Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
On E-Girls
I may be young, and I may spend too much time staring at screens, but I’m decidedly out of step with the bleeding edge of Internet culture. Only when Facebook became passé did I give in and make an account (which I seldom use). I’ve yet to touch Tik-Tok, and I doubt I ever will. All for the best, I think. But some friends just alerted me to a new-ish trend in the digital world: the so-called “e-girl” (or “e-thot,” in slightly less polite parlance).*
An e-girl is a young woman who sells feigned affection online. A customer gives her money, and she pretends to care about him by sending him pornography, seductive videos, personalized letters, or even presents. Yes, you read that correctly: A not-insignificant number of men are willing to pay random women on the Internet to give them attention. (Some even justify their pathology as a form of “providing.” “I’m doing my duty as a man!” they say. “I’m providing for her!”) This isn’t entirely new. I once read that the most popular offering among upscale brothels, for example, is not sex as such, but the whole romantic package — a nice dinner and a night on the town, followed by a consummation of the short relationship. The e-girl model makes a digital simulacrum of this available to every sad schlub with a laptop and an Internet connection. Can’t find a girlfriend? Just buy a fake one. Or try a dating simulator.
Actually, it’s even worse than that. Some guys seem to prefer e-girls to their flesh-and-blood equivalents. Floating around the web is an infamous Reddit post written by a 20-something woman whose live-in boyfriend threw hundreds of dollars at e-girls, even going so far as to buy his favorite one — but not her, his real girlfriend — a Christmas present. Despite being in a nominal relationship, he felt the need to purchase attention anyway. Blame feminism, I guess. (Sargon of Akkad certainly does.)
Just like that, the market has stolen yet more territory from the order of the sacred. The commodification of human relationships continues apace. First came pornography, which commodified sex. Next came online dating, which commodified the means by which humans form romantic relationships. Then came social media, which commodified the non-romantic parts of social life and turned us all into performing seals. Now, even ordinary affection is something to be bought and sold. What’s next? Sex dolls? AI “girlfriends”? My fashionable and tech-savvy brother tells me that “VTubing” is the hot new thing. The future is turning out to be Wall-E, minus the environmental degradation.
I’ve yet to see the conservative commentariat address this particular addition to the pile of modern social evils. They seem to think that pornography is the greatest single threat to marriage, family, and ordinary old-fashioned love; and it probably is, for now. But e-girls will have their moment in the sun. After all, this is the world the Soroses and Schwabs want: a global techno-utopian feudal order in which the docile peasantry consumes and then perishes, and does nothing else. A world without conflict, scarcity, or striving. A world where love and affection are exchanged, but never earned. Is this the kind of world you want to live in? If not, then you’d better invest in the tangible while you still can. . . .
. . . Oh, wait. My mistake. You can’t invest in the tangible because there’s a virus circulating, and it’s just too dangerous. Never mind. E-girls and sex dolls it is, then!
* Apparently, the term “e-girl” is also used to describe the style of dress such women tend to adopt. I’m sure an Internet-culture purist would object to my terminology in this piece, but I don’t care. What else am I supposed to call these people?
Published in Culture
I believe men and women want the same things but in different tones.
Just as you give flippant dismissal to the perspective of faith, I will give dismissal to your making Science god.
I don’t think I could ever have a fulfilling relationship with a self-driving car no matter how sexy it dressed.
A lot of our cultural misery involves people shouting ‘I’m just as good as you!’ in response to nothing in particular.
Happiness is always a temporary achievement. Being content or serene are things that can be long-term.
I see now that “I don’t miss any of that” could be interpreted as other than I intended. I should have put it as “I didn’t miss any of those points you made.”
I heard it was a warm gun.
Comment Rendered Superfluous by @Stina.
A university might not be the most likely place to find that these days. Then again, I’m not sure about any alternatives. (I met my wife in college, but that was a different time.)
There are many sexual perversions around that it’s impossible to keep count. It’s amazing what some men will do for a vicarious experience. And it’s amazing how many women will lower themselves to either prostitution, porn, or this. It’s a sick world. If this doesn’t show you how broken society is then I don’t know what else will.
I think I may have researched more into religion than you have about genetics. Also, why would you suggest that I have ever dismissed faith or made science god or G-d? I don’t get at all what you think my position is.
We’ve run this experiment, societies based on Christian values endured and thrived for hundreds of years.
Are we? I’m not so sure most young Christian men have any idea, either.
Could that mean that the women they’re trying to deal with, aren’t actually Christian?
I mostly agree but would caution that ultimate satisfaction can only be found in God. “Our hearts are restless, Lord, until they rest in you.” A man and woman might have a happy marriage and still be dissatisfied if they don’t also have a relationship with the Lord.
Agreed. I thought about editing. This is also a very Christian sensibility — this world isn’t heaven and won’t be until the Second Coming. But marriages can be very good.
There are no alternatives. Graduate single, die single. That’s how it works nowadays.
I went to Hillsdale. About 50 percent of my graduating class left the school either engaged or dating. The other 50 percent? Destined to be scraped off the floor by a cleanup crew.
Now that’s a cheery thought to kick off 2021.
Can’t “Like” this. I’d recommend you attend lots and lots of Hillsdale events — CCAs, Leadership Seminars, alumni events, sports camps. Whatever. Find a way to stay engaged with that community of people who have thought about and have some clue about “the good life.”
We’ve made friends there, and that’s really how a good marriage begins anyway — in friendship.
I’m a cheery guy.
It’s not that. Men have never had any idea how to interact with women. When they did, it was pure luck.
And the funny thing is that article about lonely deaths is two years old… and has no comments.
Wrong crowd, mostly. I may be an old soul, but I don’t mean it literally.
COVID: Bringing a death squad to a city near you!
Well maybe in larger society. But I thought we were – at least in part – discussing a Christian set of attitudes where women are to be cherished and honored for being mothers etc, but if Christian men approach them that way and are met with “No way, I expect a job with pay equal to yours, and a government-paid nanny to take care of children I may or may not have via a sperm bank or whatever!” doesn’t that mean the supposedly Christian women didn’t get the same message, maybe even from the church?
You missed that?
So the comments have also been closed for almost the whole 2 years.
Haha — you mean it’s a bunch of old white people? I never noticed. /sarc off
Are there no alumni groups? You can at least make connections with people who might know people or have daughters your age. I’d fix you up if we lived closer. I know some gals looking for a thoughtful Hillsdale kind of guy. . .
And he even went to Hillsdale, so my chances are probably zero.
Matches have been made right here on Ricochet. It’s good to know the “right” people.
All of that may be true. But I’ve been married 41 years and still haven’t figured my wife out. I’m sure she feels the same about me.