OK, Maybe Controversial, But Trump Is Owed a Second Term

 

A friend of mine says, “Of course, the NeverTrumpers were right after all. Trump had so alienated suburban women by his personal behavior, he couldn’t possibly have won a second term.”

This person was Trump-resistant but voted for him nonetheless and was pleasantly surprised at all he accomplished. In the end, however, after he lost, my friend returned to type. Trump was icky all along and deserved all he got.

The recent indictment of Hilary Clinton lawyer Michael Sussman, and the even more recent arrest of Michael Steele consigliere Igor Danchenko, along with the naming of various other high ranking Democrat conspirators, including Jake Sullivan, who works in the State Department at this moment, revives in me deep anger, fear, and a certainty that Donald Trump is owed four more years in the White House.

What I tell my friend and what I will say to you now is that Donald Trump was the victim of the most significant political crime in the history of our country. He came under assault from this crime and these criminals every day of his four years. This assault was perpetrated by a criminal political class within our government and was nothing less than a coup d’état unlike we have ever seen in our history.

And yes, it is likely Trump won anyway.

Consider what has been revealed in recent days by the team surrounding prosecutor John Durham.

Michael Sussman was a lawyer with the Washington DC firm of Perkins Coie, a Democrat, and Bill and Hilary Clinton legal redoubt. Have you heard about the secret connection between a Trump organization computer and a Russian bank? Supposedly this was the backchannel of communication and cash that proved Trump was owned and even an agent of Vladimir Putin. It was all made up. It was totally false. Sussman cooked it up along with a top-ranking tech executive, a major American university, and others.

In a private meeting with the General Counsel of the FBI, Sussman presented this fabrication in hopes the FBI would investigate, which they did. Sussman et al. also peddled this lie to the news media, which happily reported it. Some of them still do. It was all a lie.

In even more recent days, a Russian national named Igor Danchenko has been arrested and indicted for making false claims to the FBI. Danchenko was one of the primary sources for the so-called Steele Dossier used by nefarious figures in the FBI and the Department of Justice to invade the Trump campaign, lie to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to spy on the political opponents of Barack Obama and Bill and Hillary Clinton. The Steele Dossier was the report that roiled our politics for every minute of the Trump administration. Every minute of his administration was spent in fighting this complete fabrication.

Do you remember the Steele Dossier charge that Trump hired prostitutes to urinate on the bed in the Presidential Suite of the Ritz Carlton-Moscow? He supposedly did this because it was where Obama and his wife once slept. Danchenko totally made it up. It had no basis in fact. Of course, most of us knew that at the time. It made no sense. This alone should have been enough to stop federal agents from persecuting Donald Trump and his staff.

I will repeat that Trump and his team had to deal with this every single day for more than four years. Even now, a close friend of mine is convinced the Russians have something on Trump. And this person is highly placed in Washington DC circles.

Besides all the fabrications, it was the Clinton campaign that was hip-deep in Russians. Danchenko was a Russian national. Charles Dolan, identified at PR-Executive 1 in the Durham indictment, has been a longtime advisor not just to the Clintons and the Democrats but also to the Russian government.

Even though Donald Trump and his team had this millstone around their necks every day for more than a year, they accomplished a great deal. I covered this in detail in my book The Catholic Case for Trump.

Trump destroyed the physical ISIS Caliphate that occupied more land than Great Britain, something Obama could not do. Trump made the U.S. energy independent, an energy-exporting country, something frittered away in months by Joe Biden. Trump utterly remade the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court. It is irrelevant that he had advisors helping him. All presidents do. Trump was the most pro-life president the United States has ever had post-Roe v. Wade. He initiated pro-life policies that someone like George Bush never even considered. Instead, Bush sacrificed the pro-life issue for his forever war in the Middle East.

Trump did all this and more even though wicked men and women in and out of the federal government came after him with lies and fabrications that had to have occupied a great deal of his time and mindspace.

I understand that many conservatives may have Trump fatigue. Consider this, though. Much of that Trump fatigue had to have been related to the poisonous Steele Dossier and all that came from it. He was a man cornered by liars, and he reacted, sometimes badly. Imagine what might have happened if the FBI had done the right thing and recognized the Russian hoax for what it was? What might have happened if the FBI and the Justice Department had not acted like criminals? What might have been if Trump had been given an open field to lead the country? Sure, Trump would have been Trump, and a lot of folks do not like Trump. But at least he would have been given a chance.

My view after reading the Durham indictments of Michael Sussman and Igor Danchenko is that Trump is owed four more years. I know this will likely not happen. Nonetheless, we owe him that.

[Image Credit: Unsplash]

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 122 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    There was a time when I was naive enough to think that the American police, sheriffs, and military would refuse to obey such orders. I was wrong.

    The story of the Novocherkassk massacre was instructive to me. There were Russian military officers who thought it wrong to fire on their own citizens. They were pushed aside and replaced with people who would. People have a lot invested in their careers and it’s hard not to do what will advance them.

    We have a Ricochetto here who says as I recall it, that he would fire on massed unarmed civilians in a second of the commanding officer gave the order.

    At least he knows himself. One problem we have in this country (especially Ricochet and conservatives) is people that really don’t understand themselves or what they will actually do.

    And many heroes act without regard to planning or premeditation. I don’t think self-awareness is in itself necessarily a good thing.

    Yes and no. I tend to act more morally than I think I will. Most seem to do the opposite from what I can tell. The thing is most people view themselves as heroic that will make a stand against tyranny. Truth is that most will step back and watch it happen the second most will grab a torch and help burn or pick up a gun and start executing.

    I’ve been looking at the Wayback Machine and Internet Archive hoping to find the short film from 1970-71. It was from behind what we used to call the Iron Curtain, IIRC. It was shown on a PBS broadcast called The Show. Summed up everything you mentioned perfectly. 

    Filmed in B & W. Imagine a narrow, winding city street, cobblestone sidewalks, old stone buildings, occasional streetlamps. People are scuttling sideways, backs to the street, hugging the buildings while they move like crabs. Occasionally, someone runs into the street, only to be shot by rapid fire, as though from a machine gun. You never see the shooters or the gun. The camera stays fixed on the street. One person stops and walks into the street, and is gunned down. He inspires others until all the people walk into the street. Freedom. Yes, but with occasional gunfire that kills someone. 

    What then? One person panics and fights his way through the crowd to the wall. Soon, others follow. It takes less than 30 seconds. We’re back to the initial condition, with all people hugging the buildings. Fade to black. 

    Depressing as Hell, but I have a hard time convincing myself it’s wrong. 

    • #121
  2. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Django (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    There was a time when I was naive enough to think that the American police, sheriffs, and military would refuse to obey such orders. I was wrong.

    The story of the Novocherkassk massacre was instructive to me. There were Russian military officers who thought it wrong to fire on their own citizens. They were pushed aside and replaced with people who would. People have a lot invested in their careers and it’s hard not to do what will advance them.

    We have a Ricochetto here who says as I recall it, that he would fire on massed unarmed civilians in a second of the commanding officer gave the order.

    At least he knows himself. One problem we have in this country (especially Ricochet and conservatives) is people that really don’t understand themselves or what they will actually do.

    And many heroes act without regard to planning or premeditation. I don’t think self-awareness is in itself necessarily a good thing.

    Yes and no. I tend to act more morally than I think I will. Most seem to do the opposite from what I can tell. The thing is most people view themselves as heroic that will make a stand against tyranny. Truth is that most will step back and watch it happen the second most will grab a torch and help burn or pick up a gun and start executing.

    I’ve been looking at the Wayback Machine and Internet Archive hoping to find the short film from 1970-71. It was from behind what we used to call the Iron Curtain, IIRC. It was shown on a PBS broadcast called The Show. Summed up everything you mentioned perfectly.

    Filmed in B & W. Imagine a narrow, winding city street, cobblestone sidewalks, old stone buildings, occasional streetlamps. People are scuttling sideways, backs to the street, hugging the buildings while they move like crabs. Occasionally, someone runs into the street, only to be shot by rapid fire, as though from a machine gun. You never see the shooters or the gun. The camera stays fixed on the street. One person stops and walks into the street, and is gunned down. He inspires others until all the people walk into the street. Freedom. Yes, but with occasional gunfire that kills someone.

    What then? One person panics and fights his way through the crowd to the wall. Soon, others follow. It takes less than 30 seconds. We’re back to the initial condition, with all people hugging the buildings. Fade to black.

    Depressing as Hell, but I have a hard time convincing myself it’s wrong.

    Welcome to my world.  The black pill is harsh but so is reality 

    • #122
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.