Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.












































Discussion (33)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This bowdlerization is frankly a translation into a new language, in that translations never bring across the whole cargo -- it's simply not possible. The example of pulling hair vs wigs misses some characterization and texture, as well as substituting a supposedly equivalent expression in "nicer" terms.
No translation can convey the meaning of the original, and instead brings new baggage from the new language. It's an old problem, and not really disputed except by people with an axe to grind about the similarity of all cultures and so forth -- those folks.
So this is really a translation project, from a faraway free land into the shorn and weighted language of an oppressed people. Be nice. Or else.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Wasn't "fat" changed to "enormous" and isn't "enormous" worse?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think the word @RobLong was looking for, in regard to China, was "inscrutable."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Inscrutaburu.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The “updaters” of Roald Dahl’s books are grave robbers, pure and simple: editorial vampires of the worst sort.
You're seeing five of 33 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.