‘Then Cowgirl Change Your Ways Today…’

 

It might be too late for Liz Cheney to change her ways. She is trailing her Republican opponent, Harriet Hagerman, by 22 points in the Wyoming Republican primary.

Liz is encouraging Democrats in Wyoming to vote for her in the primary. That may not be enough to help her hold onto her seat in the House. Registered Republicans make up 71% of registered voters in Wyoming compared to 15% registered as Democrats.

From Fox News:

The Wyoming poll found that the majority of voters disagreed with Cheney’s decision to serve on the Jan. 6 Committee (63%), and thought her opposition to Trump hurt her ability to represent Wyoming (61%). And 54% said Cheney’s service on the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attacks made them less likely to vote for her.

You might want to ride the range in DC with Nancy Pelosi, but at some point, you must come back home to the voters in Wyoming.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 120 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Liz Cheney knew exactly what she was doing. She gave her constituents the middle finger and chose to be the darling of the Left and the toast of the media and D.C. parties. She was all about Liz and she knew full well what the repercussions of that choice would be back home.

    I am surprised that she chose to run for re-election after her grandstanding and virtue signaling performances. She didn’t care about the citizens of Wyoming then, why should she pretend that she does now? Her cheerleaders acknowledge that her choice involved not winning re-election, but here we are again with hypocritical Lizzy still trying to have her constiuent’s cake and eat it too. Good riddance to Lizzy the attention whore. She would not have been in the position that she is without her Dad’s name recognition and coattails. She used her Dad’s reputation to create a platform for herself that was totally selfish and entirely opposite of what she told the Wyoming voters that she conned into electing her in the first place.

    She is a liar and a selfish con artist. Good riddance. She will try to wrap herself in the blanket of a “heroine”, cheered on by gullible idiots, but she has had her 15 minutes of fame and is done in politics, by her own doing. Good.

    We shall see how history treats Liz Cheney as well as Donald Trump.

    You are convinced that you already know this answer. Once again, you are wrong. You are wrong about everything that involves Donald Trump. Give it up. You are so tiresome and predictable. Sad.

    Hm, reminds me of someone else who’s been wrong about everything for ~50 years… who was that?

    • #91
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    • #92
  3. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    Weasels gonna weasel. 

    • #93
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Chris Williamson (View Comment):

    StChristopher (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    No, Republicans will not see her as a hero. They’ll see her as a dupe to Pelosi. Pelosi had a chance to make this a fair investigation actually seeking the truth about the riots of 2020 and rejected that idea from the outset. Cheney joined the committee to give cover for Pelosi’s show trial. Shameful.

    Wikipedia says that the House passed a bill to create a bipartisan commission — equal Democrats and Republicans — but the Senate blocked it. Pelosi never would have chosen a committee of her own if Republicans hadn’t blocked the original bill, and Liz Cheney wouldn’t be in the spotlight right now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_commission .

    So, you seem to be saying that Senate Republicans forced Pelosi to establish an illegitimate “committee” which, in turn, forced or allowed Liz (Token-WY) to show or become what she is today? Interesting.

    What else did it say in that failed House bill that might have been objectionable to Senate Republicans? Or should they just have passed it without reading it? (I hear that is all the rage these days.)

    At least, by making excuses for it, they are now sort of acknowledging that a stacked committee was wrong. Maybe that’s progress.

    It would be progress if they would admit that a stacked election was wrong.

    • #94
  5. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    TBA (View Comment):
    It would be really nice if branches of government would quit cosplaying as each other. I don’t know that there has ever been a congressional trial that we could be proud of. 

    I’ve been thinking about that.  Since the era of television, congressional hearings with witnesses compelled to testify publicly started with the House Unamerican Activities Committee and later the McCarthy Senate hearings.

    I’m for taking away subpeona powers from Congress altogether, but failing that, all subpeonas should be approved by a floor vote of the full house of Congress issuing them with a 2/3’s majority required.

    That 2/3’s majority requirement solves a lot of problems with partisan witch hunts.  It’s not going to happen since it would require a constitutional amendment.

    • #95
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    cdor (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    Liz Cheney has decided that telling the truth about Trump is more important than winning an election. Good for her.

    Liz Cheney has decided that her “truth” is so weak that it cannot stand up to cross-examination.

    And that her re-election campaign is so weak that she has to ask Democrats to vote for her in the Republican primary.

    • #96
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Liz Cheney knew exactly what she was doing. She gave her constituents the middle finger and chose to be the darling of the Left and the toast of the media and D.C. parties. She was all about Liz and she knew full well what the repercussions of that choice would be back home.

    I am surprised that she chose to run for re-election after her grandstanding and virtue signaling performances. She didn’t care about the citizens of Wyoming then, why should she pretend that she does now? Her cheerleaders acknowledge that her choice involved not winning re-election, but here we are again with hypocritical Lizzy still trying to have her constiuent’s cake and eat it too. Good riddance to Lizzy the attention whore. She would not have been in the position that she is without her Dad’s name recognition and coattails. She used her Dad’s reputation to create a platform for herself that was totally selfish and entirely opposite of what she told the Wyoming voters that she conned into electing her in the first place.

    She is a liar and a selfish con artist. Good riddance. She will try to wrap herself in the blanket of a “heroine”, cheered on by gullible idiots, but she has had her 15 minutes of fame and is done in politics, by her own doing. Good.

    Well, the main problem is that Wyoming couldn’t possibly keep her in the style which she feels she deserves.

    • #97
  8. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I Walton (View Comment):

    “In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.”

    Robbins frequently posts things that sounds unambiguously Republican. Then he’ll post something like the above. The difference is that his pro republican posts are about decades old realities and not relevant to today’s politics. They could be insightful into an honest person but the current congressional investigation is obviously not seriously seeking truth. Robbins is a Democrat and a sham.

    I am a Registered Republican, have run for office as a Republican and believe that Ronald Reagan was the Greatest President of the Twentieth Century. I just don’t support Trump.

    And yet when Reagan told you about Biden, you ignored him.

    • #98
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    A lawyer should know better than to make such statements.  But then again, [standard response the mods have told me to stop using].

    • #99
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I Walton (View Comment):

    “In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.”

    Robbins frequently posts things that sounds unambiguously Republican. Then he’ll post something like the above. The difference is that his pro republican posts are about decades old realities and not relevant to today’s politics. They could be insightful into an honest person but the current congressional investigation is obviously not seriously seeking truth. Robbins is a Democrat and a sham.

    I am a Registered Republican, have run for office as a Republican and believe that Ronald Reagan was the Greatest President of the Twentieth Century. I just don’t support Trump.

    Whatever happened to the person who used to post your (public) donations to Democrats? I forget his handle.

    Pretty sure you mean Kozak.

    • #100
  11. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    kedavis (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Chris Williamson (View Comment):

    StChristopher (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    No, Republicans will not see her as a hero. They’ll see her as a dupe to Pelosi. Pelosi had a chance to make this a fair investigation actually seeking the truth about the riots of 2020 and rejected that idea from the outset. Cheney joined the committee to give cover for Pelosi’s show trial. Shameful.

    Wikipedia says that the House passed a bill to create a bipartisan commission — equal Democrats and Republicans — but the Senate blocked it. Pelosi never would have chosen a committee of her own if Republicans hadn’t blocked the original bill, and Liz Cheney wouldn’t be in the spotlight right now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_commission .

    So, you seem to be saying that Senate Republicans forced Pelosi to establish an illegitimate “committee” which, in turn, forced or allowed Liz (Token-WY) to show or become what she is today? Interesting.

    What else did it say in that failed House bill that might have been objectionable to Senate Republicans? Or should they just have passed it without reading it? (I hear that is all the rage these days.)

    At least, by making excuses for it, they are now sort of acknowledging that a stacked committee was wrong. Maybe that’s progress.

    It would be progress if they would admit that a stacked election was wrong.

    I’m not going to let them off that easy. 

    • #101
  12. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    TBA (View Comment):
    Weasels gonna weasel. 

    Let’s stay civil.

    • #102
  13. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings.  If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    • #103
  14. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    I doubt many people who are aware of the illegitimacy of the Committee would have their minds changed.  Those who don’t understand the role of the need for counter- arguments . . . Well, who cares?

    As a professor of criminal law for many years, and as one of the most experienced litigators, never believe anyone who is not cross-examined.

    — Alan Dershowitz

    We never call in witnesses to corroborate other witnesses or to give their reaction to other witnesses.

    —Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal)

    • #104
  15. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    I doubt many people who are aware of the illegitimacy of the Committee would have their minds changed. Those who don’t understand the role of the need for counter- arguments . . . Well, who cares?

    As a professor of criminal law for many years, and as one of the most experienced litigators, never believe anyone who is not cross-examined.”

    — Alan Dershowitz

    Seems like Gary used to believe that, until it became more convenient not to.

    • #105
  16. StChristopher Member
    StChristopher
    @JohnBerg

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    Wow. Plessy, move over. We may have a new nominee for the second worst appellate decision since Dred Scott.

    You need to re think this post.  You think the drop box issue in Wisconsin is worse than Plessy?  You’re no Reagan Republican with a comment like that.  

    • #106
  17. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Wow, just wow.  

    • #107
  18. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Do you think your perspective would be any different if you had watched honest hearings in which there was cross-examination by opposing sides–a true adversarial system?  

    • #108
  19. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Betraying her constituents is a good career move.  She was clearly bored pretending to be conservative and as a certified “maverick” she will open up opportunities in media, NGOs, policy shops, Washington law/lobby firms, and lucrative speaking engagements as the token “Republican” on the panel. The difference in potential income from being an orthodox conservative espousing Wyoming values versus being a prominent “maverick” is enormous.

    Benedict Arnold got few opportunities when he moved to England–the Brits believed being a disloyal weasel was dishonorable even if the weasel came over to their side. Democrats are not burdened with any similar sense of honor so the sky’s the limit for Liz.

    • #109
  20. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Old Bathos (View Comment):
    Benedict Arnold got few opportunities when he moved to England–the Brits believed being a disloyal weasel was dishonorable even if the weasel came over to their side. Democrats are not burdened with any similar sense of honor so the sky’s the limit for Liz.

    They did dissolve Kinzinger’s district for the help he gave them. 

    • #110
  21. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):
    Benedict Arnold got few opportunities when he moved to England–the Brits believed being a disloyal weasel was dishonorable even if the weasel came over to their side. Democrats are not burdened with any similar sense of honor so the sky’s the limit for Liz.

    They did dissolve Kinzinger’s district for the help he gave them.

    Adam never has been the sharpest tool in the shed.

    • #111
  22. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    I voted for Carter the first time.  Does that make me a Carter Democrat?  He sounded right, and Ford was not impressive but Carter turned out to be a fool.   I had met Reagan when he was about to become a candidate and was not impressed.  He kept saying the same thing.  What he said was right, but I didn’t believe him.  He wasn’t Carter so I voted for him.   I  learned.  He was focused, determined and knew what was important at the time.    So was Trump.  Different times.  Reagan would have also been shut out with the media controlled by the folks who want a top heavy dictatorship, even those, like Robbins, who doesn’t understand or is a Democrat, which I can’t decide.   I don’t know how Reagan would have done with the media control that currently exists.  It worked on Robbins if he’s a Reagan Republican, that is, and lots of others.  Trump was something new, something we needed and still need, but who knows if he’ll run or if he can win.  The same system exists and it’s easy to accumulate votes from senile old folks and others while tossing Republican votes, wherever Democrats control.

    • #112
  23. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Did you change your mind after watching all of 2000 Mules?

    • #113
  24. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Did you change your mind after watching all of 2000 Mules?

    Somebody at the Displotch told him it wasn’t worth watching. When he said he had ordered the DVD, I commended him on being willing to listen to the other side, but Lucy pulled the football away again. 

    • #114
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Django (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Did you change your mind after watching all of 2000 Mules?

    Somebody at the Displotch told him it wasn’t worth watching. When he said he had ordered the DVD, I commended him on being willing to listen to the other side, but Lucy pulled the football away again.

    I suspect 2000 Mules may be beyond his comprehension level.  Remember, [standard comment the mods told me to stop using].

    • #115
  26. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/is-liz-cheney-toast

     

    • #116
  27. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/is-liz-cheney-toast

     

    Probably not a waffle or pancake, so that leaves toast.  

    • #117
  28. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    Liz Cheney has decided that telling the truth about Trump is more important than winning an election. Good for her.

    Oh please? You really don’t consider that there are immense pay outs to those of one Party pretending to belong to the other?

    Di Feinstein played many of the same games in reverse – carrying the brand name of Democrat and acting like a Republican whenever there was a way to help her spouse Richard Blum secure governmental contracts from the state of Calif and then later on during Iraq War II, from the US Dept of Defense.

    The latter involved her leaking to Blum top secret info she obtained by her “leadership” on a Congressional military intel committee. The leaks were illegal, and were felonies.

    • #118
  29. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    Oh I knew he wasn’t going to stick with that, he never does.

    I changed my mind after watching the January 6th Committee Hearings. If you had watched them, you would likely have changed your mind too.

    Did you change your mind after watching all of 2000 Mules?

    Somebody at the Displotch told him it wasn’t worth watching. When he said he had ordered the DVD, I commended him on being willing to listen to the other side, but Lucy pulled the football away again.

    I suspect 2000 Mules may be beyond his comprehension level. Remember, [standard comment the mods told me to stop using].

    Yes, he’s just a family lawyer.

    • #119
  30. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Skyler (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):
    Weasels gonna weasel.

    Let’s stay civil.

    Weasels gonna coyote?

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.