Trump’s New PACs

 

So after winning the nomination Donald Trump has announced that he’s going to form Super PACs with the intention of defeating fellow Republicans Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and a third person, unnamed but widely believed to be Ben Sasse.

This is what I love about Trump. He is what is known as a mensch. You have to admire the mentality of a man who — while running for president — announces an effort to defeat his fellow Republicans because they didn’t support him, and yet says he’s mostly focused on defeating Hillary Clinton.

I for one, applaud Trump for his deeply felt commitment to the Constitution (which he knows better than anybody), to conservatism, (as he is more conservative than anyone), and to the Republican party (from which he intends to purge personally disloyal to him).

What a country.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 101 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    Man With the Axe: You have to admire the mentality of a man who — while running for president — announces an effort to defeat his fellow Republicans

    Wait. Trump is a Republican? I didn’t know. What is a Republican anyway?

    I’ll tell you this; Kasich is the closest thing you can be to a Democrat without carrying the card.

    Cruz is a conservative, and ‘Republicans’ hate him, undermined him and won’t support him.

    Interestingly, when anyone can be a Republican, everyone’s a RINO.

    The party is a launching pad, but once aloft, the candidate can go to the planet of his choice.

    • #91
  2. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Umbra Fractus:

    Guruforhire:

    BrentB67:

    Man With the Axe:Did Trump make his announcement of his plans to subvert Republicans who opposed him because he wants to impose party discipline, as some have said, or because he is vindictive, as others have said?

    Does it matter?

    See its party discipline when its Romney, he of the of the proper ruling class, because hair and chin.

    At what point after his nomination did Mitt Romney advocate purging the party of anyone who had slighted him?

    Please provide links.

    You can you restate your question in a way that is rational, or reflective of the issue at hand?

    • #92
  3. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Guruforhire:

    You can you restate your question in a way that is rational, or reflective of the issue at hand?

    You compared Trump’s behavior to Romney’s. I am asking for examples of Romney behaving in a similar manner.

    • #93
  4. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Umbra Fractus:

    Guruforhire:

    You can you restate your question in a way that is rational, or reflective of the issue at hand?

    You compared Trump’s behavior to Romney’s. I am asking for examples of Romney behaving in a similar manner.

    Google works for you too.

    • #94
  5. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Guruforhire:

    Umbra Fractus:

    Guruforhire:

    You can you restate your question in a way that is rational, or reflective of the issue at hand?

    You compared Trump’s behavior to Romney’s. I am asking for examples of Romney behaving in a similar manner.

    Google works for you too.

    So, it’s my responsibility to back up your claim?

    Nice try.

    • #95
  6. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Umbra Fractus:

    Guruforhire:

    Umbra Fractus:

    Guruforhire:

    You can you restate your question in a way that is rational, or reflective of the issue at hand?

    You compared Trump’s behavior to Romney’s. I am asking for examples of Romney behaving in a similar manner.

    Google works for you too.

    So, it’s my responsibility to back up your claim?

    Nice try.

    Don’t you know [redacted].

    [Editors’ Note: Personal Attacks.]

    • #96
  7. Johnny Dubya Inactive
    Johnny Dubya
    @JohnnyDubya

    Trump once again shows himself to be a wise and magnanimous statesman.  What a world-class temperament, in the tradition of Lincoln, Coolidge, and Reagan!

    • #97
  8. Lily Bart Inactive
    Lily Bart
    @LilyBart

    Johnny Dubya:Trump once again shows himself to be a wise and magnanimous statesman. What a world-class temperament, in the tradition of Lincoln, Coolidge, and Reagan!

    Oh, statesman-like temperament is for Loosers!    Winners run around insulting people and threatening retaliation!

    • #98
  9. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    I don’t expect Donald Trump will actually fund these PACs when the chips are down.  He’s just hoping to intimidate other Republicans who are thinking of not getting aboard the Trump Train.  He made peace with Megyn Kelly and his supporters where calling her a traitor after the first debate.  He’ll eventually forget about Kasich and Cruz.  And if he doesn’t, oh well, his ardent supporters like him because he fights, so they’re getting what they bargained for.

    • #99
  10. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Grosseteste:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Thought, I think that Romney ran a lousy campaign and did not attack Obama enough. He was my last choice in that election. As was McCain.

    I’ll admit to entertaining the idea of Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich as the nominee, but thought Romney was clearly better than Santorum or Huckabee. I could see someone preferring those two but thinking Romney was better than Paul or Gingrich. Thinking all four of those superior to Romney is a position I’m having trouble understanding.

    I did not see any of them as real candidates.

    • #100
  11. Grosseteste Thatcher
    Grosseteste
    @Grosseteste

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Grosseteste:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Thought, I think that Romney ran a lousy campaign and did not attack Obama enough. He was my last choice in that election. As was McCain.

    I’ll admit to entertaining the idea of Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich as the nominee, but thought Romney was clearly better than Santorum or Huckabee. I could see someone preferring those two but thinking Romney was better than Paul or Gingrich. Thinking all four of those superior to Romney is a position I’m having trouble understanding.

    I did not see any of them as real candidates.

    So Romney was your last choice from a list of zero? Or were Pawlenty, Bachmann, and Cain more real?

    (am I forgetting anyone?)

    • #101
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.