‘Then Cowgirl Change Your Ways Today…’

 

It might be too late for Liz Cheney to change her ways. She is trailing her Republican opponent, Harriet Hagerman, by 22 points in the Wyoming Republican primary.

Liz is encouraging Democrats in Wyoming to vote for her in the primary. That may not be enough to help her hold onto her seat in the House. Registered Republicans make up 71% of registered voters in Wyoming compared to 15% registered as Democrats.

From Fox News:

The Wyoming poll found that the majority of voters disagreed with Cheney’s decision to serve on the Jan. 6 Committee (63%), and thought her opposition to Trump hurt her ability to represent Wyoming (61%). And 54% said Cheney’s service on the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attacks made them less likely to vote for her.

You might want to ride the range in DC with Nancy Pelosi, but at some point, you must come back home to the voters in Wyoming.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 120 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Chris Williamson (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    To the Gary Robbins of the world, Trump is the Great Satan. Better the country be impoverished and enslaved to foreign powers than Trump rule for another day. No evil done by the democrats is comparable to Trump raping the country.

    This is his religion.

    Liz Cheney is one of his apostles.

    Question: Should Mike Pence have stopped the electoral college certification?

    Absolutely not.  Mike Pence should be honored by all for his courage and fidelity to the Constitution.  History will treat Mike Pence very, very well.

    • #61
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    I Walton (View Comment):

    “In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.”

    Robbins frequently posts things that sounds unambiguously Republican. Then he’ll post something like the above. The difference is that his pro republican posts are about decades old realities and not relevant to today’s politics. They could be insightful into an honest person but the current congressional investigation is obviously not seriously seeking truth. Robbins is a Democrat and a sham.

    I am a Registered Republican, have run for office as a Republican and believe that Ronald Reagan was the Greatest President of the Twentieth Century.  I just don’t support Trump.

    • #62
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin.  But they weren’t illegal in 2020.  The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    • #63
  4. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Doug Watt (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.

    Liz Cheney has decided that telling the truth about Trump is more important than winning an election. Good for her.

    Well, there are investigations and then there are investigations. I’m waiting for the investigation on the Hunter and Joe Biden joint bank account. The bank account that was used to pay prostitutes that crossed state lines to service Hunter. That is sex-trafficking. Crossing state lines makes that a federal crime. Needless to say, I’m not holding my breath and all I hear from the House are the Sounds of Silence.

    I am sure that they will investigate Hunter at length. However, Hunter’s crimes do not rival an attempted insurrection of the government and the first non-peaceful transfer of power in 230 years.

    Skyler (View Comment):

    It’s the Bush political machine behaving like the Bush political machine. Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld are part of that machine and so is Cheney’s daughter.

    The story goes, and I forget where I heard it, that Ted Cruz when he was first running for the Senate, had the opportunity to meet with G.W. Bush to pitch his case for support. Cruz concluded something to the effect that he was going to help bring the republican party out of establishment control (long before that was a popular phrase). Bush responded, “Ted, I’m the establishment.”

    And it’s the truth. The establishment doesn’t want things to change. They like the old system where the democrats control the narrative and they get into the top dog spot occasionally, but always soak up money and power even on the down side because they play ball with the dems.

    Gary Robbins is a victim, like so many others. He believes unbelievable lies. He doesn’t like Trump, therefore everything said about him is true, no matter how absurd.

    Gary, in a decade or so, the only thing that we will know about Trump is what they tell us to believe. Lots of people still believe horrendous lies about Catherine the Great being crushed by a horse while having sex with it. If they know nothing else, that’s all they know and they think it is true. What makes you think that history is fair or accurate?

    After more than 150 years of hagiography, people still think Lincoln is a sainted sage, when he was a brutal, corrupt politician, like all politicians are, just a bit more so. People have a very irrational hatred of Nixon. He made mistakes, but he isn’t the devil incarnate as he is often portrayed. He biggest sin was being a socialist, not unlike the Bushes.

    Gary is not a victim or dupe. Hes part of that establishment your referring to.

    I am part of the Reagan wing of the party.

    • #64
  5. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    What does this mean?  When talking to the waitress, or his client, or when considering what cases to take, or considering news reports, or posting on other web site, he will give credence to the “insurrection” label?

    Either it was or it wasn’t.  What is he actually saying?

    • #65
  6. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Chris Williamson (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    To the Gary Robbins of the world, Trump is the Great Satan. Better the country be impoverished and enslaved to foreign powers than Trump rule for another day. No evil done by the democrats is comparable to Trump raping the country.

    This is his religion.

    Liz Cheney is one of his apostles.

    Question: Should Mike Pence have stopped the electoral college certification?

    Yes. There was far too much doubt as to the veracity of the voting process. What should we put up with when there is blatant ballot box stuffing going on? Both the dems and the establishment wanted very much to take Trump out of office and they stymied every effort to present the evidence.

    There was no doubt by former Attorney General Barr, or the Acting Attorney General.  There is no doubt now either, see the “Lost, Not Stolen” report by 3 former Judges of the Court of Appeals.

    • #66
  7. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Liz Cheney knew exactly what she was doing. She gave her constituents the middle finger and chose to be the darling of the Left and the toast of the media and D.C. parties. She was all about Liz and she knew full well what the repercussions of that choice would be back home.

    I am surprised that she chose to run for re-election after her grandstanding and virtue signaling performances. She didn’t care about the citizens of Wyoming then, why should she pretend that she does now? Her cheerleaders acknowledge that her choice involved not winning re-election, but here we are again with hypocritical Lizzy still trying to have her constiuent’s cake and eat it too. Good riddance to Lizzy the attention whore. She would not have been in the position that she is without her Dad’s name recognition and coattails. She used her Dad’s reputation to create a platform for herself that was totally selfish and entirely opposite of what she told the Wyoming voters that she conned into electing her in the first place.

    She is a liar and a selfish con artist. Good riddance. She will try to wrap herself in the blanket of a “heroine”, cheered on by gullible idiots, but she has had her 15 minutes of fame and is done in politics, by her own doing. Good.

    We shall see how history treats Liz Cheney as well as Donald Trump.

    You are convinced that you already know this answer. Once again, you are wrong. You are wrong about everything that involves Donald Trump. Give it up. You are so tiresome and predictable. Sad.

    Thank you for your kind words.

    • #67
  8. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    I have since been convinced that it was an attempted insurrection.

    • #68
  9. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    I Walton (View Comment):

    “In a decade, maybe less, Republicans will see Liz Cheney as the hero she is.”

    Robbins frequently posts things that sounds unambiguously Republican. Then he’ll post something like the above. The difference is that his pro republican posts are about decades old realities and not relevant to today’s politics. They could be insightful into an honest person but the current congressional investigation is obviously not seriously seeking truth. Robbins is a Democrat and a sham.

    I am a Registered Republican, have run for office as a Republican and believe that Ronald Reagan was the Greatest President of the Twentieth Century. I just don’t support Trump.

    Whatever happened to the person who used to post your (public) donations to Democrats? I forget his handle.

    • #69
  10. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    Whether she has explicitly expressed this publicly or not, it’s obvious that Liz Cheney thinks that the Republican Party should spend time, perhaps a generation, in the political wilderness for their J6 sins.  I’ve seen similar views from Jonah Goldberg and just after it happened, Rob Long.  Perhaps Cheney has a Moses complex and sees herself leading the Republicans in the wilderness until finally she brings them into the Promised Land.  Of course Moses wasn’t allowed into the Promised Land, and maybe Cheney doesn’t want to carry that Moses complex quite that far.

    I might be sympathetic if the Democratic Party weren’t controlled by so many fruit cakes who are trying use multiple institutions to shutdown free speech if we disagree with them, among other things.

    I’m a conservative first, and only a nominal Republican, and if there were an effective conservative alternative I’d be open to it.

    Gary Robbins (@garyrobbins), in his usual trollish ways, says that Cheney will be seen as a hero in ten years.  I don’t think so.  She has taken too many shortcuts in her involvement with the J6 committee.  Instead of a true hearing, they are presenting a point of view, leaving out exculpatory evidence towards their view of Trump, and banning cross examination of their witnesses.  The way that “the people’s house” has compelled testimony from its citizens is also a problem.

    Cheney is looking for a larger platform than the House of Representatives, which is why she is willing to lose her seat from a backwater, by Washington D.C. standards, like Wyoming.

    There can be a conflict between party loyalty and loyalty to the country.  Cheney hasn’t straddled that divide very well.

    • #70
  11. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this.  I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used.   They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents [authorizing the boxes] are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    • #71
  12. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Wrong.

    • #72
  13. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    Law shmaw. As long as it helped get rid of Trump, it’s all good with Gary. 

    • #73
  14. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    Law shmaw. As long as it helped get rid of Trump, it’s all good with Gary.

    I get it.  We’ve had at least two previous interactions on this and he’s still singing the same tune.  The failure to challenge in time affects the legality of the ballots, not the legality of the boxes.

    • #74
  15. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

     Wow. Plessy, move over.  We may have a new nominee for the second worst appellate decision since Dred Scott.

    • #75
  16. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    Wow. Plessy, move over. We may have a new nominee for the second worst appellate decision since Dred Scott.

    I wish that I understood that.  Oh wait.  No I don’t.

    • #76
  17. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    And now I’m convinced. The state’s right (WI in this case) to regulate its elections is the equivalent of slave states and racial segregation. 

    I’m convinced Gary is a Democrat.

    • #77
  18. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Does Wyoming use Dominion voting machines? Asking for a friend.

    And dropboxes? I hear those are popular with stealing elections.

    Are we talking about how the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the entire election in 2020 was illegal? And that I was right all along?

    I really need to do my I told you so post about that.

    Drop boxes are now illegal in Wisconsin. But they weren’t illegal in 2020. The time to contest drop boxes was in the summer of 2020, not now.

    Again with this. I realize that you ignore truth when it conflicts with your “truth” but the boxes were illegal when used. They were employed because of a partisan administrative body that authorized them in contravention of existing state law.

    The Wisconsin Supreme Court:

    “We hold the documents are invalid because ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes.”

    Wow. Plessy, move over. We may have a new nominee for the second worst appellate decision since Dred Scott.

    Pathetic.

    • #78
  19. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    And now I’m convinced. The state’s right (WI in this case) to regulate its elections is the equivalent of slave states and racial segregation.

    I’m convinced Gary is a Democrat.

    I am a Registered Republican, and a former candidate for office as a Republican.

    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican and not a Trump Republican.  

    Hopefully, in 27 months both you and I will be comfortable calling ourselves DeSantis Republicans, after DeSantis is elected in 2024.

    • #79
  20. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    Whether she has explicitly expressed this publicly or not, it’s obvious that Liz Cheney thinks that the Republican Party should spend time, perhaps a generation, in the political wilderness for their J6 sins. I’ve seen similar views from Jonah Goldberg and just after it happened, Rob Long. Perhaps Cheney has a Moses complex and sees herself leading the Republicans in the wilderness until finally she brings them into the Promised Land. Of course Moses wasn’t allowed into the Promised Land, and maybe Cheney doesn’t want to carry that Moses complex quite that far.

    I might be sympathetic if the Democratic Party weren’t controlled by so many fruit cakes who are trying use multiple institutions to shutdown free speech if we disagree with them, among other things.

    I’m a conservative first, and only a nominal Republican, and if there were an effective conservative alternative I’d be open to it.

    Gary Robbins (@ garyrobbins), in his usual trollish ways, says that Cheney will be seen as a hero in ten years. I don’t think so. She has taken too many shortcuts in her involvement with the J6 committee. Instead of a true hearing, they are presenting a point of view, leaving out exculpatory evidence towards their view of Trump, and banning cross examination of their witnesses. The way that “the people’s house” has compelled testimony from its citizens is also a problem.

    Cheney is looking for a larger platform than the House of Representatives, which is why she is willing to lose her seat from a backwater, by Washington D.C. standards, like Wyoming.

    There can be a conflict between party loyalty and loyalty to the country. Cheney hasn’t straddled that divide very well.

    It would be really nice if branches of government would quit cosplaying as each other. I don’t know that there has ever been a congressional trial that we could be proud of. 

    • #80
  21. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    I have since been convinced that it was an attempted insurrection.

    What does this even mean?  An attempted insurrection is an insurrection.  An unsuccessful insurrection is an insurrection.  Words are not intended to be tissues that you use and throw away.

    • #81
  22. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    I have since been convinced that it was an attempted insurrection.

    What does this even mean? An attempted insurrection is an insurrection. An unsuccessful insurrection is an insurrection. Words are not intended to be tissues that you use and throw away.

    The judges were looking for conspiracy to commit insurrection, since conspiracies sound more nefarious than attempts.  That’s the ticket!

    • #82
  23. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    I have since been convinced that it was an attempted insurrection.

    What does this even mean? An attempted insurrection is an insurrection. An unsuccessful insurrection is an insurrection. Words are not intended to be tissues that you use and throw away.

    It means that he couldn’t think of a modifier right away but wanted to keep saying ‘insurrection’ anyway. 

    • #83
  24. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against states being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    • #84
  25. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against state’s being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    Now, WC … we know that Gary is a Reagan Republican because he has been to the Reagan Library, just as we know that I am a Lamborghini Aventador because I’ve been to a garage.

    • #85
  26. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Percival (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against state’s being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    Now, WC … we know that Gary is a Reagan Republican because he has been to the Reagan Library, just as we know that I am a Lamborghini Aventador because I’ve been to a garage.

    Don’t cross me Percy. I’m not in the mood. /jk

    • #86
  27. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Percival (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against state’s being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    Now, WC … we know that Gary is a Reagan Republican because he has been to the Reagan Library, just as we know that I am a Lamborghini Aventador because I’ve been to a garage.

    But did the garage have a Lamborghini Aventador?

    • #87
  28. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Interesting point of reference:

    “Henry and D.A. Venters convinced me that the phrase “insurrection” without a modifier is a bridge too far.” … “Y’all proved me wrong! I conceded and set the precedent that at Ricochet I will not refer to the events of January 6, 2021 as an ‘insurrection.’ For now, I will call it the ‘U.S. Capitol Riot.’” – [REDACTED], March 15, 2021

    I have since been convinced that it was an attempted insurrection.

    What does this even mean? An attempted insurrection is an insurrection. An unsuccessful insurrection is an insurrection. Words are not intended to be tissues that you use and throw away.

    The judges were looking for conspiracy to commit insurrection, since conspiracies sound more nefarious than attempts. That’s the ticket!

    So then you’re suggesting that Gary is saying that a conspiracy existed that never actually developed into an attempt at an insurrection.  In other words, Jan 6th was about an illegal desire for an insurrection.  That makes sense.  :)

    • #88
  29. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Percival (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against state’s being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    Now, WC … we know that Gary is a Reagan Republican because he has been to the Reagan Library, just as we know that I am a Lamborghini Aventador because I’ve been to a garage.

    I believe he said that he consummated his first marriage in the Reagan Library.  When he honeymooned there.  Something like that.

    • #89
  30. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The distinction is that I am a Reagan Republican

    No, you may “identify” as a Reagan Republican, but Reagan never would have argued against state’s being able to regulate their elections because it’s the equivalent of “state’s rights” arguments for slavery and segregation. You want the feds to take over elections? You’re a “Reagan Republican” the way Caitlyn Jenner or Lia Thomas are “woman of the year.”

    Only a Democrat argues an absolutist position against state’s rights — especially when it comes to elections. Fed takeover of elections is openly part of the Democrat agenda. Democrats are also blinded to the concept of tradeoffs — like the one made in 2020 when Biden was selected over Trump. We exchanged mean tweets for domestic and international disaster. People are suffering and you take zero responsibility for your part in it. Irresponsibility and blame-shifting being another characteristic of Democrats. See Biden, FJ.

    Now, WC … we know that Gary is a Reagan Republican because he has been to the Reagan Library, just as we know that I am a Lamborghini Aventador because I’ve been to a garage.

    I believe he said that he consummated his first marriage in the Reagan Library. When he honeymooned there. Something like that.

    That is too funny.  

    I have been married twice.  With my second wife, we traveled to San Diego to go to the Hotel Del Coronado.  We were stopped at a Denny’s in Simi Valley when a lady came in a said in an excited voice that she had seen President Reagan at his library.  WHAT!  We left quickly to go to the Reagan Presidential Library.  We were kept in the lobby when President Reagan came out of an elevator.  We all clapped.  He turned to us and clasped his hands together above his head. 

    Did we consumate our marriage in the Reagan Library?  Um, no. 

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.