Conventional Thinking

It’s the Republican National Convention week, or as pundits on the right call it — Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanza, and whatever other major holiday you want to thrown in there. We break it all down: the pluses, the minus, the hits and the misses. And we make some predictions for the next couple of months. As you’re hear, we recorded this show on Zoom in front of an audience of our beloved Ricochet members. We’ll be doing a few more of these on Zoom before the election, so if you’d like to participate, join us!

Music from this week’s show: Street Fighting Man by the Rolling Stones

Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsor!

ExpressVPN

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 134 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    When someone criticizes Trump about not building the wall, I ask, “How much money has Congress authorized for the wall in a spending bill?”

    Silence.

    I then ask, “How many lawsuits have been filed against the wall from the local, all the way to the Federal level to stop construction?”

    Again, silence.

    I end by asking, “How many Federal employees – including the military – have blocked any attempt by Trump to use existing funds to build the wall?” (The brass loves their planes and tanks to much to lose finding.)

    Not a peep.

    The point is, Trump has tried in every way possible to build the wall legally. As was pointed out by one of the podcasters, Trump has followed the law and the rulings of the courts, even those rulings that went against him.

    Rob is right about the memory-holing going on. You would think the Dems would take credit for impeaching Trump, but they know the country is against it (regardless of what the polls say). The other memory-hole item is how they did everything possible to prevent the wall being built. You would think they’d crow about that accomplishment, but they also know people want the wall built.

    This is a promise that Trump supporters know he tried very hard to keep. Very hard. They don’t blame him not because they are deranged, (Basically Rob is calling all of us deranged, par for the course), they don’t blame Trump because they see he was blocked.

    And if Rob thinks Ann Coulter is a soul of a reasonable, balanced human being, well, I doubt Rob’s judge of character. Ann Coulter appears unhinged to me.

    Ann Coulter is correct that Mexican culture is more or less inferior to American culture. I’m not sure that Mexican-Americans are doomed to making America Mexico. I’m with her that limiting Mexican immigration to America and spending some time assimilating Mexican-Americans would be good but I’m not convinced that Mexicans are everywhere and always bad for America.

    I suppose it depends on how badly you need low-skill workers and you don’t have enough low-skill American workers to do those jobs.

    • #91
  2. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I suppose it depends on how badly you need low-skill workers and you don’t have enough low-skill American workers to do those jobs.

    It was never about the supply of labor. There are plenty of Americans willing and able to do the dirtiest of dirty jobs. Its about the price. If you get a $15 minimum wage, you’ll suddenly have a spike of unemployment, and a spike in illegal immigration as workers willing to work (off the books) for less get into the American work force.

    • #92
  3. RPD Inactive
    RPD
    @RPD

    The “jobs Americans won’t do” is a canard. More accurately it should be “jobs American’s won’t do cheaply”. Raise the wage enough and someone will take that job.

    • #93
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I suppose it depends on how badly you need low-skill workers and you don’t have enough low-skill American workers to do those jobs.

    It was never about the supply of labor. There are plenty of Americans willing and able to do the dirtiest of dirty jobs. Its about the price. If you get a $15 minimum wage, you’ll suddenly have a spike of unemployment, and a spike in illegal immigration as workers willing to work (off the books) for less get into the American work force.

    With increasing automation and globalized labor markets you have to have a more libertarian economy and central bank. There is no other choice.

    If we actually did that, it would be less problematic to accept more legal immigration. We are obviously need this because we don’t have enough FICA slaves to pay for Medicare.

    We are going to pay through the nose for some absolutely terrible decisions made since World War II. 

    • #94
  5. Kevin Inactive
    Kevin
    @JaredSturgeon

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    I will say that deliberately or not, low-energy Trump did not step on the messaging of the other speakers Thursday night, particularly that of Ann Dorn. High-energy, riftapalooza Trump throwing out red meat in every other sentence would have totally smothered the messaging of Thursday’s other speakers, as well as the convention’s overall theme of allowing ordinary people to voice their support of Trump and justify his re-election.

    “Never interfere with your enemy when he’s destroying himself” is a saying Donald Trump rarely adheres to, because he can’t help himself from wanting to stir up trouble. But by being un-Trumpianly dull Thursday night, he also gave the media little red meat to obsess about on Friday (though of course, this situation might not still be true by the time the Sunday news shows roll around…)

    Well said.  It may be possible hat we only could have gotten Trump on the extremes and he chose to let the other Americans shine through.  In that sense he should be praised for his discipline to the plan so that he can win.  He has the most messaging discipline during elections so hopefully this is the way he plays it. 

    • #95
  6. Kevin Inactive
    Kevin
    @JaredSturgeon

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change.  Look at the potential realignments happening right now.  Parties adapt.  Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others.  If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.   

    • #96
  7. Kevin Inactive
    Kevin
    @JaredSturgeon

    Robs reaction to the small pushback he got from the online question was unhinged.  I am a very reluctant Trump supporter who has plenty negative to say about him personally, but I really hope he wins so NeverTrumpers have to eat it for 4 more years. 

    It was also nice to hear Peter talk about Trumps success in the middle east without Rob there to downplay it.

    The RNC was great.  I know Trumps speech wasn’t great because my wife is the opposite of  a NeverTrumper and she didn’t make me watch it or talk about it much.  But…the parts I saw of the RNC were simply amazing.  The message I saw was that the Republicans have a giant tent for average Americans and thats good.  Win or lose I think this Republican party has more appeal than in years.  

    If Trump can be magnanimous he would crush this.  By Nov jobs will be increasing, the worst of the second wave of corona will be behind us.  Thing will be looking good for him.  He just needs to stay on message.

    Finally, Rob should have been more specific about what the Kenosha shooter did that was insane.  Defend himself?  Defend property from looters?  Volunteer to go to somewhere else not his home and defend them?  I will grant you maybe the last…but exactly why do we have to just stand by and tolerate riots?  This is what guns are for.  

    • #97
  8. Kevin Inactive
    Kevin
    @JaredSturgeon

    Stad (View Comment):

    When someone criticizes Trump about not building the wall, I ask, “How much money has Congress authorized for the wall in a spending bill?”

    Silence.

    I then ask, “How many lawsuits have been filed against the wall from the local, all the way to the Federal level to stop construction?”

    Again, silence.

    I end by asking, “How many Federal employees – including the military – have blocked any attempt by Trump to use existing funds to build the wall?” (The brass loves their planes and tanks to much to lose finding.)

    Not a peep.

    The point is, Trump has tried in every way possible to build the wall legally. As was pointed out by one of the podcasters, Trump has followed the law and the rulings of the courts, even those rulings that went against him.

    Rob is right about the memory-holing going on. You would think the Dems would take credit for impeaching Trump, but they know the country is against it (regardless of what the polls say). The other memory-hole item is how they did everything possible to prevent the wall being built. You would think they’d crow about that accomplishment, but they also know people want the wall built.

    And its a reminder what scoundrels the GOP is that in the two first years they would not allocate some money for this.  

    • #98
  9. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    I suppose it depends on how badly you need low-skill workers and you don’t have enough low-skill American workers to do those jobs.

    It was never about the supply of labor. There are plenty of Americans willing and able to do the dirtiest of dirty jobs. Its about the price. If you get a $15 minimum wage, you’ll suddenly have a spike of unemployment, and a spike in illegal immigration as workers willing to work (off the books) for less get into the American work force.

    With increasing automation and globalized labor markets you have to have a more libertarian economy and central bank. There is no other choice.

    If we actually did that, it would be less problematic to accept more legal immigration. We are obviously need this because we don’t have enough FICA slaves to pay for Medicare.

    We are going to pay through the nose for some absolutely terrible decisions made since World War II.

    I really dont buy into the automation will kill the job market stuff. There are just too many jobs that can’t be easily automated. Yes, if you’re working on an assembly line, you may not finish out your career assembling cars. Plus the jobs that will be created by automation, every machine needs a repairman. I think there will be plenty of jobs to go around for generations to come, we may not know what those job tittles are yet – but they’ll be there.

    Hillary Clinton once said that it was important for girls to see women doing jobs, because they wont imagine doing it if they havent seen it. I called BS on this quote – not because of the gender politics, but because (I think) nearly half of all job titles or descriptions that people are working now – did not exist when they where in grade school. So there is a major piece of the workforce doing jobs they never imagined doing.

    Yes – the west has made some terrible decisions since WWii, those consequences will be coming no mater what… They maybe delayed a year or 2 here or there – but not permanently denied.

    • #99
  10. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):
    I really dont buy into the automation will kill the job market stuff. There are just too many jobs that can’t be easily automated. Yes, if you’re working on an assembly line, you may not finish out your career assembling cars. Plus the jobs that will be created by automation, every machine needs a repairman. I think there will be plenty of jobs to go around for generations to come, we may not know what those job tittles are yet – but they’ll be there.

    The issue is, it both destroys jobs and it creates wage deflation. Then you combine that with everyone insisting on we have to have a globalized trade because it lowers prices, that just makes it worse. 

    We really need to go back to a deflationary economy because prices are going down no matter what. That is what progress looks like. You make your money more off of purchasing power rather than wage increases. This would collapse the government in the financial system, so there’s that.

    • #100
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Watch this video. What if he’s even half right? Notice that he doesn’t even talk about trade. I swear this is the number one reason conservatives and libertarians have so much trouble making headway.

     

     

    Then tell me what you do about this: 

    (2) Central Banks: Fed New Inflation Target Will Hurt Consumers – YouTube

    • #101
  12. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    • #102
  13. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Taras (View Comment):

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    I’d say there are more variables than that. People from certain countries have a great track record and others tend to engender big government.

    Michael Walsh said something about this. Our country was started with basically yeoman and farmers. Countries south of us had more of a plantation crony capitalism thing going on. We tend to get the smart and honest guys out of Africa, when you leave out stupid generalized economic refugee programs disguised as political refugee programs.

    If they don’t assimilate and become prosperous you did something wrong.

    • #103
  14. LibertyDefender Member
    LibertyDefender
    @LibertyDefender

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    With increasing automation and globalized labor markets you have to have a more libertarian economy and central bank. There is no other choice.

    In 1996, I looked forward to voting for Steve Forbes, who was then by far the most libertarian legitimate candidate ever to seek the GOP nomination.

    Steve Forbes is a gold-standard fetishist.  Serious question: Can a gold standard exist in a libertarian economy and central bank?

    • #104
  15. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    LibertyDefender (View Comment):
    Serious question: Can a gold standard exist in a libertarian economy and central bank?

    Why could it not?

    • #105
  16. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Arahant (View Comment):

    LibertyDefender (View Comment):
    Serious question: Can a gold standard exist in a libertarian economy and central bank?

    Why could it not?

    It gets complicated. I didn’t say I had a solution. 

    The main thing is it can’t be so discretionary. 

    We wouldn’t be in this mess if every central banker in the Western countries read the riot act to their politicians about the deflation from automation and globalized trade.

    Inflation was never that great of a thing and now it’s really bad. Look at that second video I posted.

     

    • #106
  17. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Just to be clear CPI inflation and asset inflation are both equally bad. We are experiencing tons of the second right now. It’s all phony prosperity from central banks.

    • #107
  18. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology.  However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    • #108
  19. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    I’d say there are more variables than that. People from certain countries have a great track record and others tend to engender big government.

    Michael Walsh said something about this. Our country was started with basically yeoman and farmers. Countries south of us had more of a plantation crony capitalism thing going on. We tend to get the smart and honest guys out of Africa, when you leave out stupid generalized economic refugee programs disguised as political refugee programs.

    If they don’t assimilate and become prosperous you did something wrong.

    Asian immigrants have mostly joined the Looting Party, even though their median income is way above whites’, just like Irish immigrants did, and later Italian immigrants.  It takes generations before they gradually abandon the Looting Party.

    The quality of immigrants is correlated with how expensive it was for them to get here.  The lowest quality immigrants, regardless of race and creed, are the ones who walk across the border.

    • #109
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology. However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    I referred to nuclear-weapon-TYPE technology.  Nuclear power plants can be designed and built around much less high-temperature/high-pressure levels of operation than we’ve seen up to now.

    • #110
  21. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Taras (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    I’d say there are more variables than that. People from certain countries have a great track record and others tend to engender big government.

    Michael Walsh said something about this. Our country was started with basically yeoman and farmers. Countries south of us had more of a plantation crony capitalism thing going on. We tend to get the smart and honest guys out of Africa, when you leave out stupid generalized economic refugee programs disguised as political refugee programs.

    If they don’t assimilate and become prosperous you did something wrong.

    Asian immigrants have mostly joined the Looting Party, even though their median income is way above whites’, just like Irish immigrants did, and later Italian immigrants. It takes generations before they gradually abandon the Looting Party.

    The quality of immigrants is correlated with how expensive it was for them to get here. The lowest quality immigrants, regardless of race and creed, are the ones who walk across the border.

    Your opinion is stronger than mine. 

    • #111
  22. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    I’d say there are more variables than that. People from certain countries have a great track record and others tend to engender big government.

    Michael Walsh said something about this. Our country was started with basically yeoman and farmers. Countries south of us had more of a plantation crony capitalism thing going on. We tend to get the smart and honest guys out of Africa, when you leave out stupid generalized economic refugee programs disguised as political refugee programs.

    If they don’t assimilate and become prosperous you did something wrong.

    Asian immigrants have mostly joined the Looting Party, even though their median income is way above whites’, just like Irish immigrants did, and later Italian immigrants. It takes generations before they gradually abandon the Looting Party.

    The quality of immigrants is correlated with how expensive it was for them to get here. The lowest quality immigrants, regardless of race and creed, are the ones who walk across the border.

    Your opinion is stronger than mine.

    But it makes sense: the less work someone has to do in order to do something – including getting to another country – the less they are likely to value it.

    • #112
  23. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    Kevin (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I am not sold on demographic change. In the past, white keeps getting expanded. Zimmerman became a white Hispanic remember.

    20 years and they will all be white.

    Plus this always assumes parties don’t change. Look at the potential realignments happening right now. Parties adapt. Maybe they sell out some groups to capture others. If the demographics become impossible than Republicans will be replaced by some sort of european Christian democrat party or whatever.

    Immigrants, if they don’t arrive with capital, change the politics of a country because they overwhelmingly support the Looting Party — the Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK, Socialists in France, etc.

    I’d say there are more variables than that. People from certain countries have a great track record and others tend to engender big government.

    Michael Walsh said something about this. Our country was started with basically yeoman and farmers. Countries south of us had more of a plantation crony capitalism thing going on. We tend to get the smart and honest guys out of Africa, when you leave out stupid generalized economic refugee programs disguised as political refugee programs.

    If they don’t assimilate and become prosperous you did something wrong.

    Asian immigrants have mostly joined the Looting Party, even though their median income is way above whites’, just like Irish immigrants did, and later Italian immigrants. It takes generations before they gradually abandon the Looting Party.

    The quality of immigrants is correlated with how expensive it was for them to get here. The lowest quality immigrants, regardless of race and creed, are the ones who walk across the border.

    Your opinion is stronger than mine.

    But it makes sense: the less work someone has to do in order to do something – including getting to another country – the less they are likely to value it.

    My beef is more with the rate from certain countries. Certain areas clearly aren’t working out. I guess it’s against the law to do it that way.

    I think what Michael Walsh says is very true. There are certain cultures that have to be slowed down. Basically this country is just a culture and the constitution.

    All of these people that think Puerto Rico needs to be made a state are nuts. That’s like making a state out of Chicago. Forget it. 

     

    • #113
  24. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    My beef is more with the rate from certain countries. Certain areas clearly aren’t working out. I guess it’s against the law to do it that way.

    I think what Michael Walsh says is very true. There are certain cultures that have to be slowed down. Basically this country is just a culture and the constitution.

    All of these people that think Puerto Rico needs to be made a state are nuts. That’s like making a state out of Chicago. Forget it. 

    I think that refugees shouldn’t be given the right to vote for a few years until they can unlearn the culture that destroyed Californians. 

    • #114
  25. Chris O. Coolidge
    Chris O.
    @ChrisO

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    My beef is more with the rate from certain countries. Certain areas clearly aren’t working out. I guess it’s against the law to do it that way.

    I think what Michael Walsh says is very true. There are certain cultures that have to be slowed down. Basically this country is just a culture and the constitution.

    All of these people that think Puerto Rico needs to be made a state are nuts. That’s like making a state out of Chicago. Forget it.

    I think that refugees shouldn’t be given the right to vote for a few years until they can unlearn the culture that destroyed Californians.

    We’re taking in quite a few Chicago refugees. Texas is getting a lot of the Californians. I wonder where the rest are going.

    • #115
  26. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology. However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    I referred to nuclear-weapon-TYPE technology. Nuclear power plants can be designed and built around much less high-temperature/high-pressure levels of operation than we’ve seen up to now.

    I’m sorry, but it’s not even the same type.  The only common technology is enrichment.  Commercial power plants have nowhere near the same enrichment as nuke weapons.  As for pressure-temperature operating parameters, commercial nuclear plants still have no connection to nuclear weapons.  Nuke weapons explode, they don’t “operate.”

    Perhaps I’ve misunderstood the basis for your comment.

    • #116
  27. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology. However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    I referred to nuclear-weapon-TYPE technology. Nuclear power plants can be designed and built around much less high-temperature/high-pressure levels of operation than we’ve seen up to now.

    I’m sorry, but it’s not even the same type. The only common technology is enrichment. Commercial power plants have nowhere near the same enrichment as nuke weapons. As for pressure-temperature operating parameters, commercial nuclear plants still have no connection to nuclear weapons. Nuke weapons explode, they don’t “operate.”

    Perhaps I’ve misunderstood the basis for your comment.

    Nuclear Energy is very green and very reliable. 

    • #117
  28. Rightfromthestart Coolidge
    Rightfromthestart
    @Rightfromthestart

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology. However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    I referred to nuclear-weapon-TYPE technology. Nuclear power plants can be designed and built around much less high-temperature/high-pressure levels of operation than we’ve seen up to now.

    I’m sorry, but it’s not even the same type. The only common technology is enrichment. Commercial power plants have nowhere near the same enrichment as nuke weapons. As for pressure-temperature operating parameters, commercial nuclear plants still have no connection to nuclear weapons. Nuke weapons explode, they don’t “operate.”

    Perhaps I’ve misunderstood the basis for your comment.

    Nuclear Energy is very green and very reliable.

    If solar or wind should ever produce enough energy to be practicable the left would turn on a dime and immediately find a reason to be against it, energy means civilization and it’s civilization they are trying to obstruct and destroy. 

    This issue it not the issue, the issue is never the issue, all that matters is the revolution.

    • #118
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Rightfromthestart (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Yes, that kind of stuff is also reminiscent of how the left and others fight and sue and obstruct over capital punishment, and then argue that it should be banned because it takes too long.

    It’s the same with the construction of nuclear power plants. These plants take years to build, so lawsuits which stall bringing them on line drive up the cost. Then they turn around and say, “Nuclear energy is too expensive!”

    Yes, nuclear power is expensive to begin with, but making it more expensive doesn’t do anyone any favors . . .

    And it needn’t be that expensive to start with, if they’d use less nuclear-weapon-type technology and not demand construction by what amounts to the local plumber’s union.

    Uh . . . commercial plants don’t use nuclear weapons technology. However, the left loves to imply “there’s a nuclear bomb being built ten miles from your city” . . .

    I referred to nuclear-weapon-TYPE technology. Nuclear power plants can be designed and built around much less high-temperature/high-pressure levels of operation than we’ve seen up to now.

    I’m sorry, but it’s not even the same type. The only common technology is enrichment. Commercial power plants have nowhere near the same enrichment as nuke weapons. As for pressure-temperature operating parameters, commercial nuclear plants still have no connection to nuclear weapons. Nuke weapons explode, they don’t “operate.”

    Perhaps I’ve misunderstood the basis for your comment.

    Nuclear Energy is very green and very reliable.

    If solar or wind should ever produce enough energy to be practicable the left would turn on a dime and immediately find a reason to be against it, energy means civilization and it’s civilization they are trying to obstruct and destroy.

    This issue it not the issue, the issue is never the issue, all that matters is the revolution.

    I remember Dennis Miller interviewing a former Secretary of Energy who said that there’s SOME group against EVERY kind of energy production.

    • #119
  30. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I seem to recall that Claire Berlinski was referenced on this podcast. In case anybody’s interested, she’s in rare form right now on Twitter. Wow. lol

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.