Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Mueller Hearings in One Sentence or Less [Updated]
Mueller mulling pages
“That’s outside my purview.” —Mueller’s apparent prepared answer to every Republican question pointing out his blatant bias, through selective investigation and selective citation.
Offer your own favorite one-liner, be it gem or cow patty, in the comments. Mueller really does not seem on top of his game.
Here is the Fox Business live stream:
Here is the C-SPAN link for Mueller before the House Judiciary Committee. This is a two ring circus, so C-SPAN will also carry the House Intelligence Committee Mueller show later in the day. C-SPAN not only avoids all the network spin, painted around the sides of the screen, it also quickly produces a transcript, which is usually very close to all the exact words.
[UPDATE]
Shortly after the performance ended, President Trump walked out and addressed the American people through the media:
He is still standing because he fights.
Here is an afternoon roll-up of one sentence summaries, taken from the comments:
Short takes:
“Dave’s not here, man.”
“There was no predicate”.
“James Comey said so.”
“I don’t recall.”
“Can you repeat the question?”
“I don’t want to speculate.”
“Can I have that citation?” (Right after hearing the citation.)
“I can’t answer that.”
“I’m not going to get into that.” (Of course not.)
Longer one sentence summaries:
I’m starting to get the sense that Mueller didn’t write or read his own report, and didn’t write or read his own letters.
Hate to say it, but he seems like a fumbling old man at times.
This might not be the original Mueller but his imperfect duplicate, “Bizarro Mueller.”
What’s clear here is that Robert Mueller was a figurehead.
If it weren’t for his enabling of the dragging of our country through this mess for 2+ years, and presiding over a report with enough ambiguity to allow the dragging to continue, I would feel sorry for him.
Mueller couldn’t orchestrate a witch hunt because Mueller couldn’t orchestrate an Easter egg hunt.
Published in Politics
Mueller certainly seemed to be bumbling at certain moments. I don’t have time to watch the whole thing in order to determine whether these were representative of his testimony, or unflattering out-takes.
About the “outside my purview” responses and other answers declining to comment, my impression is that most of these were perfectly proper. The AG’s office sent Mueller a letter (which Mueller apparently requested) about the limited scope of his testimony, in light of executive privilege, ongoing investigations, and court rules limiting a prosecutor’s ability to talk about the investigative and deliberative process. This all appears quite proper to me, and appears to be a summary of rules that would apply to any prosecutor in any case.
Maybe Comey wanted him because he knew he was senile and could be molded into a figurehead,
Since Comey was a central figure in the case, both volume 1 and 2, why would Comey’s actions, which would have brought in the Steele Dossier and Fusion GPS, not have been just as central to the Special Counsel’s work as President Trump? There must be a way to look into these facts that is not obstructed by some very useful prosecutorial and investigative policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd3JnBwc9JE
Barr had better hurry. 2020 is coming around soon enough.
Yes, if this is not wrapped up by election time and Trump loses, everything questionable about this entire episode will disappear like it never happened. Though, no doubt, we would at least have Andrew Weissman’s book boasting about how they pulled it off, which will be much praised in the media.
And after all this supposed “disaster” for the Democrats, they are still swearing up and down that there WAS, indeed, “obstruction”, and “this president” is going to be “held to account” for all his high crimes and misdemeanors. They will pursue this line of thinking for as long as President Trump remains in office, and more afterward. This is thoroughly disgusting behavior.
It’s getting more and more difficult. I try like heck to fight it since two of my closest friends are Dems. WE absolutely cannot discuss politics as they think I’m crazy for supporting the president.
I had to look up the meaning of purview…..I’m not sure what exactly what was in Mueller’s purview….
You may find in right next to bailiwick found in the Book of Words Grampa Used to Say.
If Ronald Reagan’s ghost could have showed up, I could just hear him making chopped liver of the Dems by using his succinct repartee “There you go again!”
Of course the Republicans have done the same to Hilary, except that she actually deserved that treatment.
Anything that could bring down Trump:
That YouTube is followed by at least an hour’s worth of interesting clips from that day. What is interesting is going back and listening to Gowdy vs Strzok , especially at the end where Strzok makes an empassioned and now debunked claim that the FBI did not interfere in the election. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NN1d6_h9skc
I would rather have the FBI, an actual permanent agency of government with a responsibility for counter-intelligence operations, explain how the DNC database intrusion investigation, if deemed election interference, was left to a private contractor. I hope AG Barr gets to the bottom of that apparent malfeasance.
Jim Jordan was an NCAA wrestling champ (note his bulked up right ear when he speaks; you don’t get that kind of cauliflower from eating fractal salads). He worked over Mueller like some cherry that’s never been on the mats before and is trying to fish out.
Question: All my news pipelines are from ostensibly conservative sources. Are there any “victory” mashup videos from the left over Mueller’s testimony that I just haven’t seen? Or are they all “move along citizen, nothing to see here?”