A Ricochet Challenge

 

I’m torn. On the one hand, I think we should all pause from our busy schedules to consider the most salacious and astonishing tabloid scandal in British history since the Profumo affair. We could surely use the comic relief.

On the other hand, the entire story violates our Code of Conduct.

I thus solicit your suggestions for appropriate, dignified, and family-friendly ways to discuss the matter of Lord Sewel. (Warning: The link is not safe for work. And do not open it in front of your children.)

The contest is open.

Published in Culture, Entertainment, Humor
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 101 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Frank Soto Member
    Frank Soto
    @FrankSoto

    Whiskey Sam:

    1967mustangman:See this is why we need a Ricochet After Dark section.

    Finally someone gets it! Although, I usually call this kind of thing “Tuesday”.

    Senik just looks past me as if I haven’t said anything everytime I bring this up.

    • #31
  2. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    I don’t know what these Puritanical Europeans are so worked up about.  This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    • #32
  3. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    • #33
  4. user_278007 Inactive
    user_278007
    @RichardFulmer

    Clearly, Sewel is just another innocent victim of the vast, right-wing conspiracy.

    • #34
  5. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Am I gonna get redacted? I am so excited! This would be my first!

    • #35
  6. Kay of MT Inactive
    Kay of MT
    @KayofMT

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Don’t you think it was the way he said it rather than what he said? I really do miss ST.

    • #36
  7. David Knights Member
    David Knights
    @DavidKnights

    On the bright side.  Given that its a story about an English Lord, shouldn’t we just be pleased that the prostitutes were women?

    • #37
  8. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Well, the gag was directed more toward Clinton defenders circa Nineteen-Naughty-Eight.

    • #38
  9. user_233140 Inactive
    user_233140
    @JohnMurdoch

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    John Murdoch:Euphemism is your friend. What better resource (particularly in this case) than the language of the English during the Victorian Era?

    https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=victorian%20euphemisms

    “Blanket hornpipe” might do. “Convivial society,” perhaps. “Blow the grounsils?” I’m just not sure which one applies to the acts in which the Lord was filmed. The Victorian Era’s euphemisms seem lacking in descriptors for snorting cocaine off a convivial lady’s lady parts, however, while boasting of doing this at the taxpayers’ expense.

    How about this?

    Peer of the realm, convivially exploring every square inch of a subject of the realm, consuming “free market” pharmaceuticals favored among the upper classes of the realm, while eschewing any clothing products manufactured by the people of the realm.

    Or, POTRCEESIOASOTRWCFMPFATUCOTRWEACPMBTPOTR!

    A shilling to the first person to come with a limerick using our fave new acronym.

    • #39
  10. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    John Murdoch: A shilling to the first person to come with a limerick using our fave new acronym.

    I don’t have one yet but I’m pretty sure I’ll have to work it around Nantucket.

    • #40
  11. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Casey:

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Well, the gag was directed more toward Clinton defenders circa Nineteen-Naughty-Eight.

    Gag?

    You really had to go there?

    • #41
  12. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    iWe:

    Casey:

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Well, the gag was directed more toward Clinton defenders circa Nineteen-Naughty-Eight.

    Gag?

    You really had to go there?

    I… I… ugh, I’ve been backed into a code of conduct corner!

    I submit!

    • #42
  13. Howellis Inactive
    Howellis
    @ManWiththeAxe

    I’m wondering why this is even a scandal.

    Maybe it’s that the hookers were only 200 pounds (price, not body weight). That’s awfully low-budget for a lord of the realm. Say, maybe that is their body weight.

    Or is it that he was snorting cocaine with their help. Now that it a problem, as I suppose cocaine possession is a felony in England.

    To my mind the real scandal is that he would waste so much valuable money spent for time with these ladies to make political complaints that he could make in any pub for the price of a pint of Guinness for the guy sitting next to him.

    This is not a man who knows the value of a pound sterling, and therefore cannot be trusted with the public treasury.

    • #43
  14. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    iWe:

    Casey:

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Well, the gag was directed more toward Clinton defenders circa Nineteen-Naughty-Eight.

    Gag?

    You really had to go there?

    Tu quoque, iWe. :)

    And if in vino veritas, what is the Latin phrase for “hookers and blow,” and what does that get you?

    • #44
  15. user_18586 Thatcher
    user_18586
    @DanHanson

    The most amazing thing to me is that a person at this level can be so stupid as to think he can have sex with prostitutes without one of them trying to record the session for purposes of blackmail,  fame,  or money paid by a tabloid.   Doesn’t this kind of disclosure seem absolutely inevitable?

    Leaving his obvious personality flaws and the morals of the encounter aside,  I’d fire this clown just for being incredibly stupid.   And if he has any kind of security clearance,  it should be immediately revoked.   The ‘honey pot’ is a classic method for blackmailing and turning enemies into spies.

    I wonder how many similar videos are in the hands of intelligence agencies around the world,  with the ‘stars’ of said videos now working as moles within their own governments.

    Finally, given that no such video has ever appeared involving Bill Clinton,  I suggest he should be made director of the CIA.  Because given the frequency with which he engages in this kind of behaviour,  he must have Bond-level counter-espionage skills.

    • #45
  16. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Percival:

    iWe:

    Casey:

    iWe:

    Casey:This sort of thing happens in the White House all the time.

    Simon Templar was booted stage right for pointing it out, though. Or more accurately, that it is alleged that somebody in the White House, previously in his/her life, exchanged, um, services, for something that is also found in this scandal.

    Well, the gag was directed more toward Clinton defenders circa Nineteen-Naughty-Eight.

    Gag?

    You really had to go there?

    Tu quotient, iWe. :)

    Blow for blow.

    • #46
  17. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about, but suspect you are failing the challenge.

    • #47
  18. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about, but suspect you are failing the challenge.

    It is a reference to an alternative epic descent.

    • #48
  19. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    That should have been tu quoque, iWe. I’m being abused by Spellcheck.

    • #49
  20. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Labour MP Neil Coyle: “It appears his own standards fell below what Parliament expects.” 

    One girl short, I guess.

     

    • #50
  21. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Percival:Labour MP Neil Coyle:

    One girl short, I guess.

    Don’t confuse lack of quantity for lack of quality.

    • #51
  22. Steve in Richmond Member
    Steve in Richmond
    @SteveinRichmond

    “How do we discuss this?”  Is not the right question to me.  Why would we discuss this? is the real question.  So we have one more politician engaging in practices he knows are illegal, behaving as if the rules don’t apply to him, while speaking thoughts and feelings which strike me as a bit cliched and totally predictable .  That a left of center Brit MP thinks Bush was controlled by Cheney and Iraq was all about oil is hardly news.  What is there really to discuss?

    • #52
  23. Gödel's Ghost Inactive
    Gödel's Ghost
    @GreatGhostofGodel

    Man With the Axe:This is not a man who knows the value of a pound sterling, and therefore cannot be trusted with the public treasury.

    The pound sterling hasn’t been a pound sterling in my lifetime, and from this… gentleman’s… comments about open borders and welfare, he understands that better than 99% of his… peers.

    To me, the most shocking thing about the report is that he’s Labour.

    • #53
  24. PHCheese Inactive
    PHCheese
    @PHCheese

    I am surprised there no pics of Wild Bill Clinton or for that matter Ms Rodham and her girlfriends.

    • #54
  25. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    It is curious that Lord Sewell’s opinion of Jeremy Coyne while hitting the Bolivian Army marching powder is the same as mine while stone cold sober.

    • #55
  26. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about

    I don’t really even know what I’m talking about.

    • #56
  27. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    It is kind of depressing, really, that he is so lacking in creative verbosity. Most of us could have been far more damning (and clever at it).

    Unimpressive.

    • #57
  28. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Casey:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about

    I don’t really even know what I’m talking about.

    Sometimes actions speak louder than words.

    Though I cannot wait for Steyn’s next column. Nobody does a blow-joke like Mark Steyn. I cannot get the Jesse Helms knee replacement gag out of my mind, all these years later.

    • #58
  29. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    iWe:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about, but suspect you are failing the challenge.

    It is a reference to an alternative epic descent.

    Oh! That’s okay then.

    • #59
  30. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    iWe: Blow for blow.

    I have no idea what you’re talking about, but suspect you are failing the challenge.

    It is a reference to an alternative epic descent.

    Oh! That’s okay then.

    Simon would be proud of me.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.