Donald, Don’t Do it

 

This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again. He’s decided that certain key people should state that they will step down if Trump decides to run for President in 2024. And he has Ron DeSantis in his sights.

Recently I heard a reporter ask Mike Pompeo, who I believe would be a very fine presidential candidate, if he would step down from a candidacy if Trump decided to run. Pompeo indirectly stated that Trump’s candidacy wouldn’t stop him from running. Chris Christie said something similar on Fox. But both of these men don’t have a high probability of being elected.

Why is Trump attacking? Ron DeSantis is a real threat.

I know we’re a long way from 2024, but Trump wants to get in his digs early.

Trump’s first attack was indirect. DeSantis was asked about his vaccine status, and he said he’d received the vaccine, but did not reveal whether he’d had the booster, and Trump wanted everyone to know that he did have the booster. Trump’s thinly veiled response: last week he seemed to swipe at DeSantis as ‘gutless’ politicians who dodge the question out of fear of blowback from vaccine skeptics.

How does Trump know that, and why does he care?

It turns out that Trump was booed recently at two speaking events in Alabama and Dallas when he encouraged people to get the vaccine. In contrast, DeSantis has kept current on the outcomes of getting the vaccines and the booster, and is highly critical of Anthony Fauci, the man whom Trump relied on.

In addition, Trump takes credit for getting DeSantis elected. (I don’t know if he’s mentioned how, until recently when DeSantis criticized lockdowns, DeSantis frequently stated his support for Trump.) But Trump demands loyalty, and he expects DeSantis’ loyalty to extend to declining a nomination for the Presidency.

Trump is entitled to wish for whatever he likes, including a lifetime support for his running a third time for the Presidency. He’s entitled to be disappointed, even angry, at DeSantis for not agreeing to step down if Trump runs again. But he’s wrong on several other counts. First, he’s going to garner criticism should he decide to run if he demands that DeSantis not run. Second, if he criticizes DeSantis because the governor won’t step down, his input could actually increase DeSantis’ chances for the nomination. Third, he could be threatening the chances of the Republican party winning the Presidency, due to the self-serving demands he’s making, which will suggest that the Republicans can be as inept as the Democrats. Finally, he could jeopardize the future of the country if he has a role in the Republicans losing the Presidency.

If Trump could be the adult in the room (as Biden tries to claim he is) and say he’d be “disappointed” if DeSantis would win, I’d be fine with that. And we don’t know what he’ll say over the next couple of years: he could back off or dial it up.

But I’m not holding my breath. Stay tuned.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 309 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Flicker (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    This, after 9 pages devoted largely to “don’t believe anonymous sources!”

    They’re not anonymous sources. I suppose I could find the articles but it would take a very long time.

    And I don’t think I ever said don’t believe anonymous sources. I’ve said don’t believe certain sources. And don’t believe one-word, out of context quotes with the context replaced by the writer’s explanation.

    And I said rumored as an informal shorthand for “It may not be true”.

    • #271
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    BDB (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    I like Ted Cruz because he is hated by all the right people for the right reasons.

    I’m not big on Ted Cruz (now), but this is sound logic. none of us will ever have all of the information we would want, or could objectively say enables an “informed” decision. Go with what you got and don’t be talked out of it by the “cite your sources” crowd when sources aren’t the point.

    Actually, only two appointments due to the deaths of Justices Scalia and RBG.  Justice Kennedy retired on his own terms, and likely would have stayed on the Court if Hillary had been elected.  

    On the other hand, if Hillary had beaten Trump, I doubt that on January 6, 2021, Hillary would have sparked a riot and an attempted theft of the count of electoral college votes, and Trump’s populism would have been long ago forgotten.  

    • #272
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Django (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yet Reagan was disliked by a lot of the GOP establishment.

    That’s not fair. Reagan was only disliked by about 96% of the Republican establishment.

    In a sense we are not fair to the GOPe either. After all, it’s only 96% of them that give the other 4% a bad name.

    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP.  I was there.  I saw it with my own two eyes.  Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA.  It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    • #273
  4. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yes, generally you can tell a man by his enemies. And Reagan came seconds from dying by assassination. Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    The Code of Conduct prescribes 

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.
    • #274
  5. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    On the other hand, if Hillary had beaten Trump, I doubt that on January 6, 2021, Hillary would have sparked a riot and an attempted theft of the count of electoral college votes, and Trump’s populism would have been long ago forgotten.  

    Democrats fomented violent, deadly, flaming insurrections throughout 2020, with rhetoric stretching back to before Trump even took office.  For some reason, this does not bother you, nor even occur to you as the very thing you say would not have happened — it did happen.

    • #275
  6. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yes, generally you can tell a man by his enemies. And Reagan came seconds from dying by assassination. Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    The Code of Conduct prescribes

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    Proscribes.

    • #276
  7. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The Code of Conduct prescribes 

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    Proscribes.

    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP. I was there. I saw it with my own two eyes. Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA. It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    How could you possibly have seen the behind-the-scenes undermining of Reagan with your own eyes?  And what would the Reagan library have to do with it?  Why would we have to visit it to know of the fragile coalition that backed Reagan? 

    Why did we need the slogan, “Let Reagan Be Reagan” if all his allies had been completely won over?  

    • #277
  8. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    BDB (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yes, generally you can tell a man by his enemies. And Reagan came seconds from dying by assassination. Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    The Code of Conduct prescribes

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    Proscribes.

    Oh! That was my loophole.

    • #278
  9. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yes, generally you can tell a man by his enemies. And Reagan came seconds from dying by assassination. Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    The Code of Conduct prescribes

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    This is for you Garry, with all my richest Ricofection.

    Maybe if Trump is reelected it really is the Death of Democracy.

    • #279
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Trump’s populism would have been long ago forgotten.  

    You don’t know anything about this. 

    • #280
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP.  I was there.  I saw it with my own two eyes.  Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA.  It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    What happened after 1989?

    • #281
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    delete

    • #282
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    This is an epic interview of Steven Miller on Kudlow. This is what you get for voting Democrat. He is by far my favorite pundit now. 

     

    https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6292974083001

     

    Former senior White House adviser Stephen Miller slams Biden’s first press conference of 2022 on ‘Kudlow.’

     

    • #283
  14. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yes, generally you can tell a man by his enemies. And Reagan came seconds from dying by assassination. Rumor has it that Bush family was close friends with the Hinckley family.

    The Code of Conduct prescribes

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    Gary, for 4 years you bought into the entire Trump Russia collusion fantasy and now you keep pressing the (D) manufactured January 6 “insurrection” perpetrated by “domestic terrorist” narrative worthy of investigation by Federal law enforcement counter terrorism units with full blown DOJ prosecutions of alleged “domestic terror” suspects including lengthy, in some cases indefinite, incarceration as the accused await trial.

    I don’t believe you do yourself any favors by reminding the Ricochet community you are easily the most chronic violator of the Ricochet CoC.

    • #284
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I kept trying to see the other side. It took me like two months to see it was BS. Trump has too many lawyers surrounding him. The idea that he’s going to run for president while he is an International criminal is ridiculous. The IRS has carte blanche to give him a colonoscopy whenever they feel like it. It’s nuts.

    My brother-in-law still thinks that after non-justice oriented Andrew Weissman spending $40 million and dozens of hours of congressional testimony, Jared Kushner and Don Junior worked with the Russians to do something. 

    • #285
  16. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    BDB (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    On the other hand, if Hillary had beaten Trump, I doubt that on January 6, 2021, Hillary would have sparked a riot and an attempted theft of the count of electoral college votes, and Trump’s populism would have been long ago forgotten.

    Democrats fomented violent, deadly, flaming insurrections throughout 2020, with rhetoric stretching back to before Trump even took office. For some reason, this does not bother you, nor even occur to you as the very thing you say would not have happened — it did happen.

    Heck, one only has to look at the photos of the rioting and burning when Hillary lost.

    Tens of Thousands Protest Trump Election Victory, 124 Arrested - ABC News

    fNot My President': Thousands March in Protest - The Atlantic

    More Than 200 Arrested in D.C. Protests on Inauguration Day

    Dramatic Scenes as Thousands March in Protest of Trump's Victory Photos -  ABC News

    Thousands across the USA protest Trump victoryDonald Trump Win Leads to Street Protests Across U.S.

     

     

    • #286
  17. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yet Reagan was disliked by a lot of the GOP establishment.

    That’s not fair. Reagan was only disliked by about 96% of the Republican establishment.

    In a sense we are not fair to the GOPe either. After all, it’s only 96% of them that give the other 4% a bad name.

    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP. I was there. I saw it with my own two eyes. Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA. It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    Gary, your memory of Reagan is as flawed as your perceptions of Trump.

    • #287
  18. Hans Gruber Pfizer President Inactive
    Hans Gruber Pfizer President
    @Pseudodionysius

    Fruitcakes? What an insensitive, transphobic, heteronormative, hurtful epithet!

    • #288
  19. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn: This is precisely the kind of petty behavior that confirms my belief that Trump should not be elected again.

    I fervently hope Trump won’t run, but it’s a faint hope. The Republican Party would be nuts to nominate him again. Move on, guys. Alas, I think the most motivated voters are, indeed, sufficiently nutty to don the MAGA hats and damn the torpedoes.

    Therefore, I have only a glimmer of hope for 2024. Let me just say it now: I will not vote for Trump. Not in the primary. Not in the general election. I pray it doesn’t come down to two unacceptable candidates and people on both sides yelling about a binary choice. I will take the third way and not vote.

    Please start talking about the potential candidates you like and what makes them presidential in your opinion.

    Good question.

    Well, he has to have a sharp crease in his trou … sorry, I was channeling David Brooks there for a moment.

    I remember someone describing R. Reagan as a person who wanted to take care of the threats from foreign powers, remove stupid regulations, and make the federal government the least intrusive in the daily lives of Americans as possible, consistent with holding the Union together. He had faith in the ability of the citizens to run their own lives. Forty years ago I had that faith as well. Today, I am not so sure. Today, I’d still vote for a person who followed Reagan’s principles. That’s why I voted for Trump in 2020. BTW, he was the first major party candidate to get my vote since 2000, and if I had that to do over, Shrub wouldn’t have gotten my vote in 2000. I despised that fool by 2002.

    Yet Reagan was disliked by a lot of the GOP establishment.

    That’s not fair. Reagan was only disliked by about 96% of the Republican establishment.

    In a sense we are not fair to the GOPe either. After all, it’s only 96% of them that give the other 4% a bad name.

    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP. I was there. I saw it with my own two eyes. Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA. It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    Gary, your memory of Reagan is as flawed as your perceptions of Trump.

    In ’83 or so, well after PATCO, the Libyan oil embargo, telling the world that communism was headed for “the ash heap of history,” only the diehard anti-Reagan Republicans were left. Reagan breathed new life into the party of Rockefeller, Lowell Weicker, and the House of Bush. They didn’t much like it, but they could bloody well lump it.

    • #289
  20. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Hans Gruber Pfizer President (View Comment):
    Fruitcakes? What an insensitive, transphobic, heteronormative, hurtful epithet!

    Fruitcakes?  Dry but delightful.

    • #290
  21. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Hans Gruber Pfizer President (View Comment):

    Fruitcakes? What an insensitive, transphobic, heteronormative, hurtful epithet!

    Did you just assume my socio-fruitcake status?

    • #291
  22. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Reagan completely won over the entire GOP. I was there. I saw it with my own two eyes. Please go to the Reagan Presidential Library if you are ever in LA. It is in Simi Valley off of U.S. 101.

    Gary, your memory of Reagan is as flawed as your perceptions of Trump.

    Yeah, . . . um . . . Reagan was regularly opposed by the NeverReagans of his own party — the Bushies. (And I suspect Gary would have been supporting the Bushies back then.)

    • #292
  23. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Remind yourself to be “civil”. Also, you should vote. lol 

     

     

     

    “We are not a nation of laws, we are a nation of political will.” — Steve Deace

     

    • #293
  24. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Remind yourself to be “civil”. Also, you should vote. lol

     

     

     

    “We are not a nation of laws, we are a nation of political will.” — Steve Deace

     

    I’m tempted to write a check to her campaign. It’s one thing to say “thank you for your courageous vote” but it is another thing to write a check that says the same thing. 

    • #294
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Django (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Remind yourself to be “civil”. Also, you should vote. lol

     

     

     

     

    “We are not a nation of laws, we are a nation of political will.” — Steve Deace

     

    I’m tempted to write a check to her campaign. It’s one thing to say “thank you for your courageous vote” but it is another thing to write a check that says the same thing.

    People like Gary have this fantasy of Scoop Jackson coming back. From what I can tell, she’s going to go totally socialist when she’s forced to. I have no idea what to do.

    • #295
  26. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Remind yourself to be “civil”. Also, you should vote. lol

     

     

     

     

    “We are not a nation of laws, we are a nation of political will.” — Steve Deace

     

    I’m tempted to write a check to her campaign. It’s one thing to say “thank you for your courageous vote” but it is another thing to write a check that says the same thing.

    People like Gary have this fantasy of Scoop Jackson coming back. From what I can tell, she’s going to go totally socialist when she’s forced to. I have no idea what to do.

    She serves as a reminder that even among Democrats there are still a few honorable enemies. 

    • #296
  27. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The Code of Conduct prescribes 

    • Anything that makes the Ricochet Community look like a bunch of radical fruitcakes. This includes 99% of conspiracy theories.

    But apparently not the Steele Dossier – Pee Pee Tape hoaxes are totally ok with Gary.

    • #297
  28. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Hans Gruber Pfizer President (View Comment):
    Fruitcakes? What an insensitive, transphobic, heteronormative, hurtful epithet!

    Fruitcakes? Dry but delightful.

    But very high calorie. I remember eating almost an entire fruitcake by myself every Christmas until one Christmas I stopped to look at the nutrition list (or better put, lack of nutrition) and was shocked. Fruitcakes have to be the highest concentration of calories of any food item. 

    • #298
  29. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Manny (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Hans Gruber Pfizer President (View Comment):
    Fruitcakes? What an insensitive, transphobic, heteronormative, hurtful epithet!

    Fruitcakes? Dry but delightful.

    But very high calorie. I remember eating almost an entire fruitcake by myself every Christmas until one Christmas I stopped to look at the nutrition list (or better put, lack of nutrition) and was shocked. Fruitcakes have to be the highest concentration of calories of any food item.

    Just eat a slice a day.  

    • #299
  30. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    DaveSchmidt (View Comment):
    Just eat a slice a day.  

    Two slices. 

    • #300
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.