Vladophilia

 

From the head of a  think-tank, recent thoughts on Ukraine’s disinclination to be absorbed:

 

This is not an uncommon view, also expressed the other day by Noam Chomsky: it was unwise for Ukraine to resist invasion. If Russia wants your territory, you assume a supine position while gesturing broadly towards everything that was once yours, and is now theirs to control. If Russia is required to kill your people and level your neighborhoods to get what it believes is theirs, that’s on you. 

 

 

Freedom is nice and all that I guess, but economic growth is the true metric of a society’s health. Really, those idiots in the tractors, do they care who the boss is? The tech sector of Ukraine – does it matter if they’re making West-facing consumer products, or working for the FSB? What counts is the end-of-the-year balance sheet. 

Previously from the same account:

 

 

The means by which you add those 44 million are irrelevant. What counts is the world historical accomplishment. 

The population of France in 1940 was 41 million, and I suppose absorbing it into the Reich was a world historical accomplishment, but history doesn’t seem to regard it with any particular affection. On the other hand, France did surrender, and while that made things difficult for the eventual defeat of the militaristic statists in Berlin, France was spared additional physical trauma. Except for the Jews, of course, but (bored continental hand-waving gesture)

 

 

Another earlier sentiment:

 

Men of a certain age of Ricochet: did you find a spring in your step after the invasion? Perhaps a sudden urge to make changes, act boldly? Did you feel a strange charge in the older-dude zeitgeist, as though men around the world about to walk over the border of 70 suddenly felt empowered and revivified?  

Perhaps, because that Putin guy is a strong leader, and cares for his nation, unlike our guys. Granted, he’s presided over the wholesale transfer of wealth from his people to a select group of elites, and the craptacular state of his military suggests that he was either ignorant of the true state of his capabilities or uninterested in the human cost of shoving his shambolic forces into the meat grinder, and hey maybe the Defender of Christendom shouldn’t have lost a purported piece of the True Cross because his flagship wasn’t refitted because they were broke but  the oligarch’s yachts had 5G and Roombas in the master suite. But at least he’s not woke. And it’s ridiculous to think he’s not strong. Just you wait. He’s going to kill a lot of people. 

That’s what leaders do.

 

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 288 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Zafar (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Is surrendering always the worst course of action?

    Always? No. But we shouldn’t wish that state of affairs on anyone.

    The situation is what it is today – with the wisdom of hindsight, sure, so many things could have been done differently to achieve a different outcome – but since it is what it is, how are we wishing a state of affairs on anybody?

    I don’t think we should play the role of colonialists, deciding that Ukraine shouldn’t defend its independence.  

    • #91
  2. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war.

    Same here, WC. My dad was at Anzio, and probably would have been sent to the Pacific theater as well.

    Same thing with my uncle. He was back in the States after VE Day and got a 30-day leave before reporting to the West Coast for training in preparation for Operation Downfall when the bombs were dropped.

    • #92
  3. Tyrion Lannister Inactive
    Tyrion Lannister
    @TyrionLannister

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    When Donald Trump first ran for president, I would estimate that Trump only had about 5% support on Ricochet in the beginning. (The one initial vocal pro-Trump Ricochet person that I remember in 2015 left Ricochet years ago.)

    When Putin invaded Ukraine just over 50 days ago, the percent of Ricochet members who supported Putin seemed to be much, much higher than 5% or 10%.

    Whenever I have posted anything against Putin on Ricochet recently, an entire swarm of pro-Putin Ricochet members have descended upon anything I write with essentially zero Ricochet members willing to take the anti-Putin opinion.

    For some reason the members of Ricochet have transformed this into a largely pro-Putin website. Life happens fast. Other than Kozak who has Ukrainian ancestors, I would have trouble even pointing to any specific anti-Putin members of Ricochet other than perhaps some of the podcasters.

    P.S. The first people I met when I traveled to Ukraine were taxi cab drivers. One look at them and you knew that Putin was not going to conquer or easily conquer that country.

    Not sure what you are talking about- at least on this article, everyone seems to be dunking on one or two Russian apologists.  

    • #93
  4. oddhan Member
    oddhan
    @oddhan

    Think of the opportunity for art. Hanania must be looking forward to bid on “The Rape of the Ukraine Women”.

    • #94
  5. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Sure.  So would you say that Ukraine’s war to re-take Donbas, or its determination (as per the Ukrainian Constitution) to join NATO are existential for Ukraine?

    The former probably is.  Joining NATO is not existential as long as Ukraine has the freedom to decide whether or not to join NATO or some other alliance.  A treaty by which it agreed not to join any such an alliance would be an existential threat.  

    • #95
  6. MWD B612 "Dawg" Member
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    Percival (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war.

    Same here, WC. My dad was at Anzio, and probably would have been sent to the Pacific theater as well.

    Same thing with my uncle. He was back in the States after VE Day and got a 30-day leave before reporting to the West Coast for training in preparation for Operation Downfall when the bombs were dropped.

    I mean, they’re still using the Purple Heart medals produced in anticipation of the casualties expected from the invasion of Japan. At this point there must be millions who wouldn’t be here if their fathers had been sent to invade Japan.

    • #96
  7. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    Up until what point, though? This is the tricky bit for Zelensky. For the Japanese, who had convinced their people American soldiers were cannibals and had their women throwing their children and themselves off cliffs to avoid being subjugated, it took being nuked*. None of us are in the position to make the call for Zelensky, but it’s fair to ask the question, “at what point are the regions under contention no longer worth the loss of life and suffering?” There is a line, it’s just not obvious where it’s drawn.

    You can ask, but I would not try to answer that question for the Ukrainians.  

    • #97
  8. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Tyrion Lannister (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    As a final note, the claim in the OP that Russia wants to absorb Ukraine seems unlikely. Vlad’s actions have been completely consistent with his stated goals — protection of Donetsk/Luhansk and demilitarization of Ukraine. I don’t see any evidence, yet, that he wants to conquer and rule western Ukraine, which I think would be unwise, as it would tend to bog Russia down in a costly occupation.

    The situation seems similar to the transfers of Alsace and Lorraine back and forth between Germany and France. Also, Ukraine itself seems like an unstable state, cobbled together (by the Communists) from distinct cultural and ethnic groups, similar to the former Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia.

    I disagree with your entire comment, but I’ll directly challenge specifically the idea that Putin was not interested in control of Ukraine, just the “protection of Donetsk/Luhansk and demilitarization of Ukraine”.

    The strongest evidence that this is incorrect was the large push on the rest Ukraine that resulted in world backlash against Russia. Russia had tens of thousands of soldiers in tank units heading towards Kiev and surrounding regions. A large projection of power was sent against Zelensky in order to kill him and decapitate the Ukrainian government. This doesn’t look like someone who wants to take over some disputed regions in the east- it looks like a full scale invasion to replace the current leader of Ukraine with a puppet.

    Looking back 2 months- everyone expected Russia to make a move militarily into Ukraine. Biden was making public comments about how to respond to a “minor incursion”. Even if you accept the premise that Putin is only interested in those regions (and I don’t), they were already nominally under Putin’s control and he could have sent his army into the region without much outcry from the world and minimal sanctions. What shook the world into reacting so strongly was Russia’s attempt to take the entire country. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t see that Putin needed to attack the rest of Ukraine to merely take Donetsk/Luhansk.

    Putin’s televised rant a few hours before he started the war (which was consistent with everything he said about Ukraine before that) showed that he was not interested in just the provinces he had already invaded.  If people believe Putin about his “concerns” why don’t they believe what he has said about Ukraine?  

    • #98
  9. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):
    For some reason the members of Ricochet have transformed this into a largely pro-Putin website.

    I recommend you unclench.

    @ DrewInWisconsin

    When you were essentially about the only lone voice for about a decade to fight all the freedom-hating people on the gaming website, I always tried to support you.

    You were outnumbered by a ratio of about 1 to 100 and had the entire website stacked against you.

    I never told you to unclench!

    Do you really think this is a “pro-Putin website”? Based on the comments from two or three members?

    • #99
  10. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war.

    Same here, WC. My dad was at Anzio, and probably would have been sent to the Pacific theater as well.

    Same thing with my uncle. He was back in the States after VE Day and got a 30-day leave before reporting to the West Coast for training in preparation for Operation Downfall when the bombs were dropped.

    I mean, they’re still using the Purple Heart medals produced in anticipation of the casualties expected from the invasion of Japan. At this point there must be millions who wouldn’t be here if their fathers had been sent to invade Japan.

    Fr Miscamble has both written about this topic and has talks on YouTube which are worthwhile. His a priest and a history professor at Notre Dame.

    https://the-american-catholic.com/2012/07/24/father-wison-miscamble-defends-bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/

    • #100
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    BTW, some of these same theorists would say a tea-tax is also not a just cause for war. Ahem

    Maybe that means the British shouldn’t have pressed it when the colonists refused to pay?

    • #101
  12. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    None of us are in the position to make the call for Zelensky, but it’s fair to ask the question, “at what point are the regions under contention no longer worth the loss of life and suffering?” There is a line, it’s just not obvious where it’s drawn.

    Meaning the Ukrainians should just abandon the “regions” and go somewhere else, so Russia can have them?

    • #102
  13. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Headedwest (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Should the Palestinians surrender and accept that Israel is much stronger than them and they should take the deal they can get?

    Given that the Palestinians are the aggressors in the conflict, yes.

    They don’t see it that way, but iyho should surrendering or not be function of whether one side is right or not, or whether one side is too weak to win militarily or not?

    Here’s a thought: ask an honest question.

    Here’s a thought: be interesting.

    Okay, my apologies, that was uncivil.

    How about: what’s dishonest about my questions?

    Or is that just another rabbithole for the innocent and unwary?

    It seems like you are a troll arguing in bad faith.

    • #103
  14. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    People who can’t make distinctions or handle complexity should not have Twitter accounts or otherwise be encouraged to oversimplify and live in false binaries.

    Remember the idiots who could not simply oppose US Vietnam policy but had to cheer for the Viet Cong?  There is a similar cognitively challenged process at work in the Ukraine issue:  The reasonable position of opposition to direct US involvement must instead mutate into a dialog about Ukrainian corruption, Russian national identity yearnings, and even overt support of Putin along with obligatory observations about Ukrainian corruption. Either we drift into WWIII or assuage Putin’s feelings.  

     

     

    • #104
  15. MWD B612 "Dawg" Member
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    People who can’t make distinctions or handle complexity should not have Twitter accounts or otherwise be encouraged to oversimplify and live in false binaries.

    Remember the idiots who could not simply oppose US Vietnam policy but had to cheer for the Viet Cong? There is a similar cognitively challenged process at work in the Ukraine issue: The reasonable position of opposition to direct US involvement must instead mutate into a dialog about Ukrainian corruption, Russian national identity yearnings, and even overt support of Putin along with obligatory observations about Ukrainian corruption. Either we drift into WWIII or assuage Putin’s feelings.

     

     

    IIRC, one of Sun Tzu’s maxims is, in part, “Know thy Enemy.” Seems to me that trying to understand Russia’s concerns and goals is part of that and should be reasoned out. Especially if there’s hope to end the war without an absolute victory by either side. And honestly, that’s how I see this ending. IMHO Ukraine should explore a settlement while they (ostensibly) hold the advantage.

    But there’s no reason to claim that saying this means one is a “Putin stooge” or a “Putin supporter.” 

    • #105
  16. Paul Stinchfield Member
    Paul Stinchfield
    @PaulStinchfield

    MWD B612 "Dawg" (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    People who can’t make distinctions or handle complexity should not have Twitter accounts or otherwise be encouraged to oversimplify and live in false binaries.

    Remember the idiots who could not simply oppose US Vietnam policy but had to cheer for the Viet Cong? There is a similar cognitively challenged process at work in the Ukraine issue: The reasonable position of opposition to direct US involvement must instead mutate into a dialog about Ukrainian corruption, Russian national identity yearnings, and even overt support of Putin along with obligatory observations about Ukrainian corruption. Either we drift into WWIII or assuage Putin’s feelings.

     

     

    IIRC, one of Sun Tzu’s maxims is, in part, “Know thy Enemy.” Seems to me that trying to understand Russia’s concerns and goals is part of that and should be reasoned out. Especially if there’s hope to end the war without an absolute victory by either side. And honestly, that’s how I see this ending. IMHO Ukraine should explore a settlement while they (ostensibly) hold the advantage.

    But there’s no reason to claim that saying this means one is a “Putin stooge” or a “Putin supporter.”

    “Know thy enemy” is indeed of the highest importance. But don’t forget Putin’s nostalgia for the Soviet Union and the Russian empire before it: Ukraine, Poland, et al have very good reasons to fear, even hate, Russia.

    • #106
  17. Trink Coolidge
    Trink
    @Trink

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war. 

    I think I have the letters from our parents’ exchanges during that time . . in which Mother responds emotionally to her deep concern about his returning after his Omaha Beach experience.

    • #107
  18. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Trink (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war.

    I think I have the letters from our parents’ exchanges during that time . . in which Mother responds emotionally to her deep concern about his returning after his Omaha Beach experience.

    I’ve talked to a POW (or war criminal as he was called) who was in Tokyo at the time. He was very pleased with how things were brought to a hasty conclusion. 

    • #108
  19. DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax)
    @DonG

    Gazpacho Grande' (View Comment):
    Now do a map of the US.

    And then do a map of Canada.   If the folks in Ottawa tried to outlaw the French language in Quebec, it would get ugly fast.   That said, I am a fan of having a national language, but not a fan of outlawing languages.

    • #109
  20. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    philo (View Comment):

    Trink (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    *Many Catholic just-war theorists would say the US violated proportional means to achieve the end to WWII. I’m not particularly sympathetic to the argument, since my dad probably avoided fighting in the Pacific theatre in part because of the abrupt end of the war.

    I think I have the letters from our parents’ exchanges during that time . . in which Mother responds emotionally to her deep concern about his returning after his Omaha Beach experience.

    I’ve talked to a POW (or war criminal as he was called) who was in Tokyo at the time. He was very pleased with how things were brought to a hasty conclusion.

    Pretty much everybody was.  I cannot recommend enough Hornfischers book The Fleet At Flood Tide, about the last year of the war in the Pacific.  It is, in my opinion, impossible to read that book and its account of the bloody fighting on Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa, and come away unconvinced that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not only justified but necessary to end the war as quickly as possible.

     

    Even leaving that aside, if Truman had NOT used the bomb once it was available, and the war had dragged on for months (or even a few weeks) longer than it did, once news came out that we could have ended the war sooner, Truman would have been impeached.

     

    • #110
  21. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    None of us are in the position to make the call for Zelensky, but it’s fair to ask the question, “at what point are the regions under contention no longer worth the loss of life and suffering?” There is a line, it’s just not obvious where it’s drawn.

    Meaning the Ukrainians should just abandon the “regions” and go somewhere else, so Russia can have them?

    No, meaning the Ukrainians will have to decide when the price of retaining the territories is too high. I’m not here to say that’s now, just that there is always a point at which that’s the case. Maybe they never get there and drive the Russians out. We can hope.

    • #111
  22. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Headedwest (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Should the Palestinians surrender and accept that Israel is much stronger than them and they should take the deal they can get?

    Given that the Palestinians are the aggressors in the conflict, yes.

    They don’t see it that way, but iyho should surrendering or not be function of whether one side is right or not, or whether one side is too weak to win militarily or not?

    Here’s a thought: ask an honest question.

    Here’s a thought: be interesting.

    Okay, my apologies, that was uncivil.

    How about: what’s dishonest about my questions?

    Or is that just another rabbithole for the innocent and unwary?

    It seems like you are a troll arguing in bad faith.

    Accusations and no specifics are….not helpful?

    • #112
  23. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    BDB (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    2) language isn’t loyalty

    You’re right. Being a first class citizen = loyalty. Language is (just) one way of differentiating between citizens, and telling some of them that they’re more equal than others.

    Wrong a couple of times.

    The US has better luck with loyalty from the crapped-upon than from the crust. Our most equal citizens are actively working to destroy the place.

    Language matters. Culture matters. Magic dirt does not exist, and if you are going to have a culture, then you will have a language. Anything else is new-age twaddle.

    What is derided as “whiteness” is western civilization itself, and I do not care for the objections or the complaints of those who in 2022 wish to do something else. They can very well go someplace else.

    What about the 30% of Ukraine that speaks Russian? Different culture? How to accommodate within Ukraine in a way that satisfies the majority as well as the minority?

    • #113
  24. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Zafar (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    2) language isn’t loyalty

    You’re right. Being a first class citizen = loyalty. Language is (just) one way of differentiating between citizens, and telling some of them that they’re more equal than others.

    Wrong a couple of times.

    The US has better luck with loyalty from the crapped-upon than from the crust. Our most equal citizens are actively working to destroy the place.

    Language matters. Culture matters. Magic dirt does not exist, and if you are going to have a culture, then you will have a language. Anything else is new-age twaddle.

    What is derided as “whiteness” is western civilization itself, and I do not care for the objections or the complaints of those who in 2022 wish to do something else. They can very well go someplace else.

    What about the 30% of Ukraine that speaks Russian? Different culture? How to accommodate within Ukraine in a way that satisfies the majority as well as the minority?

    The evidence suggests that it wasn’t a big deal until Putin tried to make it one.

    • #114
  25. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    No, the evidence suggests the opposite. Just wiki, but a good write up:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy_in_Ukraine

    • #115
  26. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    I am amazed at how many Russia sympathizers I have come across in say the last ten years, especially from the right. Even today they are out there. What can I say.

    You can say “Maybe they’re not Russia sympathizers but don’t see any reason for the U.S. to go to war with Russia. Especially given the pre-revolutionary state of the United States right now.

    Where is this push for the US to go to war with Russia?  I haven’t seen it. 

    • #116
  27. DonG (CAGW is a Hoax) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Hoax)
    @DonG

    Manny (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    I am amazed at how many Russia sympathizers I have come across in say the last ten years, especially from the right. Even today they are out there. What can I say.

    You can say “Maybe they’re not Russia sympathizers but don’t see any reason for the U.S. to go to war with Russia. Especially given the pre-revolutionary state of the United States right now.

    Where is this push for the US to go to war with Russia? I haven’t seen it.

    Senator Chris Coons is calling for Biden to send US troops to Ukraine.

    • #117
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Oik! Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik!
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Manny (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    I am amazed at how many Russia sympathizers I have come across in say the last ten years, especially from the right. Even today they are out there. What can I say.

    You can say “Maybe they’re not Russia sympathizers but don’t see any reason for the U.S. to go to war with Russia. Especially given the pre-revolutionary state of the United States right now.

    Where is this push for the US to go to war with Russia? I haven’t seen it.

    Every call for a no-fly-zone is a call for war with Russia.

    And as I’ve been saying, we might think that supplying weapons keeps our hands clean, but it doesn’t matter what we think. What matters is what Vlad thinks. And he’s already saying that if NATO allies keep supplying Ukraine, he’ll consider it an act of war and respond Nuclearly.

    It also doesn’t help that there’s a senile old man wandering around yapping about genocide and war crimes and calling for regime change.

    As for me, I think we’ve already done enough damage to Ukraine over the last decade, and I think it’s high time we got out.

    Of course, I also think it’s time for a new isolationism. And yes, I used the I-word to trigger everyone. But I’m really tired of America sending billions of dollars to NGOs overseas, laying out the welcome mat for everyone and his nine wives to flood into the country, sending manufacturing abroad and killing our workforce, . . . and then blaming Americans for being upset about it.

    Close the borders to everyone. Pull up the drawbridges. Focus on the homeland.

    • #118
  29. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Headedwest (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Should the Palestinians surrender and accept that Israel is much stronger than them and they should take the deal they can get?

    Given that the Palestinians are the aggressors in the conflict, yes.

    They don’t see it that way, but iyho should surrendering or not be function of whether one side is right or not, or whether one side is too weak to win militarily or not?

    Here’s a thought: ask an honest question.

    Here’s a thought: be interesting.

    Okay, my apologies, that was uncivil.

    How about: what’s dishonest about my questions?

    Or is that just another rabbithole for the innocent and unwary?

    It seems like you are a troll arguing in bad faith.

    Accusations and no specifics are….not helpful?

    You mentioned that conservatives don’t listen to black Americans and made fun of two black Americans Diamond and Silk. Also, Thomas Sowell is practically a saint among conservatives. 

    You often talk like conservatives don’t care about different kinds of folks and it rubs me the wrong way. I wish you would say, “I think your a bit wrong about this and here is why. What do you think about it?”

    But you are quick to mention when someone is white or had a comfortable childhood. 

    For example, someone posted a long scholarly article about how Winston Churchill was not responsible for the famine in India at the time. You responded by saying something to the effect that, “Would you say that about the Irish famine?” And you ignored the arguments in the long article from Hillsdale. It irks me.

    • #119
  30. MWD B612 "Dawg" Member
    MWD B612 "Dawg"
    @danok1

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):
    Of course, I also think it’s time for a new isolationism. And yes, I used the I-word to trigger everyone.

    You aren’t triggering me, brother. I’m on board.

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik! (View Comment):
    Close the borders to everyone. Pull up the drawbridges. Focus on the homeland.

    Works for me.

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.