Democrat Incumbents’ Fund ‘Primarying’ Their Colleagues

 

This is an interesting case of Democrat infighting. Media star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a program to raise funds for challengers to her Democrat incumbent colleagues. Normally, the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee asks incumbents to contribute campaign funds for general campaigning on behalf of incumbents. Miss AOC is refusing to contribute those funds to the party and instead is helping fund campaigns by those candidates she deems more worthy. Interesting, very interesting.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 37 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    RushBabe49: Interesting, very interesting

    McCain isn’t the only one who frags his own.

    • #1
  2. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    I like what you to Alexandria Two-Names’ title!

    • #2
  3. Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… Coolidge
    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo…
    @GumbyMark

    Arahant (View Comment):

    RushBabe49: Interesting, very interesting

    McCain isn’t the only one who frags his own.

    The difference is with McCain it was always personal, he had no overriding philosophy.  For AOC it is strictly ideology.

    • #3
  4. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    You go poking around for this sort of thing and you are going to find a whole lot of similar contribution records that may be uncomfortably close to home. (Hint: It is no accident that there are always a workable number of squishy, swing-able votes in the Senate when they are “needed.”)

    • #4
  5. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Bold move. She clearly believes she’s the future of the party and that the establishment can’t touch her. Not voting with the Party on floor votes is bad but a newbie messing with campaign money and funding challenges to incumbents is anathema. Let the blood-letting begin!

    • #5
  6. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Didn’t the Tea Party do something like this?

    • #6
  7. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Didn’t the Tea Party do something like this?

    Yes, but the Tea Party was a separate movement pre-saging Trump, as opposed to a Freshman Congresscritter.

    • #7
  8. Aaron Miller Inactive
    Aaron Miller
    @AaronMiller

    I’m not sure this benefits Republicans. It means Democrats are likely to become more radical than they already are. And I wouldn’t bet that radical statism makes them any less popular in the main elections. 

    We are nearing a point where Democrats don’t need voters to like them or even to dislike Republicans more. With career-ending accusations like “homophobia”, organized harrassment via social media, and violent mobs like the Orwellian-named Antifa, being publicly identified as a Republican voter can have threatening consequences. Fear of not belonging to the reigning party can become an election strategy if left unchecked. 

    • #8
  9. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Miss AOC, the ex-bartender, may soon return to her career. 

    She is at 18% approval in her district last I heard.

    Her “chief of staff,” the one with the Che tee shirt has left already,

    • #9
  10. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    They are starting to eat their own . . .

    • #10
  11. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    This is a beautiful thing!  The more power Occasional-Cortex gathers, the more advantage Republicans will have. 

    • #11
  12. Sweezle Inactive
    Sweezle
    @Sweezle

    AOC is irrelevant to politics.  She’ll take her cute, perky, ignorant self to a media career at MSNBC soon enough.

    • #12
  13. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    Stad (View Comment):

    They are starting to eat their own . . .

    Taste the rainbow…

    • #13
  14. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    This is exactly what conservative members of Congress, both chambers, should be doing. No money for the self-serving Congressional parties to use to keep their current crew in leadership. Every dollar to actually advance the things voters sent that conservative to Congress to accomplish.

    • #14
  15. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Stad (View Comment):

    They are starting to eat their own . . .

    Not quite. This is real leftists getting serious about replacing the old grifters.

    • #15
  16. JennaStocker Member
    JennaStocker
    @JennaStocker

    Sounds like a hostile takeover. It will be interesting to see how the ongoing power struggle between the new generation – the Squad – and Nancy Pelosi plays out. But it could just be “new boss same as the old boss…”

    • #16
  17. Larry3435 Inactive
    Larry3435
    @Larry3435

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    And I wouldn’t bet that radical statism makes them any less popular in the main elections. 

    If it doesn’t, then we’re already doomed.

    • #17
  18. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    They are starting to eat their own . . .

    Not quite. This is real leftists getting serious about replacing the old grifters.

    You should add “. . . with new grifters.”

    • #18
  19. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    Larry3435 (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    And I wouldn’t bet that radical statism makes them any less popular in the main elections.

    If it doesn’t, then we’re already doomed.

    We’re in trouble, that’s for sure. Radical statism probably isn’t the thing that will continue to turn off young people – not to say they’re becoming Republican anytime soon, but I’d bet they won’t really show up to vote.

    If I’m right, it’s gonna be because some of these kids have had people try to sell them on the transgender fad, or teachers that wanted to inject gay history into, you know, history-history. One of the most noteworthy facts is that if you could show me a single entertaining liberal/progressive YouTube channel I can show 15 that make fun of the left. Then there’s South Park and Rick and Morty. Or to include current events, there was that nuke Ricky Gervais dropped on those tragically, yet hilariously, out-of-touch celebrities.

    • #19
  20. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    While I can’t imagine crediting her with good sense, it’s definitely wise from her apparent ideological perspective.  Good advisors, maybe.

    Meanwhile, I heartily approve of dissension in the ranks of my opponents.

    • #20
  21. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    I, too, would like to donate to the causes I choose, and not to ones I don’t. Welcome to the club, @AOC

    https://twitter.com/molratty/status/1216034249318551557

    • #21
  22. HerrForce1 Coolidge
    HerrForce1
    @HerrForce1

    Collin Anderson at the Free Beacon tweeted earlier,

    Ah, so there’s an organization that advocates for you and your co-workers, but you don’t agree with their political spending, so you don’t want to pay dues to that organization. Sound familiar?

    Apt point, likely lost on or ignored by AOC’s ideology. Reminds me of the heady days of 2011-12 when I no longer had to shovel cash into my Wisconsin teacher’s union coffers. 

    • #22
  23. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Comment):

    I, too, would like to donate to the causes I choose, and not to ones I don’t. Welcome to the club, @AOC

    https://twitter.com/molratty/status/1216034249318551557

    But, like, for seriously…. she really wants to! It’s something she’s super-passionate about.

    • #23
  24. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Comment):

    I, too, would like to donate to the causes I choose, and not to ones I don’t. Welcome to the club, @AOC

    https://twitter.com/molratty/status/1216034249318551557

    To All,

    I do not fundamentally disagree with sentiments like this but I wonder if that changes when a powerful member of Congress can command large (corporate) contributions in return for passage of preferred / preferential legislation and thusly amass a comparatively huge campaign war chest that allows him to reach out to distant states / districts to distort / pervert the balance of funding within the confines of that very localized election.

    Just askin’.

    • #24
  25. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Manny (View Comment):

    This is a beautiful thing! The more power Occasional-Cortex gathers, the more advantage Republicans will have.

    Advantage in the next election but the far left plays long term, that’s why they usually eventually win.  We have to focus on the post trump election.  

    • #25
  26. Samuel Block Support
    Samuel Block
    @SamuelBlock

    So, like I said. Here’s where we’re really winning. 

    • #26
  27. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Manny (View Comment):

    This is a beautiful thing! The more power Occasional-Cortex gathers, the more advantage Republicans will have.

    I’m not so sure that a communist having so much power and financing to dominate the House of Representatives is at all beautiful.  There are vastly different descriptors I would choose. 

    • #27
  28. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    philo (View Comment):

    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Comment):

    I, too, would like to donate to the causes I choose, and not to ones I don’t. Welcome to the club, @AOC

    https://twitter.com/molratty/status/1216034249318551557

    To All,

    I do not fundamentally disagree with sentiments like this but I wonder if that changes when a powerful member of Congress can command large (corporate) contributions in return for passage of preferred / preferential legislation and thusly amass a comparatively huge campaign war chest that allows him to reach out to distant states / districts to distort / pervert the balance of funding within the confines of that very localized election.

    Just askin’.

    The present campaign finance rules encourage this sort of thing, and actually has been around for quite awhile.  One reason Nancy Pelosi is where she is at, is her past (and present?) fund raising prowess, and of course her constituency is a wealthy one in San Francisco.

    • #28
  29. Al Sparks Coolidge
    Al Sparks
    @AlSparks

    I was mentioned before in one of the comments, but I thought I’d highlight the irony that there is some fundraising going on to primary AOC.

    • #29
  30. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Stad (View Comment):

    They are starting to eat their own . . .

    I know it’s not a proper conservative position, but I think it’s time for fork subsidies. 

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.