If I Were a Thoughtful Racist

 

I got to wondering. What would a thoughtful, intelligent, devious racist do? What kind of policies and positions would he take?

A thoughtful racist:

  • Would support BLM, as the ultimate result is going to be much more death and destruction in the Black community. Removing the police from black communities, defunding them, and restricting their ability to enforce the law is going to have a severe negative impact on blacks.
  • Would be a supporter of Planned Parenthood and abortion. Blacks currently abort ½ of all their children. Racists going back to Margaret Sanger have supported the idea.
  • Would support any dysfunctional black culture that glorifies, crime, drugs, violence, and promiscuity and denigrates black women.
  • Would support ideas such as this:

that make those traits that are most likely to make someone a success in society “ White” and anathema to blacks.

  • Would support the apartheid in our schools with segregated classes, dormitories, graduations in our schools.
  • Would support Black dependence on government.
  • Would work to destroy Black families and encourage those Black women who don’t abort to have their children out of marriage.
  • A thoughtful racist would support a political culture that would try to maximize all the above.

So, who are the real racists in our society? And where do they find a political home?

None of those things seem remotely Conservative to me.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 61 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Housebroken Coolidge
    Housebroken
    @Chuckles

    Ontheleftcoast (View Comment):

    Freeven (View Comment):

    Conservatives often lament the fact that Blacks (and other Lefty Poster Children) overwhelmingly vote for the very policies that put them and keep them in the very conditions they complain about. We talk about how the Dems use Blacks, and wonder why Blacks don’t see it. When we do this, we often overlook the other half of the equation: Blacks are using Dems right back, leveraging their votes to force Dems to give them other people’s stuff. Why would either side want to change the dynamic when each side feels they are profiting from the arrangement? Sure, the Dems are cynical and corrupt, but Blacks et al are also. It’s not that Blacks are acting as Useful Idiots for the Left. It’s that Whites are acting as Useful Idiots for both sides.

    Also, Republicans have mostly done a really lousy job of having a presence on the ground in black communities, so it’s not as though there’s been much compettition for the Dems.

    I’m not real sympathetic to this excuse, and that’s all it is.

    • #31
  2. Housebroken Coolidge
    Housebroken
    @Chuckles

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    The definition of racist today is too broad.

    If anyone has a prejudiced thought for a few minutes then everyone is a bigot.

     

    That’s just racist!

    • #32
  3. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Roderic (View Comment):

    LBJ was an unreconstructed racist of the old school. When the federal government finally crushed segregation and the Klan in the South he didn’t change his ideas about blacks, he changed his strategy.

    If he had deliberately sought to destroy the black family and the black community forever leaving them powerless and dependent on his ilk in the government then he could not have done any worse than he did with the Great Society.

    “I’ll have those n###### voting Democrat for  200 years”.

    • #33
  4. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):
    Lastly, if racist thoughts constitute racism then we are all racists. Fortunately we can’t be prosecuted for thought crimes or can we?

    You haven’t been paying attention lately.

    • #34
  5. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    Roderic (View Comment):

    LBJ was an unreconstructed racist of the old school. When the federal government finally crushed segregation and the Klan in the South he didn’t change his ideas about blacks, he changed his strategy.

    If he had deliberately sought to destroy the black family and the black community forever leaving them powerless and dependent on his ilk in the government then he could not have done any worse than he did with the Great Society.

    Exactly. I’ve witnessed first hand, through my church work, how the Great Society destroyed many, many low-income families — black and white, but especially black families.

    • #35
  6. Housebroken Coolidge
    Housebroken
    @Chuckles

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    …we can’t be prosecuted for thought crimes or can we?

    Guess you forgot about “hate crime”.

    • #36
  7. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    Lastly, if racist thoughts constitute racism then we are all racists. Fortunately we can’t be prosecuted for thought crimes or can we?

     

     

    Not yet,  anyway.

     

    • #37
  8. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    I am happy that a few left-of-center people are also disgusted by this.

    Wow, good stuff!  

    • #38
  9. Housebroken Coolidge
    Housebroken
    @Chuckles

    So ok, I finally did a search to find out what NMAAHC, which apparently published the poster, stood for: Per Wikipedia its part of the Smithsonian system.  Your tax dollars at work.

    • #39
  10. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Actually worse then what I posted. Second half got omitted. Heres the entire poster…

    It’s truly disgusting .

    • #40
  11. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Kozak: A thoughtful racist, would support a political culture that would try to maximize all the above.

    To understand your point, people have to be able to get beyond what Thomas Sowell calls “stage one thinking.” They have to learn to ask, “And then what?” If the government dictates X, what incentives will that create? What disincentives? How will people respond to the incentives and disincentives? Could their responses cause unintended consequences?

    One of the gifts God has given me is a pretty good ability to ask about second and third order effects. A person intent on setting back the social, economic, and cultural development of black Americans (i.e., someone who wanted to harm black Americans) would design “anti-poverty” and “anti-discrimination” policies and programs just like those developed in the 1960s and 1970s. Such policies and programs were almost guaranteed to set black Americans back, and could be implemented subversively but effectively because they [falsely] look like their intent is to help black Americans.

    • #41
  12. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    Franco (View Comment):
    To back up a step, what kind of person believes Black folk need special help?

    When liberals talk about a whole group of people as if they are children who need to be taken care of, who, exactly, is the racist?

    Franco (View Comment):
    Poor Oprah had to endure a snooty Gucci clerk in St. Moritz judging her as being too poor to bother with showing her some exquisite Italian leather purse! I want to assure everyone that I, a privileged white hetero have been treated quite the same way by snooty Swiss clerks.

    Had a family friend when I was a kid who was a very successful (and very white) surgeon. He talked about wearing jeans to the Mercedes dealership and getting completely ignored by the salesmen. Eventually, he went up and showed them his business card and ended up driving home in his new car.

    • #42
  13. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    The last thing you want the car dealership to know is you are a successful professional.

    I want to buy a car when I was in the Air Force.

    The salesman eventually got out of me I was AF. And an officer. And a physician.

    And his eyes lit up.

    • #43
  14. Housebroken Coolidge
    Housebroken
    @Chuckles

    Keep trying to make a follow up observation on @vancerichards comment nbr 42 but seems I’m not allowed.  But for some years I worked for a fellow that was quite wealthy, owned an island in the Bahamas (no his  name wasn’t Epstein).  He, too, went to a Mercedes dealership wearing typical South Florida yard work clothes to buy a car, and was ignored-so he just went to another dealer, not Mercedes, and paid cash for his brand new vehicle which we then modified to burn hydrogen. 

    Let me hasten to add, I know this isn’t universal dealership practice.

    • #44
  15. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Kodak, 

    This post is brilliant and should be expanded into “The Thinking Racist’s Handbook”,  or “A Guide For The Thinking Racist”, with chapters that first show the success of each evil idea followed by a  how-to section for furthering the diabolical goals. (Am thinking of something like Anthony Esolen’s “Ten Ways to Destroy The Imagination of Your Child.”)  The book would be a great way of getting Thomas Sowell’s name out there as the problem for all thinking racists.  
    Of course, one of the most important chapters would be the one on the importance of continuing to keep the children of the targeted race trapped in bad public schools.
    To write that one it’s important to read Thomas Sowell’s most recent book. I haven’t read it yet, but, it would have to be enormously helpful.

    • #45
  16. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    You’ll also want a chapter on promoting the culling of the targeted herd through defunding the police in their neighborhoods. The idea is to ensure that their embittered, fatherless males have every chance to gun each other down in feuds before they can grow up late into men and become husbands and fathers.

    • #46
  17. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Freeven (View Comment):
    People act in their perceived best interests

    Some act in what they perceive to be the best interest of the country. What’s Wrong with Kansas?

    • #47
  18. Freeven Member
    Freeven
    @Freeven

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Freeven (View Comment):
    People act in their perceived best interests

    Some act in what they perceive to be the best interest of the country. What’s Wrong with Kansas?

    Thanks for pointing this out. I should have done so in my original comment.

    • #48
  19. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    Kodak,

    This post is brilliant and should be expanded into “The Thinking Racist’s Handbook”, or “A Guide For The Thinking Racist”, with chapters that first show the success of each evil idea followed by a how-to section for furthering the diabolical goals. (Am thinking of something like Anthony Esolen’s “Ten Ways to Destroy The Imagination of Your Child.”) The book would be a great way of getting Thomas Sowell’s name out there as the problem for all thinking racists.
    Of course, one of the most important chapters would be the one on the importance of continuing to keep the children of the targeted race trapped in bad public schools.
    To write that one it’s important to read Thomas Sowell’s most recent book. I haven’t read it yet, but, it would have to be enormously helpful.

    “The Thinking Racist’s Handbook” is a great idea!

    Present the handbook as though it really is aimed at the aspiring racist, with each chapter describing one of the Left’s policy positions (though don’t describe it as a “Left” policy), and how useful that policy would be for keeping black people down. Chapters could include:

    minimum wage laws so that less-prepared blacks are prevented from starting on the employment ladder,

    eliminating school choice so that black children remain trapped in poorly performing schools,

    lowering performance expectations with respect to school and social (including criminal) behavior so that blacks don’t feel much need to improve their performances,

    providing financial subsidies to single mothers to discourage marriage and two parent households so that poor children (who are mostly black) don’t experience the stability and development opportunities of a married two parent household,

    enacting gun control laws to keep uppity blacks from fighting back against white domination,

    encouraging students to enter colleges for which they are academically unprepared so that they fail out rather than succeed at colleges that better match their academic preparation,

    setting up corporate diversity and affirmative action staff roles into which to place black employees so those employees don’t take productive and valuable line or operations roles away from white employees.

    I would greatly enjoy seeing how the Left would react to such a publication. 

    • #49
  20. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    “The Thinking Racist’s Handbook” is a great idea!

    The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics might be a good resource.

    • #50
  21. Brandon Member
    Brandon
    @Brandon

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    “The Thinking Racist’s Handbook” is a great idea!

    The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics might be a good resource.

    I was thinking The Screwtape Letters.  

    • #51
  22. Brandon Member
    Brandon
    @Brandon

    You could set the book up much like The Screwtape Letters, as a series of letters between a modern aspiring racist and a 1960’s veteran that’s been running the racket for years.  You’d have to make it very clear in the forward that the work is a satire and that the protagonists are clearly evil people.  I’m not real keen on the above title choice.  It’s provocative, but I’m more interested in changing minds than provoking.    Provocative actions get people that already think like you to pat you on the back, but they don’t change minds.  You’d want to go with something like Wolves in the Fold or They are Among Us because what you’re writing is, in reality, not a pamphlet but a horror story.

    Chapter I: “I’m here to help” (how the radical left has infiltrated the black community by posing as saviors)

    Chapter II:  It’s the Culture, Stupid (How the radical left has created and fostered a culture that perpetuates negative results)

    Chapter III: Eating out of Our Hands (How to create long-term government dependence).

    Chapter IV: The Silent Genocide (Abortion)

    Chapter V: Racist Projection as Protection (White Fragility shields racists from criticism)

    Chapter VI: Choosing the Right Cult (Marxist Wokeness replacing Christianity)

    Chapter VII: Separate but Unequal (The Leftist case for segregation)

    Chapter VIII: Not one of Us (How to push out dissenting black voices. . .Sowell, Steele, Hughes, Williams, et al).

    Chapter IX: Race Baiting Like a Pro (Sharpton?  Please, try DiAngelo).

    Chapter X: Doubling Down (Repeating the cycle when your “solutions” don’t work).

    • #52
  23. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Brandon (View Comment):

    You could set the book up as a series of letters between a modern aspiring racist and a 1960’s veteran that’s been running the racket for years. I’ve already got this book mapped out:

    Chapter I: “I’m here to help” (how to infiltrate the black community)

    Chapter II: It’s the Culture, Stupid (How to create and foster a culture that perpetuates negative results)

    Chapter III: Eating out of Our Hands (How to create long-term government dependence).

    Chapter IV: The Silent Genocide (Abortion)

    Chapter V: Racist Projection as Protection (White Fragility shields racists from criticism)

    Chapter VI: Choosing the Right Cult (Marxist Wokeness replacing Christianity)

    Chapter VII: Separate but Unequal (The Leftist case for segregation)

    Chapter VIII: Not one of Us (How to push out dissenting black voices. . .Sowell, Steele, Hughes, Williams, et al).

    Chapter IX: Race Baiting Like a Pro (Sharpton? Please, try DiAngelo).

    Chapter X: Doubling Down (Repeating the cycle when your “solutions” don’t work).

    Chapter XI: The Numinous Negro and replacing G-d with melanin. Seriously, why don’t more people this essay. It explains most everything that is dumb with our obsession about race. 

    Who is the Numinous Negro? He is everywhere, especially in our hearts, and if we are lucky he is our friend. The dictionary defines “numinous” as “of or pertaining to a numen,” which was a Roman term for “the presiding divinity . . . of a place.” “Numinous” also means “spiritually elevated.” Jungians and literary critics love the word, but normal theologians use it too. The Numinous Negro is a presiding divinity. The place he presides over is America, and contact with him elevates us spiritually.

    You see him in the gooey prose of white liberals whenever a Negro appears (“Negro” was the accepted word when blacks first became Numinous)…

    Art and entertainment, always eager for shortcuts to characterization, make frequent use of the Numinous Negro. When we see a Negro in movies or television, we not only know he is Numinous (unless he is Thuggish- see below), we can judge the other (white) characters by how they treat him. The saintly Death Row hero of The Green Mile was so Numinous that even movie reviewers noticed the technique. Morgan Freeman’s character in The Shawshank Redemption was more complex, though it had elements of numinosity. Some years ago, Freeman played Petruchio in a Central Park production of The Taming of the Shrew. There he was not Numinous at all, simply a figure of farce (and an excellent one). But so ingrained are our expectations that it took this spectator a moment to adjust.

    • #53
  24. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Brandon (View Comment):

    You could set the book up as a series of letters between a modern aspiring racist and a 1960’s veteran that’s been running the racket for years. I’ve already got this book mapped out:

    Chapter I: “I’m here to help” (how to infiltrate the black community)

    Chapter II: It’s the Culture, Stupid (How to create and foster a culture that perpetuates negative results)

    Chapter III: Eating out of Our Hands (How to create long-term government dependence).

    Chapter IV: The Silent Genocide (Abortion)

    Chapter V: Racist Projection as Protection (White Fragility shields racists from criticism)

    Chapter VI: Choosing the Right Cult (Marxist Wokeness replacing Christianity)

    Chapter VII: Separate but Unequal (The Leftist case for segregation)

    Chapter VIII: Not one of Us (How to push out dissenting black voices. . .Sowell, Steele, Hughes, Williams, et al).

    Chapter IX: Race Baiting Like a Pro (Sharpton? Please, try DiAngelo).

    Chapter X: Doubling Down (Repeating the cycle when your “solutions” don’t work).

    Chapter 10, in that case, could be “Doubling Down or ‘All Just A Little Bit Of History Repeating’ : How to re-brand tried and true ‘solutions’ that served our interests in the past so that the opposition will be lured into attempting these again.”

    • #54
  25. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Brandon (View Comment):
    Chapter VIII: Not one of Us (How to push out dissenting black voices. . .Sowell, Steele, Hughes, Williams, et al).

    We need to add Riley now.

    • #55
  26. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Maybe the Handbook could be a group writing project?

    Each person taking 1 topic to expound on?

    • #56
  27. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Maybe the Handbook could be a group writing project?

    Each person taking 1 topic to expound on?

    Well it would be a great book. But it would be written by mostly white guys and therefore dismissed. 

    • #57
  28. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Maybe the Handbook could be a group writing project?

    Each person taking 1 topic to expound on?

    Well it would be a great book. But it would be written by mostly white guys and therefore dismissed.

    But see I think that’s what would make it so subversively persuasive. If the “woke” crowd (or Progressives, or Left) saw their policy preferences presented by presumed actual racists, and presented with the objective of furthering racism, the “woke” or Progressive, or Leftist might feel the urge to actually think about their policy preferences. 

    • #58
  29. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    White Culture?

    Hawaiian proverb:
    Life is in labor (labor produces what is needed for life)

    African proverb:
    Even the best cooking pot will not produce food.

    Zimbabwean proverb:
    You have little power over what’s not yours.

    Chinese proverbs:

    • Pearls don’t lie on the seashore. If you want one, you must dive for it.
    • Talk does not cook rice.
    • Teachers open the door but you must walk through it yourself.
    • He who depends on himself will attain the greatest happiness.
    • #59
  30. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Maybe the Handbook could be a group writing project?

    Each person taking 1 topic to expound on?

    Well it would be a great book. But it would be written by mostly white guys and therefore dismissed.

    No no no. Written from the perspective of people who wish to maintain and promote race and class supremacy for themselves and their posterity, mostly white guys would have the most credibility. You’re already being smeared as racists, well, take advantage of that.
    If you guys are careful to reflect the following throughout the book, people are going to read and consider your arguments.

    (1) Implied deep satisfaction over all the Democrats and Progressives have done that has kept people of different races separate and unequal, admiration for cunning and subtle new approaches they’ve used to accomplish the same prevention of opportunity they once achieved while being honest about what they were doing. (Past methods of oppression should be described respectfully. It should be emphasized that those methods, like fighting on horseback, were exactly right for the circumstances of the time.)

    (2) Resentment and concern over the people, ideas and behaviors that could undermine the race and class supremacy you always maintain you want.

    In case you do get together to do this, I’m posting the short list of books, later today, I want to remind you to look over again or study. (These are books I probably heard about through, or due to, your posts on Ricochet.) You’re the perfect people to each take a chapter and write this book.

    If any money is made on the book, it should go to those schools that, I think, are called “Success Academy“. Those are the schools that Thomas Sowell talks about in his book.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.