The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureFederalist Radio HourDaily SignalThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Erick Erickson ShowMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnCall Me Back - with Dan SenorConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenHeritage ExplainsThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?Hillsdale DialoguesThe Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Podcasts/
  2. 3 Whisky Happy Hour/
  3. Back to the Ring on ‘the FDR Question’
February 5, 2022
3 Whisky Happy Hour•February 5, 2022Ricochet

Back to the Ring on ‘the FDR Question’

Subscribe to 3 Whisky Happy HourSubscribe

Last week's episode with Conrad Black defending his pro-FDR thesis generated a lot of reader interest and comments, so Lucretia and I decided to return to the boxing ring to argue out the matter de novo. It will not be a surprise to regular listeners to hear that Lucretia is not persuaded, even by the serious arguments of another of our favorite thinkers after Lord Black, the late scholar John Adams Wettergreen, who argued that FDR's liberalism and policy architecture was different in degree and kind from the liberalism of the 1960s and after.

In fact, fans of Team Lucretia will likely enjoy this smackdown, though we do save time at the end for some quick reflections on the week's main news, including our handicap of who has the greatest faceplant this week: Facebook, Zucker or Zuckerberg, or Caryn Johnson (better known as "Whoopi Goldberg"), and some worrying news about whisky!

Steve gets his revenge at the end, though, with exit music from Prog Rock legend Gentle Giant.

Hosted by Steve Hayward, with guest "Lucretia"

Discussion (10)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Boney Cole@BoneyCole·4y

    It’s a diverse world. Canada could never elect a Trump. But the US did not come up with a trucker convoy or it’s equivalent. Maybe between us we can make some headway against a new world order. Of note, the Canadian leader of the conservatives, now deposed, sounded like a secret agent planted by Klaus Schwab.

    By the way, did you know that a young Klaus Schwab met and claimed to have been fundamentally changed by the same radical Brazilian Bishop that inspired Father Bergolio in his youth? Small world.

  • PODCAST ORGANIZATION

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Hayward@StevenHayward·4y
    ReplyingtoBoney Cole

    Boney Cole (View Comment):

    It’s a diverse world. Canada could never elect a Trump. But the US did not come up with a trucker convoy or it’s equivalent. Maybe between us we can make some headway against a new world order. Of note, the Canadian leader of the conservatives, now deposed, sounded like a secret agent planted by Klaus Schwab.

    By the way, did you know that a young Klaus Schwab met and claimed to have been fundamentally changed by the same radical Brazilian Bishop that inspired Father Bergolio in his youth? Small world.

    I'm always instantly suspicious of Latin American theologians.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bishop Wash@BishopWash·4y

    Class VI, Lucretia.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Leslie Watkins@LeslieWatkins·4y
    The Four Freedoms, I think, are reflective of what you guys were saying about Roosevelt’s rhetoric and political thought. The first two—freedom of speech and freedom of religion—derive directly from the philosophy of America’s founding. Freedom to speak. To worship. To be the sovereign of oneself. But the second two—freedom from fear and freedom from want—veer sharply toward the early twentieth-century progressive view that human beings are have the right to expect external assistance for their own lives. Together, the two types of freedoms become a kind of palimpsest of FDR’s historical mindset reframed for the exigencies of his time.
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Leslie Watkins@LeslieWatkins·4y
    ReplyingtoLeslie Watkins

    Leslie Watkins (View Comment):

    The Four Freedoms, I think, are reflective of what you guys were saying about Roosevelt’s rhetoric and political thought. The first two—freedom of speech and freedom of religion—derive directly from the philosophy of America’s founding. Freedom to speak. To worship. To be the sovereign of oneself. But the second two—freedom from fear and freedom from want—veer sharply toward the early twentieth-century progressive view that human beings are have the right to expect external assistance for their own lives. Together, the two types of freedoms become a kind of palimpsest of FDR’s historical mindset reframed for the exigencies of his time.

    If you may indulge me, I'd like to present a short essay I wrote back in 2007:

    The Idea of Freedom

    If Greece gave the world the idea of democracy and Rome the rule of law, America has given the world the idea of freedom. Freedom not simply from oppression or the restrictions of class or caste or biology, but freedom to: to achieve something for oneself.

    As Rose Wilder Lane, daughter of the American prairie, wrote, freedom is not how we see it now: inherent, preexistent, a gift of birth, like breathing. No, the idea of freedom had to be discovered, in the great raw materials of an unearthed land, seen through the eyes of an Enlightened mind, its expressions reaching to the sky, like the great monument bridges linking east and west, the discovery relayed on foot, on horseback, in wagons, trains, and automobiles, by raft, ferry, riverboat. Not for security, but for self-determination, the possible.

    Lest one romanticize, the idea of freedom also means the freedom to fail, to die unrealized, untested, unchanged. But, also, to confront the bigoted anger of prejudice, first by the one, then by the many, eventually to overcome the idea of it, first within the one and then within the many. For groups are never free. Only individuals are free. And only individuals can reject the idea of America.

+5 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of ten comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •