Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
David French Is Not a Serious Conservative
The one area where we have had strong movement, gun rights, he attacks. Idolatry? Please. French wants to compromise and give up on progress made.
But, that is not the real reason he is not a serious conservative. No, this is just icing on the cake. Proof, if you will, of his nature. He proved he was unserious when he genuinely considered Bill Kristol’s plan to run for President and try to get the election thrown to the House. A serious conservative would never have courted a constitutional crisis because he did not like the GOP nominee.
So, of course, French is against standing our ground on guns. What else can we expect from a man who thought it would have been a good idea for our Republic to be selected President after 90%+ of the voters voted for someone else.
Published in General
Why doesn’t he lose all credibility with that “armed to the teeth” bit?
I would have said the left gets most of what it wants now and comes back later for the rest. Conservatives get Failure Theater.
The Motor-Voter Act was a “Bipartisan Compromise.” Democrats got to register voters at the DMV. Republicans got a requirement that voter rolls be regularly audited and ineligible (dead, relocated, non-existent) voters be removed. The Democrats got what they wanted, but blue states fought against voter roll audits and Democrat groups sued to prevent them from happening in Red States.
The Bush 41 Tax Increase was also supposedly a “Bipartisan Compromise” of spending cuts in return for a tax increase. The Tax increase happened. The Spending Cuts Didn’t.
The Simpson-Mazzoli Amnesty Act was supposed to bring about Border Security in exchange for a mass amnesty of illegal immigrants. The amnesty happened, the border security didn’t.
Such is the history of the GOP “reaching across the aisle” to forge “Bipartisan Compromises.”
Well, on the plus side I suppose – in terms of your argument, anyway – Ricochet probably has a lot fewer subscribers than National Review. So what do WE matter?
Have to agree with Jerry on this. As with all rights, whether a person has a right to do something does not mean that they should do that thing. You need to think about whether it is wise to take a deliberately provocative stance. We should be able to draw such lines, even if we don’t want people arrested or punished.
Just looking at this from a sample data perspective. We know it’s a small sample and self-selected to boot, BUT it is still more information than we had before the question was asked. I would not think that the score of respondents so far matter in gross terms. As a breakdown, however, it is valuable.
I thought that the fat dorks sporting rifles at Starbucks were abusing their rights, and counterproductive. However, open carry at a protest is fine by me. Open carry is even better than concealed carry at helping people remember to mind their manners.
NR started to lose me after our loss in 2008.
The GOP had been running away from Reaganism, limited government and free markets since Jan 20th, 1989. That abandonment contributed to the 2008 financial crisis and the butt-kicking we received that year.
Right after that loss, NR’s David Frum, a “reform” conservative, started publishing articles saying we need to run even further from Reagan and limited government. He seemed to think that free markets were just a fad of the ’80s and those principles were no longer applicable.
NR’s embrace of that and other forms of big-government conservatism (like American Compass) were a major turn-off.
Ironically, NR’s “Against Trump” issue made me think that maybe NR was returning to its roots. (Sorry folks, I thought Trump was a stealth liberal.)
I would prefer a conservative publication to be firmly against big-government conservatism, and not be a platform for big government groups to get their start.
How does this relate to David French? Just his similarity to many other NT’s that got their start at NR.
Sorry, Gary, but you are calling us cultists, as in followers of the Cult of Personality. The whole point of saying there is a “Cult of Personality” is to imply the people following the person are irrational, and somehow in thrall to the person. That is what you mean, and that is been a charge of Never Trump from day one.
As is usual for you, you refuse to own your own bad behavior on all things Trump.
No, the Never Trump thing started before he won. It was a strategy to help him lose. The idea was he would not be supported even if he won, so he had better not win!
That is utter hypocrisy.
This is so not the case. The NRO website is a total mess. It is full of pop up ads that rescale the page when you view it on a tablet or phone. It is nigh unreadable. American Greatness is bad enough, but NRO takes the cake. It did not used to be that way!
You can read the site if you want to, but the idea that is is easy to navigate and clean is objectively false.
Also someone Gary supports 100%
I can’t tell who this is directed at.
Republicans need to have the help of the Democrats to enact an agenda.
Democrats don’t need Republican’s to keep moving the nation into socialism.
Sad.
Go for it! He is a treasure.
They are on his article, therefore, French owns them. The man who, himself, considered doing something, and then supported McMullan doing it, that would have destabilized our democracy for sure should shut up. I will never trust this man again. Anyone supporting the Krystol plan with McMullan is an anti-democratic, anti-republican technocrat. I have yet to see anyone even try to defend the plan as anything else, and I have made two previous posts about it.
David French cannot be serious about the defense of our Republic when he considered participating in, and supported his scheme. It is the sort of thing bad drama villains would try. Talk about stealing an election fair and square.
It does have a pro NR Biased Ownership and Leadership.
I have fond memories of NR and I still read them once in a while. But mostly that is when Powerline links to them.
Ok, I am going to burst some bubbles here.
National Review magazines circulation is about 90000. Lets triple that for maybe online subscribers.
The magazines I used to work for had maybe 20-25o00 circulations.
So the vast majority of conservatives dont even know NRO is.
Compare that to Breitbart.com. In Internet rankings they are 1624th. Vs NRO 12082nd rank.
Shows of political “compassion,” e.g. “kinder, gentler conservatism” or showing up to empathize after a shooting, are usually just posturing, triangulating, etc. Id est, BS.
The most compassionate thing we can do high crime areas is re-toughen law enforcement, back to what Giuliani & Co. successfully did in NYC in the 1990s, and maybe more so. Raise the salaries of cops in high crime precincts. Put up CCTV everywhere like in the UK. Give neighborhood informants Swiss bank accounts.
I’m all in on parental choice, but what if all the schools are teaching propaganda? The most prestigious and expensive private schools are infused with wokeism. Ricochet is doing its part in this fight, but the problem is deeply embedded. Until the right can somehow claim its share inside the accreditation bureaucracy and the teachers’ colleges, school choice may be limited to the lesser of evils.
All-boys schools? Been there, done that. Didn’t help my grades, but a proven remedy for impure thoughts! But now you’d need too many schools. Miss Peregrine’s Academy for the Otherly Gendered?
It’s less of a mess if one subscribes.
Yes, and according to the “google machine,” the much-vaunted (by those who work at it, anyway) “Commentary” magazine has a circulation of about 26,000.
Last I remember, “circulation” is the number of actual subscribers/buyers multiplied by some number on the assumption that subscribers/buyers let other people read their copy too. So the actual number of copies sold is something less than 26,000.
Don’t think I should have to pay money to avoid ads of random size.
I disagree. The extra ads are paying your freight.
Remember, if you’re not paying for a product, then YOU ARE the product.
Not my point. It ain’t the ads, it is how they are displayed.
But if you think it is good business to drive people away from the free content, you can think so.
It happened in my country. Dont let it happen to yours.
It would be interesting to find any kind of rational reason for that stupidity.
The shot heard around the world was the government trying to disarm the people.
It was the point of no return then, and will be again if it comes to it.
Not gonna happen.
Neither side has the numbers to do it by themselves generally speaking. The Democrats hve sadly been more effective at pushing their agenda through.
Nope. Very effective.