Handel Defeats Ossoff in Georgia Special Election

 

Republican Karen Handel has defeated Democrat Jon Ossoff in Georgia’s 6th District special election to replace HHS Secretary Tom Price. With 100 percent of precincts reporting, Handel received 52.7 percent to Ossoff’s 47.3 percent.

The contest garnered significant national attention as another chance for Democrats to take a GOP seat and send a message to President Donald Trump. Ossoff, a political newcomer, raked in a staggering $23 million from across the nation, as well as high-octane political and celebrity endorsements. As with other touted Democratic efforts since Trump’s inauguration, however, it was all for naught.

Note: Being a political professional, I did offer the most important insight of the evening as the first votes rolled in.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 124 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. JcTPatriot Member
    JcTPatriot
    @

    While making sure that we kept the seat is unimportant in the voting scheme of the House, the firm kick to the teeth of the DNC and slapping the smug smiles off the faces of the MSM means so much to America.

    Giving confidence to America that lots of people support our President is something that is needed right now, as the MSM and the McCain wing of Congress double-down on their pure lies and Fake News against Trump.

    I know I might be whistling past the graveyard, but I hope the Trump-haters on the Right will start obtaining some of that confidence, too. The more Americans who have the President’s back, the more likely it is that others will also join, and the phrase “Supermajority in ’18” might start to become commonplace.

    • #61
  2. Randal H Member
    Randal H
    @RandalH

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Well, all I can say is “Hallelujah!”

    Edit: Doesn’t quite work without the tweet referencing Handel’s Messiah.

    • #62
  3. Suspira Member
    Suspira
    @Suspira

    This is a great relief, but I can’t help think Republicans dodged a bullet here (um, maybe I shouldn’t use that saying for awhile). Ossoff was a spectacularly bad candidate of the sort run to show the flag in an overwhelmingly GOP district. How would a serious Democrat have fared in this race?

    • #63
  4. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    EJHill (View Comment):
    The most important special election in the history of the Republic…. means nothing now that the Democrat lost.

    • #64
  5. Johnny Dubya Inactive
    Johnny Dubya
    @JohnnyDubya

    Approximately $275 spent by Ossoff per vote received. All down the drain, much of it “coastal elite” money. It warms the cockles of my heart.

    • #65
  6. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    So, who hacked this election? The Norks? The Romanians? The Joooooos?

    It can’t be because they nominated a pajama-wearing, cocoa-swilling twerp. Nope. Can’t be that.

    • #66
  7. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    @suspiraHow would a serious Democrat have fared in this race?

    I don’t know. But it does raise these questions… “What if they’d run a unicorn?” “What if they’d run a jackalope?” “What if they’d run Nessie of Loch Ness?” (I maybe can answer that last question. I don’t think Nessie would have been eligible, being from Scotland and all. But considering the canidate they did run, who knows?)

    • #67
  8. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Melissa Praemonitus (View Comment):

    RightAngles (View Comment):
    Hahahaha! Yay! He wasn’t even eligible to vote in the district. The Dems simply cannot believe the will of the people. They can’t get it through their pointy little heads. Their pointy exploding little heads.

    Liberals persist in believing that you really can fool all the people, all the time.

    Not really, They believe you can fool most of the people most of the time.  So far they are at about 47%

    • #68
  9. JcTPatriot Member
    JcTPatriot
    @

    Suspira (View Comment):
    This is a great relief, but I can’t help think Republicans dodged a bullet here (um, maybe I shouldn’t use that saying for awhile). Ossoff was a spectacularly bad candidate of the sort run to show the flag in an overwhelmingly GOP district. How would a serious Democrat have fared in this race?

    Ah, Ms. Sus, there’s the rub! The Democrats are completely out of likable, serious candidates. The Clintons and Obama were the last chances they had at that. All they have now are trashy little lying scumbags like this twerp. Their ideas are completely bankrupt, and so they have been trying to win with Cults of Personality and MSM mud-slinging. As the Right’s voice gets louder and louder, the message is getting through: “Stop being selfish and believing the lies the DNC is telling you, and start looking at the Candidate, instead.” When people do that, they can easily see the candidate with the ‘D’ by their name is a complete fraud.

    • #69
  10. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    • #70
  11. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    So, I guess this shows that, unlike so much of the rest of the country, this district isn’t sexist.

    • #71
  12. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Kellyanne brings the heat!

    • #72
  13. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Wait…he’s Batman?!

    • #73
  14. - Inactive
    -
    @Roberto

    JcTPatriot (View Comment):
    While making sure that we kept the seat is unimportant in the voting scheme of the House, the firm kick to the teeth of the DNC and slapping the smug smiles off the faces of the MSM means so much to America.

    It is not unimportant and does matter. For precisely the reasons you list. The Democrats have been investing ludicrous efforts into these trivial by-elections. It is almost soley for morale, to energize their members. “See, the ‘resistance’ is working. All the shouting, the rioting and the violence is worth it. See, it is working!”

    This one special election seat in the House means next to nothing regarding legislation, but it means a great deal to all the volunteers and activists who invested themselves into that campaign in order to convince themselves that the tide was turning. That the will of the people could be overturned through violence.

    It doesn’t end here, some will despair  and a handful may even resign themselves to being rational and begin to debate their points. But some will say, “The system has failed. Time to kill some GOP/racists/nazis/selfish bastards… whatever.” Given what we have seen so far it is a foolish mistake to assume these activists so riled up will placidly  accept the results here.  The assasin who went for Rep. Salise and his people will not be the only one, there will be others.

    You can bank on that.

    • #74
  15. Weeping Inactive
    Weeping
    @Weeping

    Clavius (View Comment):

    Weeping (View Comment):

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.: Ossoff, a political newcomer, raked in a staggering $23 million from across the nation

    This fact right here is enough to make me glad he lost. I think funding for state elections should come from within the state – not from outside of it.

    But look at all that liberal money that was wasted. Beautiful!

    I’ll admit that that is nice. But still…….

    • #75
  16. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Is it good news, because Handel got a higher vote share than Trump did, or bad news, because she got a lower vote share than her (Republican) predecessor?

    From fivethirtyeight:

    Exactly how red Georgia 6 is matters, both for forecasting who will win and for interpreting what the results of the special election mean. Yes, Trump barely squeaked by Hillary Clinton there [1%], but most other Republican candidates — presidential and House — have done much better. Tom Price, who represented the district in Congress until he resigned to become Trump’s secretary of health and human services, carried it by 23 percentage points in 2016. Mitt Romney beat Barack Obama there by the same margin in 2012.

    • #76
  17. - Inactive
    -
    @Roberto

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Is it good news, because Handel got a higher vote share than Trump did, or bad news, because she got a lower vote share than her (Republican) predecessor?

    From fivethirtyeight:

    Exactly how red Georgia 6 is matters, both for forecasting who will win and for interpreting what the results of the special election mean. Yes, Trump barely squeaked by Hillary Clinton there [1%], but most other Republican candidates — presidential and House — have done much better. Tom Price, who represented the district in Congress until he resigned to become Trump’s secretary of health and human services, carried it by 23 percentage points in 2016. Mitt Romney beat Barack Obama there by the same margin in 2012.

    Thinking about it for five seconds one might say irrelevant. The idea that this election was about Trump at all was always quite fantastical.

    • #77
  18. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    James Gawron (View Comment):

    Vance Richards (View Comment):
    So, is it still a referendum on Trump?

    Vance,

    No, it was a referendum on the democrats and nobody likes them.

    Regards,

    Ji

    Well 47.5% of people like them, in this particular Congressional district.

    • #78
  19. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    • #79
  20. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Is it good news, because Handel got a higher vote share than Trump did, or bad news, because she got a lower vote share than her (Republican) predecessor?

    I noticed that too, but I don’t have an answer.

    • #80
  21. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    It looks like a doggie, but it’s no Yellow Dog…

    • #81
  22. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Is it good news, because Handel got a higher vote share than Trump did, or bad news, because she got a lower vote share than her (Republican) predecessor?

    I noticed that too, but I don’t have an answer.

    The ridiculous spending margin on the part of the Dem* candidate kind of makes comparisons to previous elections irrelevant, don’t you think?

    *the party of “lets get money out of politics”, I might add.

     

    • #82
  23. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Percival (View Comment):
    Sweeter yet: Planned Parenthood dropped $730K to beat her.

    BwhahahahaHAH!

    When are Republicans going to learn the meaning of “fungible?”  That $730k was our tax dollars.

    • #83
  24. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Suspira (View Comment):
    This is a great relief, but I can’t help think Republicans dodged a bullet here (um, maybe I shouldn’t use that saying for awhile). Ossoff was a spectacularly bad candidate of the sort run to show the flag in an overwhelmingly GOP district. How would a serious Democrat have fared in this race?

    Serious Democrats are called Republicans.

    • #84
  25. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    I Walton (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):
    This is a great relief, but I can’t help think Republicans dodged a bullet here (um, maybe I shouldn’t use that saying for awhile). Ossoff was a spectacularly bad candidate of the sort run to show the flag in an overwhelmingly GOP district. How would a serious Democrat have fared in this race?

    Serious Democrats are called Republicans.

    Serious Democrats are called “psychotic”.

    • #85
  26. BD1 Member
    BD1
    @

    NeverTrumpers Stephen Hayes and Noah Rothman are taking solace in the fact that the South Carolina result was closer than expected.

    • #86
  27. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    Advice to our Dem friends:  Think smaller.  Get some political experience first.  Like maybe run for dog catcher in Podunk Falls.

    • #87
  28. La Tapada Member
    La Tapada
    @LaTapada

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Is it good news, because Handel got a higher vote share than Trump did, or bad news, because she got a lower vote share than her (Republican) predecessor?

    I noticed that too, but I don’t have an answer.

    The ridiculous spending margin on the part of that Dem* candidate kind of makes comparisons to previous elections irrelevant, don’t you think?

    *the party of “lets get money out of politics”, I might add.

    When did the predecessor get his votes? In a general election? That would have a different turnout than a special election. It seems that the type of election and the money spent would make big differences.

    • #88
  29. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    James Gawron (View Comment):

    Vance Richards (View Comment):
    So, is it still a referendum on Trump?

    Vance,

    No, it was a referendum on the democrats and nobody likes them.

    Regards,

    Ji

    Well 47.5% of people like them, in this particular Congressional district.

    Considering it was over 48% in the primary, it’s going in the right direction.

    Nobody knows how to waste money like you neverTrumpers and Democrats.

    • #89
  30. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    – (View Comment):
    Thinking about it for five seconds one might say irrelevant. The idea that this election was about Trump at all was always quite fantastical.

    I’m noticing a trend here.

    1. “Trump is toxic! We might have a chance this year.”
    2. “Polling is close. We might pull this one off!”
    3. [Democrats run on “Trump! Trump! Trump!”]
    4. [Democrats lose the election]
    5. “This had nothing to do with Trump.”
    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.