Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
OK, Maybe Controversial, But Trump Is Owed a Second Term
A friend of mine says, “Of course, the NeverTrumpers were right after all. Trump had so alienated suburban women by his personal behavior, he couldn’t possibly have won a second term.”
This person was Trump-resistant but voted for him nonetheless and was pleasantly surprised at all he accomplished. In the end, however, after he lost, my friend returned to type. Trump was icky all along and deserved all he got.
The recent indictment of Hilary Clinton lawyer Michael Sussman, and the even more recent arrest of Michael Steele consigliere Igor Danchenko, along with the naming of various other high ranking Democrat conspirators, including Jake Sullivan, who works in the State Department at this moment, revives in me deep anger, fear, and a certainty that Donald Trump is owed four more years in the White House.
What I tell my friend and what I will say to you now is that Donald Trump was the victim of the most significant political crime in the history of our country. He came under assault from this crime and these criminals every day of his four years. This assault was perpetrated by a criminal political class within our government and was nothing less than a coup d’état unlike we have ever seen in our history.
And yes, it is likely Trump won anyway.
Consider what has been revealed in recent days by the team surrounding prosecutor John Durham.
Michael Sussman was a lawyer with the Washington DC firm of Perkins Coie, a Democrat, and Bill and Hilary Clinton legal redoubt. Have you heard about the secret connection between a Trump organization computer and a Russian bank? Supposedly this was the backchannel of communication and cash that proved Trump was owned and even an agent of Vladimir Putin. It was all made up. It was totally false. Sussman cooked it up along with a top-ranking tech executive, a major American university, and others.
In a private meeting with the General Counsel of the FBI, Sussman presented this fabrication in hopes the FBI would investigate, which they did. Sussman et al. also peddled this lie to the news media, which happily reported it. Some of them still do. It was all a lie.
In even more recent days, a Russian national named Igor Danchenko has been arrested and indicted for making false claims to the FBI. Danchenko was one of the primary sources for the so-called Steele Dossier used by nefarious figures in the FBI and the Department of Justice to invade the Trump campaign, lie to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to spy on the political opponents of Barack Obama and Bill and Hillary Clinton. The Steele Dossier was the report that roiled our politics for every minute of the Trump administration. Every minute of his administration was spent in fighting this complete fabrication.
Do you remember the Steele Dossier charge that Trump hired prostitutes to urinate on the bed in the Presidential Suite of the Ritz Carlton-Moscow? He supposedly did this because it was where Obama and his wife once slept. Danchenko totally made it up. It had no basis in fact. Of course, most of us knew that at the time. It made no sense. This alone should have been enough to stop federal agents from persecuting Donald Trump and his staff.
I will repeat that Trump and his team had to deal with this every single day for more than four years. Even now, a close friend of mine is convinced the Russians have something on Trump. And this person is highly placed in Washington DC circles.
Besides all the fabrications, it was the Clinton campaign that was hip-deep in Russians. Danchenko was a Russian national. Charles Dolan, identified at PR-Executive 1 in the Durham indictment, has been a longtime advisor not just to the Clintons and the Democrats but also to the Russian government.
Even though Donald Trump and his team had this millstone around their necks every day for more than a year, they accomplished a great deal. I covered this in detail in my book The Catholic Case for Trump.
Trump destroyed the physical ISIS Caliphate that occupied more land than Great Britain, something Obama could not do. Trump made the U.S. energy independent, an energy-exporting country, something frittered away in months by Joe Biden. Trump utterly remade the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court. It is irrelevant that he had advisors helping him. All presidents do. Trump was the most pro-life president the United States has ever had post-Roe v. Wade. He initiated pro-life policies that someone like George Bush never even considered. Instead, Bush sacrificed the pro-life issue for his forever war in the Middle East.
Trump did all this and more even though wicked men and women in and out of the federal government came after him with lies and fabrications that had to have occupied a great deal of his time and mindspace.
I understand that many conservatives may have Trump fatigue. Consider this, though. Much of that Trump fatigue had to have been related to the poisonous Steele Dossier and all that came from it. He was a man cornered by liars, and he reacted, sometimes badly. Imagine what might have happened if the FBI had done the right thing and recognized the Russian hoax for what it was? What might have happened if the FBI and the Justice Department had not acted like criminals? What might have been if Trump had been given an open field to lead the country? Sure, Trump would have been Trump, and a lot of folks do not like Trump. But at least he would have been given a chance.
My view after reading the Durham indictments of Michael Sussman and Igor Danchenko is that Trump is owed four more years. I know this will likely not happen. Nonetheless, we owe him that.
[Image Credit: Unsplash]
Published in General
Time will tell
I completely agree with you. I will only consider the candidates from the “Fighter Caucus”.
Henry, F J/J G lives in a parallel hell world where all hope is dead and 1984 is the best case scenario.
His immigration stance is absolute garbage and he would compromise all the time with Democrats. These are based on his record, @juliablaschke I would have voted for him in the general, but my vote for president never matters due to being in Illinois.
CAUTION: Some parallel worlds are closer than they appear.
Even the vain Chris Christie who is just as pathetic as Rubio as a POTUS candidate saw why not to vote for Rubio, especially given his garbage immigration stances and Gang of 8 persona ….
LOL. If he does win another term with this break in between from the previous, is he term limited or does the break allow him a third term? I forget how that works.
I’ve been trying to push Greg Abbott of Texas. Seems to me, from a distance of course, he’s done a super job in Texas. What do people think?
It’s called reality. Come visit some time.
Maybe.
Thank you, Columbo — I’m no fan of Chris Christie, all things considered, despite his experience doing X and Y in some corrupt state. And I *was* a fan of Marco Rubio, Senator(DeepState) from Nowhere who tried to sand the corners on amnesty. Shame on him and I don;t even think his heart was in it — he just got way too deep into Madame Charen’s pity for the downtrodden Brown People and their required patronization by the Deep State for any conservative to be comfortable with.
Rubio was a specific flavor of heartbreak — one that has a name: Gang of Eight.
This was a great example of CC taking down (as you say) MR on the debate stage. For those who never thought that much of Trump, watch the video again, and pay attention to the body language and camera presence of everybody who is *not* speaking. Most look like they are waiting to speak — Trump looks like he is weighing a grade for the speaker. Certainly that counted for something. He didn’t play the same game, it is true — he, like Reagan, won by playing his own game.
But yes — CC definitively took down MR by pointing out his POLSCI-101 performance at the graduate level. Almost unfair.
Has Rubio ever been tested under fire by the hate media? Trump, Cruz, and DeSantis have passed those tests. Maybe Abbott. I don’t recall the media ever trying to make Rubio the most hated person in America.
I think it’s a total of two terms, but I don’t feel like looking it up. I doubt he’s going to run, and don’t think he’d be allowed to win if he did.
I do think he’s running and if things are as today he would win in a landslide, but three years is a long way away.
I don’t want to go all FJ/JG here but if he ran again, firstly, WHOO BOY! would there be a show. Covid cases from “unvaccinated Trump supporters” would go through the roof! And lock downs. And there would be riots! And there would be arrests. I don’t who would be targeted, but there would be a dozen high-profile, videoed, SWAT assisted FBI arrests of housewives and journalists in the last few months leading up to the election. And then Trump would come down with a fatal case of food poisoning from his polonium stew, or more likely a plane crash.
Even Ricochet would fill up again with lefty trolls. Does anyone think they would allow Trump to be president again? (I’m up for it.)
A LOT depends on 2022. If Trump is running with huge majorities in both houses, things might be different. In addition, Slow Joe’s dementia is getting worse every day, his filter is off, and dealing with GOP — even GOPe — majorities will be too much for him to handle. I would expect a public breakdown from him. He’ll be on the sidelines and no one wants Kamala. Who steps in?
What “we” do about the idiots on our side who support Christie, Hogan, and still think it was worth what Biden is imposing on the country to get Trump out of office is the big question.
Yes, two terms, regardless of how they’re spaced.
I can easily imagine President Trump winning in 2024. The margin would have to be big enough to prevent it from being stolen. If we can keep the Democrats from federalizing elections, I think there’s a decent chance that we can clean up some of what happened in 2020… if we start early. I think the nation will be hurting quite a lot within a couple of years, and ready for a change.
(My hope is still that some other Republican runs with Trump’s endorsement.)
I think one of the differences between our ways of thinking is that you look at things, at least in the US, as individual choices (what we drive, what we think, who we vote for, what we choose to eat) collecting into broader and broader categories of individual choices leading eventually to a group consensus of one sort or another, e.g., liberty or security, givers versus takers, or Republican or Democrat political dominance. Whereas I see American culture as divided along these lines, I view control of the culture, politics, medical care and finances as secured by one activist group with essentially one purpose, and which dictates and fences in, often covertly, the information and the very thinking used for the individual choices we all make.
In other words, I very much doubt that counting votes counts in determining our representatives, and even if it does, even the information, that undergirds the thinking, that precedes the individual voting is severely controlled. And this control will only escalate in the coming next few years.
And if at one point the consensus of thinking goes against these activists, then the barbed wire will go up again and the army will be called out again, and this will be a repeat of January of this year.
There was a time when I was naive enough to think that the American police, sheriffs, and military would refuse to obey such orders. I was wrong.
Thank you Henry.
The story of the Novocherkassk massacre was instructive to me. There were Russian military officers who thought it wrong to fire on their own citizens. They were pushed aside and replaced with people who would. People have a lot invested in their careers and it’s hard not to do what will advance them.
Couple that with the results of a survey from about five years ago, and you are no doubt correct. The question asked of police officers was what made them choose that career. The overwhelming answer was one word: “Pension”.
Same here. I once was reassured by Boss that there were enough patriotic SF guys to respond well to an increasingly lawless state. I miss his assurances.
We have a Ricochetto here who says as I recall it, that he would fire on massed unarmed civilians in a second of the commanding officer gave the order.
At least he knows himself. One problem we have in this country (especially Ricochet and conservatives) is people that really don’t understand themselves or what they will actually do.
He said he’d be following orders. I think that is commonly called the Nuremburg Defense.
And many heroes act without regard to planning or premeditation. I don’t think self-awareness is in itself necessarily a good thing.
Maybe I shouldn’t have brought it up. I’m not military, so I don’t know how orders are mentally processed in the potentially fractions of a second it takes to carry them out. But this attitude, no matter how prevalent it is, does pit the at least portions of the military against the population that it supposedly serves.
You should have. It is good to know where we all stand. Regardless of split-second responses to commands, one would have plenty of time to consider where he/she was going, and who the opposition would be. I suspect that the reaction would be, roughly: I won’t have to actually shoot my fellow citizens, so I’ll go along. When ordered to …?
Yes and no. I tend to act more morally than I think I will. Most seem to do the opposite from what I can tell. The thing is most people view themselves as heroic that will make a stand against tyranny. Truth is that most will step back and watch it happen the second most will grab a torch and help burn or pick up a gun and start executing.