Things That Matter

 

I took this photo a week ago, as I was walking through the Catia barrio in central Caracas. The man sitting in the trash had put thin rolls of paper up his nose as not to smell the rotten food that he was eating, and those around him are so used to this image that they simply walk on by.

The photo was taken on an iPhone, and not only because it’s far too dangerous to be revealed as a journalist in a neighborhood like Catia, completely run by Colectivos, but also because I had been held at gunpoint and robbed by that very same paramilitary group just a few days prior. I had lost everything but my life and now, using a phone I had been given by a friendly twitter-follower, I was snapping pictures and trying to continue my reporting in a makeshift guerrilla-style way.

As some of you know, I was born and raised in Sweden and was blessed by having some long and loving summers in Texas that shaped me into this strange amalgam of a person; a Jewish woman with middle eastern eyebrows, a Swedish passport and an all-American heart. Perhaps it’s because nothing about me makes sense that I have spent most of my adult life making sense of things – searching for clues about the world and its inhabitant – or maybe I just have wanderlust caused by an upbringing in the Northern woodlands, far from all the places I know call my home.

Two things have influenced me more than all other. One is (as I described here on Ricochet in a previous post) my time in Texas as a young child and another my first visit to Poland in 1993, when I as a precocious 11-year-old was allowed to accompany my father on a work trip. My father didin’t exactly suffer from helicopter parenting so while he was in meetings I walked around Gdansk on my own, talking to strangers and taking pictures with my ancient instamax. I won’t spend this entire post detailing what I saw but I will say that the meeting between a recently liberated East, reaching for the West, moved me deeply. I never got to see the depths of despair under Communism but I got a whiff of it there, seeing a country seemingly rebuilding after an extended war, and even though I was far too young to understand what I had seen or to analyze what I experienced it stuck with me to the point where I can still conjure up those images – of empty shelves next to neon Levis signs – and revisit the visceral feeling of being a visitor from the future carrying a message from a faraway world.

When my father and I had dinner that night I told him about my day and he relayed his experiences from having worked in Eastern Europe in the 80’s, having friends and colleagues be arrested and spied upon and fighting for every inch of freedom under an iron Communist rule. To me, it sounded like the dark part of a fairy tale – when the witch puts a spell on the Kingdom and makes everything turn gray – but later in life I would learn about the realities of what he had told me, and (as Ricochet readers may know) take many turns on my road to fully understand it.

Sweden has long been known as a socialist paradise (a faulty rep as it’s actually a mixed economy/liberal welfare state with high taxes and a socialist veneer) and as such its political and intellectual elite have turned Chavez’ Venezuela to a cause celebre and an example of ideology done right. Sweden isn’t alone in this. Much of the Western world has, after Cuba became too distasteful for even the most hardened ideologists, hailed Venezuela as the last outpost, a plucky rebel state in a capitalist world. Despite ample proof of the Venezuelan people’s suffering, progressive Westerners insisted that the vision of Chavez was sound and upon his death, nearly 6 years ago to the day, there were plenty of tear-filled eulogies over a man who sent his own people into the deepest depths of despair.

So a few weeks ago, when I saw what I thought were signs of real change in this totalitarian state, I decided I had to go and see it for myself and report in whatever way I could from the last outpost of Socialism. I was supposed to stay in Venezuela for six days, and now I am coming up on five weeks, and everything I know has changed in the interim. I knew how bad it was here, but I didn’t know, I had a sense of human suffering but I had no idea what it actually looked like.

In the past five weeks I have seen children dying in the street from starvation and curable diseases, a society lacking even the most basic necessities and a people who has lost all hope. I have been targeted, hunted and harmed for being a journalist, hid under the pulpet as armed Chavistas broke down the door to the National Assembly and seen people line up for over 48 hours to be given a government-issued car battery. I have seen this failed state up close and with every passing day I have more questions and more reasons to stay, because and despite it all.

I have been blessed to be on the excellent Ricochet Podcast a few times since starting my reports from and on Venezuela and in the last one we discussed a possible American intervention, something that my Twitter DMs tell me stirred up a lot of emotions, and before I throw myself into more Venezuelan adventure I thought I would address the issue here, on the best feed I know.

To understand why I am in favor of limited American intervention in Venezuela, one has to consider my background, which is why I bored you with this lengthy prelude. In my mind, America has always been a savior, despite being raised in a country that sat on its high horse an hissed about imperialism and “world policing”. America put things right, using its considerable toolbox to oust despots and set people free and not unlike the superheroes of my childhood, always shows up just in the nick of time.

I get that it’s a hard sell. Venezuela has, long before Chavez, favored strong-arm leadership and nurtured an almost messianic cult of personality in its political life and the same people who elected Chavez as a savior 21 years ago are now looking to be saved by the US and bailed out by a foreign entity. After Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan (to name a few recent examples) my argument for saving America from a Hezbollah stronghold on its border may not win many hearts and minds and, furthermore, a possible (probable) extended war between US troops and Cuban, Venezuelan, Lebanese, Iranian and Colombian paramilitary entities may result in a non-negliable cost of American life and treasure. I get it. To most, and ask like that would simply sounds like chutzpah.

And still, here I am, trying to figure the world out and asking myself and you if maybe, it could be done?

I may be naive, I will grant you all that; Thinking that a limited intervention can be the beginning of a profitable alliance in a highly strategic place, and that this could be a new version of PLAN Columbia that includes a few drones, a Petroleum pact and a long overdue slap in Iran’s face. I may also be emotional, or schmaltzy, as we say, in the face of all this suffering and the people coming up to me, begging for me to get the words and images out there so that the world will finally care about this despot’s slow murder of his own people.

I don’t know how or if this crisis will end or how long I will stay in Venezuela, but I know that every journalist at some point in their career has a feeling that there’s something they need to see through. A week ago I was face down on the ground with a gun to the back of my head, the weight of the Maduro government over me and the legacy of Chavez all around. Two days after that, i sat down with one of the senior leaders of the colectivos, the very paramilitary group that held and robbed me, sharing a plastic cup of coffee and discussing strategies for a possible civil war. This country makes no sense, and so I try to make sense of it. This crisis is underreported, and so I came. This is what I think journalism is and should be – going to the heart of the story and reporting what you see. It isn’t fancy and most often, it doesn’t make you famous. But these are things that matter, and the only way to find some sense.

Apart from my cameras and equipment, I packed very few things for this trip, but I did bring three items for my own enjoyment. Cigars (obviously), a copy of Krauthammer’s “Things that matter” and an old iPod filled with podcasts for those bumpy Caracas flights. I have now spent considerable hours listening to Rob, James and Peter, going back to the very beginning, and few things are as comforting as listening to them duke it out over elections long passed and stepping on segways like a Norwegian entering a Sauna (it’s funny if you know Norwegians). All three things are now in the hands of a colectivo gang in San Antonio Del Tachira and as upsetting as it was to lose everything I have worked so hard for I can’t help but giggle at the thought of a Maduro henchman lighting up a Cuban to the sound of Conservative banter while cracking the spine of Krauthammer’s book.

And to those of you in the comments who said that no matter how much I’m getting paid for this, it’s not worth it, I must disappoint – twice! Not only am I freelancing (and thereby being paid in pennies and booze) but given my recent run-in with the “law” I may end up paying to be here, in more ways than one. It’s not about the money (sorry, Rob, I know this hurts your soul!), I’m afraid. I need to understand this, and make sense of it all before I go and bring a little bit of truth out there among all the disinformation, to help a people I quite honestly have come to love.

We may disagree on a lot, the Venezuelans and I, but we share one common goal and central passion; the yearning for freedom and the fight against accepted truths. It may not be much, but to me, these are the things that matter.

Sincerely,

your (lovable?) fool in Caracas

Published in Foreign Policy, General, Journalism
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 56 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Technically, I didn’t say what you are doing isn’t worthwhile, just that the recompensation is nowhere near enough. And it’s not.

    Be safe.

    • #31
  2. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    My heart bleeds for Venezuela, and worries about you, Annika.  But I can’t agree to your plea for intervention.  Venezuela is not and has not been an American ally.  While saving them may be worth spilling blood, I don’t think it should be American blood.  The Venezuelan people chose Chavez, quite deliberately, knowing that it meant stealing from the rich to give to the poor.  Only after socialism broke the economy did public opinion in Venezuela begin to turn against Chavez.  The consequences, in justice, really and truly belong to them.  They need to spend their own lives to correct their error and earn their freedom.  Our intervening, however admirable it may sound, will simply give rhetorical fuel to the anti-American, anti-Capitalist demagogues, and the socialist scourge will be back in power in a generation or less.

    I’d be perfectly fine sending weapons for them to use.  Even free of charge.  But they need their own anti-socialist revolutionary heroes to put in their history books.  And their suffering children need to see their parents fight for freedom.  Heartless it may be, but nothing less will suffice.

    • #32
  3. Theodoric of Freiberg Inactive
    Theodoric of Freiberg
    @TheodoricofFreiberg

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):
    I’d be perfectly fine sending weapons for them to use. Even free of charge. But they need their own anti-socialist revolutionary heroes to put in their history books. And their suffering children need to see their parents fight for freedom. Heartless it may be, but nothing less will suffice.

    I think you’re correct in your assessment. The native population must have the most skin in the game. When we’ve attempted to impose The American Way on other nations, with the native population mostly standing around and watching or even resisting, it hasn’t turned out well. The only notable exceptions are Germany and Japan. But that took brutally bombing them back to the Stone Age.  South Korea is the only other notable exception, but North Korea is a constant reminder that it was only a partial victory. Ever since our victory in WWII, we’ve suffered under the delusion that we can turn every country into a flourishing democracy. We can’t.

    • #33
  4. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Theodoric of Freiberg: Ever since our victory in WWII, we’ve suffered under the delusion that we can turn every country into a flourishing democracy. We can’t.

    First you have to reduce them to rubble…

    • #34
  5. Doug Watt Member
    Doug Watt
    @DougWatt

    The US could strike from a distance. Some well placed cruise missiles directed against Cuban barracks in Venezuela, and military airfields wouldn’t be a bad thing. A warning from the Trump administration that all oil tankers, regardless of the flag they fly will be turned away by the US Navy, and sunk if necessary. Declare a no fly zone over Venezuela. Don’t need to put boots on the ground. We have a canal to protect, don’t need no Russians, Cubans, and Iranians in our backyard.

    • #35
  6. Arizona Patriot Member
    Arizona Patriot
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Retail Lawyer (View Comment):

    Your courage is admirable and I have enjoyed all of your reporting that I could find.

    I hope the American military steers clear of any involvement in Venezuela for the following reasons: The US seems to be tasked with rebuilding society after each military engagement. This is expensive and hopeless. We have ridiculous rules of engagement making victory slow, expensive, and unlikely. Look at the relatively minor issue of what becomes of captured ISIS fighters in the mideast. In any sane world, they would be promptly killed for fighting out of uniform . (Geneva Convention, unfair advantage, danger to civilians, etc.). Watch how this plays out. America will foot the bill for their humanitarian treatment until they die of old age. We are literally too civilized and humanitarian to conduct military operations that are not existential, sort of like Europe. Except we can still muster an army so we are asked to do the fighting.

    Half of our country is trying its best to stuff impoverished Third Worlders into America, without any limiting principle, and make them wards of the state. This will bankrupt us, and is already insanely expensive even if the left is unsuccessful in its goals. We cannot afford humanitarian interventions while most of my state, California, is currently a humanitarian disaster and unable to educate its children.

    Finally, there is the fact that the citizenry of Venezuela brought this on themselves. Being stupid and ignorant has consequences. Like Instapundit says, “you can vote in socialism but you have to shoot your way out”. I would support NGOs smuggling rifles into Venezuela, but they can shoot their own way out.

    Am I being too heartless here?

    I don’t think you’re being too heartless.

    I don’t think that smuggling in weapons is a good idea, because I don’t really get the impression that any side contains “good guys.”  It looks like one batch of Leftist/Socialist kleptocrats fighting another.

    It’s not just that the Venezuelans brought this upon themselves by choosing Chavez and then Maduro.  I don’t get the impression that the opposition is much better.  If they had a Reagan or a Thatcher, or even a Kemp or a Cruz, with significant public support, I’d have more sympathy.  They must have people of this ideological persuasion, but it appears that they have virtually no electoral support.

    So sorry, Venezuelans.  You get to sleep in the bed you made.  Next time, think about making your bed somewhere other than a locked cage without any food.

    • #36
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):
    Your reporting from Venezuela has been Pulitzer Prize worthy.

    Yes, it has.  However, it explodes the myth of how socialism is great for people, so I doubt she’ll ever get it.

    But someone should nominate her . . .

    • #37
  8. Arizona Patriot Member
    Arizona Patriot
    @ArizonaPatriot

    Annika:

    I have some serious questions about the political situation.  I think that your reporting has been focused more on the humanitarian issues.  I have no way to know whether you’ll have either the inclination, or the opportunity, to respond.

    (1) What is the nature of the Guaido coalition? 

    My impression is that it is a loose and fractious coalition of Left and Center-Left parties in Venezuela.  There appear to be a couple of tiny parties of the Right in the coalition, but I don’t even know whether “Right-wing” in Venezuela correlates in any way to conservative or Republican in the US.

    So it looks to me like we have one dreadful, socialist, Left-wing coalition headed by Maduro and another perhaps-a-little-less dreadful, perhaps-not-quite-so Socialist, Left-wing coalition headed by Guaido.  These two coalitions seem to split the support of the overwhelming majority of the population.  Something like Stalinists vs. Trotskyites, though perhaps not quite so extreme as these two.

    Frankly, I don’t see much of a practical difference between these choices.

    I’m certainly not inclined to spend American blood and treasure to put someone with an ideology somewhere between Bernie and AOC in charge in Venezuela.  This hits very close to home for me.  My oldest son is a Marine reservist who reported for a lengthy active duty assignment earlier this week.

    (2) Are there any “good guys”?

    By this, I don’t mean generally decent, ordinary folks who just happen to vote for some Left-wing demagogue or other.  I mean a serious leader, with meaningful political support, who generally favors something that I would recognize as decent government.  By this, I mean traditional Christian values on social issues; free enterprise on economic issues; and a generally pro-American foreign policy.

    I don’t see anyone like this in Venezuela, but I don’t know much about their politics.  Is there some hope?  A Reagan, or a Thatcher, a Vaclav Havel?  Anyone?

    (3) How could we install a “good guy”?

    Even if there is a “good guy” available as I define it above, I don’t see any plausible path to installing and maintaining him in power.

    The people of Venezuela do not appear to share these values.  They want something very different.  This implies that, if we could somehow find a Venezuelan leader to my liking, he would be perceived — correctly, in large part — as the puppet of conservative Americans.

    He would have two choices: (a) rule by force, without elections for a pretty long period of time, or (b) defy America after we place him in power in order to establish public popularity.  In other words, another Batista or another de Gaulle.  I didn’t like the originals of either of these movies, and I have no desire to watch a remake.

    Sorry to be pessimistic.  I’d really like to be wrong about this.

    • #38
  9. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Rodin (View Comment):

    We used to believe in “fighting wars there, so we aren’t fighting a war here“. But now that the disease of Islamism-Marxism-Nihilism are holding seats in our Congress and aided by a majority in the House, we are fighting a war here. And this does not feel like winning. I cannot imagine doing anything other than fighting a proxy war if any assault that puts Guiado in the capitol quickly devolves into a guerrilla war.

    And the cognitive dissonance of fighting in Venezuela for a new nation while not addressing the invasion of our own country is like being hooked up to a small transfusion tube while bleeding out of an open main artery.

    How the [redacted] have we gotten here? I like Victor Davis Hanson’s optimistic paean to American resilience, but how we survive all this is beyond me.

    Be safe, Annika, our prayers are with you.

    We don’t have to fight a war there.  The Colombian’s and Peruvians with some help from Brazil will have to move forward, with the US. demonstrating air support.  The Venezuelan military are just crooks, the senior officers will  immediately go to Cuba or any country that will have them and let them take their foreign holdings,  the junior officers will join the invading forces.  In contrast, the Colombian military are real, but the Venezuelan military need to see US air support to collapse quickly.   There is no rush however.  It has to cook a while, as there is always some chance that the regime will collapse and if not folks everywhere else have to see that as a fact. 

    • #39
  10. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    It’s Friday 7:30 AM Central and Drudge is reporting that Venezuela has been plunged into darkness – no power – and only one week of food? How is Annika charging the phone? It may be time to get out (if you can) and return after power is restored – this is very very scary and you want to be able to come back whole and healthy.

    • #40
  11. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    As I first read through the early paragraphs of this yesterday a few old references came to mind that I wanted to offer up but by the time I got to the end they just didn’t seem fit as well into the true meat of your story.  Well, since I have the day off and we seem to have passed the initial (and most important) wave of member commentary, I figured I might as well drop a few in for related interests and perspective.

    The first couple came to mind during your first paragraph in discussing the picture and related experience.  Such observations passed to the rest of the civilized world are so important…and, unfortunately, nothing new.   Here, from five score and seventeen years ago in The People of the Abyss, is Jack London in London:

    Both kept their eyes on the pavement as they walked and talked, and every now an then one or the other would stoop and pick something up, never missing a stride the while. I thought it was cigar and cigarette stumps they were collecting, and for some time took no notice. Then I did notice.

    From the slimy, spittle-drenched sidewalk, they were picking up bits of orange peel, apple skin, and grape stems, and, they were eating them. The pits of greengage plums they cracked between their teeth for the kernels inside. They picked up stray bits of bread the size of peas, apple cores so black and dirty one would not take them to be apple cores, and these things these two men took into their mouths, and chewed them, and swallowed them; and this, between six and seven o’clock in the evening of August 20, year of our Lord 1902, in the heart of the greatest, wealthiest, and most powerful empire the world has ever seen. Page 42

    At eight o’clock we went down into a cellar under the infirmary, where tea was brought to us, and the hospital scraps. These were heaped high on a huge platter in an indescribable mess – pieces of bread, chunks of grease and fat pork, the burnt skin from outside of roasted joints, bones, in short, all the leavings from the fingers and mouths of the sick ones suffering from all manner of diseases. Into this mess the men plunged their hands, digging, pawing, turning over, examining, rejecting, and scrambling for. It wasn’t pretty. Pigs couldn’t have done worse. But the poor devils were hungry, and they ate ravenously of the swill, and when they could eat no more they bundled what was left into their handkerchiefs and thrust it inside their shirts. – Pages 59-60

    [cont’d…]

    • #41
  12. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    […cont’d]

    Lastly, with respect to your reference to the empty store shelves, there is this from the Victor Serge novel (is it fiction?) The Case of Comrade Tulayev:

    … The shelves in the shops were full of boxes, but, to avoid any misunderstanding, the clerks had put labels on them: Empty Boxes. Nevertheless, graphs showed the rising curves of weekly sales. … – Page 10

    It seems the hardest lessons must be learned over and over again. I’m just glad there are people willing to go witness the worst of it an bring the truth back to the rest of us.

    • #42
  13. Aaron Miller Inactive
    Aaron Miller
    @AaronMiller

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    The Venezuelan people chose Chavez, quite deliberately, knowing that it meant stealing from the rich to give to the poor. Only after socialism broke the economy did public opinion in Venezuela begin to turn against Chavez.

    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    But there is a valid concern that whoever could replace Chavez would echo his mistakes. Annika’s plea might benefit from introducing people in the US to Venezuela’s alternative leaders. Or can a people even focus on policies for freedom before restoring basic infrastructure and limiting violence?

    • #43
  14. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    If we vote socialism in, everyone, whether they voted for it or not, and even those that did not vote, deserves the consequences of socialism. That is the outcome of belonging to a representative government. You earn the consequences of every election, whether it went the way you wanted it to go or not. That is the deal.

    The consequence may involve rebelling against a tyrannical government – which is the inevitable outcome of socialism unless it is voted out again – but we should not do that until our enumerated rights are violated by that government. The first violation will likely be the suspension of our right to bear arms and self-defense, at which point we push back hard. But becoming “the Resistance” before the government suspends rights is a step on the path to tyranny itself.

     

    • #44
  15. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    If we vote socialism in, everyone, whether they voted for it or not, and even those that did not vote, deserves the consequences of socialism. That is the outcome of belonging to a representative government. You earn the consequences of every election, whether it went the way you wanted it to go or not. That is the deal.

    That strikes me as an impoverished use of the word “deserves,” one that robs it of the normal meaning we associate with it.

    • #45
  16. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    If we vote socialism in, everyone, whether they voted for it or not, and even those that did not vote, deserves the consequences of socialism. That is the outcome of belonging to a representative government. You earn the consequences of every election, whether it went the way you wanted it to go or not. That is the deal.

    That strikes me as an impoverished use of the word “deserves,” one that robs it of the normal meaning we associate with it.

    Nevertheless, in a participative electoral system, the pledge to uphold the results of an election – whether we agree with it or not – is part of the deal. If our fellow citizens choose poorly, at least part of the fault is ours because we did not convince them of the folly of their choice. So, yes, deserves it the right word.

    • #46
  17. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    If we vote socialism in, everyone, whether they voted for it or not, and even those that did not vote, deserves the consequences of socialism. That is the outcome of belonging to a representative government. You earn the consequences of every election, whether it went the way you wanted it to go or not. That is the deal.

    That strikes me as an impoverished use of the word “deserves,” one that robs it of the normal meaning we associate with it.

    Nevertheless, in a participative electoral system, the pledge to uphold the results of an election – whether we agree with it or not – is part of the deal. If our fellow citizens choose poorly, at least part of the fault is ours because we did not convince them of the folly of their choice. So, yes, deserves it the right word.

    Snort.

    Nonsense. Deserves is completely the wrong word. “Deserve” means to merit, to receive as a natural consequence of choices made. If someone works to his utmost ability to convince his fellow citizens that socialism is insane and will destroy us all, and is nonetheless unsuccessful in persuading them, it is nonsense to suggest that his choices lead naturally to the consequence, or that his actions earned that outcome.

     

    • #47
  18. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Seawriter (View Comment):…the pledge to uphold the results of an election – whether we agree with it or not – is part of the deal

    Yea, but deals are made to be broken.  Just ask any Democrat or Progressive Methodist.  But, I digress.

    • #48
  19. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):
    One could say Americans “chose” Obama and nearly Hillary Clinton as well. Fully half of Americans support socialists over Republicans. Does that mean we all deserve the consequences of socialism?

    If we vote socialism in, everyone, whether they voted for it or not, and even those that did not vote, deserves the consequences of socialism. That is the outcome of belonging to a representative government. You earn the consequences of every election, whether it went the way you wanted it to go or not. That is the deal.

    That strikes me as an impoverished use of the word “deserves,” one that robs it of the normal meaning we associate with it.

    Getting what you don’t deserve because enough of your fellow citizens support a regime that oppresses you is the source of civil war. So maybe the real observation is not that you “deserve” oppression but that you “deserve” civil war? Throughout millennia oppression by one group over another has fueled migration as an alternative to civil war. But when migration is not an option then civil war is what you get. It literally is “pick your poison”.

    • #49
  20. Chris Campion Coolidge
    Chris Campion
    @ChrisCampion

    This might be the best Ricochet post ever.  And more or less shames those who just talk, vs. those who do.

    Like you, Annika.  Be safe.  You can’t fully tell the story you’ve seen in Venezuela if you don’t eventually come home.

    • #50
  21. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):
    he Venezuelan people chose Chavez, quite deliberately, knowing that it meant stealing from the rich to give to the poor. Only after socialism broke the economy did public opinion in Venezuela begin to turn against Chavez.

    This reminds me of something I read recently, in 2 Samuel.  King David is under threat by Absalom, who is aiming to take over the kingdom.  A lot of folks went along with it.  David seemed to get his own house in order, and fled Jerusalem.  Later, after Absalom was killed, and David returns, the people are all “Ah yeah, our King is back!”  

    The “people” are fickle, and don’t seem to have the foggiest idea what they want.  

    • #51
  22. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    Welcome back to Ricochet!

    Many prayers for your safety, the Venezuelan people, and for the work that you continue to do.

    • #52
  23. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Maduro didn’t start as a tyrant right out of the gate.  He had to become ever more tyrannical to hold onto power, as he lost popular support as a result of the country falling apart.   It isn’t falling apart because of his tyranny, those two things are the effects; the cause is socialist policies.  As near as I can tell Juan Guaidó is a socialist.  So if we kill a whole mess of Venezuelans and some number of American troops to overthrow Maduro and install Juan Guaidó, what would be the difference?  Would we still not see starvation in Venezuela?  It would be like staging a coup against President Bernie Sanders so we could install President Cortez.

    Here’s another thing to consider.  Even if it all went well and Guaidó turned out to be an undercover capitalist who restored Venzuela’s lost prosperity, the U.S. would be blamed for every bad thing that happens in Venezuela for the next 60+ years, the same way that we are still blamed for present-day Iran because we helped overthrow their president in the 1950’s.

    • #53
  24. Shauna Hunt Inactive
    Shauna Hunt
    @ShaunaHunt

    So grateful you are safe! Thank you for your sacrifices.

    • #54
  25. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    Annika’s latest is at The Daily Beast:

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/venezuela-simmers-with-violence-as-putin-sends-in-russian-troops-the-wise-are-running-for-their-lives

    Annika is still in danger, along with her new friends.

    • #55
  26. Yehoshua Ben-Eliyahu Inactive
    Yehoshua Ben-Eliyahu
    @YehoshuaBenEliyahu

    You’ve made your point, Annika.  Now get the heck out of there!  Come to Israel where you will find 1001 topics to cover and be embraced by your family of fellow Jews.  We even have an extra room in our apartment where you could stay.

    • #56
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.