failure?
Agreed. No need to look for a fight and purposefully alienate someone who should be an ally.
I think that it’s really hard to draw any conclusions from this special election. It is certainly good news that the Republican won.
Here are a few quick analytical points (from Wikipedia):
I’m hesitant about drawing any conclusions from this. Price typically won by large margins, but he was an incumbent who first won the seat in 2004. Price’s big win in 2016, while Trump carried the district by only 1% in the same election, shows a significant lack of correlation between the Congressional and Presidential votes. The big spending in the 2017 special election, and the different electorate that typically turns out for a special, make any comparisons speculative.
I also wouldn’t jump to conclusions based on the fact that Trump barely won this heavily Republican district in 2016. We know that the Trump-Clinton contest split the electorate in unusual ways. Trump doubtless performed far better in many areas than another Republican would have, as shown by his big victory in Ohio and remarkable wins in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. In other areas, Trump doubtless performed worse than another Republican would have, and it appears that Georgia 6 is one of those areas.
Not at all, my friend. All one has to do is go back to what people were saying before the election when they thought Ossoff would win. By their logic Ossoff’s loss then becomes a re-affirmation of everything Trump stands for. We live in such interesting times.
Yep, one can only wonder what conclusions the Democrat/media would have drawn had Ossoff won?? Yea I really, really wonder!
OK, I agree that it’s easy to draw conclusions. Heck, you can always draw any conclusion that you want. It’s hard to draw meaningful conclusions about the national electorate from a single election.
It is a good trend that Republicans have held several hotly contested House special elections. But they’ve generally been closer than I would either like or expect, given the demographics of the district. So, again, I don’t think that we can draw a meaningful conclusion from the Georgia 6 result.
Oh, sure, go and throw extra words in there that totally matter. :D
I gotta disagree. The Democrats have been targeting these special elections with their ginormous political machine and all the money it takes to operate it. Boatloads and boatloads of (George Soros’s and PP’s) money. And they still can’t deliver a win. They never even tried to compete in these solidly Republican districts before, which is why the margins were so huge. I think it tells us there’s a ceiling on support for the Left in America, and BHO, Clinton and company have found it.
I think it’s huge psychologically, and if I lived in that district I’d be furious that not only did they run a candidate who doesn’t even live there, but he took millions of dollars from people who not only don’t live in the district, but don’t even live in the state. What do those people care about that district’s local issues, and where do they get off trying to influence this election?
Samuel L. Jackson got pimp-slapped for his trouble.
Couldn’t agree more AP, however the Republicans better put up or there going to get put out.
The conclusion I drew is that people might not like Trump, but they hate Nancy Pelosi.
Umbra,
Works for me.
Regards,
Jim