Dates

 

Tom Wolfe once implied in an interview that there was much to gauge about America by asking college-aged men how many dates they had to go on before … ya know. If we factor out boastfulness and put pretending he got honest answers to the side, he noticed a trend that developed from the sixties when he began asking. As decades passed, the responses went from five to four, three to two, to one, until, by the time he was researching for his third novel, I Am Charlotte Simmons, the most common he received was, dates?…”

Anybody who knows anything about youth culture knows that dates are done for. For now, anyway.

Now the fact that Wolfe knew to frame the question that way already said something about how a patriotic skeptic understood our culture. Whether or not he put much stock in the idea that there was a burgeoning two Americas, I couldn’t say. But for now, the hookup scene is what’s happening. It’s an ick-fest for the bold; blech-y for the blacked out. It’s gross. Worst of all, it’s consensual.

*****

Bad as things are, it’s not what you think. There have never been more 25-year-old virgins in the history of Earth. It’s especially sad because I doubt there’s ever been a time when fellas have ever felt more shame for being virgins. “Incels” is what they’re called now. The prehistoric dilemma of all single dude-dom is supposedly noteworthy nowadays. It isn’t. The lack of work ethic is. But the lack of clear expectations preclude running on the wheel. For starters, it helps if someone sets up the carrot.

Even when we set aside super spreaders, the problem remains. Boys do not ask girls to accompany them to dinner and motion picture entertainment. If and when … ya know … happens, there isn’t much of period of time before … you get the idea. I can’t even say which is the bigger issue! It’s probably worse the way it all goes down when it goes down. But the rarity of it all isn’t entirely unrelated to Harry opting to become Sally.

From what I can see, the funky way of contemporary coupling goes thusly: young people go to bars or parties. Then they drink too much. In the process, they work up nerve. They pair up and “get outta here.” Happenings happen. A few months go by, parents visit town, and the girl works up another kind of nerve, soberly this time.

“Soooo … am I your girlfriend?”

Guy says, “Uh … yeah.”

It’s not the stuff “happily ever after” is made of.

I’m sure it’s not the whole thing, hopefully just a dismal tide. But this datelessness is worth penciling in, no? I wonder if young people could do each other right by agreeing to more reasonable expectations. I suspect they need to be told in order to have them in the first place. Perhaps sex education has been left to creeps – whether credentialed school board members who direct seventh-grade biology teachers or the pimply seventh graders who’ve been lying about their exploits since before they even earned pimples – for too long.

#savethedate

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 154 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I was a firm believer in “don’t fish off the company pier.” I think that’s gone the way of the Dodo Bird.

    Considering the long history of people meeting their spouses at the workplace, that never seemed smart to me, at least not as some enforceable company policy.

    I don’t think it’s ever gone out of style.  It’s just become illegal.

    It’s like saying don’t date anyone at the same college as you.

    • #61
  2. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Chuck (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Ray Gunner (View Comment):

    The way I remember it (back in the Pleistocene), the purpose of dating was to test for marriageability. I seems to me young people not dating is a function of young people not marrying. What’s the point of dating in your 20s if you are not going to get serious about marriage until your 40s?

    By which time the women are too old to have children.

    Not so sure about that.

    There are exceptions, but in scientific terms, pregnancy past age 35 or something is considered “geriatric,” last I heard.

    My newest grandchild’s mom was 42.  She probably would not be pleased with that description.

     

    • #62
  3. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    This seems like it belongs on this thread.

     

    I typed out this for comment #1.  But I thought it was too early.  Glad you included it.

    • #63
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Chuck (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Chuck (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Ray Gunner (View Comment):

    The way I remember it (back in the Pleistocene), the purpose of dating was to test for marriageability. I seems to me young people not dating is a function of young people not marrying. What’s the point of dating in your 20s if you are not going to get serious about marriage until your 40s?

    By which time the women are too old to have children.

    Not so sure about that.

    There are exceptions, but in scientific terms, pregnancy past age 35 or something is considered “geriatric,” last I heard.

    My newest grandchild’s mom was 42. She probably would not be pleased with that description.

     

    It’s medical terminology, I didn’t invent it.

    Anyway, it’s not exactly a secret that women have far more difficulty getting pregnant past about 35, and more difficulty carrying to term, additional complications, etc.  That some manage to do it anyway doesn’t refute that.  And any man who gets serious about any woman who is 35+ and says she might want kids “someday,” is more likely than not to end up disappointed.  (Especially if the woman ends up not being able to have kids, and punishes HIM for it.  Like it was somehow his fault.  For not coming along when she was younger and somehow changing HER mind?  Whatever.)

    • #64
  5. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    BDB (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Except for the fact that I wouldn’t be here, there is one dance I wished my Mom had never gone to.

    Sounds deep, dark, and full of secrets. Godspeed to Mom, wherever she is.

    That rural small town dance is the one where she met my father. Her life was pretty much down hill from there. 

    She passed away 12 years ago. My dad last month. 

    • #65
  6. Stina Inactive
    Stina
    @CM

    TBA (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    In the world of dating, there are no rules. It’s the wild west. Nobody knows what to expect. At one extreme of the spectrum are the guys and girls who throw themselves, naked, at anything that moves. In the middle are people who consider themselves tasteful and wouldn’t mind cohabitating or having some fun under the covers, so long as he makes six figures or she’s smart and cute, or whatever. At the other end are old-fashioned Christians “saving themselves” — likely forever. Others check out altogether and settle for porn, drugs, and video games.

    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    This sounds like an opportunity for churches – it would serve them well to facilitate marriage by mixing young Catholics together, with ground rules to help.

    And no, I have no idea how this would be done.

    Eros is a powerful thing, and it used to be constrained by society by way of some variety of elders. It chafed. And no one misses chafing.

    Now Eros is free of all the old constraints and perhaps the most bizarre thing it does is with this freedom is…nothing. Nothing at all.

    I don’t know which young people to pity more.

    When I was a teenager, my episcopal diocese had a bishop that was very youth-centric and he created an office for a director of youth ministry. This director arranged diocesan-wide camp retreats, festivals, weekend lock-ins, community service/outreach and other events that brought the entire diocesan youth together. It was kind of a golden age. My Ocala church had close relationships with churches in Deland, Kissimmee, and St. Cloud. We had friends everywhere. When I moved to Orlando, the relationships started there helped in plugging me into another church.

    This can be done for young adults, too. While the social club aspect is good to have, more focus is needed on getting hands dirty across individual churches.

    • #66
  7. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    I think part of the problem too is that kids really need to “start younger.”  “Playing doctor” shouldn’t be seen as “assault” etc the way the loons have it now.

    • #67
  8. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Samuel Block

    Tom Wolfe once implied in an interview that there was much to gauge about America by asking college-aged men how many dates they had to go on before … ya know. If we factor out boastfulness and put pretending he got honest answers to the side, he noticed a trend that developed from the sixties when he began asking.

    I tend to agree with him about when this began. A few things happened in the sixties that got it started. I did my teen years in the fifties and I didn’t see it. I did see it in the sixties, a big change in the ladies’ willingness. I think most of the changes that led to this change had their greatest effects on females. The growing divorce rate, then no-fault divorce, the pill, the feminist movement, then more women working and living independently, all this had secondary effects on men that is now having a major and significant effect.  I did a post about something I called an epiphany, maybe a bad description,  when I came face-to-face with unwillingness but strong attraction. Everything  took a different path. Turned out well for me and my close and well-behaved, intact family..

    • #68
  9. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    Do these gatherings actually happen? And zero relationships is what happens?

    Interesting….

    But, yes, even before I heard that I knew the paralysis is a big issue.

    Yes, they happen. I just returned from one. And no, nobody ends up dating . . . except the people in the group who met online.

    No luck online? Then you’re screwed. (Or not screwed, as the case may be.)

    • #69
  10. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    Hoyacon (View Comment): How do dating websites and apps fit into this?

    They’ve ruined everything.

    • #70
  11. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    What would the gender distribution be?

    A pretty even split. Not that it matters.

    • #71
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    What would the gender distribution be?

    A pretty even split. Not that it matters.

    Of course these days, “gender” doesn’t seem to mean what it used to.  An “even split” could mean 50% men who identify as men, and 50% men who identify as women.

    • #72
  13. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    Chuck (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Chuck (View Comment):

    This conversation is flabbergasting! Until now I just assumed that those not dating were exceptions pretty much living on the left coast – well, except for a few reprobates. My eyes have been opened, but I sure do wish they had remained closed.

    I thought my preference for arranged marriages and avoiding the dangers concomitant with dating made me a dinosaur but now I find I’m a dimetrodon at the very best. 😔

    Aw, man! I’m sorry. Would it make you feel any better if I said that I don’t think we’re doomed?

    Probably not. But if you could prove it…

    I can’t really prove it… not yet. But the short response I can give is that I know people in their 20s and 30s are fatigued by the arrangement. I’ll let them do a lot of talking about their foibles and every once in a while I’ll kindly toss in a conservative sentiment. Every time I do it, I can see it’s something they hadn’t heard before, but clocks are turning. 

    They want what we’re selling, we just don’t sell it well… not yet.  I’ll take our problem over the Left’s problem of having a bad product. 

    I’m trying to write more regularly, so I’ll try to gather some thoughts on this and put something out when I can.

    • #73
  14. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    Do these gatherings actually happen? And zero relationships is what happens?

    Interesting….

    But, yes, even before I heard that I knew the paralysis is a big issue.

    Yes, they happen. I just returned from one. And no, nobody ends up dating . . . except the people in the group who met online.

    No luck online? Then you’re screwed. (Or not screwed, as the case may be.)

    I’ve never done online. I don’t know of anything like this in my city. I do go on dates, but the women here are pretty progressive and with the ones I’ve gone out with are just a bit passed the point I can work with. Even so, I’ll probably stick with spontaneity.

    But as for these Catholic meets, is it that the guys aren’t working up the nerve to ask the girls out? Are the girls dismissive? Too picky? Prudish? Regardless of what it is that you’ve noticed, this whole phenomenon is something Catholics should be talking about more.

    • #74
  15. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    Bartholomew Xerxes Ogilvie, Jr. (View Comment):

    The whole subject of dating is one that I view as a detached observer, because I managed never to experience it. My wife and I were friends for a year and a half before we even held hands, and by that point we already knew each other well. And neither of us had ever had a serious relationship before we met each other.

    Honestly, I always felt lucky for having avoided that whole experience. The idea of going on a first date with someone you don’t even know, evaluating their suitability as a romantic partner from the outset (could she be the one?) … that seems like an awful lot of pressure. How can you even enjoy dinner?

    On the other hand, though, at least the thought of a long-term commitment was part of the expectation. The emergence of hookup culture just makes me thankful that I was born when I was.

    Same as  BXO. Little experience, met wife in law school. Slow going given my inexperience. But it worked out. For almost 52 years. Then in the Navy I saw what the sailors experienced in Olongapo. Holy sh*t.  Wonder if they wound up happy in the end. 

    • #75
  16. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    BDB (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):

    Dating at 50, after my first wife passed, was very very different than at 18-23, when I married her. At 50-55 everyone was complex to the point of being nuts, but many women were willing to be quickly unchaste. As one told me, hey, I’m pushing 60, I’ll take it while I can!

    That’s adorable.

    Dr R (almost posted Dr. B) sounds like sailors and the gals in P.I. in 1972.  Had to deal with a bunch of them wanting to get the green cards. 

    • #76
  17. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    Do these gatherings actually happen? And zero relationships is what happens?

    Interesting….

    But, yes, even before I heard that I knew the paralysis is a big issue.

    About the last thing – maybe THE last thing – any guy needs is a “date” that turns into a rape accusation the next day, or week, or month, or year…

    Ke that’s young or middle age men’s stuff. No older gal would claim getting raped by a 60 something. Too embarrassing. 

    • #77
  18. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Marjorie Reynolds (View Comment):
    With Catholics, there’s some that just take it too far. I remember a woman I used to meet from time to time at pro life groups and we’d be talking and she would always bring up chastity and how nothing would ever come right if we didn’t have more of it. Now I’ve never claimed to be a good Catholic so if you ask me chastity is like most things, alright in moderation.

    This one’s tricky… I’m actually converting and my mentioning this probably means I’m not off to a great start – I’ll definitely have something to talk with my sponsor next week. But given what I’m reading, I wonder if the church needs have more parishioners who are confident enough to say, “Here are the rules. We’re not allowed to tell you that you can break the rules. But here are the rules for when you do break the rules…. and afterwards go to confession. Less-good Catholics probably have a role to play.

    I hope I don’t irritate too many people with that. It just seems like another of those more reasonable expectations I was talking about in the post. Even if there’s a better way, a little bit of premarital hanky-panky seems like it beats a lifetime of onanism.

    Are you ready to hear about how onanism doesn’t equate to masturbation?

    Sure. I like Bible stories.

    Well there have been longer threads/posts on it before. And I figured one of the more theological members might take it up. But anyway. Basically what it boils down to is that Onan wasn’t bad because of masturbation, he was bad because he defied God’s command that he (marry and?) impregnate his brother’s widow, if I recall the details correctly.

    In terms of logic, I suppose the summation would be that “Onanism” is (a form of, or a situation involving) masturbation, but not all masturbation is “Onanism.”

    Has St. A weighed in yet? Know he is not a Catholic, like me and some on here, but educated in Texas. So will have some good insights. 

    • #78
  19. navyjag Coolidge
    navyjag
    @navyjag

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I was a firm believer in “don’t fish off the company pier.” I think that’s gone the way of the Dodo Bird.

    Considering the long history of people meeting their spouses at the workplace, that never seemed smart to me, at least not as some enforceable company policy.

    And leads to lots of employment litigation. Thank God!

    • #79
  20. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    navyjag (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    Do these gatherings actually happen? And zero relationships is what happens?

    Interesting….

    But, yes, even before I heard that I knew the paralysis is a big issue.

    About the last thing – maybe THE last thing – any guy needs is a “date” that turns into a rape accusation the next day, or week, or month, or year…

    Ke that’s young or middle age men’s stuff. No older gal would claim getting raped by a 60 something. Too embarrassing.

    For most of the young/middle age guys it’s a cop out. Crazy b-words aren’t new. They get a lot of attention, but they aren’t that hard to spot and then avoid. I know guys who weren’t wise enough to spot the signs, but those guys aren’t the same as the ones who aren’t jumping into the modern romance scene… ya know, such as it is.

    • #80
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    navyjag (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    My experience has been that culturally conservative, religious Millennials/Gen Z-ers who want to lead lives of bourgeois virtue and do things the “right” way are risk-averse to the point of paralysis. Because there are no rules. And no institutional support for dating, either. It’s a miracle any marriages happen.

    You can gather 50 Catholics between the ages of 20 and 30 in a room every week for six months, and how many relationships will result? Z-e-r-o.

    Do these gatherings actually happen? And zero relationships is what happens?

    Interesting….

    But, yes, even before I heard that I knew the paralysis is a big issue.

    About the last thing – maybe THE last thing – any guy needs is a “date” that turns into a rape accusation the next day, or week, or month, or year…

    Ke that’s young or middle age men’s stuff. No older gal would claim getting raped by a 60 something. Too embarrassing.

    For most of the young/middle age guys it’s a cop out. Crazy b-words aren’t new. They get a lot of attention, but they aren’t that hard to spot and then avoid. I know guys who weren’t wise enough to spot the signs, but those guys aren’t the same as the ones who aren’t jumping into the modern romance scene… ya know, such as it is.

     

    Catchy tune, too.

     

    • #81
  22. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Samuel Block (View Comment):
    But as for these Catholic meets, is it that the guys aren’t working up the nerve to ask the girls out?

    Yes, that’s a common complaint among Catholic girls.

    Samuel Block (View Comment):
    Are the girls dismissive? Too picky? Prudish?

    Yes, that’s a common complaint among Catholic guys.

     

    • #82
  23. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):
    Rather, he discouraged frivolous dating, understanding that romantic involvement carries with it tremendous mystical attachments that are not easily undone if/when things don’t work out.

    This isn’t necessarily bad advice (especially in the current climate) but I’d like to put in a word in favor of some frivolous dating, let’s say between ages 17-21 or so. I had a ball dating a bunch of different dudes early in my college career. I was always straightforward about what they could expect (we weren’t exclusive, I don’t drink, and sex was totally off the table) and yet somehow I never seemed to lack for male attention. It was fun and exciting and an excellent way to find out what I did and didn’t want in a boyfriend. And when it was time to move on to more serious relationships, I felt like I had had a lovely time playing the field.

    I agree, I think one problem is the lack of frivolous dating.  No one I knew in high school or college in the 90’s went on frivolous dates.  We hung out and socialized in co-ed packs, until two paired off and word spread around that they were now “boyfriend and girlfriend,” which status lasted until they broke up.  If you went on a “date” it pretty much assumed and implied you were already in some sort of exclusive relationship.

    • #83
  24. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    But given what I’m reading, I wonder if the church needs have more parishioners who are confident enough to say, “Here are the rules. We’re not allowed to tell you that you can break the rules. But here are the rules for when you do break the rules…. and afterwards go to confession. Less-good Catholics probably have a role to play.

    I’m not sure what sort of parish you’re joining, but in my experience there are plenty of parishioners (and not a few priests) who quite openly dissent from Church teaching on all sorts of subjects.  Though they’re not likely to tell you to go to confession afterwards, as most of them rarely if ever frequent that sacrament.

    As for chastity, I don’t recall hearing much about it growing up Catholic in the 80’s.  The one discussion of sex I recall from my religious education classes was pretty much the same as what I got in public school sex ed, centered on gross-out pictures of the effects of various STDs.

    • #84
  25. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Ray Gunner (View Comment):

    The way I remember it (back in the Pleistocene), the purpose of dating was to test for marriageability. I seems to me young people not dating is a function of young people not marrying. What’s the point of dating in your 20s if you are not going to get serious about marriage until your 40s?

    Yeah, that’s a trick. A lot of young people have taken the bad advice that whether or not they get married will make no difference in their lives. Most will say they don’t want to. They’re full of it but as a result they aren’t aiming. That’s why there’s the awkward conversations that make it “official,” then years and years of “going out,” and then sometimes they decide to marry up for tax purposes. “It makes sense,” they say.

    It’s odd.

    I am friends with 2 separate couples that both met each other in college, lived together, stayed together exclusively after college, and continued “going out” or whatever you want to call it for over a decade before finally deciding to tie the knot as the milestone birthday of 30 approached.

    • #85
  26. Marjorie Reynolds Coolidge
    Marjorie Reynolds
    @MarjorieReynolds

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    But given what I’m reading, I wonder if the church needs have more parishioners who are confident enough to say, “Here are the rules. We’re not allowed to tell you that you can break the rules. But here are the rules for when you do break the rules…. and afterwards go to confession. Less-good Catholics probably have a role to play.

    I’m not sure what sort of parish you’re joining, but in my experience there are plenty of parishioners (and not a few priests) who quite openly dissent from Church teaching on all sorts of subjects. Though they’re not likely to tell you to go to confession afterwards, as most of them rarely if ever frequent that sacrament.

    As for chastity, I don’t recall hearing much about it growing up Catholic in the 80’s. The one discussion of sex I recall from my religious education classes was pretty much the same as what I got in public school sex ed, centered on gross-out pictures of the effects of various STDs.

    I don’t think that’s what he’s saying.

    It’s not about being so arrogant you think the teaching doesn’t apply to you or the naivety  or pride to think only bad people commit mortal sins. It’s having the humility to admit I was wrong and confession can help, and being able to accept forgiveness because I’m only human.

    • #86
  27. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    Chuck (View Comment):

    This conversation is flabbergasting! Until now I just assumed that those not dating were exceptions pretty much living on the left coast – well, except for a few reprobates. My eyes have been opened, but I sure do wish they had remained closed.

    I thought my preference for arranged marriages and avoiding the dangers concomitant with dating made me a dinosaur but now I find I’m a dimetrodon at the very best. 😔

    As it happened, last night was prayer meeting night for my church.  By the grace of God I was reminded in my conversation with a man from Arizona(Phoenix) and a man from Minnesota (Minneapolis) that there are in fact many who, while not so desirous of arranged marriages, have a biblical view of marriage, dating and premarital sex. Because of that there are many, both male and female, that enter into marriages chaste: Marriages which last a lifetime.

    I had temporarily forgotten that anecdotal stories are hardly the basis of sound judgment.

     

    • #87
  28. Justin Other Lawyer Coolidge
    Justin Other Lawyer
    @DouglasMyers

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):
    Rather, he discouraged frivolous dating, understanding that romantic involvement carries with it tremendous mystical attachments that are not easily undone if/when things don’t work out.

    This isn’t necessarily bad advice (especially in the current climate) but I’d like to put in a word in favor of some frivolous dating, let’s say between ages 17-21 or so. I had a ball dating a bunch of different dudes early in my college career. I was always straightforward about what they could expect (we weren’t exclusive, I don’t drink, and sex was totally off the table) and yet somehow I never seemed to lack for male attention. It was fun and exciting and an excellent way to find out what I did and didn’t want in a boyfriend. And when it was time to move on to more serious relationships, I felt like I had had a lovely time playing the field.

    Just getting back to this–you’re point is well taken.  I probably chose poorly by using the term “frivolous”.  The kind of dating atmosphere you describe seems perfectly healthy, and I did not interpret my father’s advice so as to oppose such friendships.

    How I interpreted the advice was this: Don’t keep dating a girl who for whatever reason(s) you would never consider marrying.  Low key dating helps to make important evaluations, but it’s important not to allow a relationship to “progress” merely because there’s some attraction.

    In any event, good thoughts.  Thanks!

    • #88
  29. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    I had no dating life until I got my license . . .

    A License to Date? Did it have your picture?

    I supposed I should have said “driver’s license.”  However, don’t some colleges require signed consent forms before couples date?  Or maybe that’s to have sex . . .

    • #89
  30. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Stad (View Comment):

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    I had no dating life until I got my license . . .

    A License to Date? Did it have your picture?

    I supposed I should have said “driver’s license.” However, don’t some colleges require signed consent forms before couples date? Or maybe that’s to have sex . . .

    Wouldn’t it be simpler to require chastity belts that could only be opened when two keys were turned simultaneously? 

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.