Conservative Swamp Creatures

 

Listening to a podcast by Jonah Goldberg it suddenly dawned on me why the guy is skeptical of Trump. As he said on the podcast, he has lived in Washington D.C. most of his life. He worked in think tanks there for years and all of his friends are government or political wonk types. He goes to all the big insider parties and functions. Most of the guests he has on the podcast are DC insiders, often second or third generation Swamp Creatures. He’s a Swamp Creature.

I have no doubt that he’s conservative and smart, but apparently he’s a Swamp Creature first and foremost. In fact, after a little research, I found that many of the other prominent conservative Trump skeptics are similar. They’ve been in and out of government in DC and/or work in this or that conservative think tank or publication. I expect that their first loyalty is to the place from which they draw their sustenance. Any threat to that is going to evoke a visceral reaction. And we all know what Trump promised to do and is doing with the Swamp.

First comes the emotional reaction, then there follows the rationale for it. With time this rationale becomes more elaborate, and what you’re left with at the end are conclusions that make no sense. So you have Bill Kristol saying that Trump has turned him into a Democrat. Editors of the Bulwark are advocating for a third-party candidate and David French is saying that Christians should not vote for Trump. This against the most firmly conservative, effective, and anti-abortion president ever.

Some of them say that Trump is an “existential” threat to the country, and he is in fact a threat to what they hold dear, but under Trump, the rest of the country is doing fine.

I’m not sure how fond of democracy any of these guys ever were, but increasingly they are open about being skeptical of it, and that’s apparently because democracy and the people have turned against the Swamp. And let us remind ourselves about why this has happened — the Swamp failed a large number of the American people. Washington insiders have contempt for ordinary Americans, and their policy preferences show it. Free trade and relatively open borders, among other things, boosted the economy and made Swamp Creatures and their friends rich and powerful. Ordinary Americans suffered from a loss of jobs and income, depression, dislocation, drug abuse, and suicide. The people have pushed back against Creature policies. This the conservative Swamp Creatures deride as populism and warn of mob rule, but instead of picking up pitchforks the people elected Donald Trump and most likely will do so again.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 101 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    Racism, yes, that’s the ticket. Poor, pitiful cognizetti, forced to live and perform servile work as noble truth-tellers in downtrodden NYC and DC. And we have the nerve to criticize them! If they can’t stand the heat, how dare we say get out of the kitchen?

    We need to recognize our privilege of not having to struggle with 6 and 7-figure salaries as pundits, press and various other hangers-on, dining around on the town, meeting important people and doing whatever other G-d-forsaken these unfortunates are called to do. Straight up racism, thanks for the bat-signal.

    I’m with you, Jeanne. I absolutely love being lectured on racism. I mean, it’s not like we get our fill from Lefty.

    Race baiting: the beat goes on. 

    • #61
  2. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel (View Comment):

    I guess you could call us Swamp Creatures; we moved to the DC area a year ago and lived in New Jersey working for conservative NYC-based media before this.

    I’m 90% in agreement with you on the phenomenon. One word in defense of their perspective is this: we are friendly with a lot of folks who work inside the administration who share a lot of horror stories about how mismanaged it is. A lot of my concern about Trump is based on those reports. I’m still voting for him because I’ll take mismanagement over a socialist-takeover of our federal government, though.

    I would guess that almost everyone with a job has, at some point, thought that their company was mismanaged. To the extent that this is even a question with an objective answer, some of those people were correct and others not. How do we know which is which?

    Everyone who has been behind the scenes in any industry or area of endeavor comes away horrified. I say this as a person who worked for an international airline for 11 years (you do not want to know).  If we’re talking about Washington, DC, I have a feeling there are those who feel a sense of self-importance and being an “insider” if they have dirt to dish. And if we’re talking about being inside the Trump Administration, I’d say those who say derogatory things are likely working against him for their own reasons. I’d think it makes them look a lot worse than it makes Trump look.

    • #62
  3. Drusus Inactive
    Drusus
    @Drusus

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    Racism, yes, that’s the ticket. Poor, pitiful cognizetti, forced to live and perform servile work as noble truth-tellers in downtrodden NYC and DC. And we have the nerve to criticize them! If they can’t stand the heat, how dare we say get out of the kitchen?

    We need to recognize our privilege of not having to struggle with 6 and 7-figure salaries as pundits, press and various other hangers-on, dining around on the town, meeting important people and doing whatever other G-d-forsaken these unfortunates are called to do. Straight up racism, thanks for the bat-signal.

    I’m with you, Jeanne. I absolutely love being lectured on racism. I mean, it’s not like we get our fill from Lefty.

    Race baiting: the beat goes on.

    And where did I call, much less lecture, anyone on this thread about racism? Come on, folks. 

    • #63
  4. drlorentz Member
    drlorentz
    @drlorentz

    Drusus (View Comment):
    You are welcome at any point to respond to the substance of what I said instead of taking one word out of context and running with it. I’ll wait – but I won’t hold my breath. 

    Do hold your breath but don’t turn blue. But since you asked…

    Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address?

    That is a seemingly willful misinterpretation of the OP. It’s not as if every resident of the District and environs is like Mr Goldberg in the sense discussed here. As a former resident of that area myself I can vouch for the fact that it is most diverse, demographically speaking. Instead, my interpretation is that it’s the company Mr Goldberg keeps, not his street address, that matters. It’s not unreasonable to judge people by the company they keep to some extent.

    How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?”

    Much the same as I feel about your comment. 

    I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Too bad for you, and for him, that his constituents felt otherwise. It was my understanding that their collective opinions were more consequential than your individual opinion. He was turned out of office by the voters. That’s our system, objectionable though you may find it.

    You may cease waiting and resume breathing. 

    • #64
  5. Drusus Inactive
    Drusus
    @Drusus

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Drusus (View Comment):
    You are welcome at any point to respond to the substance of what I said instead of taking one word out of context and running with it. I’ll wait – but I won’t hold my breath.

    Do hold your breath but don’t turn blue. But since you asked…

    Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address?

    That is a seemingly willful misinterpretation of the OP. It’s not as if every resident of the District and environs is like Mr Goldberg in the sense discussed here. As a former resident of that area myself I can vouch for the fact that it is most diverse, demographically speaking. Instead, my interpretation is that it’s the company Mr Goldberg keeps, not his street address, that matters. It’s not unreasonable to judge people by the company they keep to some extent.

    How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?”

    Much the same as I feel about your comment.

    I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Too bad for you, and for him, that his constituents felt otherwise. It was my understanding that their collective opinions were more consequential than your individual opinion. He was turned out of office by the voters. That’s our system, objectionable though you may find it.

    You may cease waiting and resume breathing.

    It’s not a willful misinterpretation. Mr. Goldberg may live in blue, blue, blue DC, but his company is Buckleyite. I’ll take that over the company of the come-and-go sleaze that Trump has largely surrounded himself with, the Haley’s and Mattis’s notwithstanding.  

    And about Eric Cantor? Brat did nothing useful and lost to Spanberger. His formerly useful seat is held by a Democrat. How about them apples? 

    • #65
  6. Norm McDonald Inactive
    Norm McDonald
    @Pseudodionysius

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    My issue with Jonah has been the transformation from one of my go to Conservative pundits to someone I seldom listen to or read.

    If you make your livelihood in the business of attracting listeners/readers to hear/read your thoughts and ideas, and more and more of them find your thoughts and ideas not worth listening to, then you better come up with an alternate career plan …. fast.

    Irrelevance in the punditry business is a bitch.

    I’m surprised no one mentions the Dolphin laugh.

    • #66
  7. Norm McDonald Inactive
    Norm McDonald
    @Pseudodionysius

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Drusus (View Comment):
    . But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    It’s certainly a good place to start.

    Preach it, brother. Preach it.

    • #67
  8. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Norm McDonald (View Comment):

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    My issue with Jonah has been the transformation from one of my go to Conservative pundits to someone I seldom listen to or read.

    If you make your livelihood in the business of attracting listeners/readers to hear/read your thoughts and ideas, and more and more of them find your thoughts and ideas not worth listening to, then you better come up with an alternate career plan …. fast.

    Irrelevance in the punditry business is a bitch.

    I’m surprised no one mentions the Dolphin laugh.

    Works best with the lounge lizard version of the Flipper theme. With the implied dolphin sex…

    • #68
  9. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Kevin Creighton (View Comment):
    The GOP used to be a party of ideals, but with Trump, it is becoming a coalition party, expanding the electoral map into areas formerly protected by the Blue Wall.

    Are we talking ancient history here? When were Republicans not a coaliton? The famed three legged stool arose during the Cold War or earlier. The Cold War started at the end of WW2 and ended in 1990(?) which would be 45 years of being a coalition. Since then I think that coalition was largely intact but fraying recently.

    No, the social conservatives were largely quiescent until Rov v. Wade. It was Reagan who at least rhetorically embraced Christian conservatives (the third leg alongside economic and national security conservatives).

    • #69
  10. Boss Mongo Member
    Boss Mongo
    @BossMongo

    Drusus (View Comment):
    My further objections to him as scum come from the experience of a military family member who had dealings with him. Your mileage may vary. 

    @drusus, unacceptable.  You got a family member that declares Flynn human scum?  That needs facts, man.  5Ws.  As an ops guy, Flynn’s way of doing business was revolutionary (which, I think, is why he was set up and sunk by the IC).

    But I know for a fact that Flynn made considerable contributions to killing our enemies and protecting the force.

    So, if you’re going to call out Flynn as human scum, I’m calling out your family member.  What service, what job, what deployment, what personal experience with Flynn?

    You called an American hero scum; Support or retract your statement.

    • #70
  11. Drusus Inactive
    Drusus
    @Drusus

    Boss Mongo (View Comment):

    Drusus (View Comment):
    My further objections to him as scum come from the experience of a military family member who had dealings with him. Your mileage may vary.

    @drusus, unacceptable. You got a family member that declares Flynn human scum? That needs facts, man. 5Ws. As an ops guy, Flynn’s way of doing business was revolutionary (which, I think, is why he was set up and sunk by the IC).

    But I know for a fact that Flynn made considerable contributions to killing our enemies and protecting the force.

    So, if you’re going to call out Flynn as human scum, I’m calling out your family member. What service, what job, what deployment, what personal experience with Flynn?

    You called an American hero scum; Support or retract your statement.

    You are welcome to consider the additional facts laid out in the earlier part of my statement that you did not quote. The family anecdote is icing, not the cake. 

     

    • #71
  12. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Norm McDonald (View Comment):

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    My issue with Jonah has been the transformation from one of my go to Conservative pundits to someone I seldom listen to or read.

    If you make your livelihood in the business of attracting listeners/readers to hear/read your thoughts and ideas, and more and more of them find your thoughts and ideas not worth listening to, then you better come up with an alternate career plan …. fast.

    Irrelevance in the punditry business is a bitch.

    I’m surprised no one mentions the Dolphin laugh.

    The Flipper laugh was a delightful idiosyncrasy back when Jonah mattered.

    Since his onset of TDS  he sounds like an annoying 10 year old girl imitating a sea mammal.

    • #72
  13. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    Roderic: I have no doubt that he’s conservative . . .

    But what does conservative mean in the Swamp?

    I really don’t mean for this to be a rhetorical question. I’m curious. Because I’m told that the average “conservative” in the Acela corridor isn’t really all that concerned about the 2nd Amendment, abortion, religious liberty, immigration, jobs going overseas, or other issues that are of much more importance in hated flyover country. So when a swamp-dweller is labeled “conservative” I really need more information.

     

    Once upon a time conservatives were the deplorables, the worst of the Republican extremists. Barry Goldwater called himself a conservative, at a time when conservative was synonymous with outcast. By the end of the Reagan term, though, people found it desirable to attach the conservative label to themselves. G.H.W. Bush was an example. It was about that time that the term “conservative” was in trouble. 

    • #73
  14. Roderic Coolidge
    Roderic
    @rhfabian

    Bethany Mandel (View Comment):

    I guess you could call us Swamp Creatures; we moved to the DC area a year ago and lived in New Jersey working for conservative NYC-based media before this.

    I’m 90% in agreement with you on the phenomenon. One word in defense of their perspective is this: we are friendly with a lot of folks who work inside the administration who share a lot of horror stories about how mismanaged it is. A lot of my concern about Trump is based on those reports. I’m still voting for him because I’ll take mismanagement over a socialist-takeover of our federal government, though.

    There’s that “chaos in the White House” meme again.  For a place where chaos rules they sure do seem to get a lot done.  I wonder if any of those stories being passed around in DC are true.  

    • #74
  15. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Roderic (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel (View Comment):

    I guess you could call us Swamp Creatures; we moved to the DC area a year ago and lived in New Jersey working for conservative NYC-based media before this.

    I’m 90% in agreement with you on the phenomenon. One word in defense of their perspective is this: we are friendly with a lot of folks who work inside the administration who share a lot of horror stories about how mismanaged it is. A lot of my concern about Trump is based on those reports. I’m still voting for him because I’ll take mismanagement over a socialist-takeover of our federal government, though.

    There’s that “chaos in the White House” meme again. For a place where chaos rules they sure do seem to get a lot done. I wonder if any of those stories being passed around in DC are true.

    Add to that the concept that all this time there were holdovers and resisters within the Trump Administration intentionally attempting to create and cultivate the “choas in the White House” meme.

    • #75
  16. Roderic Coolidge
    Roderic
    @rhfabian

    Drusus (View Comment):

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    Like I said, I have no doubt that he’s conservative, and it’s not just about his address, but where people get their rice bowl filled and who their friends are has a lot to do with their opinions.

    • #76
  17. Norm McDonald Inactive
    Norm McDonald
    @Pseudodionysius

    Scaramucci

    Every time I hear this I think Christopher’s Sacaramanga in the Man with the Golden Gun and his infamous 3 nipples.

    • #77
  18. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Jonah doesn’t base his view on what the economy is doing today. And he doesn’t base it on getting golf invites from Trump. And that makes his voice valuable and independent and very unswampy. And many other conservatives hate him for that.

    Says the hater of Trump.  Jonah was interesting and his book was good but he has gone off the edge in his disdain for the man who is doing what conservatives promised for years and did NOT deliver.  John McCain ran for reelection in 2016 on a promise to “Build the Damn Wall” and repeal Obamacare.  How’d he do ?

    • #78
  19. derek Inactive
    derek
    @user_82953

    Have you ever heard a Chris Matthews rant, where he is almost foaming at the mouth? I heard Jonah do a rant like that once, on the edge of control. It was quite sad. I like Jonah, have listened to him and read him for a long time.

    There are lots of things going on here. The half century long project among Conservatives to maintain a government in waiting through think tanks and all the various employment opportunities outside of government in Washington didn’t deal with an outsider very well. Especially when the outsider had nothing but disdain for them. Except for a few, like the people who are coming up with judges.

    Trump directly campaigned against the Republican foreign policy establishment, using the same language as he would have used talking to a subcontractor who wasn’t performing. He made enemies and they have responded poorly.

    Trump also challenged the quasi libertarian economic consensus among this establishment. Free trade, open borders were the goal. 

    But even worse was the hard arithmetic that for every Jonah Goldberg there were 50,000 disgruntled and unhappy voters to be gained. Watch this election cycle; it is a battle between those who consider themselves important vs those who consider the working class voters important. Jonah was on the losing side of that fight last time.

    I’ve said many times that Obama made the person he was talking to feel like one of the two most intelligent people in the room. Trump forces people who think they know to argue the point with the guy who has been displaced by cheap labor overseas, or the military grunt who is grist for the unending war mill. There might be an argument to be made, but no one comes out of it feeling good about themselves.

    Finally, a specific complaint. I know people like Trump, I have worked for them. I suspect every single thing positive and negative that is said about Trump is true. But they are movers and shakers, they make things happen. Another thing I know is that the world of commercial development is the most chaotic and anarchic that you could imagine, where the ‘rule of law’ means that everyone goes broke; time costs vast amounts of money. So disputes are negotiated and enforced not by law but by bludgeon. If you can’t walk away from a project and let everyone else bleed you are in a weak position and you won’t survive. Everyone else at the table is in the same position. It is a tough world. During the nomination process, Goldberg went on and on that Trump wasn’t committed; he openly talked about walking away, giving up if it didn’t work out. That instinct of having an exit strategy is deep within his psyche, that is how you survive in the world he knows. Goldberg showed me he really didn’t know; I was less informed after reading him than before. Not good.

    • #79
  20. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    Jonah doesn’t base his view on what the economy is doing today. And he doesn’t base it on getting golf invites from Trump. And that makes his voice valuable and independent and very unswampy. And many other conservatives hate him for that.

    I wonder how many know that the president of the Stanford college Republicans is Susan Rice’s son ?

    • #80
  21. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel (View Comment):

    I guess you could call us Swamp Creatures; we moved to the DC area a year ago and lived in New Jersey working for conservative NYC-based media before this.

    I’m 90% in agreement with you on the phenomenon. One word in defense of their perspective is this: we are friendly with a lot of folks who work inside the administration who share a lot of horror stories about how mismanaged it is. A lot of my concern about Trump is based on those reports. I’m still voting for him because I’ll take mismanagement over a socialist-takeover of our federal government, though.

    I would guess that almost everyone with a job has, at some point, thought that their company was mismanaged. To the extent that this is even a question with an objective answer, some of those people were correct and others not. How do we know which is which?

    Mismanaged might have something to do with the fact that 95% of the federal government is still being run (being charitable) by the people who were mismanaging it before 2016.  It is a fact that Trump never had “Binders Full of Women,” or men for that matter.  Ross Perot would have faced the same problem if he had been elected in 1992.  The Deep State might have been less well organized since 8 years of Clinton and Obama were in the future.

    • #81
  22. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Drusus (View Comment):
    Michael Flynn resigned after 24 days for misleading the Trump administration about his relationship with Russia. However you feel about his treatment by the FBI, that much is not in doubt. My further objections to him as scum come from the experience of a military family member who had dealings with him. Your mileage may vary. 

    I will self -censor my reaction that statement.  Flynn was the first target of the Deep State (or Intel community if you prefer) because he knows how useless the CIA has been since the Church Committee, if not before.  Also you might be interested in the fact that the FBI agents initially reported on the 302s, which have vanished somehow, that he was not dishonest in his answers.  That was before Sally Yates got hold of them.

    • #82
  23. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    All true, but I choose to not get overly wrought up over his Never-Trumpism.  I still regard “Liberal Fascism” and “The Tyranny of Cliches” as must-reads for Conservatives.  

    • #83
  24. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    All true, but I choose to not get overly wrought up over his Never-Trumpism. I still regard “Liberal Fascism” and “The Tyranny of Cliches” as must-reads for Conservatives.

    Not so much a “must-read” but more like  “(sigh) if you must. But could I interest you in something by Thomas Sowell?”

    • #84
  25. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    Drusus (View Comment):

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    I agree that living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor, if the individual doing that living and moving has not been corrupted.

    If lobby-ism is seen as a perfectly normal and decent way to affect legislation, if assassinating the reputations of decent people by amping up some minor character flaw is approved even while ignoring the decent qualities of those people, if failing to understand that populism is the last need  of everyday people  who see the entire way of American life being flipped to the absurd notions that our society can absorb overnight 75 million out of one billion people from south of the border, then those involved in such beliefs and behaviors should not be surprised if their beliefs, activities and they themselves are suspect.

    • #85
  26. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    Racism, yes, that’s the ticket. Poor, pitiful cognizetti, forced to live and perform servile work as noble truth-tellers in downtrodden NYC and DC. And we have the nerve to criticize them! If they can’t stand the heat, how dare we say get out of the kitchen?

    We need to recognize our privilege of not having to struggle with 6 and 7-figure salaries as pundits, press and various other hangers-on, dining around on the town, meeting important people and doing whatever other G-d-forsaken these unfortunates are called to do. Straight up racism, thanks for the bat-signal.

    You seem to have missed the “reverse” part of what I said.

    Reverse racism is still racism. Hey, you’re the one that called it.

     

    I have quit using the word racism as the expression “hate-filled bigotry” can apply to both sides with much more of a sting than the now over used word “racism.”

    @drusus

     

    • #86
  27. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    CACrabtree (View Comment):

    All true, but I choose to not get overly wrought up over his Never-Trumpism. I still regard “Liberal Fascism” and “The Tyranny of Cliches” as must-reads for Conservatives.

    Not so much a “must-read” but more like “(sigh) if you must. But could I interest you in something by Thomas Sowell?”

    EXCELLENT!  “Intellectuals and Society”, “Dismantling America”, “The Vision of the Annointed” and a half dozen others occupy places of honor on my bookshelves.  I still miss his periodic “Random Thoughts” columns.

    • #87
  28. jeannebodine Member
    jeannebodine
    @jeannebodine

    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret (View Comment):

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    jeannebodine (View Comment):

    Drusus

    This entire post smacks of a bizarre sentiment akin to reverse racism. Your primary objection to Goldberg’s conservative bona fides is his address? How do you feel when people use language like “deplorables” or judge you according to your address as a “fly-over?” It’s a particularly hard pill for those of us who do not consider Washington insiders to be definitionally corrupt, especially when contrasted to the train of creatures — oh, I’m sorry — “the best people” that Trump has used and discarded. Scaramucci, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Stone, etc. etc. etc. Sorry, I’ll take an Eric Cantor any day of the week.

    Jonah has his silliness, and it is not hidden. Sometimes it intrudes and eclipses his serious intellectual attempts. But living and moving in DC circles cannot be a disqualifying factor in and of itself.

    Racism, yes, that’s the ticket. Poor, pitiful cognizetti, forced to live and perform servile work as noble truth-tellers in downtrodden NYC and DC. And we have the nerve to criticize them! If they can’t stand the heat, how dare we say get out of the kitchen?

    We need to recognize our privilege of not having to struggle with 6 and 7-figure salaries as pundits, press and various other hangers-on, dining around on the town, meeting important people and doing whatever other G-d-forsaken these unfortunates are called to do. Straight up racism, thanks for the bat-signal.

    You seem to have missed the “reverse” part of what I said.

    Reverse racism is still racism. Hey, you’re the one that called it.

     

    I have quit using the word racism as the expression “hate-filled bigotry” can apply to both sides with much more of a sting than the now over used word “racism.”

    @drusus

    Yes, they’ve moved on to white supremacist since racist is so ubiquitous as to be meaningless. In this instance, I guess racism, oh, I’m sorry, reverse-racism, had to do to in order to hurl a nonsensical insult. Location-of-residence supremacist or whatever just wouldn’t have had the same sting – not that the allegation of reverse racism was anything but ludicrous.

    • #88
  29. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    Drusus (View Comment):
    Michael Flynn resigned after 24 days for misleading the Trump administration about his relationship with Russia. However you feel about his treatment by the FBI, that much is not in doubt. My further objections to him as scum come from the experience of a military family member who had dealings with him. Your mileage may vary.

    I will self -censor my reaction that statement. Flynn was the first target of the Deep State (or Intel community if you prefer) because he knows how useless the CIA has been since the Church Committee, if not before. Also you might be interested in the fact that the FBI agents initially reported on the 302s, which have vanished somehow, that he was not dishonest in his answers. That was before Sally Yates got hold of them.

    You bring up perhaps the most salient point of all: the 302’s initially recorded somehow mysteriously vanished.

    And it was reported that Comey (IIRC) himself told FBI agents to lie or do whatever was needed to bring down teh Trump personnel they had in their gun sights.

    If it was not Comey, then  it was someone almost as powerful.

    Once that admission was noted, Flynn’s entire indictment should have been negated.

    • #89
  30. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Jonah doesn’t base his view on what the economy is doing today. And he doesn’t base it on getting golf invites from Trump. And that makes his voice valuable and independent and very unswampy. And many other conservatives hate him for that.

    Says the hater of Trump. Jonah was interesting and his book was good but he has gone off the edge in his disdain for the man who is doing what conservatives promised for years and did NOT deliver. John McCain ran for reelection in 2016 on a promise to “Build the Damn Wall” and repeal Obamacare. How’d he do ?

    And Obama himself, allied with Schwartzennegger who was Calif gov at the time, deported some 3/4 of a million people from Calif without the matter  making much of a wave, from the Big  Media point of view.

    How did Obama do that? Yet people who support Obama and consider him the greatest President of modern times do not even know of his purge of undocumented people, not only here in Calif but across the nation. (As many as 1.75 million people may have been ousted circa 2009 and 2010.)

    Anything Trump does to limit new people coming in is considered racist; but Obama deporting people has not taken his high ranking “compassion index” down even a notch.

     

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.