Origins of Covid

 

When you have to sue the government to get them to share legally available information, it almost always means they know more than they want you to know. Whatever the origins of Covid, policymakers have behaved from the outset of the pandemic in ways that can only be described as curious. Their frequently irrational behavior, and contradictory pronouncements, have spawned any number of theories as to why they have flailed the way they have.

One thought I have had is that the folks at the CDC have behaved in ways someone would if they were afraid that this virus might not act like a naturally occurring virus. It isn’t as if we haven’t had coronaviruses in the world before. And we generally know the course a viral outbreak takes through a population. Sure, maybe this one has a marginally higher mortality rate for certain segments of the population. But some of the behavior of policymakers has suggested their behavior is born out of a concern, not just for mortality, but for the possibility that the entire pandemic course with this one could somehow be…different.

Such puzzling behavior has prompted all manner of attempts to explain their inconsistent, and often ridiculous, policy prescriptions. Hanlon’s razor is always – always – the most likely explanation: Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Or perhaps the popular explanation on the right, that the bureaucrats are power-mad, is correct. Perhaps some combination of stupidity and a lust for power offers the magic decoder ring.  Embrace the healing power of and.

The delusional view on the left, that the government is a benevolent caretaker of the citizenry and only wants what’s best for us, should have died as the last planes left Afghanistan, abandoning the remaining American citizens to their fate. But they’ll be telling us again that we should trust our well-being to the government before the week is out. They’re incapable of learning from experience. (The determination of the poobahs of social media to decorate the posts of their users with ubiquitous assurances of the probity of the government’s pronouncements on Covid is a case in point.)

The fact that the federal government routinely demonstrates its indifference to the welfare of American citizens doesn’t, however, really explain the epidemic of bureaucratic bumbling and burbling.

I’ve been long haunted by the thought that we should at least consider whether the wacky behavior of the bureaucrats might suggest that some of them suspect something, and have been haphazardly reacting out of fear that the virus could behave in ways for which there is no natural precedent.

Just wondering.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 76 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    I’ll go you one better:  My wife works at a tribal clinic and for several months helped run a vaccine clinic.  They vaccinated thousands of people.  Many of them friends and family.  Of them all, one, just one had an issue.  A good friend of mine who’d had a serious bout with COVID early on, who also has allergies.  He got one shot of one of the mRNA vaccines and had an extreme allergic reaction.  But he didn’t die.  He knew he might have the reaction and consulted with his doctor.  

    Anecdotal, yes.  But so is Hoffe’s nonsense.  

    • #61
  2. Keith Lowery Coolidge
    Keith Lowery
    @keithlowery

    Spin (View Comment):
    That doesn’t mean there is nobody who will have a negative affect.  It just means the risk vs. reward clearly favors getting vaccinated over not getting vaccinated. 

    “There are no solutions – only tradeoffs.” – Thomas Sowell

    The pandemic is the world’s largest ever experiment in decision making in the face of uncertainty. People will have to decide which of the available tradeoffs they can tolerate. I’m vaccinated, but I understand some people’s reluctance, and I come down firmly on the side of liberty – ESPECIALLY when there’s uncertainty.

    We don’t know the long term risks of the vaccines, but the good new is that the people who most need the vaccines tend not to have a long term horizon to worry too much about. So there’s that. 

    • #62
  3. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Spin (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):
    The delta variant is more transmissible but less lethal.

    It’s clearly more transmissible, but it’s not clear to me that it is less lethal.

    I mean, it very much IS clear that any variant of COVID is milder for breakthrough cases of the vaccinated, versus unvaccaniated.

    Well, I’ve heard differently. I’ve heard that covid following vaccination is worse that covid alone.

    That’s simply not true. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t somewhere out there who was vaccinated who had a horrible case of COVID. There are. But the numbers are small. More people are hospitalized unvaccinated that the other way ’round. Most of the anti-vax stuff is simply nonsense.

    Well, now you see you’re conflating anti-vax with anti-covid vaccine. Two different things. And two different points of view. And doctors themselves who are pro-Vax are anti-covid vaccine.

    In todays climate, “Anti-vaxx” means anti-covid vaccine. So when I used it earlier, I meant anti-covid vaccine. So we are clear.

    I heard a statistic on ZDogg yesterday (or perhaps it was the day before): 96% of doctors are vaccinated. So forget what the CDC tell us. Forget what Fauci tells us. We know we can’t trust them. What do the doctors tell us? They tell us the vaccines are safe and efficacious.

    So I’ll amend what I said: most of the anti-covid vaccine stuff is nonsense. That isn’t to suggest that we shouldn’t ask questions, we should. But nonetheless, the vast majority of us, particular us old sedentary types (and what are we at Ricochet if not old and sedentary) (that’s a joke), should be getting the vaccine. Unless our doctor has told us not to. And most of our doctors will tell us very much to get vaccinated.

    I listened to Zdog for one video, and with all respect, he didn’t impress me at all.

    My “doctor” (a PA) has not been vaccinated, and I know he doesn’t trust them.  Another “doctor” (another PA) got the vaccine and came to worked and stretched his arms up in victory and proclaimed “Now I am invincible!!!” but he’s the biggest fearfulest Gladys Kravitz, telling everyone to pull their mask closer over their noses.  And complaining to HR if you don’t.

    Another doctor I know (a real doctor) thinks what he’s told to think.  In the early months of 2020 he laughed off the virus saying, “It’s only the flu!” but by March he was wearing a two-filter respirator even when sitting at his desk.

    And besides what doctor is going to fill out any survey and admit that they haven’t gotten vaccinated even if it’s true.  Not many, I don’t think.

     

    • #63
  4. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):

    As to the U.S. agencies and their roles I think it important to distinguish between the CDC and the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) which is Fauci’s fiefdom. I attribute the disastrous performance of the CDC to a combination of bureaucracy and incompetence. Fauci is another matter. It is now clear that, since early 2020, Fauci and the EcoHealth Alliance, through which NIAID funds were funneled to the Wuhan lab, have feared their activities may have contributed to this disaster and worked diligently to cover up any connection between them and Wuhan and mislead the American public. For that alone, Fauci should be fired.

    Fauci reminds me of J Edgar Hoover. Both long-time skillful bureaucrats allowed to stay in powerful positions beyond retirement age because politicians were scared to touch them. Both skilled at intimidating their critics. Both love the limelight and know how to play the press. Both idolized uncritically by their fans.

    I think you and Spin have the right of it.  Fauci deliberately went around the Gain-of-Function research oversight process.  People should be asking for the approval documents and oversight for this proposal. He was very clearly negligent, and practiced a deceptive coverup including lying repeatedly to Congress.  You don’t need to make him into a supervillain to show he is despicable.  I wrote an entire post unloading on the guy.

    Add in China’s known record of blatant safety and environmental violations, and you have the biosafety equivalent to a Chernobyl-style RBMK reactor.

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):
    I am perfectly fine with Hanlon’s Razor here. We had been trying to create a virus for many years for the purposes of having a vaccine that would help prevent or mitigate some form of naturally occurring pandemic. And it got out of hand.

    Come on, Spin, you’re doing your name. “We had been trying to create a virus with greater binding to human lung tissue, with greater lethality, with a novel RNA structure that is not seen elsewhere in nature, and still pin in on the bats…”. C’mon. It’s like the story of Churchill and the fancy lady haggling over a price. Once you say or write the words, “We had been trying to create a virus for many years”, you are admitting it is bio warfare.

    But despite the likelihood of COVID being a bio weapon, I guess it wasn’t scary enough.

    An Australian Quantas pilot states that The WHO’s Tedros is explaining how the Marberg virus is going to replace the COVID pandemic and a vaccine for it is already in the works.

    https://bitchute.com/video/WfmTeqf0zwKy/

    ####

    @CarolJoy the Marburg Virus is a viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) caused by a filovirus like Ebola.   It is extremely lethal, which limits its ability to spread, as does the fact it has a contact and droplet based transmission.  Marburg VHF can be contained with strict hygiene and use of lots of bleach in African field hospitals.  It’s dangerous in the context of a terror attack, but not pandemic material.  Quarantine the people bleeding everywhere and you are good.

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Nohaaj (View Comment):

    Keith Lowery: I’ve been long haunted by the thought that we should at least consider whether the wacky behavior of the bureaucrats might suggest that some of them suspect something, and have been haphazardly reacting out of fear that the virus could behave in ways for which there is no natural precedent.

    I have had almost exactly the same thought process, especially at the global national level. Countries across the globe have enacted these incredibly over reaching lockdowns, and mask mandates based upon what we should presume to be deep, detailed knowledge of what we are dealing with. But, then I realize if this knowledge existed, surely one of these leaders would regard his population with enough respect, that he would share that knowledge. Surely one of them, somewhere. Nope, nada.

    You merely need to look at the actions of governors and mayors to realize they have no knowledge, nor regard for their constituents, as they mandate covid active patients must be admitted to nursing home and assisted living facilities, then subsequently mandate that all children must wear masks in school. No logic, no reasoning, only reactionary power mongers, dictating what we plebes can and can not do, not for our safety, or out of concern for our health, but for them to wield power.

    One national leader did take an action reflecting his intelligent decision that his citizenry deserved his leadership and not his selling them out with regard to COVID.

    I am meaning the President of Belarus, who refused the offer from WEF or World Bank for 960 million dollars, in exchange for this president to fully agree his citizens would be masked up, locked down, and experience serious vax mandates, and he said one emphatic “No!”

    He then went public with the offer and his response.

    But I can’t help but think the integrity he demonstrated. It does not require a lot of imagination to consider the type of slush fund this president could have set up for his and his family’s benefit.

    Instead, he immediately became a target for American media outlets. The fact that the Belarus president treated a journalist who was CIA as being CIA and had a jet turn around to deliver that “journalist” into Belarus government custody. Apparently the Belarus president had learned something from President Viktor Yanukovich, of the Ukraine, who did not take appropriate actions against “journalists” and then ended up being ousted in a coup, a coup aided and abetted by US Vice President Biden and the State Department, in part for the benefit of Burisma, an energy company intent on having access to Ukraine’s vast shale oil resources. (At the time, Hunter Biden was on the Board of Directors at Burisma.)

    You are aware that Lukashenko is a wannabe Stalin, right?  He’s a legit dictator, not someone with a slightly more authoritarian style of leadership like Orban.   Read up on the guy a little before you go trumpeting him.  Also, the protests in the Ukraine were driven by Yanukovich playing games with elections.  Given our recent experience, I’d figure you could understand why the average Ukrainian wanted a change in government.  (I have no doubt people were throwing money around to influence things, just that I don’t want to write off the legit reasons for the people of Ukraine to rise up)

    • #64
  5. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Vince Guerra (View Comment):

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):
    I do not think it was a bioengineered weapon deliberately released by China and have seen scant evidence of that.

    I can’t say whether or not it was deliberately released (and neither can you), but it is a deliberately created, bioengineered weapon that has killed hundreds of thousands whether it was intended for that purpose or not – a fact that was lied about and covered up by just about everyone involved with it except for a few Chinese defectors. A lie that would still be covered up but for a FOIA release over a year later.

    If it was created in your opinion (and others) as a bio-weapon, it really is a moot point if it was accidentally released or not – some very dangerous demented people created something that would have been eventually released to do harm to the world at some point, if in fact, it was bio-engineered and did not emerge from nature – GADS!!!!

    I was just thinking about that this morning.  Apparently fauci funded two separate labs in Wuhan to conduct gain of function research; both I believe while the moratorium was on in the US.  He really must have wanted a chimera that could infect the human body, and now he’s got what he wanted.

    • #65
  6. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Spin (View Comment):

    Vince Guerra (View Comment):
    https://rumble.com/vktsl8-dr-hoffe-reports-capillary-blockage-in-62-of-his-patients-after-receiving-v.html

    I’ll see your link, and raise you another: https://factcheck.afp.com/http%253A%252F%252Fdoc.afp.com%252F9HK9UY-6

    So…again…most doctors say you should get the vaccine. Most of the reasons not to get the vaccine, like this nonsense from Dr. Hoffe, are nonsense.

    So, again “believe what you wanna”.

    No, believe what you’re told to believe.  Government would never lie about any of this.

    • #66
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Spin (View Comment):

    I’ll go you one better: My wife works at a tribal clinic and for several months helped run a vaccine clinic. They vaccinated thousands of people. Many of them friends and family. Of them all, one, just one had an issue. A good friend of mine who’d had a serious bout with COVID early on, who also has allergies. He got one shot of one of the mRNA vaccines and had an extreme allergic reaction. But he didn’t die. He knew he might have the reaction and consulted with his doctor.

    Anecdotal, yes. But so is Hoffe’s nonsense.

    I personally know of two young men who got cardiac inflammation, hospitalization two days after getting their second vaccine, and a boat load of medicines to go home with.  And I’m not even in the business.  Anecdotal, too.

    • #67
  8. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    @CarolJoy the Marburg Virus is a viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) caused by a filovirus like Ebola.   It is extremely lethal, which limits its ability to spread, as does the fact it has a contact and droplet based transmission.  Marburg VHF can be contained with strict hygiene and use of lots of bleach in African field hospitals.  It’s dangerous in the context of a terror attack, but not pandemic material.  Quarantine the people bleeding everywhere and you are good.

    This is true unless they’ve modified it to be more transmissible.  Sort of like they’ve done to SARS.

    • #68
  9. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    Flicker (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    @ CarolJoy the Marburg Virus is a viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) caused by a filovirus like Ebola. It is extremely lethal, which limits its ability to spread, as does the fact it has a contact and droplet based transmission. Marburg VHF can be contained with strict hygiene and use of lots of bleach in African field hospitals. It’s dangerous in the context of a terror attack, but not pandemic material. Quarantine the people bleeding everywhere and you are good.

    This is true unless they’ve modified it to be more transmissible. Sort of like they’ve done to SARS.

    I have to admit I have no idea where the Quantas pilot got the idea that Marburg would be released soon. I know that on the Australian continent, truckers staged a vast nation wide highway shutdown, during the end of August, and a lot of people have had it.

    Would the PTB in Australia raise the ante to go the Marburg route? In order to quell the possible uprising of the populace? Would they ensure it was modified it to make more transmissable and less deadly? It has been said for quite a while that the COV vaxxes contain both HIV and ebola. Gates himself has bragged about the capacity of “new vaccines containing newer technologies” allowing for a switch to be turned on or off. (I confess I don’t remember if that was a statement he made as a general overview, like back in 2015, or something he said in one of his televised interviews in Spring 2020.)

    • #69
  10. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    @ CarolJoy the Marburg Virus is a viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) caused by a filovirus like Ebola. It is extremely lethal, which limits its ability to spread, as does the fact it has a contact and droplet based transmission. Marburg VHF can be contained with strict hygiene and use of lots of bleach in African field hospitals. It’s dangerous in the context of a terror attack, but not pandemic material. Quarantine the people bleeding everywhere and you are good.

    This is true unless they’ve modified it to be more transmissible. Sort of like they’ve done to SARS.

    I have to admit I have no idea where the Quantas pilot got the idea that Marburg would be released soon. I know that on the Australian continent, truckers staged a vast nation wide highway shutdown, during the end of August, and a lot of people have had it.

    Would the PTB in Australia raise the ante to go the Marburg route? In order to quell the possible uprising of the populace? Would they ensure it was modified it to make more transmissable and less deadly? It has been said for quite a while that the COV vaxxes contain both HIV and ebola. Gates himself has bragged about the capacity of “new vaccines containing newer technologies” allowing for a switch to be turned on or off. (I confess I don’t remember if that was a statement he made as a general overview, like back in 2015, or something he said in one of his televised interviews in Spring 2020.)

    Here are just two.

    WHO warns population: Highly dangerous Marburg virus detected in a new region in Africa

    8/10/2021, 9:06:40 AM

    Marburg Virus Threatens to Spread from Guinea, WHO Warns the Ebola-Like Virus Could Be Contagious

    BY  RENZ SOLIMAN AUG 10, 2021 10:15 PM EDT

    • #70
  11. Vince Guerra Inactive
    Vince Guerra
    @VinceGuerra

    Spin (View Comment):

    Vince Guerra (View Comment):
    https://rumble.com/vktsl8-dr-hoffe-reports-capillary-blockage-in-62-of-his-patients-after-receiving-v.html

    I’ll see your link, and raise you another: https://factcheck.afp.com/http%253A%252F%252Fdoc.afp.com%252F9HK9UY-6

    So…again…most doctors say you should get the vaccine. Most of the reasons not to get the vaccine, like this nonsense from Dr. Hoffe, are nonsense.

    So, again “believe what you wanna”.

    That “fact-check” is laughable. He didn’t say 62% of patients who get the shot get blood clots. He said 62% of his patients did, and the “fact-check” doesn’t make that distinction or interview him to follow up on the claim. I could post a hundred testimonies from doctors and nurses singing the same tune by the way. Including some very good friends of mine, one a doctor who resigned last month. From a nurse friend who texted me the other day:

    You’ll be surprise how many patients that have gotten it and shared with me they regret getting it, after building a rapport with them! That they’ve only had problems.

     

    • #71
  12. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    This whole discussion illustrates that many (most?) people don’t trust a lot of the information being put out because everything Covid-19 has been completely politicized. I would argue most of the initial politicization was by the people who sought to paint the disease as severe and high risk. In the process of painting a severe and high risk disease, those people conveyed an impression that they might be doing so as cover to control the lives of others, and they did little to counter that impression. The other people who were suspicious of the people painting a severe and high risk image looked for information to counter that image. And the result is that almost all the information available to the general public is generated and presented first as part of a political campaign, so that none of it is to be believed. 

    • #72
  13. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    This whole discussion illustrates that many (most?) people don’t trust a lot of the information being put out because everything Covid-19 has been completely politicized. I would argue most of the initial politicization was by the people who sought to paint the disease as severe and high risk. In the process of painting a severe and high risk disease, those people conveyed an impression that they might be doing so as cover to control the lives of others, and they did little to counter that impression. The other people who were suspicious of the people painting a severe and high risk image looked for information to counter that image. And the result is that almost all the information available to the general public is generated and presented first as part of a political campaign, so that none of it is to be believed.

    True, but I would take it a step farther and make it more general.  The government has been telling things other than the truth for at least five years, and going back to “If you like you doctor.”  There’s not much credibility left even before don’t-wear/wear/don’t-wear/wear-two-masks, and before fauci wagged his finger in the air in wonderful Bill Clinton style and said, “I did not directly fund that virus, Covid-19!”

    Added: And let me take it a step further.  When people died with covid, they counted it as died from covid.

    Now when someone dies with the vaccine, they died from something other than the vaccine.

    This level of hypocrisy and lies is phenomenal.  It undercuts any truth that they may be inadvertently telling.  Any statistics that they may be presenting.  Any instruction that they may be giving.  And any mandates that they may be dictating.

    • #73
  14. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Keith Lowery (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):
    That doesn’t mean there is nobody who will have a negative affect. It just means the risk vs. reward clearly favors getting vaccinated over not getting vaccinated.

    “There are no solutions – only tradeoffs.” – Thomas Sowell

    The pandemic is the world’s largest ever experiment in decision making in the face of uncertainty. People will have to decide which of the available tradeoffs they can tolerate. I’m vaccinated, but I understand some people’s reluctance, and I come down firmly on the side of liberty – ESPECIALLY when there’s uncertainty.

    We don’t know the long term risks of the vaccines, but the good new is that the people who most need the vaccines tend not to have a long term horizon to worry too much about. So there’s that.

    Agree. We don’t know the long term effects of either the disease or of the vaccines.

    For the elderly, the short term negative effects of the disease are severe enough, and the short term negative effects of the vaccine small enough that many elderly and near-elderly will rationally choose to take the vaccine and thus take on the risks of the unknown long-term effects. That was my thinking. I am 65 years old. My “long term” maxes out at 25 – 30 years.

    But for younger people who don’t have other significant health issues, the uncertainty of the unknown long term effects of both the disease and of the vaccine loom larger. The short term negative effects of the disease are relatively low risk. So are the risks of short term negative effects of the vaccines. But neither risk is zero, so it is not irrational for a younger person to choose either the uncertainty of the short term and long term risks of the disease, or the short term and long term risks of the vaccine. And for women currently of childbearing age, or girls not yet of childbearing age, the uncertainty of the long term unknown looms even larger. 

    This Covid-19 stuff is all too new for there to be enough certainty about what the “right” level of risk-taking to dictate that everybody MUST take a particular course of action.  

     

    • #74
  15. DaveSchmidt Coolidge
    DaveSchmidt
    @DaveSchmidt

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Keith Lowery (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):
    That doesn’t mean there is nobody who will have a negative affect. It just means the risk vs. reward clearly favors getting vaccinated over not getting vaccinated.

    “There are no solutions – only tradeoffs.” – Thomas Sowell

    The pandemic is the world’s largest ever experiment in decision making in the face of uncertainty. People will have to decide which of the available tradeoffs they can tolerate. I’m vaccinated, but I understand some people’s reluctance, and I come down firmly on the side of liberty – ESPECIALLY when there’s uncertainty.

    We don’t know the long term risks of the vaccines, but the good new is that the people who most need the vaccines tend not to have a long term horizon to worry too much about. So there’s that.

    Agree. We don’t know the long term effects of either the disease or of the vaccines.

    For the elderly, the short term negative effects of the disease are severe enough, and the short term negative effects of the vaccine small enough that many elderly and near-elderly will rationally choose to take the vaccine and thus take on the risks of the unknown long-term effects. That was my thinking. I am 65 years old. My “long term” maxes out at 25 – 30 years.

    But for younger people who don’t have other significant health issues, the uncertainty of the unknown long term effects of both the disease and of the vaccine loom larger. The short term negative effects of the disease are relatively low risk. So are the risks of short term negative effects of the vaccines. But neither risk is zero, so it is not irrational for a younger person to choose either the uncertainty of the short term and long term risks of the disease, or the short term and long term risks of the vaccine. And for women currently of childbearing age, or girls not yet of childbearing age, the uncertainty of the long term unknown looms even larger.

    This Covid-19 stuff is all too new for there to be enough certainty about what the “right” level of risk-taking to dictate that everybody MUST take a particular course of action.

     

    As a part of the 65+ cohort, I got vaxxed because my wife (a retired teacher) was completely wigged out about the virus.  I fugured the long-term/short-term odds favored me getting it.  I have firmly told my mid-30s kids not to get vaxxed until the consequences are better understood.  They have between them 7 kids they will have to care for.  No reason for them to take an experimental drug.  

    • #75
  16. Headedwest Coolidge
    Headedwest
    @Headedwest

    Spin (View Comment):
    I’ll tell to anyone who will listen that the risks associated with COVID are far greater than the risks associated with the vaccines.

    Are you offering a guarantee to me that my vaccination cannot possibly be something I regret having done — say 10 years from now?

    Long term safety isn’t known yet.

    • #76
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.