Tag: Robert Mueller

What if Mueller Was “Used” from the Start?


Yesterday was a sad day for Robert Mueller. Many have already focused on his inept and befuddled performance in front of the House Committees. After reflecting on the two meetings, I have an even more tragic and disgraceful theory of what we watched.

They used Mueller from the very beginning.

Let’s go back to when Mueller was first hired. I surmise that even then, Mueller was showing signs not only of age but of mental difficulties, albeit to a lesser degree. Although he was no longer in government, he associated with people who were, people who might have realized that he was no longer the brilliant, dedicated, and admirable man he once was. Wouldn’t he be the perfect person to “put in charge” of a group of operatives who were working to take down the president? Especially if the position of Special Counsel were presented to him as a worthy way to save the country from a crazy and incompetent president?

A Question for Historians: Robert Mueller’s Incapacity


To say that Robert S. Mueller III did not distinguish himself in his Congressional testimony Wednesday would be an understatement. His answers were halting, when not evasive, and he repeatedly had to ask that a question be repeated. Long before his appearance before the Judiciary and Intelligence committees, there had been rumors that he was senile.

His testimony today suggests two possibilities: that he really is senile, or that he is pretending to be so in order to avoid having to explain his conduct as Special Prosecutor. If the latter is true, it had to do with his reluctance to discuss his decision to hire a host of hyper-partisan Democrats, such as Andrew Weissman, to do the footwork on the case and with his failure to investigate the origins of the Fusion GPS report and to consider the possibility that the Russians made clever use of the Clinton campaign.

I am, however, inclined to suppose that the former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is senile and that he was already suffering from dementia when he was named Special Prosecutor. This would explain a great deal. If, in effect, the hyper-partisan Andrew Weissman was in charge, it would explain why, though by then they knew that he was innocent, the Special Prosecutor and his team did not exonerate Donald Trump of collusion with the Russians prior to the 2018 midterms. It would also explain the absence of any curiosity concerning Christopher Steele and the Fusion GPS report. And, of course, it would explain all the malarkey about obstruction of justice.

Mueller Testimony Not Going Well; Democrats, Media, NeverTrumpers Hardest Hit


I’m watching the Mueller testimony this morning (live feed embedded below). I do not think it’s going well for the Democrats, the Media, and NeverTrumpers. Here are some highlights (lowlights?) so far:

  1. Mueller’s answers are halting and doddering. He appears confused at many times and not familiar with many aspects of the report. For instance, Mueller stated that he was not familiar with Fusion GPS and couldn’t recall whether he had met with Rod Rosenstein in May of 2017.
  2. Rep. Ratcliffe forced Mueller to admit that the “not exonerated” standard does not exist, is not authorized by any DOJ policy, and has never been applied to anyone other than Trump. Mueller’s defense in this regard was that Trump is “unique.” I.E. Orange Man Bad.
  3. Rep Gohmert asked Mueller who wrote the statement that Mueller read in his infamous press conference at the end of May. Mueller replied he wasn’t going to get into that. Gohmert replied, “that’s what I thought. You didn’t write it.” Mueller made no reply (I.E., he did not dispute that he did not write his own statement.) Gohmert then cited numerous news articles that have identified Mueller and James Comey as friends and asked Mueller if he and Comey are friends. Mueller replied that they were work colleagues who started at the DOJ at the same time. Gohmert replied to the effect, “That’s not my question. Were you friends? You can work together and not be friends. You were friends.” To which Mueller admitted, “We were friends.”
  4. The Democrats keep on breathlessly discussing the report’s claims  about the ways that Trump supposedly obstructed justice, such as that he called White House Counsel Don McGahn on a weekend to discuss Mueller. The fact that Trump called McGahn at home on a Saturday is apparently quite important. In addition, several Democrats have cited the Report’s finding that Trump tweeted his displeasure about the investigation.


Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America discuss Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s public statement that is only going to inflame the political tensions in Washington. President Trump and Don Jr. are both throwing cold water on another possible Roy Moore run for U.S. Senate.   And Jim and Greg examine the Democratic Party’s tightening of the rules for presidential candidates to qualify for the primary debates.

Robert Mueller Begs Congress to Impeach President Trump


Today Special Counsel Robert Mueller gave a statement in which he begged Congress to impeach President Trump: “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse the president of wrong doing.” Please impeach, in other words.

I think Mueller is a disgrace. Take for example his insistence that Trump is guilty until proven innocent rather than innocent until proven guilty. “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” he said during his statement, repeating a line from the written Mueller Report. This is a direct assault on the entire American idea of justice, which is that the accused do not have to prove their innocence. Rather the government must prove their guilt. Mueller did not spend some $30 million trying to prove Trump “clearly did not commit a crime.” His mandate was to prove Trump’s guilt.

Member Post


What a mess. The Democrats are still desperate to impeach Donald Trump, and it appears they will do just about anything to do that—even destroy their own party. First, they are demanding that Mueller meet with them, although they state that the May 15 hearing date is only tentative. I expect they are trying to […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

Barr Trumps Mueller


The recent release of the Mueller Report has brought with it neither peace nor finality. Rather, it marks the end of only the latest skirmish in the ongoing war between an embattled president and his determined Democratic foes. To be sure, the charges of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians have been safely put to bed.

But the battle over whether the President engaged in obstruction of justice in the aftermath of his electoral victory has flared anew, in large measure because Mueller issued a Scotch verdict of not-proven when he wrote: “Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” That passage offers an open invitation to Congress to continue an investigation of whether the president obstructed justice. Progressive Democrats are now pressuring Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to begin impeachment proceedings against the president on just that charge.

Yet, is the obstruction charge merited? Not in my view. Mueller’s Report is far less persuasive than the much-criticized unsolicited memorandum on the same topic that William Barr submitted to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on June 8, 2018, prior to Barr becoming Attorney General of the United States. That memorandum lay behind Barr’s widely challenged decision not to pursue obstruction of justice charges against the President.

John Dowd was President Trump’s lawyer during a critical time in the Mueller probe. Boy, was there a lot going on behind the scenes. A peek inside the epic battle of the presidency with the president’s attorney.

Mueller Did the Right Thing


It seems that “13 hardened Democrats” or “angry Democrats” did not deliver a politically-motivated, illegitimate hit job after all. Based on what we know so far, the special counsel’s office reported that it did not find evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. This is a fabulous vindication of the integrity of the system.

No one is noticing that. Instead, the Trump team is gorging on schadenfreude, and the anti-Trump team is choking on bile.

It’s fair to say that those who spent hour upon cable TV hour lovingly anticipating that President Trump would be frog-marched from the White House in handcuffs after the delivery of this report have egg on their faces. It isn’t clear which hurts more, the disappointment about being wrong or the worry about drooping ratings.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America are glad to see the Mueller report conclude that neither Donald Trump not anyone else in his campaign conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 elections. They also get a kick out of Trump critics frantically moving the goalposts to claim the new attorney general is doing Trump’s bidding or that the real action is in Congress or with the federal prosecutors in New York. And they shake their heads at the overall performance of the mainstream media in covering this story since the last presidential campaign.

Breaking: AG Barr Delivers Mueller Summary Report to Congress


Attorney General William Barr sent his summary of the Mueller Investigation to Congress Sunday. You can read a PDF of the document here. The letter recounts the full Mueller report, dividing it into two parts: possible Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, and obstruction of justice. Regarding the first, Barr writes:

The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

Concerning the second issue, obstruction, Barr writes:

Robert Mueller Delivers Report to Attorney General


According to news reports, Robert Mueller has delivered a report to Attorney General Bill Barr. Fox News:

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has submitted to Attorney General Bill Barr his long-awaited report on the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential race and possible collusion with Trump associates — marking the end of the politically explosive probe and the beginning of a new battle over its contents and implications. Mueller is “not recommending any further indictments,” a senior DOJ official told Fox News.

Jim Geraghty of National Review and Greg Corombos of Radio America welcome the news that the Mueller probe will likely end soon with no further indictments.  They wonder why President Trump is so insistent upon inviting New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft to the White House with his team and whether he would be smarter to keep a distance after Kraft’s arrest for solicitation.  And they have fun with a recent column wondering why so many of the Democrats running for president seem really weird.

Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Known Russian, Charged With Obstruction (Not Collusion™)


In a developing news story, Fox News reported that Natalia Veselnitskaya, who is (gasp!) Russian, has been charged in absentia this morning in federal court in the Southern District of New York with obstruction of justice “in connection to a civil money laundering and forfeiture case involving a Russian tax refund fraud scheme, first uncovered by the late Sergei Magnitsky.”

I have no idea what that means but it’s clear it has nothing to do with Donald Trump. This is despite the fact that the only reason this is a news item anyone will pay attention to is that Veselnitskaya was one of several people connected to the Democrat opposition research firm Fusion GPS that met with Donald Trump, Jr; Paul Manafort; and Jared Kushner in Trump Tower, June 2016. This was the meeting that, when it was first reported on by the very fake news, we were promised proved collusion™, except that it didn’t.

In fact, Veselnitskaya was in the country to lobby against the Magnitsky Act, named after the aforementioned Sergei Magnitsky. Who was she working with in her anti-Magnitsky Act endeavors? Fusion GPS, the same firm that produced the phony Steele Dossier, which was compiled by former British spook Christopher Steele using information fed to him by Russian intelligence officers.

Member Post


As Sarah walked from the diner’s serving room to the kitchen, she knew two things: her blood pressure had already begun to rise, and that it was only a matter of time before her latest customer began screaming like a psychopath. Sadly, it was a routine that they had all become used to. She really […]

Join Ricochet!

This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

One Person can (In)validate the Steele Dossier and No One Seems to Bother


Christopher Steele.

Christopher Steele deliberately constructed his Trump dossier to be unverifiable. As long as it remains invalidated, it hangs over the Trump administration, even though the Clinton campaign was identified as its funder and Steele refused to vouch for it under oath. Apparently he did not express such doubts when he was peddling the dossier to a skeptical press.