Wither Q?

 

Q is a cult, and its prophet and instrument of salvation is Donald Trump. As of last Sunday the faithful were still insisting that the Plan would be fulfilled. What’s the Plan? Why, it’s a brilliant, complex, breathtaking long-game effort to take down the hydra-headed pedophiliac crime syndicate that controlled The Swamp. While things may have seemed dark on Sunday, the faithful were assured that everything was still working. The president was not in Washington, but in Texas; the White House videos had been filmed in front of a green screen to distract the enemies. Trump was actually directing the military from a secret base. 

Later in the afternoon, some people on Twitter started a story about DC’s air traffic shut down completely, with massive numbers of troop-carrying planes on the runway. Debunkers posted shots of air traffic from flight-tracker apps; people whose accounts had lots of numbers in there names and eagles in their bios noted that jets had flown over their house very low and loud, so yes, it’s happening. 

Except it didn’t, and it won’t. Donald Trump will leave office without making the Q prophecies come true. You have to wonder what that means for the cult. There’s a precedent, after all. Some recalculate the date of the Rapture; some turn on the person who was supposed to lead them to heaven; some fall away, disheartened, and pull a caul over the episode in their life and move on, abashed. 

In a way, it already happened. After the election, Q had to revise its predictions to accommodate events, and for some the Stolen Election was proof of the existence of powerful contrary forces. But moving on past the inauguration means losing faith in Trump as the powerful force that will sweep away iniquity. Obviously, he wasn’t, and didn’t. The Deep State wasn’t supposed to win. Pelosi was supposed to be in Gitmo wearing Clockwork-Orange eyelid-spreaders watching film of all the things her minions did to children in the catacombs under a pizzeria.

The left is not burdened with Q-type nonsense. The Putin-Puppet stuff came close. Fitzmas was another. But compared to Q, those are garden-variety political-scandal narratives with an institutional conclusion. I wonder if the left can move past these things easier because they have deeper narratives that offer solace. They can always fall back on the comforting certainties of American sinfulness, the knowledge they are virtuously embroiled in a long twilight struggle against the idea of American exceptionalism. The country is fatally corrupted by racism, sexism, and capitalism, with slavery the Original Sin that taints every atom of ink in its founding documents – but that somehow this uniquely immoral construct can be redeemed by a devotion to a slow-grinding, never-ending rearrangement of its fundamentals,  punctuated by violence to encourage the stragglers.

Marxism is Q without the “best by” date printed on the label.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 196 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Annefy (View Comment):

    So we have millions of people unemployed. Millions of small businesses lost forever. Millions of children being abused daily by teachers refusing to do their jobs. The global economy in free fall. All this as a direct result of government malfeasance.

    We have A new president on the horizon that does not engender any confidence in improving any of these situations, and there’s a long list of other things I’m pretty sure he’s going to make worse. 

    So yes – this is the perfect moment to make sure we don’t have any nut jobs in our ranks because the left will hang it around the neck of the right. 

    What a profound and counterproductive waste of time.

    The bulk of posts on Ricochet are on topics outside your list.  If you want to write posts on those topics, go for it, they are important topics.  But we are all free to write about what we want except for . . . well, I can’t get into the details but it involves giraffes.

    • #151
  2. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Is it threadjacking if I jump in and out with a note on James Bond’s Q, referenced above? Desmond Llewellyn, the actor who played Q, had worked with Sean Connery in British TV in the Fifties. On the set, he did what wise bit players do–defer to the star, don’t do anything to attract undue attention. After all, Sean’s a huge star now. The director took him aside. “No, don’t be deferential. You don’t like him. He takes all your wonderful gadgets and breaks them.” Llewellyn got the message and changed his tone, becoming the irritated, supercilious Q we all know. “Try to pay attention, double-O seven…”

    If that’s what you got, more. :)

    Judy Dench was also very good at irritated.

     

    • #152
  3. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    I’d be the first to admit that a James Bond trivia quiz is probably more fun than a Qanon trivia quiz–

    Question 5: What do the following names have in common?

    Seth Rich

    Mark Zuckerberg

    Baron von Rothschild

    Moses

     

     

    • #153
  4. GLDIII Temporarily Essential Reagan
    GLDIII Temporarily Essential
    @GLDIII

    GLDIII……  Threadjacker,

    Given the absurdity of the whole Q thing, I think I can live with it.

    • #154
  5. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    I’d be the first to admit that a James Bond trivia quiz is probably more fun than a Qanon trivia quiz–

    Question 5: What do the following names have in common?

    Seth Rich

    Mark Zuckerberg

    Baron von Rothschild

    Moses

     

     

    They were each found floating in a basket and adopted by people of high social standing?

    I mean, that’s true. But is it what you were thinking?

    • #155
  6. Bob W Member
    Bob W
    @WBob

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    If I can sum up and save time, there are different responses:

    Q is peculiar and horribly fascinating, but irrelevant.

    Q is irrelevant, and you should be talking about Subject A.

    Q is irrelevant, and the fact you are not talking about Subject A means you don’t care about Subject A as much as you should, which means you are either naive, misguided, wrong, or actively opposing the discussion of Subject A, and this will be brought up in the future.

    Q is a problem, but not a big one.

    Q is a problem that reveals bigger problems in society, and we should address them, but not at the expense of more pressing issues.

    Q is a problem that reveals bigger problems in society, and we should address them, because the left is going to hang this around the neck of everyone on the right and it will be good to have answers and solutions.

    I’m somewhere between the last two.

    It’s also an example of a deeper problem with human nature: amazingly, humans seem to be capable of believing that they believe something, without actually believing it. The effect is something that looks and feels, to the believer and to others, just like actual belief but which actually is not. I suspect that many if not most Q “believers” fall into this category. Few would actually bet their lives on the truth of Q dogma, which means that as much as they feel that they believe it, in fact they do not.

    • #156
  7. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Bob W (View Comment):
    It’s also an example of a deeper problem with human nature: amazingly, humans seem to be capable of believing that they believe something, without actually believing it. The effect is something that looks and feels, to the believer and to others, just like actual belief but which actually is not. I suspect that many if not most Q “believers” fall into this category. Few would actually bet their lives on the truth of Q dogma, which means that as much as they feel that they believe it, in fact they do not.

    That’s a fascinating point, and I think you’re on to something. I know a few people who believe some stuff because it’s possible, and the wrong people say it isn’t. Whether they’d go to the wall for it, I don’t know.

    Over at Vice: QAnon followers know him as “Neon Revolt.” In real life, he’s a failed screenwriter from New Jersey named Robert Cornero, Jr. The story says he has 635K followers on Gab. Given that most people on Gab probably don’t follow to see what the other side is up to, as you have on Twitter, maybe that’s 600K followers who like the message. Peel away a third and say they’re just here for the lulz. That leaves a lot of people who absorb this stuff, and while they don’t think the GEOTUS will use the Global Broadcasting System tonight to announce the round-up has begun, well, they wouldn’t be surprised if he did, y’know?

     

    • #157
  8. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Annefy (View Comment):

    So we have millions of people unemployed. Millions of small businesses lost forever. Millions of children being abused daily by teachers refusing to do their jobs. The global economy in free fall. All this as a direct result of government malfeasance.

    We have A new president on the horizon that does not engender any confidence in improving any of these situations, and there’s a long list of other things I’m pretty sure he’s going to make worse. 

    So yes – this is the perfect moment to make sure we don’t have any nut jobs in our ranks because the left will hang it around the neck of the right. 

    As William F. Buckley might have put it, we are ah capable of simultaneously perambulating and chicle mastication. And I’m not in favor of purging Q because otherwise the left will hang it around the neck of the right; I’m in favor of doing it because it’s the right thing to do.

    • #158
  9. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Bob W (View Comment):
    It’s also an example of a deeper problem with human nature: amazingly, humans seem to be capable of believing that they believe something, without actually believing it. The effect is something that looks and feels, to the believer and to others, just like actual belief but which actually is not. I suspect that many if not most Q “believers” fall into this category. Few would actually bet their lives on the truth of Q dogma, which means that as much as they feel that they believe it, in fact they do not.

    That’s a fascinating point, and I think you’re on to something. I know a few people who believe some stuff because it’s possible, and the wrong people say it isn’t. Whether they’d go to the wall for it, I don’t know.

    Over at Vice: QAnon followers know him as “Neon Revolt.” In real life, he’s a failed screenwriter from New Jersey named Robert Cornero, Jr. The story says he has 635K followers on Gab. Given that most people on Gab probably don’t follow to see what the other side is up to, as you have on Twitter, maybe that’s 600K followers who like the message. Peel away a third and say they’re just here for the lulz. That leaves a lot of people who absorb this stuff, and while they don’t think the GEOTUS will use the Global Broadcasting System tonight to announce the round-up has begun, well, they wouldn’t be surprised if he did, y’know?

     

    Next thing you know, they’ll say there are more than two sexes.

    • #159
  10. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):

    So we have millions of people unemployed. Millions of small businesses lost forever. Millions of children being abused daily by teachers refusing to do their jobs. The global economy in free fall. All this as a direct result of government malfeasance.

    We have A new president on the horizon that does not engender any confidence in improving any of these situations, and there’s a long list of other things I’m pretty sure he’s going to make worse.

    So yes – this is the perfect moment to make sure we don’t have any nut jobs in our ranks because the left will hang it around the neck of the right.

    As William F. Buckley might have put it, we are ah capable of simultaneously perambulating and chicle mastication. And I’m not in favor of purging Q because otherwise the left will hang it around the neck of the right; I’m in favor of doing it because it’s the right thing to do.

    Purging Q from what? How?

    Go for it, whatever it means. Can’t wait to see all the Q warriors go even harder after all of the other even more important things because they are the right things to do.

    • #160
  11. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Bob W (View Comment):
    It’s also an example of a deeper problem with human nature: amazingly, humans seem to be capable of believing that they believe something, without actually believing it. The effect is something that looks and feels, to the believer and to others, just like actual belief but which actually is not. I suspect that many if not most Q “believers” fall into this category. Few would actually bet their lives on the truth of Q dogma, which means that as much as they feel that they believe it, in fact they do not.

    That’s a fascinating point, and I think you’re on to something. I know a few people who believe some stuff because it’s possible, and the wrong people say it isn’t. Whether they’d go to the wall for it, I don’t know.

    Personally I’d “go to the wall” for few things, and I sincerely pray I don’t have to find out which ones any time soon.

    • #161
  12. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):

    So we have millions of people unemployed. Millions of small businesses lost forever. Millions of children being abused daily by teachers refusing to do their jobs. The global economy in free fall. All this as a direct result of government malfeasance.

    We have A new president on the horizon that does not engender any confidence in improving any of these situations, and there’s a long list of other things I’m pretty sure he’s going to make worse.

    So yes – this is the perfect moment to make sure we don’t have any nut jobs in our ranks because the left will hang it around the neck of the right.

    As William F. Buckley might have put it, we are ah capable of simultaneously perambulating and chicle mastication. And I’m not in favor of purging Q because otherwise the left will hang it around the neck of the right; I’m in favor of doing it because it’s the right thing to do.

    I’m curious how you are going to “purge” the subterranean and obscure Q faction? And are you giving it/them WAY TOO MUCH credit for influencing anything to do with the GOP or the conservative movement? <Whispering> Perhaps there are many spineless Republican politicians and self-avowed conservative commentators who have had more influence in tearing apart the GOP and the conservative movement…it’s just a theory I have. But be careful. I also subscribe to Ann Elk’s theory about dinosaurs.

    There were several Ricochet members who believed that President Trump was intimately colluding with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election for the better part of three years and perhaps a few who still believe that.

    A few days ago, a Ricochet member offered up that President Trump was planning to assassinate Mike Pence.

    There will always be kooks of any political stripe or even hazy, murky, amorphous, nebulous, and indefinable ideology.

    White supremacist, Richard Spencer – once a supporter of Donald Trump – jumped over to supporting Joe Biden. Clearly not a deep thinker and a man of ever-shifting principles…kinda like Mitt Romney.

    Doesn’t a great purging of Q ascribe to it even more attention and credibility than it deserves and thus have the unintended consequence of validating Leftists assertion that most Republicans endorse Q nonsense? Such a campaign would certainly validate all the idiotic claims by commentators like Jennifer Rubin, Bill Kristol, Mona Charen…about Trump supporters. I could name more but I don’t want to thrown onto a bonfire.

    • #162
  13. Joseph Eagar Member
    Joseph Eagar
    @JosephEagar

    I. M. Fine (View Comment):

    Joseph Eagar (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    This is one that always perplexes me. Somehow, though I read quite a bit and try to stay informed, I have managed never to read anything purported to be by this Q, I’m blissfully ignorant of it, and I’m barely aware that it exists. Perhaps it’s that I eschew YouTube videos other than for entertainment. Anyway, I wonder how many normal people actually have a clue what this thing is or give it the least credence. Are we talking chemtrails levels of buy-in here? Or 9/11 Truther? Or is it more like the Catastrophic Climate Change level of broad commitment?

    Whatever. That InfoWars guy has been around a long time and I’ve never read his stuff either. I probably need to get out more.

    I was just thinking the same thing. How widespread was Q really? I never read any of Q’s stuff either. I don’t even know if Q is supposed to be one person or a group.

    I think QAnon is more widespread — and more potent — than many of us realize. Its adherents are zealous and passionately committed. The OP is correct; their “plan” has not been realized and their apocalyptic clock is ticking. Some may indeed move on, but others may elect to take the long-anticipated “storm” into their own hands. Their presence in Washington on the 6th was extensive.

    Here are some reliable numbers reported in a recent issue of Forbes.

    According to NBC News, a recent internal investigation by Facebook determined that QAnon had millions of members and followers on the social platform, and the Wall Street Journal reported that membership in ten large Facebook groups devoted to QAnon had grown by more than 600% since the start of Covid-related lockdowns. In late August, Facebook announced it removed over 790 groups, 100 pages and 1,500 ads connected to QAnon, while also restricting over 10,000 accounts on Instagram.

    I dunno.  A lot of people also think Bush faked 9/11, Obama is a Muslim, FEMA builds concentration camps, etc.  Q seems kind of tame by comparison.

    • #163
  14. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    Joseph Eagar (View Comment):
    I dunno. A lot of people also think Bush faked 9/11, Obama is a Muslim, FEMA builds concentration camps, etc. Q seems kind of tame by comparison.

    Like I said earlier, I’ve had friends and family go down various conspiracy trails.  It’s not a pretty sight, especially when they act on those beliefs in ways that are otherwise irrational.

    • #164
  15. Joseph Eagar Member
    Joseph Eagar
    @JosephEagar

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Joseph Eagar (View Comment):
    I dunno. A lot of people also think Bush faked 9/11, Obama is a Muslim, FEMA builds concentration camps, etc. Q seems kind of tame by comparison.

    Like I said earlier, I’ve had friends and family go down various conspiracy trails. It’s not a pretty sight, especially when they act on those beliefs in ways that are otherwise irrational.

    A lot of this is driven by the ridiculous number of social taboos in our society.  They make people feel the reality reflected in spoken language isn’t the one that actually exists.  So long as America continues to have a stupid number of unspoken taboos we will continue to be a hotbed of conspiracy theories.

    • #165
  16. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    I. M. Fine (View Comment):
    Facebook determined that QAnon had millions of members and followers on the social platform

    If it were any other source than Facebook, I might have taken this seriously. 

    Their tracking software would record a curious visitor who got an ad bounced from another curious visitor, who got there via another curious or misdirected visitor, and that kind of tracking could easily make 100 active members out of 360,000,000 people look like several thousand or a million.  

    • #166
  17. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    James Lileks: Wither Q?

    Shouldn’t it be whither? Or is it a play on words?

    • #167
  18. RPD Inactive
    RPD
    @RPD

    MarciN (View Comment):

    I. M. Fine (View Comment):
    Facebook determined that QAnon had millions of members and followers on the social platform

    If it were any other source than Facebook, I might have taken this seriously.

    Their tracking software would record a curious visitor who got an ad bounced from another curious visitor, who got there via another curious or misdirected visitor, and that kind of tracking could easily make 100 active members out of 360,000,000 people look like several thousand or a million.

    Facebook, and I don’t have a lot of trust in NBC not to find a set of numbers to present the narrative they desire.

    • #168
  19. Southern Pessimist Member
    Southern Pessimist
    @SouthernPessimist

    I like to fish but mostly in the ocean. I occasionally catch a shark. I more often catch a remora.

    • #169
  20. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Purging Q from what? 

    From the conservative movement 

    How?

    Anathemize the beliefs and the people who trade in them, or wink at them for political gain

    Go for it, whatever it means. Can’t wait to see all the Q warriors go even harder after all of the other even more important things because they are the right things to do.

    It’s like saying can’t wait to see all the election fraud warriors go even harder after CRT and race-science believers in the Biden DOJ. Raising one subject does not mean it’s top priority to be addressed at the exclusion of all others. 

    • #170
  21. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Doesn’t a great purging of Q ascribe to it even more attention and credibility than it deserves and thus have the unintended consequence of validating Leftists assertion that most Republicans endorse Q nonsense? Such a campaign would certainly validate all the idiotic claims by commentators like Jennifer Rubin, Bill Kristol, Mona Charen…about Trump supporters. I could name more but I don’t want to thrown onto a bonfire.

    A) I don’t know how prominent conservative leaders calling out Q as nutwad drivel validates Leftist assertions, but saying nothing doesn’t. A good communicator could wrap up the message in an attack on the nonsense that percolates on the Left, and worse than Q, is accepted uncritically by far more people. Yeah, we have a smattering of Q, but you have an infestation of Antifa. Go on the offensive. Strike back twice as hard, as a friend once said.

    B) Rubins gonna rubin and no one cares, and any assertion of principles – any – will be twisted by the commentariat. Dogs bark, caravans move on, and all that. I’ve no interest in trimming sails because some bad-faith writer will fit the statement into their preexisting narrative.

    Replace “Q” with “Flat-earthers” or “Lizard-alien believers,” if you wish. Imagine everyone goes to the mat for years defending Gen. Flynn and he turns out to believe that the Queen of England is a shapeshifter from another world. Maybe cut loose the pols who just can’t bring themselves to say “no, Mike’s wrong about that”?

    • #171
  22. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Doesn’t a great purging of Q ascribe to it even more attention and credibility than it deserves and thus have the unintended consequence of validating Leftists assertion that most Republicans endorse Q nonsense? Such a campaign would certainly validate all the idiotic claims by commentators like Jennifer Rubin, Bill Kristol, Mona Charen…about Trump supporters. I could name more but I don’t want to thrown onto a bonfire.

    A) I don’t know how prominent conservative leaders calling out Q as nutwad drivel validates Leftist assertions, but saying nothing doesn’t. A good communicator could wrap up the message in an attack on the nonsense that percolates on the Left, and worse than Q, is accepted uncritically by far more people. Yeah, we have a smattering of Q, but you have an infestation of Antifa. Go on the offensive. Strike back twice as hard, as a friend once said.

    Forgive me…for a moment I thought you wanted to go on a mission to “purge” Q not simply call them out as nutwads engaged in drivel in a one-off Ricochet post. I can’t for the life of me understand where I got that impression.

    B) Rubins gonna rubin and no one cares, and any assertion of principles – any – will be twisted by the commentariat. Dogs bark, caravans move on, and all that. I’ve no interest in trimming sails because some bad-faith writer will fit the statement into their preexisting narrative.

    The bad faith writers and NeverTrump commentators were alluded to only to point out that a campaign to purge Q only validated their already inflated notions about how influential Q is with the 74 million who voted for Trump. When it comes to proportionality these commentators are chicken feed and useful idiots to the larger media and Big Tech complex who will just use them to validate the assertion that QAnon loons and white supremacists make up the bulk of Trump’s support…”Don’t believe us? Read what Bill Kristol, or Mona Charen say.”

    … Imagine everyone goes to the mat for years defending Gen. Flynn and he turns out to believe that the Queen of England is a shapeshifter from another world. Maybe cut loose the pols who just can’t bring themselves to say “no, Mike’s wrong about that”?

    You’re really worried that Gen. Flynn will somehow achieve some sort of prominence and influence in the right side of the political spectrum? And what? Steal the thunder from a rising star in the party? He should be the least of your worries or the GOP’s problems, as should Sidney Powell whose lawsuits never panned out or the histrionic spotlight hog Lin Wood. On my last days on Twitter even before the Georgia run-off both Powell and Wood had come in for a great deal of well-deserved criticism from Trump supporters.

    • #172
  23. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    James – Since I hit the 500-word wall, permit me to add that QAnon is not in the conservative movement. It/they are in the conspiracy theory mongering movement and likely couldn’t coherently articulate anything about conservative ideology. But one of them has some pretty fancy headgear.

    Finally, I think a response to my Comment #137 would be much more interesting to read.

    Cheers.

    • #173
  24. Gazpacho Grande' Coolidge
    Gazpacho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Eridemus (View Comment):

    Now the BBC is reporting that there is a media crackdown on ”Trumpism” as if all Trump supporters are the same as the fringe group Q-Anon. I guess that is what Europeans will think, to hellp dull the deeper issue of loss of freedom of speech.

    They do this because it’s easy, meaning it would require more work to break down people who voted for him into other categories.

    Voted for Trump = QAnon supporter (if not secret member)

    See?  Easy math!

    • #174
  25. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Purging Q from what? 

    From the conservative movement 

    How?

    Anathemize the beliefs and the people who trade in them, or wink at them for political gain

    What are the beliefs of Q and why do you think they are already in the conservative movement? 

    • #175
  26. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Go for it, whatever it means. Can’t wait to see all the Q warriors go even harder after all of the other even more important things because they are the right things to do.

    It’s like saying can’t wait to see all the election fraud warriors go even harder after CRT and race-science believers in the Biden DOJ. Raising one subject does not mean it’s top priority to be addressed at the exclusion of all others.

    Correct. There are always many issues that need addressing. However, which issues you raise and which you don’t and when you raise them of course says something about what you think of the relative importance of the issues and how you view the world.. I don’t even know why you’re arguing the point. Q is not on the same level as CRT, election system problems, or even timid/incompetent/false Republicans. Not even close. I’m commenting because your choice is emblematic of a disconnect from me. A broader movement disconnect in terms of what we value, how we prioritize, and how we react to the disconnection. 

    • #176
  27. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    B) Rubins gonna rubin and no one cares, and any assertion of principles – any – will be twisted by the commentariat. Dogs bark, caravans move on, and all that. I’ve no interest in trimming sails because some bad-faith writer will fit the statement into their preexisting narrative.

    Isn’t that why you’re writing about Q though? Someone claims Q belongs to us so you’re hopping to? 

    • #177
  28. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Doesn’t a great purging of Q ascribe to it even more attention and credibility than it deserves and thus have the unintended consequence of validating Leftists assertion that most Republicans endorse Q nonsense? Such a campaign would certainly validate all the idiotic claims by commentators like Jennifer Rubin, Bill Kristol, Mona Charen…about Trump supporters. I could name more but I don’t want to thrown onto a bonfire.

    A) I don’t know how prominent conservative leaders calling out Q as nutwad drivel validates Leftist assertions, but saying nothing doesn’t. …

    James, the answer is right there in the comment you quoted. Disagree with Brian’s point, but at least acknowledge it. You’re giving it more attention and credibility than it deserves and in the process accepting that Q is currently part of the conservative movement and is something to be answered for. If I don’t say anything about flat earth does that mean I’m validating it?

    • #178
  29. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    I love the Purge Q stuff.  So how you guys planning that?  Lock them or just stand them against the wall and shoot them?  Cancel them?  Get them kicked out of their jobs and livelihoods?  Maybe just take their kids?  Their houses, their property?  What wonderful conservative way do you want to bend these people to your conservative collective will?

    • #179
  30. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    Replace “Q” with “Flat-earthers” or “Lizard-alien believers,” if you wish. Imagine everyone goes to the mat for years defending Gen. Flynn and he turns out to believe that the Queen of England is a shapeshifter from another world.

    Wow, James.  I was with you until you revealed yourself to be a shapeshifting reptilian alien denier.  And it’s not just the Queen.  The entire royal family has been replaced by the reptiles.  Time to open your eyes, man.

    • #180
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.